BACKGROUND: Recruiting participants for clinical trials poses challenges. Major barriers to participation include psychological factors (eg, fear and mistrust) and logistical constraints (eg, transportation, cost, and scheduling). The strategic design of clinical trial messaging can help overcome these barriers. While strategic communication can be done through various channels (eg, recruitment advertisements), health care providers on the internet have been found to be key sources for communicating clinical trial information to US adults in the social media era.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine how communication source (ie, medical doctors and peers) and message framing of TikTok videos (ie, psychological and logistical framing) influence clinical trial-related attitudes, perceptions, and sign-up behaviors under the guidance of the integrated behavioral model.
METHODS: This study used a 2 (source: doctor vs peer) × 2 (framing: psychological vs logistical) between-participant factorial design web-based experiment targeting adults in the United States who had never participated in clinical trials (ie, newcomers). A Qualtrics panel was used to recruit and compensate the study respondents (n=561). Participants viewed short-form videos with doctors or peers, using psychological or logistical framing. The main outcome measures included perceived source credibility, self-efficacy, attitude toward clinical trial participation, behavioral intention, and sign-up behavior. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the direct and indirect effects of message factors on the outcome variables. Source (doctor=1; peer=0) and framing (psychological=1; logistical=0) were dummy-coded.
RESULTS: Doctor-featured messages led to greater perceived source credibility (β=.31, P<.001), leading to greater self-efficacy (95% CI 0.13-0.30), which in turn enhanced behavioral intention (95% CI 0.12-0.29) and clinical trial sign-up behavior (95% CI 0.02-0.04). Logistical barrier-framed messages led to greater self-efficacy (β=-.09, P=.02), resulting in higher intention to participate in clinical trials (95% CI -0.38 to -0.03) and improved sign-up behavior (95% CI -0.06 to -0.004). Logistical barrier-framed messages were also directly associated with an increased likelihood of signing up for a clinical trial (β=-.08, P=.03). The model accounted for 21% of the variance in clinical trial sign-up behavior. Attitude did not significantly affect behavioral intention in this study (β=.08, P=.14), and psychological and logistical barrier-framed messages did not significantly differ in attitudes toward clinical trial participation (β=-.04, P=.09).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings advance our understanding of how people process popular message characteristics in short-form videos and lend practical guidance for communicators. We encourage medical professionals to consider short-form video sites (eg, TikTok and Instagram Reels) as effective tools for discussing clinical trials and participation opportunities. Specifically, featuring doctors discussing efforts to reduce logistical barriers is recommended. Our measuring of actual behavior as an outcome is a rare and noteworthy contribution to this research.

OBJECTIVE: The scientific literature reports on how social media potentially influences eating disorders, although there is a large gap in the specific case of TikToks influence of adolescent\'s recovery from anorexia nervosa (AN). Our study uses in-depth interviews with female adolescents primarily suffering from AN to explore how they perceive the social media platform TikTok in relation to their recovery.
METHODS: A total of 14 interviews with female adolescents recovering from AN were conducted and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: We developed four distinct main themes: social connectivity, algorithmic engagement, regulation and adaptation, and personal agency and recovery pathways. Our findings indicate both potential benefits and harm by TikTok use when in recovery from AN, depending on a complex interplay of individual and contextual factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The study adds nuance to the on-going scientific debate on the role that TikTok plays in recovery from AN in general from the perspective provided by female adolescents. Suggestions are made for clinical implications at adolescent AN outpatient care including parental or professional support in TikTok adaptations and advice on how to discern when use may be triggering or supportive. Future research would benefit from longitudinal designs and inclusion of how individual differences, such as gender and personality, influence the effects on recovery and TikTok use.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality, reliability, and level of misinformation in TikTok videos about hysteroscopy.
METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of TikTok videos retrieved using \"hysteroscopy\" as search term was performed. Patient education materials assessment tool for audio-visual content (PEMAT A/V), the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), global quality scale (GQS), video information and quality index (VIQI) and misinformation assessment were used.
RESULTS: Of three hundred videos captured, 156 were excluded and 144 were included. Most videos were partially accurate or uninformative (43.8% and 34.7%, respectively). Non-healthcare providers produced more inaccurate or uninformative videos than healthcare workers (51.1% vs 4.0%; P < 0.001). Compared to content by professionals, content by patients showed increased distrust towards gynecologists (11.7% vs 0%; P = 0.012) and increased incidence of anxiety and concern towards hysteroscopy (25.5% vs 2%; P < 0.001). PEMAT A/V scores for understandability and actionability were low at 42.9% (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.1-70) and 0% (IQR: 0-0), respectively. Understandability (P < 0.001) and actionability (P = 0.001) were higher for professionals\' created content relative to patients\' videos. Similarly, median mDISCERN score was low (1 [IQR 0-2]), with significantly higher score for healthcare professionals compared to patients (P < 0.001). Overall video quality was also low, with median VIQI and GQS score of 7 (IQR 4-11) and 1 (IQR 1-3), respectively, and significantly higher scores for healthcare workers\' captions compared to patients\' for both (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: TikTok videos\' quality on hysteroscopy seems unsatisfactory and misinformative, with low understandability and actionability scores. Videos recorded by healthcare workers show higher quality and less misinformation than those by patients. Raising the awareness regarding the low quality of medical information on social media is crucial to increase future reliability and trustworthiness.

BACKGROUND: Social networks have emerged as powerful tools in education, offering new opportunities for interactive learning. TikTok has gained popularity among young people and has potential for use as a teaching tool in health disciplines.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational program based on a multimodal intervention using the TikTok platform to improve theoretical-practical knowledge about diabetic debut and vaccination schedules and satisfaction in nursing students.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental study design.
METHODS: Faculty of Nursing, University of Cadiz, Spain.
METHODS: 74 third-year undergraduate university nursing students.
METHODS: According to Kolb\'s experiential learning model, a multimodal educational intervention was carried out during the academic year 2022/2023, with 12 h of training. In these sessions, theoretical content on the vaccination calendar and diabetic debut was developed with written case studies. In the last session, 19 working groups were formed and each group was given a practical case study to solve through role-playing and creating a video in TikTok. A questionnaire to measure individual knowledge and a rubric questionnaire were used to evaluate the simulations in TikTok platform.
RESULTS: A significant improvement (z = 6.843, p < 0.001) was observed in the mean scores (9.93 ± 1.65) of the posttest of the knowledge questionnaire, used to evaluate abstract conceptualisation abilities. Additionally, a mean score of 10.42 (SD = 1.42) of the items on the rubric questionnaire, designed to assess active experimentation and reflective observation abilities, were correctly performed. It stands out that 97.1 % of the students positively valued the elements of teaching innovation implemented, while 82.9 % showed a high level of satisfaction with their activity.
CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal educational intervention using TikTok platform proved to be effective in improving the acquisition of theoretical-practical knowledge in the university students included in the study. Therefore, this type of experiential training is recommended for the training of future health professionals.

This qualitative study examines how five secondary school TESOL teachers in Thailand use TikTok to express their emotions and shape their professional identities. The research uses semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis to explore the platform\'s role as an emotional outlet and a medium for enhancing teacher-student relationships. Findings indicate that TikTok helps teachers manage work-related stress and allows them to present authentic selves, facilitating deeper connections with students. This interaction further informs their pedagogical practices and supports their professional identity development. The study suggests that TikTok\'s ability to bridge emotional expression with professional engagement offers valuable insights for integrating social media into educational frameworks. Recommendations are provided for leveraging these platforms to enhance teachers\' well-being and instructional strategies, highlighting the need for further research with a broader sample. This study demonstrates the potential of social media to impact teaching dynamics and professional growth.

Introduction The benefits of Electronic Health Records (EHR) use in clinical care are well documented. However, without proper education and training on EHR systems, clinicians may face challenges in utilizing these technological tools effectively. Suboptimal usage of EHR systems can affect productivity. This study assesses the effectiveness of an end-user-designed education bundle as a supplement to existing training in EHR training for house officers. Additionally, it evaluates the effectiveness of using non-conventional teaching modalities (i.e., short TikTok-style videos) to see how effective and accepted it was in comparison to traditional educational material. Methods A single-armed pre-post-study design consisting of 36 house officers was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention bundle. The bundle consists of a series of EHR tips and tricks as identified by experienced senior medical officers. The three components of the bundle are a handbook with consolidated tips and tricks, a long-form lecture video, and a series of TikTok-style videos. Distribution was done through healthcare collaborative platforms such as TigerConnect™ (Los Angeles, USA) and email. Results Participants found that the inclusion of our supplementary education bundle results in more effective training for EHR usage, with mean effectiveness with and without the educational bundle being 7.77 and 6.44, respectively (p < 0.001). There were also significant improvements in ease of finding information (7.67 vs 7.14, p = 0.016), performing general functions (7.50 vs 6.89, p = 0.0050), and overall efficiency (7.39 vs 6.92, p = 0.022). We also found TikTok-style videos were non-inferior to more traditional forms of education such as a handbook and traditional long-form lecture videos (p = 0.250). Conclusion An end-user-driven education bundle focusing on high-yield, advanced functions may be useful in enhancing the overall EHR system experience for junior doctors. Of note, TikTok-style videos may be no less effective than traditional methods of EHR teaching.

BACKGROUND: The risks associated with negative doctor-patient relationships have seriously hindered the healthy development of medical and healthcare and aroused widespread concern in society. The number of public comments on doctor-patient relationship risk events reflects the degree to which the public pays attention to such events.
OBJECTIVE: To explore public emotional differences, the intensity of comments, and the positions represented at different levels of doctor-patient disputes.
METHODS: Thirty incidents of doctor-patient disputes were collected from Weibo and TikTok, and 3655 related comments were extracted. The number of comment sentiment words was extracted, and the comment sentiment value was calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare differences between each variable group at different levels of incidence. Spearman\'s correlation analysis was used to examine associations between variables. Regression analysis was used to explore factors influencing scores of comments on incidents.
RESULTS: The study results showed that public comments on media reports of doctor-patient disputes at all levels are mainly dominated by \"good\" and \"disgust\" emotional states. There was a significant difference in the comment scores and the number of partial emotion words between comments on varying levels of severity of doctor-patient disputes. The comment score was positively correlated with the number of emotion words related to positive, good, and happy) and negatively correlated with the number of emotion words related to negative, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of emotion words related to negative, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness directly influences comment scores, and the severity of the incident level indirectly influences comment scores.

UNASSIGNED: Use of different social media platforms has increased radically over the past decade, emerging as an important part of adolescents and young people\'s everyday life. This might exert potential adverse effects on sleep quality and daytime performance of young adults.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the relation between use of social media platforms and sleep quality among public secondary school students.
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 961 students in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia. Students were asked to fill in a structured interview questionnaire covering personal data, pattern of social media use, sleep quality using The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and their mental health status using the depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21).
UNASSIGNED: Students\' ages ranged from 15 to 20 years with a mean age of 16.7 ± 2.1 years old. A total of 570 (59.3%) students were females. Tiktok (80%), Snapchat (77.9%), Instagram (63.8%) and YouTube (58.8%) were the most reported platforms used. Regarding their sleep quality, 34.7% of students were poor sleepers. TikTok use (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.77), hours spent on social media (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.37) and having moderate to severe depressive symptoms (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.40) were significant independent predictors of poor sleep among the studied sample.
UNASSIGNED: The present study emphasized the association between prolonged use of social media and poor sleep quality among Saudi adolescents. Awareness and behavioral change strategies and activities concerning the drawbacks of poor sleep and proper use of social media are urgently called for to control mental and physical health consequences of poor sleep and social media addiction.

暂无摘要。

Researchers used the TikTok platform to investigate the quality of select TikTok educational content regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). One hundred TikTok videos that fit the inclusion criteria were analyzed using DISCERN, a tool that evaluates the quality of consumer health information on the internet. There was no substantial difference in DISCERN scores between physicians and non-physician content creators. Nevertheless, both groups consistently scored low (<3) in areas such as providing sources of information, indicating the publication date of their sources, discussing treatment risks, and outlining potential consequences if no treatment is pursued.