OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of systemic therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) remains limited due to the constraints of systemic toxicity and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. Temporoparietal fascial flaps (TPFFs) and vascularized peri cranial flaps (PCF) are not restricted by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as they derive their vascular supply from branches of the external carotid artery. Transposition of a vascularized TPFF or PCF along a GBM resection cavity may bring autologous tissue not restricted by the BBB in close vicinity to the tumor bed microenvironment, permit ingrowth of vascular channels fed by the external circulation, and offer a mechanism of bypassing the BBB. In addition, circulating immune cells in the vascularized flap may have better access to tumor-associated antigens (TAA) within the tumor microenvironment. We conducted a first-in-human Phase I trial assessing the safety of lining the resection cavity with autologous TPFF/PCF of newly diagnosed patients with GBM.
METHODS: 12 patients underwent safe, maximal surgical resection of newly diagnosed GBMs, followed by lining of the resection cavity with a pedicled, autologous TPFF or PCF. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Secondary analysis of efficacy was examined as the proportion of patients experiencing progression-free disease (PFS) as indicated by response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria and overall survival (OS). The study was powered to determine whether a Phase II study was warranted based on these early results. For this analysis, subjects who were alive and had not progressed as of the date of the last follow-up were considered censored and all living patients who were alive as of the date of last follow-up were considered censored for overall survival. For simplicity, we assumed that a 70% PFS rate at 6 months would be considered an encouraging response and would make an argument for further investigation of the procedure.
RESULTS: Median age of included patients was 57 years (range 46-69 years). All patients were Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype. Average tumor volume was 56.6 cm3 (range 14-145 cm3). Resection was qualified as gross total resection (GTR) of all of the enhancing diseases in all patients. Grade III or above adverse events were encountered in 3 patients. No Grade IV or V serious adverse events occurred in the immediate post-operative period including seizure, infection, stroke, or tumor growing along the flap. Disease progression at the site of the original tumor was identified in only 4 (33%) patients (median 23 months, range 8-25 months), 3 of whom underwent re-operation. Histopathological analyses of those implanted flaps and tumor bed biopsy at repeat surgery demonstrated robust immune infiltrates within the transplanted flap. Importantly, no patient demonstrated evidence of tumor infiltration into the implanted flap. At the time of this manuscript preparation, only 4/12 (33%) of patients have died. Based on the statistical considerations above and including all 12 patients 10/12 (83.3%) had 6-month PFS. The median PFS was 9.10 months, and the OS was 17.6 months. 4/12 (33%) of patients have been alive for more than two years and our longest surviving patient currently is alive at 60 months.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that insertion of pedicled autologous TPFF/PCF along a GBM resection cavity is safe and feasible. Based on the encouraging response rate in 6-month PFS and OS, larger phase II studies are warranted to assess and reproduce safety, feasibility, and efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION FOR PROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03630289, dated: 08/02/2018.

Cochlear implant surgeries have become increasingly common in India, leading to a rise in complications such as cochlear implant exposure. To address this issue, we present a novel technique involving a single incision dual cover using the temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF) and skin flap to give durable cover for exposed cochlear implants. Materials and Methods  A retrospective study was conducted between December 2019 and December 2022 on patients who underwent the dual flap procedure for exposed cochlear implants. Results  The average defect size was 2 × 2 cm, and the average length of hospital stay was 10 days. Fourteen skin flaps were closed primarily, while two required skin grafting for donor site closure. At the time of discharge, all wounds showed successful healing with intact skin coverage over the cochlear implant device site. The average follow-up period was 12 months, during which two patients had donor site scar alopecia, while others had adequate hair growth masking the scar. All patients consistently used their cochlear implants. Conclusion  Our single-incision, dual cover TPFF + skin flap technique offers a reliable and innovative solution for managing exposed cochlear implants. With successful implant salvage and favorable postoperative outcomes, this approach demonstrates the versatility and reliability of the TPFF as an excellent option for reconstructive surgeons dealing with cochlear implant complications.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients continue to suffer a poor prognosis. The blood brain barrier (BBB) comprises one of the obstacles for therapy, creating a barrier that decreases the bioavailability of chemotherapeutic agents in the central nervous system. Previously, a vascularized temporoparietal fascial scalp flap (TPFF) lining the resection cavity was introduced in a trial conducted in our institution, in newly-diagnosed GBM patients in an attempt to bypass the BBB after initial resection. In this paper, we report on a new technique to bypass the BBB after re-resection and potentially to allow tumor antigens to be surveilled by the immune system. The study aims to assess the feasibility of performing a cranial transposition and revascularization of autologous omentum after re-resection of GBM. Laparoscopically harvested omental free flap was transposed to the resection cavity by a team consisting of neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists, and general surgeons. This was done as part of a single center, single arm, open-label, phase I study. Autologous abdominal omental tissue was harvested laparoscopically on its vascularized pedicle in 2 patients, transposed as a free flap, revascularized using external carotid artery, and carefully laid into the tumor resection cavity. Patients did well postoperatively returning to baseline activities. Graft viability was confirmed by cerebral angiogram. Omental cranial transposition of a laparoscopically harvested, vascularized flap, into the cavity of re-resected GBM patients is feasible and safe in the short term. Further studies are needed to ascertain whether such technique can improve progression free survival and overall survival in these patients.

OBJECTIVE: Complications, including framework exposure, infections, and reconstructed auricle deformation, may occur after auricular reconstruction. However, reports on surgical methods for cases with unsatisfactory outcomes after auricular reconstruction using an autologous costal cartilage are insufficient. Herein, we summarized retreatment casesfor poor ear morphology in patients who had undergone auricular reconstruction in our department for 5 years and discussed other techniques.
METHODS: Between September 2014 and September 2019, 24 ears of 24 patients with poor morphology, unsatisfactory macroscopic characteristics and anatomical structures, and unsatisfactory outcomes of local repair after auricular reconstructive surgery were treated. Patients were divided into the following three groups: type 1 (9 ears), with intact and sufficient hairless skin in the mastoid region behind the reconstructed ear; type 2 (7 ears), with intact, but insufficient, hairless skin in the mastoid region behind the reconstructed ear; and type 3 (8 ears), with hairless skin in the mastoid region behind the reconstructed ear with impaired skin integrity.
RESULTS: Twenty-two (91.6%) patients successfully completed the surgical treatment and recovered well; one experienced delayed wound healing and another developed hypertrophic scarring at the incision site at 3 months postoperatively. All patients were followed for 0.5-4 (mean, 2.8) years. The macrostructure of the reconstructed ear post-revision was stable and significantly improved in terms of morphology and structure.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unsatisfactory outcomes after auricular reconstruction, the appropriate technique for the revision surgery should consider the local soft tissue conditions of the reconstructed ear to obtain satisfactory results.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue reconstruction of the hand and distal upper extremity is challenging to preserve the function of the hand as good as possible. Therefore, a thin flap has been shown to be useful. In this retrospective study, we aimed to show the use of the free temporoparietal fascial flap in soft tissue reconstruction of the hand and distal upper extremity.
METHODS: We analysed the outcome of free temporoparietal fascial flaps that were used between the years 2007and 2016 at our institution. Major and minor complications, defect location and donor site morbidity were the main fields of interest.
RESULTS: 14 patients received a free temporoparietal fascial flap for soft tissue reconstruction of the distal upper extremity. Minor complications were noted in three patients and major complications in two patients. Total flap necrosis occurred in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The free temporoparietal fascial flap is a useful tool in reconstructive surgery of the hand and the distal upper extremity with a low donor site morbidity and moderate rates of major and minor complications.

With an increase in the number of cochlear implant surgeries there is bound to be an increase in the number of complications. A dreaded problem in any implant procedure is the implant exposure and infection. Explantation of the implant leads to an unpleasant situation to the patient and the surgeon owing to the high cost of the device. There are reports in the literature favouring the mandatory relocation or removal of the infected implants. On the other hand, there are convincing reports of implant salvage using skin, muscle or fascial flaps. In this paper we have analysed a series of cases referred to us from the departments of E.N.T for the management of implant exposure/infection. We have also reviewed similar case series reported in the literature. From 2014 to 2017 we operated six cases of exposed cochlear implant. We salvaged the implant in five cases, where we could do two layer coverage consisting of the inner temporoparietal fascial flap and outer scalp skin flap. In one case where the temporoparietal fascial flap could not be done as superficial temporal vessels were found to be injured in the previous surgery, the implant was removed due to persistent infection. All these cases were administered appropriate antibiotics for a minimum period of 3 weeks. Early double layer closure with inner temporoparietal fascial flap and outer scalp rotation flap coupled with appropriate antibiotics can salvage an infected, exposed implant.

Reconstruction of combined skin and tendon loss in an injury of the dorsum of the hand is a challenging problem because it is required to achieve adequate excursion of the tendon. We herein report our case of extensor tendon repair for a dorsal hand injury using a rolled deep temporal fascial (DTF) graft and a free temporoparietal fascial flap. The patient regained satisfactory hand function with minimal donor site morbidity. DTF utilization as tendon grafts spares another incision for tendon grafting. Furthermore, one can integrate all the donor sites into the temporal region by choosing the scalp as a donor site for skin grafting. Patients can benefit from this procedure, which provides a functional reconstruction of the hand and leaves only inconspicuous donor site scars.

The success of expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) to the anterior skull base, sellar, and parasellar regions has been greatly aided by the advancement in reconstructive techniques. In particular, the pedicled vascularized flaps have been developed and effectively cover skull base defects of varying sizes with a significant reduction in postoperative CSF leaks. There are two aims to this review: (1) We will provide our current, simplified reconstruction algorithm. (2) We will describe, in detail, the relevant anatomy, indications/contraindications, and surgical technique, with a particular emphasis on the nasoseptal flap (NSF). The inferior turbinate flap (ITF), middle turbinate flap (MTF), pericranial flap (PCF), and temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF) will also be described. The NSF should be the primary option for reconstruction of majority of skull base defects following endonasal endoscopic surgery. In general, for the planum, cribriform, and upper two-thirds of the clivus, the NSF is ideal. For the lower-third of the clivus, the NSF may not be adequate and may require additional reconstructive options. Although limited in reach or more technically challenging, these reconstructive flaps should still be considered and kept in the surgical algorithm.

BACKGROUND: PCF is the most common major complication after salvage total laryngectomy (TL), especially for previously irradiated patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer.
RESULTS: A 65-year-old woman presented with recurrent bilateral supraglottic SCC requiring salvage TL 5.5years after initial T1N0M0 epiglottic SCC resection. Her post-operative course was complicated by PCF development one month post-operatively and surgical fistula closure was delayed for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The fistula persisted despite local wound therapy, several primary closures, pectoralis flap reconstruction with multiple revisions, and extensive hyperbaric oxygen treatments. Given her prior history, she underwent a staged right temporoparietal fascial flap reconstruction for persistent complex fistula, with second-stage flap takedown and complete inset of the TPFF skin island into the PCF.
CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates the utility of staged TPFF in complex PCF repair, with minimal morbidity, especially in a patient with prior irradiation and flap use that complicates tissue availability.

OBJECTIVE: This article introduces a classification scheme for extensive traumatic anterior skull base fracture to help stratify surgical treatment options. The authors describe their multilayer repair technique for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak resulting from extensive anterior skull base fracture using a combination of laterally pediculated temporalis fascial-pericranial, nasoseptal-pericranial, and anterior pericranial flaps.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified patients treated surgically between January 2004 and May 2014 for anterior skull base fractures with CSF fistulas. All patients were treated with bifrontal craniotomy and received pedicled tissue flaps. Cases were classified according to the extent of fracture: Class I (frontal bone/sinus involvement only); Class II (extent of involvement to ethmoid cribriform plate); and Class III (extent of involvement to sphenoid bone/sinus). Surgical repair techniques were tailored to the types of fractures. Patients were assessed for CSF leak at follow-up. The Fisher exact test was applied to investigate whether the repair techniques were associated with persistent postoperative CSF leak.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were identified in this series. Thirty-seven (86%) were male. The patients\' mean age was 33 years (range 11-79 years). The mean overall length of follow-up was 14 months (range 5-45 months). Six fractures were classified as Class I, 8 as Class II, and 29 as Class III. The anterior pericranial flap alone was used in 33 patients (77%). Multiple flaps were used in 10 patients (3 salvage) (28%)--1 with Class II and 9 with Class III fractures. Five (17%) of the 30 patients with Class II or III fractures who received only a single anterior pericranial flap had persistent CSF leak (p < 0.31). No CSF leak was found in patients who received multiple flaps. Although postoperative CSF leak occurred only in high-grade fractures with single anterior flap repair, this finding was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Extensive anterior skull base fractures often require aggressive treatment to provide the greatest long-term functional and cosmetic benefits. Several vascularized tissue flaps can be used, either alone or in combination. Vascularized flaps are an ideal substrate for cranial base repair. Dual and triple flap techniques that combine the use of various anterior, lateral, and nasoseptal flaps allow for a comprehensive arsenal in multilayered skull base repair and salvage therapy for extensive and severe fractures.