UNASSIGNED: Alterations in autonomic function are evident in some chronic pain conditions but have not been thoroughly examined in people with osteoarthritis (OA). The study aimed to examine resting autonomic nervous system (ANS) function in people with knee OA, and the response of the autonomic and nociceptive systems to acute stress.
UNASSIGNED: A preliminary cross-sectional study was undertaken involving people with knee OA (n = 14), fibromyalgia (n = 13), and pain-free controls (n = 15). The sympathetic and parasympathetic components of the ANS were assessed through measures of pre-ejection period (PEP), skin conductance level (SCL), and high frequency heart rate variability (HF HRV). The nociceptive system was assessed through pain ratings associated with a tonic heat pain stimulus. In separate sessions, ANS and heat pain measures were assessed at rest and in response to nociceptive and mental arithmetic stressors.
UNASSIGNED: The knee OA group showed reduced HF HRV at rest and reduced modulation in response to stress. Resting PEP and SCL were normal in the knee OA group but PEP modulation was impaired in both chronic pain groups during nociceptive stress. The expected reduction in tonic heat pain ratings in response to stress was lacking in the knee OA and FM groups.
UNASSIGNED: Preliminary evidence shows impaired parasympathetic nervous system function at rest and in response to nociceptive and mental stress in people with knee OA, with some evidence of altered sympathetic nervous system function. Impaired ANS function could contribute to ongoing pain experienced, and interventions that target ANS function could be beneficial.

Immersive virtual reality (VR) is a promising tool to reduce pain in clinical setting. Digital scripts displayed by VR disposals can be enriched by several analgesic interventions, which are widely used to reduce pain. One of these techniques is hypnosis induced through the VR script (VRH) which is facilitated by immersive environment and particularly efficient even for low hypnotizable patients. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a VRH script on experimentally induced cold pain perception (intensity and unpleasantness) and physiological expression. 41 healthy volunteers had been recruited in this within-subjects study. They received 9 stimulations of 20 s (3 non-nociceptive cold; 3 low nociceptive cold and 3 highly nociceptive cold) during a VRH session of 20 min (VRH condition) or without VRH (noVRH condition). Physiological monitoring during the cold pain stimulation protocol consisted of recording heart rate, heart rate variability and respiratory frequency. Maximum cold pain intensity perception, measured through the visual analog scale (VAS) on 10, was of 3.66 ± 1.84 (VAS score/10) in noVRH condition and 2.46 ± 1.54 in VRH (Wilcoxon, p < 0.0001). Considering pain unpleasantness perception, 3.68 ± 2.06 in noVRH and 2.21 ± 1.63 in VRH (Wilcoxon, p < 0.0001). Hypnotizability negatively correlated with the decrease in VAS intensity from noVRH to VRH (Spearman r = -0.45; p = 0.0038). In our sample, we found that 31/41 volunteers (75.6%) displayed a reduction of more than 10% of their VAS pain intensity and unpleasantness scores. Trait anxiety was the best predictor of the VRH responders, as well as heart rate variability. In addition, respiratory rate was diminished under VRH in every subgroup. VRH is an effective tool to reduced pain intensity and unpleasantness in a vast majority of healthy subjects. We further indicate in this study that heart rate variability parameter RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences) is a good predictor of this effect, as well as anxiety as a personality trait (but not state anxiety). Further studies are expected to determine more precisely to whom it will be the most useful to offer tailored, non-pharmacological pain management solutions to patients.

The neurobiological underpinnings of gender differences in pain perception, and how these differences may be modified by age, are incompletely understood, placing patients at risk of suboptimal pain management. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined brain responses in the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS, specifically, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, hypothalamus, amygdala, and periaqueductal gray, during an evoked pain task. We investigated the interaction of age and gender in our sample of healthy adults (27 females, 32 males, 30-86 years) on DPMS response. In a perceptually matched thermal pain paradigm, we investigated pain unpleasantness and neural responses for 3 heat pain percepts: just noticeable pain, weak pain, and moderate pain (MP). Females reported just noticeable pain at a lower temperature, but reported less unpleasantness at weak pain and MP percepts, compared to males. There was a significant age-by-gender interaction during moderate pain in the right anterior cingulate cortex and bilateral insula, such that, males had a stronger positive relationship between DPMS response and age compared to females in these regions. Our results indicate that differences in DPMS responses may explain some gender differences in pain perception and that this effect may change across the adult lifespan. PERSPECTIVE: Gender differences in pain have been well-documented but the brain mechanisms for these differences are still unclear. This article describes potential differences in brain functioning during different levels of pain that could explain differences in pain responses between men and women across the adult lifespan.

BACKGROUND: Opioid administration to patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is controversial because they are believed to be more sensitive to opioids. However, objective data on opioid effects in OSA are lacking. We tested the hypothesis that subjects with untreated OSA have increased sensitivity to opioids compared with subjects without OSA, or with OSA treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP).
METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective cohort study in subjects without OSA (n=20), with untreated OSA (n=33), or with treated OSA (n=21). OSA diagnosis was verified using type III (in-home) polysomnography. Subjects received a stepped-dose remifentanil infusion (target effect-site concentrations of 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 ng ml-1). Primary outcome was miosis (pupil area fractional change), the most sensitive opioid effect. Secondary outcomes were ventilatory rate, end-expired CO2, sedation, and thermal analgesia.
RESULTS: There were no differences in miosis between untreated OSA subjects (mean=0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.61) and subjects without OSA (mean=0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.62) (mean difference=0.02, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.22); between treated OSA subjects (mean=0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.68) and subjects without OSA (difference=0.07, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.29); or between untreated OSA and treated OSA (difference=-0.05, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.16). There were no significant differences between subjects without OSA, untreated OSA, and treated OSA in ventilatory rate, end-expired CO2, sedation, or thermal analgesia responses to remifentanil. There was no relationship between OSA severity and magnitude of opioid effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Neither obstructive sleep apnoea nor obstructive sleep apnoea treatment affected sensitivity to the miotic, sedative, analgesic, or respiratory depressant effects of the opioid remifentanil in awake adults. These results challenge conventional notions of opioid effects in obstructive sleep apnoea.
BACKGROUND: NCT02898792 (clinicaltrials.gov).

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the link between local vasodilation and pain perception in elderly subjects, testing the hypothesis that altered local cutaneous blood flow participates in the decrease in pain tolerance with age.
METHODS: Sixty-eight young and 83 older participants performed a pain tolerance test in which they hold their hand in an airtight box in which air temperature was regulated at 65 °C until the pain became unbearable. Participants continuously estimated pain intensity. Skin temperature and local blood flow in the box-exposed hand were continuously monitored.
RESULTS: In the young group, 97% of subjects resisted pain until the end of the test, whereas only 53% in the elderly group managed to do so, indicating that pain tolerance is impaired in the elderly. Among all participants, the skin temperature associated with the first pain sensation was below the threshold for nociceptor activation (43 °C). Interestingly, blood flow in the elderly group was correlated with pain judgment, whereas no such correlation was observed in the young.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the local vasodilator response induced by local heating may be involved in pain perception and may influence thermal pain tolerance with aging. These results could contribute to a better understanding of vascular deficits and the development of chronic pain in vascular pathologies.

Pain-related depression of corticomotor excitability has been explored using transcranial magnetic stimulation-elicited motor-evoked potentials. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography now enables non-motor area cortical excitability assessments, offering novel insights into cortical excitability changes during pain states. Here, pain-related cortical excitability changes were explored in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex (M1). Cortical excitability was recorded in 24 healthy participants before (Baseline), during painful heat (Acute Pain), and non-noxious warm (Warm) stimulation at the right forearm in a randomized sequence, followed by a pain-free stimulation measurement. Local cortical excitability was assessed as the peak-to-peak amplitude of early transcranial magnetic stimulation evoked potential, whereas global-mean field power measured the global excitability. Relative to the Baseline, Acute Pain decreased the peak-to-peak amplitude in M1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex compared with Warm (both P < 0.05). A reduced global-mean field power was only found in M1 during Acute Pain compared with Warm (P = 0.003). Participants with the largest reduction in local cortical excitability under Acute Pain showed a negative correlation between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and M1 local cortical excitability (P = 0.006). Acute experimental pain drove differential pain-related effects on local and global cortical excitability changes in motor and non-motor areas at a group level while also revealing different interindividual patterns of cortical excitability changes, which can be explored when designing personalized treatment plans.

UNASSIGNED: Mathematical modeling has played a significant role in understanding how homeostatic sleep pressure and the circadian rhythm interact to influence sleep-wake behavior. Pain sensitivity is also affected by these processes, and recent experimental results have measured the circadian and homeostatic components of the 24 h rhythm of thermal pain sensitivity in humans. To analyze how rhythms in pain sensitivity are affected by disruptions in sleep behavior and shifts in circadian rhythms, we introduce a dynamic mathematical model for circadian and homeostatic regulation of sleep-wake states and pain intensity.
UNASSIGNED: The model consists of a biophysically based, sleep-wake regulation network model coupled to data-driven functions for the circadian and homeostatic modulation of pain sensitivity. This coupled sleep-wake-pain sensitivity model is validated by comparison to thermal pain intensities in adult humans measured across a 34 h sleep deprivation protocol.
UNASSIGNED: We use the model to predict dysregulation of pain sensitivity rhythms across different scenarios of sleep deprivation and circadian rhythm shifts, including entrainment to new environmental light and activity timing as occurs with jet lag and chronic sleep restriction. Model results show that increases in pain sensitivity occur under conditions of increased homeostatic sleep drive with nonlinear modulation by the circadian rhythm, leading to unexpected decreased pain sensitivity in some scenarios.
UNASSIGNED: This model provides a useful tool for pain management by predicting alterations in pain sensitivity due to varying or disrupted sleep schedules.

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer is one of the most painful cancer types, and is often refractory to existing analgesics. Oral cancer patients frequently develop a tolerance to opioids, the mainstay of current cancer pain therapy, leaving them with limited therapeutic options. Thus, there is a great need to identify molecular mechanisms driving oral cancer pain in an effort to develop new analgesics. Previous reports demonstrate that oral cancer patients experience intense mechanical pain and pain in function. To date, no studies have examined thermal pain in oral cancer patients or the role that alcohol consumption plays in oral cancer pain. This study aims to evaluate patient-reported pain levels and thermal allodynia, potential molecular mechanisms mediating thermal allodynia, and the effects of alcohol consumption on patient-perceived pain.
METHODS: This study evaluated human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines for their ability to activate thermosensitive channels in vitro and validated these findings in a rat model of orofacial pain. Patient-reported pain in a south Texas OSCC cohort (n = 27) was examined using a visual analog scale (VAS). Covariant analysis examined variables such as tobacco and alcohol consumption, ethnicity, gender, and cancer stage.
RESULTS: We determined that OSCC secretes factors that stimulate both the Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin type 1 channel (TRPA1; noxious cold sensor) and the Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid type 1 channel (TRPV1; noxious heat sensor) in vitro and that OSCC-secreted factors sensitize TRPV1 nociceptors in vivo. These findings were validated in this cohort, in which allodynia to cold and heat were reported. Notably, subjects that reported regular alcohol consumption also reported lower pain scores for every type of pain tested, with significantly reduced cold-induced pain, aching pain, and burning pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral cancer patients experience multiple types of cancer pain, including thermal allodynia. Alcohol consumption correlates with reduced OSCC pain and reduced thermal allodynia, which may be mediated by TRPA1 and TRPV1. Hence, reduced pain in these patients may contribute to a delay in seeking care, and thus a delay in early detection and treatment.

Virtual reality hypnosis (VRH) is a promising tool to reduce pain. However, the benefits of VRH on pain perception and on the physiological expression of pain require further investigation.
In this study, we characterized the effects of VRH on the heat pain threshold among adult healthy volunteers while monitoring several physiological and autonomic functions.
Sixty healthy volunteers were prospectively included to receive nociceptive stimulations. The first set of thermal stimuli consisted of 20 stimulations at 60°C (duration 500 milliseconds) to trigger contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs). The second set of thermal stimuli consisted of ramps (1°C/second) to determine the heat pain threshold of the participants. Electrocardiogram, skin conductance responses, respiration rate, as well as the analgesia nociception index were also recorded throughout the experiment.
Data from 58 participants were analyzed. There was a small but significant increase in pain threshold in VRH (50.19°C, SD 1.98°C) compared to that in the control condition (mean 49.45°C, SD 1.87; P<.001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test; Cohen d=0.38). No significant effect of VRH on CHEPs and heart rate variability parameters was observed (all P>0.5; n=22 and n=52, respectively). During VRH, participants exhibited a clear reduction in their autonomic sympathetic tone, as shown by the lower number of nonspecific skin conductance peak responses (P<.001, two-way analysis of variance; n=39) and by an increase in the analgesia nociception index (P<.001, paired t-test; n=40).
The results obtained in this study support the idea that VRH administration is effective at increasing heat pain thresholds and impacts autonomic functions among healthy volunteers. As a nonpharmacological intervention, VRH has beneficial action on acute experimental heat pain. This beneficial action will need to be evaluated for the treatment of other types of pain, including chronic pain.

Background: The influence of examiner gender on pain reporting has been previously explored in both research and clinical settings. However, previous investigations have been limited, with the majority of studies employing single, static assessments of pain (e.g., cold pressor test, verbal pain ratings). The impact of examiner gender on both static and dynamic heat-based pain assessments is currently unknown. Methods: Thirty eight participants (20 females aged 24.1 ± 4.44, and 18 males, aged 24.8 ± 4.54) completed two identical testing sessions, randomized to a male and female examiner in a cross-over design. Pain sensitivity was examined using heat pain thresholds, verbal pain ratings to tonic heat, computerized visual analog scale (CoVAS) rating to tonic heat, and participant-controlled temperature (PCT) heat pain assessments. Results: Female participants reported higher verbal pain to tonic heat with a female examiner compared to male participants, with similar trends for CoVAS responses to tonic heat. Conversely heat pain thresholds and PCT were not significantly influenced by experimenter gender. Conclusions: Overall, verbal ratings were the most impacted by examiner gender, with temperature-based methods such as PCT and pain thresholds showing little to no examiner gender effects. While the gender of the examiner may be an important consideration in the measurement of sex and gender differences in pain research, the choice of pain assessment method may be of similar consequence.