Thoracic paravertebral block

胸椎旁阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:改良根治术(MRM)后急性术后疼痛控制不足会损害肺功能。这项工作旨在评估单次胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对接受MRM的女性患者的术后肺部影响。
    方法:这种前瞻性,对40名女性美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)II-III进行了随机比较试验,18至50岁,在全身麻醉(GA)下接受MRM。患者分为两组(每组20例):第一组接受ESPB,第二组接受TPVB。每组接受20ml体积的0.5%布比卡因单次注射。
    结果:呼吸功能测试显示,两组的用力肺活量(FVC)和用力呼气量(FEV1)均较基线降低。6小时后,I组的FEV1/FVC比低于II组。两组在第一次术后镇痛请求的持续时间方面具有可比性(P值=0.088),术后镇痛消耗量相当(P值=0.855),血流动力学稳定,无副作用。
    结论:超声引导下的ESPB和TPVB在MRM后的最初24小时内似乎都能有效保护肺功能。这被认为是由于它们的疼痛缓解作用,两组患者术后镇痛消耗量减少,术后镇痛需求时间延长。
    结果:
    NCT03614091注册日期为2018年7月13日。
    BACKGROUND: Inadequate acute postoperative pain control after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) can compromise pulmonary function. This work aimed to assess the postoperative pulmonary effects of a single-shot thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in female patients undergoing MRM.
    METHODS: This prospective, randomized comparative trial was conducted on 40 female American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II-III, aged 18 to 50 years undergoing MRM under general anesthesia (GA). Patients were divided into two equal groups (20 in each group): Group I received ESPB and Group II received TPVB. Each group received a single shot with 20 ml volume of 0.5% bupivacaine.
    RESULTS: Respiratory function tests showed a comparable decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume (FEV1) from the baseline in the two groups. Group I had a lower FEV1/FVC ratio than Group II after 6 h. Both groups were comparable regarding duration for the first postoperative analgesic request (P value = 0.088), comparable postoperative analgesic consumption (P value = 0.855), and stable hemodynamics with no reported side effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both ultrasound guided ESPB and TPVB appeared to be effective in preserving pulmonary function during the first 24 h after MRM. This is thought to be due to their pain-relieving effects, as evidenced by decreased postoperative analgesic consumption and prolonged time to postoperative analgesic request in both groups.
    RESULTS:
    UNASSIGNED: NCT03614091 registration date on 13/7/2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术后疼痛管理和认知功能保留对于接受胸腔镜肺癌(LC)手术的患者至关重要。这是使用胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)或基于舒芬太尼(SUF)的多模式镇痛来实现的。然而,两者联合使用对术后疼痛和术后认知功能障碍(POCD)的疗效和影响尚不清楚.
    目的:探讨TPVB联合SUF为基础的多模式镇痛在胸腔镜根治术LC患者中的镇痛效果及对POCD的影响,以优化术后疼痛管理,改善患者预后。
    方法:本回顾性分析纳入郑州大学附属肿瘤医院和河南省肿瘤医院2021年5月至2023年1月行胸腔镜下LC根治术的107例患者。将接受基于SUF的多模式镇痛的患者(n=50)和接受基于TPVB+SUF的多模式镇痛的患者(n=57)分为对照组和TPVB组,分别。我们比较了两组患者在术后2、12和24h休息和咳嗽时的Ramsay镇静量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。血清肾上腺素水平(E),血管紧张素II(AngII),去甲肾上腺素(NE),超氧化物歧化酶(SOD),血管内皮生长因子(VEGF),转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1),肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α),术前和术后24h测定S-100钙结合蛋白β(S-100β)。在手术前1天以及手术后3天和5天进行简易精神状态检查(MMSE),术后5天监测POCD的发生情况。还记录了不良反应。
    结果:没有明显的时间点,组间,两组Ramsay镇静评分及交互作用(P>0.05)。重要的是,有显著的时间点效应,组间差异,静息和咳嗽时VAS评分的交互作用(P<0.05)。术后12、24h静息及咳嗽时的VAS评分均低于术后2h,且随着术后时间的增加而逐渐降低(P<0.05)。TPVB组术后2、12、24h的VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。TPVB组术后第1天和第3天的MMSE评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后5d内TPVB组POCD发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组均有血清E升高,AngII,术后24h血清SOD水平与术前相比降低,TPVB组各项指标均较好(P<0.05)。血清VEGF水平显著升高,TGF-β1,TNF-α,两组术后24h观察S-100β,TPVB组低于对照组(P<0.05)。
    结论:TPVB联合SUF为基础的多模式镇痛进一步缓解了胸腔镜下LC根治术患者的疼痛,增强镇痛效果,减少术后应激反应,并抑制术后血清VEGF的增加,TGF-β1,TNF-α,和S-100β水平。该方案还降低了POCD并具有高安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management and cognitive function preservation are crucial for patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer (LC). This is achieved using either a thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) or sufentanil (SUF)-based multimodal analgesia. However, the efficacy and impact of their combined use on postoperative pain and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remain unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the analgesic effect and the influence on POCD of TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC to help optimize postoperative pain management and improve patient outcomes.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 107 patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection for LC at The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital between May 2021 and January 2023. Patients receiving SUF-based multimodal analgesia (n = 50) and patients receiving TPVB + SUF-based multimodal analgesia (n = 57) were assigned to the control group and TPVB group, respectively. We compared the Ramsay Sedation Scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and with cough between the two groups at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Serum levels of epinephrine (E), angio-tensin II (Ang II), norepinephrine (NE), superoxide dismutase (SOD), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and S-100 calcium-binding protein β (S-100β) were measured before and 24 h after surgery. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was administered 1 day before surgery and at 3 and 5 days after surgery, and the occurrence of POCD was monitored for 5 days after surgery. Adverse reactions were also recorded.
    RESULTS: There were no significant time point, between-group, and interaction effects in Ramsay sedation scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). Significantly, there were notable time point effects, between-group differences, and interaction effects observed in VAS scores both at rest and with cough (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at rest and with cough at 12 and 24 h after surgery were lower than those at 2 h after surgery and gradually decreased as postoperative time increased (P < 0.05). The TPVB group had lower VAS scores than the control group at 2, 12, and 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The MMSE scores at postoperative days 1 and 3 were markedly higher in the TPVB group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of POCD was significantly lower in the TPVB group than in the control group within 5 days after surgery (P < 0.05). Both groups had elevated serum E, Ang II, and NE and decreased serum SOD levels at 24 h after surgery compared with the preoperative levels, with better indices in the TPVB group (P < 0.05). Marked elevations in serum levels of VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β were observed in both groups at 24 h after surgery, with lower levels in the TPVB group than in the control group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: TPVB combined with SUF-based multimodal analgesia further relieves pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic radical surgery for LC, enhances analgesic effects, reduces postoperative stress response, and inhibits postoperative increases in serum VEGF, TGF-β1, TNF-α, and S-100β levels. This scheme also reduced POCD and had a high safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞(UTPB)被广泛用于胸外科手术的术后镇痛。然而,它有许多缺点。胸腔镜引导下胸椎旁阻滞(TTPB)是一种新的胸椎旁阻滞(TPB)技术。在这项研究中,我们比较了TTPB和UTPB在胸腔镜肺癌根治术后疼痛管理中的应用.
    方法:总共,将80例患者1:1随机分为UTPB组和TTPB组。TPB的手术时间,第一次穿刺的成功率,块段范围,术后2、6、12、24和48h的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,比较两组患者术后不良反应发生率。
    结果:TPB组的TPB手术时间明显短于UTPB组(2.2±0.3vs.5.7±1.7min,t=-12.411,P<0.001)。TTPB组的首次穿刺成功率和感觉阻滞段的成功率明显高于UTPB组(100%vs.76.9%,χ2=8.309,P<0.001;6.5±1.2vs.5.1±1.3级,t=-5.306,P<0.001)。术后48h休息和咳嗽时的VAS评分明显高于TTPB组术后2、6、12和24h。TTPB组术后12小时和24小时休息和咳嗽时的VAS评分明显低于UTPB组(休息:2.5±0.4vs.3.4±0.6,t=7.325,P<0.001;2.5±0.5vs.3.5±0.6,t=7.885,P<0.001;咳嗽:3.4±0.6vs.4.2±0.7,t=5.057,P<0.001;3.4±0.6vs.4.2±0.8,t=4.625,P<0.001)。两组术后不良反应比较差异无统计学意义。
    结论:与UTPB相比,TTPB显示出优势,例如更简单,更方便的手术,手术时间短,第一次穿刺的成功率更高,更宽的块段,和优越的镇痛效果。TTPB能有效减轻胸腔镜肺癌根治术患者术后疼痛。
    背景:https://www.chictr.org.cn,标识符ChiCTR2300072005,预期于2023年5月31日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UTPB) is widely used for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery. However, it has many disadvantages. Thoracoscopy-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TTPB) is a new technique for thoracic paravertebral block (TPB). In this study, we compared the use of TTPB and UTPB for pain management after thoracoscopic radical surgery for lung cancer.
    METHODS: In total, 80 patients were randomly divided 1:1 into the UTPB group and the TTPB group. The surgical time of TPB, the success rate of the first puncture, block segment range, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post operation, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: The surgical time of TPB was significantly shorter in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 5.7 ± 1.7 min, t = - 12.411, P < 0.001). The success rate of the first puncture and the sensory block segment were significantly higher in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (100% vs. 76.9%, χ2 = 8.309, P < 0.001; 6.5 ± 1.2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.3 levels, t = - 5.306, P < 0.001, respectively). The VAS scores were significantly higher during rest and coughing at 48 h post operation than at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post operation in the TTPB group. The VAS scores were significantly lower during rest and coughing at 12 and 24 h post operation in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (rest: 2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6, t = 7.325, P < 0.001; 2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6, t = 7.885, P < 0.001; coughing: 3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7, t = 5.057, P < 0.001; 3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.8, t = 4.625, P < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with UTPB, TTPB shows advantages, such as simpler and more convenient surgery, shorter surgical time, a higher success rate of the first puncture, wider block segments, and superior analgesic effect. TTPB can effectively reduce postoperative pain due to thoracoscopic lung cancer radical surgery.
    BACKGROUND: https://www.chictr.org.cn , identifier ChiCTR2300072005, prospectively registered on 31/05/2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨超声引导下间歇性胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)联合静脉镇痛(PCIA)减轻胸腔镜手术(VATS)术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的效果。
    将120例接受VATS的肺癌患者分为三组:S组(单TPVBPCIA),I组(间歇性TPVB+PCIA),和P组(PCIA)。患者的NRS评分,术后盐酸氢吗啡酮消耗量,记录盐酸布辛纳嗪的肌肉注射情况。记录PONV的发生率和并发症。
    与P组相比,I组和S组术后1-48h静态NRS评分均显著降低(P<0.05),I组术后1~48h动态NRS评分明显下降(P<0.05)。与P组相比,Ⅰ组患者发生PONV的比例明显降低(P<0.05),而S组没有显著差异。Ⅰ组住院时间较其他两组明显缩短(P<0.01),患者满意度较对照组显著提高(P<0.05)。
    间歇性TPVB联合PCIA可减轻术后疼痛和PONV的发生。
    UNASSIGNED: To explore the benefits of ultrasound-guided intermittent thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) combined with intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in alleviating postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) during video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).
    UNASSIGNED: 120 patients with lung carcinoma undergoing VATS were included and divided into three groups: group S (single TPVB+PCIA), group I (intermittent TPVB+PCIA), and group P (PCIA). The patients\' NRS scores, postoperative hydromorphone hydrochloride consumption, and intramuscular injection of bucinnazine hydrochloride were recorded. The incidence of PONV and complications were documented.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with the group P, both group I and group S had significantly lower static NRS scores from 1-48 hours after the operation (P <0.05), and the dynamic NRS score of group I at the 1-48 hours after the operation were significantly decreased (P <0.05). Compared with the group P, the proportion of patients with PONV in group I was significantly lower (P <0.05), while there was no significant difference in group S. Moreover, the hospitalization period of patients in group I was significantly reduced compared with the other two groups (P <0.01), and the patient satisfaction was significantly increased compared with the group P (P <0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Intermittent TPVB combined with PCIA can reduce the postoperative pain and the occurrence of PONV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:手术后肺部并发症(PPCs)延长了患者的住院时间,并增加了电视胸腔镜(VATS)肺部手术后的围手术期死亡率。胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)可在VATS手术后提供有效的镇痛效果;然而,关于TPVB对PPC发病率的影响知之甚少。这项研究的目的是确定TPVB与GA联合使用是否会导致较少的PPC,并在接受VATS肺手术的患者中提供比简单的全身麻醉更好的围手术期肺保护。
    方法:将302例接受VATS肺手术的患者随机分为两组:椎旁阻滞组(PV组)和对照组(C组)。PV组的患者将接受TPVB:在全身麻醉诱导之前,将向T4和T7胸椎旁间隙施用15ml的0.5%罗哌卡因。C组患者不进行干预。两组患者在手术期间都将接受保护性通气策略。围手术期保护性机械通气和标准液体管理将适用于两组。患者自控静脉镇痛用于术后镇痛。主要终点是术后7天内PPC的复合结果。次要终点包括血气分析,术后肺部超声评分,NRS评分,QoR-15评分,住院相关指标和长期预后指标。
    结论:本研究将更好地评估TPVB对接受VATS肺叶切除术/肺段切除术患者的PPCs发生率和长期预后的影响。研究结果可为优化围手术期肺保护策略提供临床依据。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05922449。2023年6月25日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) extend the length of stay of patients and increase the perioperative mortality rate after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pulmonary surgery. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) provides effective analgesia after VATS surgery; however, little is known about the effect of TPVB on the incidence of PPCs. The aim of this study is to determine whether TPVB combined with GA causes fewer PPCs and provides better perioperative lung protection in patients undergoing VATS pulmonary surgery than simple general anaesthesia.
    METHODS: A total of 302 patients undergoing VATS pulmonary surgery will be randomly divided into two groups: the paravertebral block group (PV group) and the control group (C group). Patients in the PV group will receive TPVB: 15 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine will be administered to the T4 and T7 thoracic paravertebral spaces before general anaesthesia induction. Patients in the C group will not undergo the intervention. Both groups of patients will be subjected to a protective ventilation strategy during the operation. Perioperative protective mechanical ventilation and standard fluid management will be applied in both groups. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia is used for postoperative analgesia. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of PPCs within 7 days after surgery. Secondary endpoints include blood gas analysis, postoperative lung ultrasound score, NRS score, QoR-15 score, hospitalization-related indicators and long-term prognosis indicators.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study will better evaluate the impact of TPVB on the incidence of PPCs and the long-term prognosis in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy/segmentectomy. The results may provide clinical evidence for optimizing perioperative lung protection strategies.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05922449 . Registered on June 25, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:尽管电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)具有减少伤害和更快愈合的优点,患者仍然忍受中度和重度术后疼痛。扑热息痛和甘露醇注射液,中国首个对乙酰氨基酚注射液,具有管理方便的优点,迅速开始行动,没有第一遍效果。这项研究的目的是探讨对乙酰氨基酚和甘露醇注射术后镇痛的疗效。联合胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)治疗VATS术后疼痛。
    方法:本研究是单中心,prospective,随机化,双盲对照临床试验。将预定接受VATS的患者随机分为三组,全身麻醉组(C组),TPVB组(T组)和TPVB+扑热息痛+甘露醇打针组(TP组)。在这项研究中,主要结局以静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分确定,次要观察结果是首次使用镇痛泵,镇痛泵中羟考酮的总消耗量,术后第48小时有效和完全镇痛泵按压次数,围手术期服用舒芬太尼,拔管时间,住院时间,尿量,以及不良事件的发生率。
    结果:在休息和咳嗽的状态下,与C组和T组相比,TP组患者在术后1、12、24和48小时的VAS疼痛评分显着降低。第一次按下镇痛泵,患者自控镇痛(PCA)的有效和完全按压次数低于C组和T组。TP组尿量较高.三组拔管时间无差异,住院时间和不良反应,提示对乙酰氨基酚和甘露醇静脉注射是一种安全有效的围手术期镇痛方法。
    结论:扑热息痛和甘露醇注射液,联合TPVB可能对VATS患者的急性疼痛控制提供重要的有益效果,并减少阿片类药物的消耗。
    背景:该试验于2023年6月19日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=199315),注册号ChiCTR2300072623(19/06/2023)。
    Although video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has advantages of reduced injury and faster healing, patients still endure moderate and severe postoperative pain. Paracetamol and mannitol injection, the first acetaminophen injection in China, has the advantages of convenient administration, rapid onset of action, and no first-pass effect. This aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of postoperative analgesia with paracetamol and mannitol injection, combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPVB) in post VATS pain.
    This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial. Patients scheduled for VATS were randomly divided into three groups, general anesthesia group (Group C), TPVB group (Group T) and TPVB + paracetamol and mannitol injection group (Group TP). In this study, the primary outcome was determined as visual analog scale (VAS) scores at rest and coughing, the secondary observation outcomes were the first time to use analgesic pump, the total consumption of oxycodone in the analgesic pump, number of effective and total analgesic pump compressions at first 48 h postoperatively, the perioperative consumption of sufentanil, time to extubation, hospital length of stay, urine volume, and the incidence of adverse events.
    In a state of rest and cough, patients in the Group TP showed significantly lower VAS pain scores at 1, 12, 24, and 48 postoperative-hour compared with Group C and Group T. Intraoperative sufentanil and postoperative oxycodone consumption, the first time to press analgesic pump, the times of effective and total compressions of patient- controlled analgesia (PCA) were lower than those of the Group C and Group T. Interestingly, urine output was higher in Group TP. There were no differences between the three groups in terms of extubation time, length of hospital stay and adverse effects, indicating that intravenous paracetamol and mannitol injection is an effective and safe perioperative analgesia method.
    Paracetamol and mannitol injection, combined with TPVB may provide important beneficial effects on acute pain control and reduce the consumption of opioid in patients undergoing VATS.
    The trial was registered on Jun 19, 2023 in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=199315 ), registration number ChiCTR2300072623 (19/06/2023).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经阻滞下清醒的乳房手术对麻醉师来说是一个挑战,和不同的块组合已用于镇静下的手术。胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)被认为仅用于乳房的手术麻醉就足够了。我们进行了TPVB的组合,胸肌神经I阻滞,和前锯肌平面阻滞用于患有严重合并症的老年患者的清醒乳房手术。手术麻醉得以实现,不包括皮肤切口。任何区域麻醉技术都是不够的;相反,乳房的手术麻醉需要多个胸壁块。
    Awake breast surgeries under nerve blocks have been a challenge for anaesthesiologists, and different block combinations have been used for surgery under sedation. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) was thought to be sufficient alone for surgical anaesthesia of the breast. We performed a combination of TPVB, pectoralis nerve I block, and serratus anterior plane block for awake breast surgery in an elderly patient with serious comorbidities. Surgical anaesthesia was achieved, excluding skin incision. Any regional anaesthesia technique alone is not sufficient; rather, multiple thoracic wall blocks are needed for surgical anaesthesia of the breast.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)在全麻(GA)胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的镇痛效果。
    回顾性分析了2021年10月至2022年10月在南方战区总医院接受GA下胸腔镜肺叶切除术的82例患者的临床记录。根据所采用的麻醉方法将患者分为两组:全身麻醉组(G组,n=37),和TPVB加GA组(T组,n=45)。镇痛作用,平均动脉压(MAP),比较两组的心率(HR)和不良事件发生率.
    T组患者在12h时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分,术后24h和48h显著低于G组(P<0.05)。MAP和HR气管插管诱导时间(T1),单肺通气(T2),皮肤切口(T3),操作完成(T4),拔管后20分钟(T5)两组均低于T0,T组明显高于G组(P<0.05)。T组不良事件发生率为6.67%,显著低于G组(24.32%)(P<0.05)。
    TPVB联合GA可提高镇痛效果,在操作过程中提高MAP和HR,降低胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者不良事件的发生率。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the analgesic effect of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy under general anesthesia (GA).
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical records of 82 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy under GA from October 2021 to October 2022 in the General Hospital of Southern Theater Command were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the method of anesthesia used: general anesthesia group (Group-G, n=37), and TPVB plus GA group (Group-T, n=45). The analgesic effect, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and the rate of adverse events in both groups were compared.
    UNASSIGNED: Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of patients in Group-T at 12h, 24h and 48h after the operation were significantly lower compared to Group-G (P<0.05). MAP and HR the time of tracheal intubation induction (T1), single lung ventilation (T2), skin incision (T3), operation completion (T4), and 20 minutes after the extubation (T5) were lower in both groups compared to T0, and were significantly higher in Group-T compared to Group-G (P<0.05). The rate of adverse events in Group-T was 6.67%, significantly lower compared to Group-G (24.32%) (P<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: TPVB combined with GA can improve the analgesic effect, improve MAP and HR during the operation, and reduce the incidence of adverse events in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究比较了单注射和双注射双侧胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)技术在乳房缩小成形术患者中的镇痛效果和皮肤阻滞分布。
    方法:获得伦理委员会批准后,该研究包括60例计划进行双侧乳房成形术的患者。术前,患者接受单(S组:T3-T4)或双(D组:T2-T3&T4-T5)双侧注射TPVBs,每侧使用布比卡因0.375%20ml.所有患者均在全身麻醉下手术。术前30分钟和术后48小时,对锁骨中线上的T3-T6皮肤组织阻滞分布进行针刺试验。所有患者在数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分≥4时接受对乙酰氨基酚1g,在1h后再次接受NRS≥4时接受曲马多1mg/kg。主要终点是术后12h的NRS疼痛评分。次要终点是术后前48h的皮肤阻滞分布和NRS评分,直到第一次疼痛的时间和第1天和第2天的镇痛药消耗。
    结果:52名患者完成了研究。第12h的NRS疼痛评分相似(右侧:P=0.100,左侧:P=0.096)。其余NRS评分和其他参数在组间也具有可比性(P≥0.05)。仅单次注射TPVB应用时间较短(P<0.001)。
    结论:单次注射TPVB技术提供了足够的皮肤组织分布和镇痛效果,具有更快,更小的侵入性优点。
    BACKGROUND: This study compares the analgesic effects and dermatomal blockade distributions of single and double injection bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) techniques in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty.
    METHODS: After obtaining ethics committee approval, 60 patients scheduled for bilateral reduction mammaplasty were included in the study. Preoperatively, the patients received one of single (Group S: T3-T4) or double (Group D: T2-T3 & T4-T5) injection bilateral TPVBs using bupivacaine 0.375% 20 ml per side. All patients were operated under general anesthesia. The T3-T6 dermatomal blockade distributions on the midclavicular line were followed by pin-prick test for 30 min preoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. All patients received paracetamol 1 g when numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score was ≥ 4, and also tramadol 1 mg/kg when NRS was ≥ 4 again after 1 h. The primary endpoint was NRS pain scores at postoperative 12th h. The secondary endpoints were dermatomal blockade distributions and NRS scores through the postoperative first 48 h, time until first pain and the analgesic consumption on days 1 and 2.
    RESULTS: Fifty-two patients completed the study. The NRS pain scores at 12th h were similar (right side: P = 0.100, left side: P = 0.096). The remaining NRS scores and other parameters were also comparable within the groups (P ≥ 0.05). Only single injection TPVB application time was shorter (P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The single injection TPVB technique provided sufficient dermatomal distribution and analgesic efficacy with the advantages of being faster and less invasive.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号