Theory of planned behaviour.

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性疼痛是一种使人衰弱且常见的健康问题。全科医生(GP)经常开阿片类药物来治疗慢性疼痛,尽管有益的证据有限,危害的证据越来越多,包括处方阿片类药物使用障碍(pOUD)。澳大利亚全科医生担心长期阿片类药物的危害,但很少有人参与pOUD的治疗。关于全科医生在其慢性疼痛患者中诊断和管理pOUD的经验的研究很少。
    方法:这项定性研究使用半结构化访谈和案例研究,通过计划行为理论(TPB)的镜头来调查全科医生的经验。城规会描述三个因素,个人感知的信念/态度,感知的社会规范和感知的行为控制。参与者通过在线视频会议平台接受了采访。访谈被逐字转录和主题分析。
    结果:24名全科医生参加。参与者意识到慢性疼痛患者的复杂表现,并担心长期使用阿片类药物。他们的方法是整体的,但他们对pOUD诊断的了解有限,认为pOUD只有一种治疗方法:阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT).参与者对处方阿片类药物感到不舒服,并且害怕困难,与患者就pOUD的可能性进行冲突对话。这导致对诊断pOUD的回避和消极态度。很少有积极的社会规范,很少有同事诊断或管理pOUD。参与者报告说,他们的同事只提供了积极的支持,因为这将使他们避免自己管理pOUD,而患者和其他工作人员往往不支持。负面行为控制在知识水平低的情况下很常见,技能,专业支持,许多参与者描述的时间和报酬不足。他们认为OAT不是核心的一般做法,需要专家管理。这种二分法反映在他们的观点中,即卫生系统只支持慢性疼痛或pOUD的治疗,不是两个条件。
    结论:消极信念,消极的社会规范和消极的行为控制降低了这组全科医生的个人行为意向.慢性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物的诊断和管理pOUD被认为是困难和不支持的。改变行为的干预措施必须解决负面看法,以导致更积极的意图参与pOUD的管理。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a debilitating and common health issue. General Practitioners (GPs) often prescribe opioids to treat chronic pain, despite limited evidence of benefit and increasing evidence of harms, including prescription Opioid Use Disorder (pOUD). Australian GPs are worried about the harms of long-term opioids, but few are involved in the treatment of pOUD. There is little research on GPs\' experiences diagnosing and managing pOUD in their chronic pain patients.
    METHODS: This qualitative research used semi-structured interviews and a case study to investigate GPs\' experiences through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). TPB describes three factors, an individual\'s perceived beliefs/attitudes, perceived social norms and perceived behavioural controls. Participants were interviewed via an online video conferencing platform. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four GPs took part. Participants were aware of the complex presentations for chronic pain patients and concerned about long-term opioid use. Their approach was holistic, but they had limited understanding of pOUD diagnosis and suggested that pOUD had only one treatment: Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT). Participants felt uncomfortable prescribing opioids and were fearful of difficult, conflictual conversations with patients about the possibility of pOUD. This led to avoidance and negative attitudes towards diagnosing pOUD. There were few positive social norms, few colleagues diagnosed or managed pOUD. Participants reported that their colleagues only offered positive support as this would allow them to avoid managing pOUD themselves, while patients and other staff were often unsupportive. Negative behavioural controls were common with low levels of knowledge, skill, professional supports, inadequate time and remuneration described by many participants. They felt OAT was not core general practice and required specialist management. This dichotomous approach was reflected in their views that the health system only supported treatment for chronic pain or pOUD, not both conditions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Negative beliefs, negative social norms and negative behavioural controls decreased individual behavioural intention for this group of GPs. Diagnosing and managing pOUD in chronic pain patients prescribed opioids was perceived as difficult and unsupported. Interventions to change behaviour must address negative perceptions in order to lead to more positive intentions to engage in the management of pOUD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管有证据表明,在曼戈奇(和马拉维)糖尿病和高血压患者中,关注当地知识在设计适当的干预措施方面发挥了关键作用,对当地的突出信念知之甚少。
    目的:以计划行为理论为理论视角,这项研究旨在确定糖尿病患者对可改变风险行为的显著信念,芒戈奇的高血压或两者兼而有之,马拉维东南部。具体来说,目标是确定优势和劣势(行为显著信念),赞成或不赞成(规范的突出信念)的人,以及改变糖尿病患者可改变风险行为的措施的推动者和障碍(控制突出信念),芒戈奇的高血压或两者兼而有之,马拉维。
    方法:Mangochi区医院的高血压糖尿病诊所,马拉维东南部。
    方法:在25名患者中进行了一项准实验性试验的形成性定性研究,有目的地取样,患有糖尿病的人,2019年2月在Mangochi区医院接受高血压或两者兼而有之。研究人员使用计划行为理论启发访谈指南对患者进行了深入访谈。专题内容分析用于确定新出现的主题。
    结果:共招募了25名参与者,其中12人(48%)患有糖尿病。从这一分析中出现了五个主题领域:身体和心理健康,社会脱节,感知支持系统,感知到的促成因素和感知到的变革障碍。
    结论:确定了每个重要信念的适当单词。未来的研究人员在设计基于糖尿病和高血压计划行为理论的干预措施时,应该使用已确定的突出信念。贡献:本文增加了知识体系,告知使用计划行为理论来解决从业者中可修改的风险因素,马拉维曼戈奇及其他地区非传染性疾病领域的初级保健和家庭医学专家和学者。
    BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence of the key role played by focusing on local knowledge in designing appropriate interventions regarding modifiable risk behaviours among patients living with diabetes and hypertension in Mangochi (and Malawi), little is known about local salient beliefs.
    OBJECTIVE: With a focus on the theory of planned behaviour as a theoretical lens, this study aimed to identify salient beliefs about modifiable risk behaviours among patients with diabetes, hypertension or both in Mangochi, south-eastern Malawi. Specifically, the objectives were to identify advantages and disadvantages (behavioural salient beliefs), people who approve or disapprove (normative salient beliefs) and enablers and barriers (control salient beliefs) for measures to change modifiable risk behaviours among patients with diabetes, hypertension or both in Mangochi, Malawi.
    METHODS: A hypertension diabetes clinic at Mangochi District Hospital, south-eastern Malawi.
    METHODS: A formative qualitative study of a quasi-experimental trial was conducted among 25 patients, purposefully sampled, who were living with diabetes, hypertension or both at Mangochi District Hospital in February 2019. Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with patients using an interview guide informed by the theory of planned behaviour\'s elicitation interview guide. Thematic content analysis was used to identify emerging themes.
    RESULTS: A total of 25 participants were recruited, of which 12 (48%) were living with diabetes. Five thematic areas emerged from this analysis: physical and psychological fitness, social disconnection, perceived support systems, perceived enablers and perceived barriers to change.
    CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate words for each salient belief were identified. Future researchers should use the identified salient beliefs when designing interventions based on the theory of planned behaviour in diabetes and hypertension.Contribution: The paper adds to the body of knowledge informing the use of theory of planned behavior in addressing modifiable risk factors among practitioners, specialists and academics in primary care and Family Medicine in the field of noncommunicable diseases in Mangochi Malawi and beyond.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Preconception care is a promising new approach to improve the health of future children through primary intervention. Although most women have a positive attitude towards preconception care, women often do not seek preconception care for themselves.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore women\'s hesitancy to seek preconception counselling.
    METHODS: An empirical-analytic approach was used to explore women\'s hesitation to seek preconception counselling. In-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews (n = 16) of women desiring to conceive were conducted, and responses were analysed using the determinants \'attitude\' and \'subjective norms\' of the Theory of Planned Behaviour of Ajzen.
    RESULTS: The interviewed women expressed a positive attitude towards preconception care in general but were hesitant about seeking preconception care themselves. Women seemed to regard themselves as not being in the target group for preconception care. Additionally, we identified the following four subthemes of subjective norms around the process of becoming pregnant: planning, publicity, information on fertility and artificiality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Women do not consider themselves to be part of the target group for preconception care. In some aspects, subjective norms around the process of becoming pregnant may conflict with the current practice of preconception care. Recommendations are provided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号