目的:近几十年来,拉丁美洲的癌症治疗轨迹研究取得了进展;然而,这种方法的理论方法使用的多样性可能是令人困惑的,难以为学术和专业社区使用。分析在拉丁美洲进行的关于癌症护理轨迹的研究,提出开发的方法的类型学,并综合关键发现。
方法:对PubMed索引期刊上发表的研究的范围审查,LILACS,并在2006-2021年期间进行了SciELO数据库。
结果:分析了22篇文章。描述性的类型学,评价性,并提出了解释性方法。从关键发现来看,确定了以下内容:快感和力量感在危险实践发展中的重要性;流行的解释模型对识别异常和寻找注意力的作用;各种个人的相互作用,人际关系,组织,以及限制及时诊断和治疗连续性的结构性障碍;顺序或并行使用不同形式的护理,公共和私人;以及社会支持网络的重要性。
结论:提出的类型学阐明了该方法的不同用途。信息综合证明了关于访问的多个障碍的问题结,并允许我们在未来的研究中优先考虑癌症类型的研究,阶段,以及几乎没有被解决的人口,以及方法论方法的多样化。
OBJECTIVE: In recent decades there has been a development of research on cancer care trajectories in Latin America; however, the diversity of theoretical-methodological uses of this approach can be confusing and difficult for the academic and professional community to use. To analyze studies that have been carried out in Latin America on cancer care trajectories to propose a typology of the approaches developed and synthesize key findings.
METHODS: A scope review of studies published in journals indexed in PubMed, LILACS, and SciELO databases in the period 2006-2021 was conducted.
RESULTS: 22 articles were analyzed. A typology of descriptive, evaluative, and interpretative approaches was proposed. From the key findings, the following were identified: the importance of pleasure and the feeling of power in the development of risky practices; the role of popular explanatory models for the identification of abnormality and the search for attention; the interaction of various personal, interpersonal, organizational, and structural barriers that limited timely diagnosis and continuity of treatment; the sequential or parallel use of different forms of care, public and private; and the importance of social support networks.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed typology clarifies the different uses of the approach. The informative synthesis evidences problematic knots regarding multiple barriers to access and allows us to propose as priorities in future research the study of types of cancer, stages, and populations that have been scarcely addressed, as well as the diversification of methodological approaches.