■理论域框架(TDF)是实现科学中使用最广泛的基础框架之一。它是从33种心理学理论发展而来的,最新版本确定了14个领域,包括84个理论结构。这些领域和结构捕获了影响行为的因素的复杂性,使框架成为在卫生和社会护理环境中设计和实施干预措施的宝贵工具。
■总结发展,热门话题,以及TDF相关研究的未来趋势,并为实施从业者提供有关TDF应用的更多信息。
■我们使用TDF作为主题,并搜索了ISIWebofScience核心合集,确定1382相关出版物。我们使用了Excel等分析工具,Tableau,VOSviewer,和Citespace对相关出版物进行文献计量分析。
■我们将英国确定为主要贡献者,以伦敦大学学院为重点院校。SusanMichie在总引文中排名最高。分析强调癌症和中风是使用TDF的主要临床医学相关主题。新出现的主题包括虐待,暴力,孕产妇健康,产前保健,患者参与,和创伤知情护理等。“护士”和“定性研究”成为最近和持久的热点,可能表明未来的研究趋势。
■本文首次尝试使用文献计量分析来总结TDF。我们建议该方法可用于分析科学实施其客观性和可量化性的其他理论框架。总的来说,TDF的应用范围正在从公共卫生转向更专业的临床方向,尽管其在公共卫生领域的应用正在不断扩大。在未来,TDF的用户数量也有望从实施科学家扩展到专业技术人员。
UNASSIGNED: The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is among the most extensively utilised foundational frameworks in implementation science. It was developed from 33 psychological theories, with the latest version identifying 14 domains encompassing 84 theoretical constructs. These domains and constructs capture the complexity of factors that affect behaviours, making the framework a valuable tool for designing and implementing interventions within health and social care settings.
UNASSIGNED: To summarise the development, hot topics, and future trends in TDF-related research and provide implementation practitioners with more information on the application of TDF.
UNASSIGNED: We used TDF as the topic and searched the ISI Web of Science Core Collection, identifying 1382 relevant publications. We used analytical tools such as Excel, Tableau, VOSviewer, and Citespace to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the relevant publication.
UNASSIGNED: We identified the United Kingdom as the primary contributor, with University College London as the key institution. Susan Michie ranked highest in total citations. The analysis highlighted cancer and stroke as primary clinic medicine-related topics using TDF. Emerging themes encompass abuse, violence, maternal health, antenatal care, patient involvement, and trauma-informed care et al. \"Nurse\" and \"qualitative research\" emerged as recent and enduring hotspots, possibly indicating future research trends.
UNASSIGNED: This article represents the first attempt to summarise the TDF using bibliometric analysis. We suggest this method can be used to analyse other theoretical frameworks in scientific implementation of its objectivity and quantifiability. Overall, the application scope of TDF is shifting from public health towards more specialised clinical directions, although its application in the field of public health is continuously expanding. In the future, the number of users of TDF is also expected to expand from implementation scientists to professional technical personnel.