We compared 2 suturing techniques for reattachment of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) via all-suture anchor.
We used fresh, matched-pair, cadaveric hands. We disarticulated the fingers at the proximal interphalangeal joints, preserving the proximal FDP. We released the FDPs at their distal insertion and placed an all-suture, 1.0-mm anchor at the center of each FDP footprint. Each anchor\'s sutures were used to reattach each FDP using 1 of 2 techniques: group H (n = 14) via horizontal mattress; group H + K (n = 12) via horizontal mattress with knots thrown and, with each suture tail, 3 proximal, running-locking, Krackow-type passes on the radial and ulnar FDP sides with the suture ends tied together. We excluded 2 specimens from the H + K group because of improper anchor placement. All other fingers in both groups were individually mounted in an MTS machine for FDP loading in the following sequence for 500 cycles each: (1) to 15 N to simulate passive motion forces; (2) to 19 N for short-arc active motion forces; and (3) to 28 N for full active motion forces. Specimens that had not failed during cyclic testing were then loaded to failure. We measured FDP-to-bone gapping via a digital transducer. We defined failure as >3-mm gapping.
The H + K group had significantly less gapping during cyclic loading up to 19 N and significantly higher load to failure. The H + K group failed exclusively at the anchor-bone level; the H group failed mostly by suture-tendon pullout.
The H + K group performed significantly better regarding cyclic and load-to-failure testing after FDP reattachment.
The H + K technique combines the benefits of horizontal-mattress tendon-to-bone apposition and Krackow-tendon locking. It converts the point of failure to the bone level rather than the suture-tendon level.

BACKGROUND: Distal triceps tendon ruptures (DTTRs) are highly uncommon injuries and can be treated with surgical repair. The purpose of this review was to compare the outcomes and complications of various surgical techniques used for primary repair of DTTRs.
METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed were searched from data inception to October 15, 2020. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies tool was used to assess study quality. Data are presented descriptively.
RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were identified, comprising 560 patients (565 triceps tendons), of whom 78.6% were male patients. The mean age was 46.1 ± 8.4 years, and the mean follow-up period was 31.8 ± 21.0 months. The overall complication rate across all DTTR repair procedures was 14.9%. The distribution of complications for each technique was 29.2% for the direct repair technique, 15.2% for the transosseous technique (transosseous suture), and 7.7% for the suture anchor technique. Common complications include ulnar neuropathies, infections, and pain. The overall rerupture rate for transosseous suture, suture anchor, and direct repair was 4.3% (n = 12), 2.1% (n = 3), and 0% (n = 0), respectively. Patients undergoing DTTR repair experience significant improvements postoperatively regarding pain, strength, and range of motion.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing DTTR experience improvements in postoperative outcomes; however, there is a moderate reported risk of rerupture or complication. Owing to the heterogeneity in rupture patterns, surgical procedures, and outcome measures, it is difficult to ascertain the superiority of one surgical technique over another. Future studies should use large prospective cohorts and long-term follow-up to determine more accurate complication rates and outcome scores.

BACKGROUND: Management of pectoralis major (PM) injuries is largely determined by the anatomic location of the injury, with tendon avulsions from the humerus requiring surgery while myotendinous (MT) injuries are typically managed non-operatively. Because physical examination cannot reliably make this distinction, MRI is often used for staging. However, correct classification can also be difficult with MRI where there is extensive soft tissue edema and distorted anatomy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of primary and secondary MRI signs of PM injury for distinguishing tendon avulsions from MT injuries in a selected sample of patients that underwent surgical repair using a practical interpretation algorithm.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, 3 blinded observers independently assessed the MRI findings of 17 patients with PM injury (including 12 acute injuries, 4 chronic, and 1 of uncertain age) where subsequent surgery documented tendon avulsion (11) and MT injuries (6) by applying the primary MRI criteria of absent tendon at the humerus, retracted tendon stump, epicenter of edema, and the secondary finding of soft tissue edema contacting the anterior humeral cortex. Operative findings were used as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were recorded for each finding.
RESULTS: The primary MRI finding of lack of a visible tendon at the insertion (sensitivity 82-100%, specificity 100%) and the secondary finding of edema contacting the anterior humeral cortex (sensitivity 64-91%, specificity 67-100%) were both useful for the distinction of tendon avulsion from MT injury, particularly in acute injuries. The presence of a retracted tendon stump and the epicenter of edema were not reliable findings. The use of a decision tree including the secondary finding of humeral edema increased the sensitivity and specificity for 2 of the 3 observers.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI assessment of PM injury focused on the humeral insertion of the PM tendon allows accurate distinction of tendon avulsion from MT injury.
UNASSIGNED: This study describes a practical approach to classifying PM injuries with MRI to distinguish injuries that require surgery from those that can potentially be managed conservatively.

Aim To report clinical, functional and radiographic results of oneincision distal biceps tendon repair with Toggle Loc (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) at an average 4-year follow-up and to assess posterior interosseous nerve injury complications after reconstruction. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 58 consecutive distal biceps tendon repairs performed at our department between 2010 and 2018. Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale and elbow range of motion (ROM) were recorded at each follow-up and an ultrasound examination was also performed to assess the repaired biceps brachii tendon. Results Clinical evaluation showed good and excellent results at medium- and long-term follow-up. A temporary posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsy developed in four (6.81%) patients and always resolved in 8 weeks. PIN palsy prevalence is in accordance with the results of the previous studies. Conclusion Distal biceps tendon repair with Toggle Loc is an effective surgical procedure. PIN injury is a relatively rare complication after one-incision anterior repair. Our complication rate did not differ significantly from other studies that have used cortical button fixation, reported in current literature. Our results confirm that accidental injury of PIN may also happen to experienced surgeons and suggest extreme care and an appropriate surgical technique to reduce this iatrogenic risk.

Avulsion fracture types II and III of flexor digitorum profundus (FPD), also called Jersey Finger, in flexor zone 1 are an uncommon pathology requiring surgical treatment. The aim of this study was to assess whether hook miniplates were an accessible and reliable option to repair FDP avulsion types II and III. Between July and August 2018, we treated 2 consecutive patients\' zone 1 Leddy-Packer type II and III FDP injuries with hook plates and 1.2 × 7 mm screws included in Medartis Aptus Hand fixation system set. Patients were aged 37 and 39 years, a man and a woman, respectively. At the end of the follow-up, we evaluated the Visual Analog Scale, range of motion, grip strength, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand. Both patients completed 12 months of follow-up with excellent functional and radiological results. Neither presented complications or residual disability. This injury has been treated with a wide range of surgical techniques, including anchor suture, pullout button sutures, screws, and plates. However, due to the difficulty in surgical fixation of fragments around finger joints, limited access to ligaments and tendons, and the lack of cases, none of the techniques have turned out as a clear option above others. Hook plates placed in distal phalanx emerge as surgical treatment for FDP avulsion types II and III in flexor zone 1, with excellent clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Hamstring tendon autograft (semitendinosus and gracilis) is the most commonly used graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Distal hamstring tendons avulsion is a rare condition, and this paper describes a previously unreported injury, local management of this rare injury pattern, and the existing literature regarding treatment options.
METHODS: Two cases are presented of distal hamstring avulsion from the tibia of reconstituted tendons, together with additional 12 cases of distal hamstrings tendon avulsion. Functional outcomes following treatment of this injury are presented, together with a literature review of management options.
RESULTS: Early surgical reattachment using suture anchor fixation was performed and excellent results were achieved in 93% of cases (13 out of 14 patients). Patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated a median Marx score 14.5 (IQR 4) and median SHORE score 34.5 (IQR 4). The mean time to surgery was 22 days (range 5-60), with mean time to return to sport at pre-injury level 5.5 months (range 2.5-12).
CONCLUSIONS: Distal hamstring tendon avulsion is a rare condition, with no consensus regarding optimal management options. Acute surgical repair leads to excellent results, with a return to pre-injury level of sporting activity.
METHODS: IV.

BACKGROUND: Isolated closed rupture or avulsion of the flexor digitomm superficialis (FDS) tendon at its insertion is a rare diagnosis. It can be related to a pathology such as rheumatoid arthritis, bony abnormalities, tenosynovitis, fractures, or tuberculosis. A review of the literature identified only few cases of closed avulsion or rupture of FDS tendons nonpathologically. We hope this report will help to gather more experience for the surgical intervention in a delayed presentation of ruptured flexor digitorm superficialis tendon. The work has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria.
METHODS: We report a case of 48-year-old surgeon who sustained a trauma to her left middle finger. The patient presented three months after injury with complaints of pain and decreased range of motion of involved digit. Patient was treated conservatively and after failure of conservative treatment surgical intervention was done with complete tendon excision and capsulotomy of Proximal interphalangeal joint. Patient retained full range of motion and pain subsided.
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated closed avulsions or rupture of the FDS tendon is a challenging entity in hand surgery in diagnosis and treatment. Nonsurgical treatment with splinting and physiotherapy might help to prevent flexion deformity. The surgical treatment include tenolysis, flexor digitorum superficialis tendon excision, and in selected patients capsulotomies of involved joints.
CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature identified only few cases of closed avulsion of FDS tendons nonpathologically. Early diagnosis and intervention can prevent sequel of flexion contracture.

OBJECTIVE: Avulsion injury of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon has been traditionally repaired with a pull-out suture over the nail plate. Complication rates with this method and improvements in anchor design have led to the increased use of bone anchors to give a rigid all-inside repair. However, the dimensions of the distal phalanx may limit their use. The primary hypothesis was that 2 micro bone anchors could fit in either perpendicular or 45° proximally angled positions within each distal phalanx. A further hypothesis was that 1 mini bone anchor could fit in similar positions in the distal phalanx.
METHODS: Thirty-two fresh frozen fingers were dissected, and the FDP tendon was removed from the distal phalanx footprint. Two bone anchor types were used, mini and micro sizes, and inserted at 2 angles, perpendicular and 45° proximally angled. Observations of dorsal cortex and joint space penetration were recorded. Distal phalanx dimensions were measured for each finger.
RESULTS: The micro anchors penetrated the dorsal cortex in perpendicular tests in little fingers only. The micro anchor did not penetrate the joint in any angled tests. The mini bone anchor penetrated the dorsal cortex in 100% of perpendicular tests and the joint in 63% of angled tests, although none of these included the middle finger.
CONCLUSIONS: Two micro bone anchors fit within the distal phalanx in all fingers tested, except the little finger, when placed in the perpendicular position. At a 45° angle, the distal phalanx of the little finger can also accommodate micro bone anchors without any evidence of complication when placed 4 mm from the joint. The mini anchors were too large to fit in a perpendicular position within the distal phalanx. In the 45° angled position, the joint was not penetrated by the mini anchor in only middle fingers.
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides anatomical evidence of the accommodation of micro bone anchors within the distal phalanx in perpendicular or 45° angled positions for the repair of FDP tendon avulsion injury.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this review are to discuss the diagnosis and management of mallet and jersey finger injuries in athletes and to highlight how treatment impacts return to play.
RESULTS: Mallet finger: although numerous non-operative and operative techniques have been described, there continues to be little consensus regarding the optimal procedure. Jersey finger: ultrasound appears to be a cost-effective imaging modality that may be useful for preoperative planning. Wide-awake surgery offers optimal intraoperative assessment of the tendon repair. Tendon repair with volar plate augmentation has been shown to improve the strength of the repair in the laboratory, and early clinical results are encouraging. Most mallet finger injuries will heal with non-operative treatment over a period of 8-12 weeks, even when treatment is delayed up to 3-4 months. An acute diagnosis of jersey finger requires surgical treatment and generally means 8-12 weeks of inability to compete in most contact sports.

Intratendinous ruptures of a flexor digitorum profundus tendon are rare in patients who do not have rheumatoid arthritis. A case of a patient with no history of autoimmune disease who suffered a traumatic rupture of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon to the ring finger in the mid-palm is reported.
Les ruptures traumatiques du flexor digitorum profundus intratendineux sont rares chez les patients qui ne souffrent pas de polyarthrite rhumatoïde. On présente ici le cas d’un homme ne présentant aucun antécédent de maladie auto-immune qui a subi une rupture traumatique du flexor digitorum profundus intratendineux de l’annulaire, au niveau du milieu de la paume.