UNASSIGNED: Tarsal tunnel syndrome, also known as posterior tibial neuralgia, is a compressive neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve or one of its divisions (calcaneal, lateral plantar or medial plantar nerve) within the tarsal tunnel. This scoping review aims to systematically map and summarise current literature regarding the management of tarsal tunnel syndrome.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Medline and Cinahl were searched using the terms \'tarsal tunnel\', \'syndrome\', \'entrapment\', \'compression\', \'posterior tibial\', \'neuropathy\' and \'neuralgia. Two stage title abstract screening was performed. Observational studies reporting the outcome of treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome were included.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 32 studies were included in the review. Excellent or good results are seen in 75.3 % of cases, with the remainder (24.7 %) achieving fair or poor outcomes. Factors which may influence outcome include patient age, symptom duration, aetiology, co-morbidities, pre-treatment symptom severity and nerve fibrosis.
UNASSIGNED: Although favourable outcomes are seen in the majority of cases, poor results are not uncommon. A range of prognostic factors are identified; however, firm conclusions cannot be drawn from the findings of individual low-quality studies. Further research in identifying prognostic factors may aid in clinical decision making and management of patient expectations.
UNASSIGNED: Level IV Scoping review.

The flexor digitorum accessorius longus muscle (ALM) can be overlooked as the eliciting factor in patients with tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS), an entrapment neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve that elicits sole numbness and pain. Most elicitations are idiopathic, however, mass lesions within the tarsal tunnel can be also implicated. We report an 80-year-old woman whose flexor digitorum ALM led to the onset of bilateral TTS. She had suffered numbness in both soles for 3 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the bilateral tarsal tunnel showed that the posterior tibial nerve was compressed by the arteriovenous complex and in contact with the flexor digitorum ALM. We diagnosed bilateral TTS based on her symptoms and imaging findings, and performed bilateral decompression surgery of the posterior tibial nerve under local anesthesia. The artery on both sides was dislocated for nerve decompression. Because the posterior tibial nerve on the right side was strongly compressed in ankle plantar flexion we excised a portion of the tendon compressing the nerve. Postoperatively her symptoms gradually improved and she reported surgical satisfaction 6 months after the operation. In patients with flexor digitorum ALM-related TTS, the effect of dynamic factors on MRI findings and on surgical treatment decisions must be considered. Intraoperatively, not only the flexor digitorum ALM, but also other potential etiologic factors eliciting TTS must be kept in mind.

The neuropathic compression of the tibial nerve and/or its branches on the medial side of the ankle is called tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS). Patients with TTS presents pain, paresthesia, hypoesthesia, hyperesthesia, muscle cramps or numbness which affects the sole of the foot, the heel, or both. The clinical diagnosis is challenging because of the fairly non-specific and several symptomatology. We demonstrate a case of TTS caused by medial dislocation of the talar bone on the calcaneus bone impacting the tibial nerve diagnosed only by ultrasound with the patient in the standing position.

BACKGROUND: Children with Hunter syndrome have a high prevalence of nerve compression syndromes given the buildup of glycosaminoglycans in the tendon sheaths and soft tissue structures. These are often comorbid with orthopedic conditions given joint and tendon contractures due to the same pathology. While carpal tunnel syndrome and surgical treatment has been well-reported in this population, the literature on lower extremity nerve compression syndromes and their treatment in Hunter syndrome is sparse.
METHODS: We report the case of a 13-year-old male with a history of Hunter syndrome who presented with toe-walking and tenderness over the peroneal and tarsal tunnel areas. He underwent bilateral common peroneal nerve and tarsal tunnel releases, with findings of severe nerve compression and hypertrophied soft tissue structures demonstrating fibromuscular scarring on pathology. Post-operatively, the patient\'s family reported subjective improvement in lower extremity mobility and plantar flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: In this case, peroneal and tarsal nerve compression were diagnosed clinically and treated effectively with surgical release and postoperative ankle casting. Given the wide differential of common comorbid orthopedic conditions in Hunter syndrome and the lack of validated electrodiagnostic normative values in this population, the history and physical examination and consideration of nerve compression syndromes are tantamount for successful workup and treatment of gait abnormalities in the child with Hunter syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve (PTN) cross-sectional area (CSA) reference values for the diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) using ultrasound imaging exist in several countries but not in South Africa (SA). Therefore, the objective was to measure the CSA reference values for PTN in SA.
METHODS: Ultrasound CSA measurements of PTN in both ankles on 112 participants were performed, the mean measurement was recorded, and the effect of race, age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded.
RESULTS: In this study, the primary variables age and BMI affect the CSA measurement of the PTN. A positive correlation was found between PTN asymptomatic size and age (r = 0.196, P < 0.05), size and BMI (r = 0.200, P < 0.05). Age (categories) had a mean value of 3.17 for the age group 36-45 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.4). The mean BMI was 30.0 kg/m2 (CI 28.57-31.08). As for the asymptomatic PTN, a mean CSA reference value of 0.10 cm2 was obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: With increase in age and BMI, a greater PTN measurement will occur. Race appears to be a contributing factor, but further research is needed in this regard. The reference CSA value for normal PTN should be set at 0.10 cm2 for all racial groups for a basic musculoskeletal ultrasound exam protocol in South Africa.

Tarsal tunnel syndrome is a neuropathic compression of the tibial nerve and its branches on the medial side of the ankle. It is a challenging diagnosis that constitutes symptoms arising from damage to the posterior tibial nerve or its branches as they proceed through the tarsal tunnel below the flexor retinaculum in the medial ankle, easily forgotten and underdiagnosed. Neural compression by vascular structures has been suggested as a possible etiology in some clinical conditions. Tibial artery tortuosity is not that rare, but only that it affects the nerve can cause tarsal tunnel syndrome. Therefore, a study care must be taken to avoid false-positive errors.

UNASSIGNED: The sensitivity of diagnosing tarsal tunnel syndrome with an electrodiagnostic study is just over 50%. Given this low reliability, many surgeons prefer to make a diagnosis solely from a physical examination, despite reported electrodiagnostic findings. Thus, to understand the clinical ramifications between these 2 methods of diagnosis, this investigation compared the postoperative outcomes following a tarsal tunnel release between patients with positive and negative preoperative electrodiagnosis (EDx).
UNASSIGNED: This study retrospectively reviewed 53 consecutive patients who underwent tarsal tunnel release by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. The primary outcome was pain level using visual analog scale (VAS) whereas the secondary outcomes were 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, recovery times (time to return to activities of daily living, work, and sports), and complications. Pre- and postoperative functional outcomes were compared within each EDx group using a paired sample t test. Postoperative outcomes between groups were compared using a generalized linear model adjusted for potential confounders.
UNASSIGNED: Both EDx groups (positive studies = 31 patients and negative studies = 22 patients) demonstrated significant improvement of all functional outcomes (P < .001). We found no significant difference in recovery time or postoperative outcomes between the 2 groups (P > .05). Multivariable analysis showed diabetes (risk ratio [RR] = 1.79, 95% CI 1.11-2.90) and longer duration of symptoms before surgery (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) as prognostic factors for residual pain following tarsal tunnel release.
UNASSIGNED: In our series, we found that preoperative electrodiagnostic results did not prognosticate postoperative functional outcomes or recovery times after tarsal tunnel release.

Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is a nerve entrapment of the posterior tibial nerve. This uncommon condition frequently goes undiagnosed or misdiagnosed even though it interferes with the daily activities of workers. Here we discuss the return to work status of a 37-year-old male patient who manages a manufacturing plant. He was identified as having Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome as a result of a foot abnormality and improper shoe wear. He had moderate pes planus and underwent tarsal tunnel release on his right foot. What are the determinant factors in defining a patient\'s status for returning to work after a tarsal tunnel release? We conducted a literature review using PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane. The Indonesian Occupational Medicine Association used the seven-step return-to-work assessment as a protocol to avoid overlooking the process. Duration of symptoms, associated pathology, and the presence of structural foot problems or a space-occupying lesion are factors affecting outcome. Post-operative foot scores, including Maryland Foot Score (MFS), VAS, and Foot Function Index, can be used to evaluate patient outcomes. Early disability limitation and a thorough return-to-work assessment are needed.

BACKGROUND: Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is a common entrapment neuropathy that is sometimes elicited by ganglia in the tarsal tunnel.
METHODS: Between August 2020 and July 2022, we operated on 117 sides with TTS. This retrospective study examined data from 8 consecutive patients (8 sides: 5 men, 3 women; average age 67.8 years) with an extraneural ganglion in the tarsal tunnel. We investigated the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes for these patients.
RESULTS: The mass was palpable through the skin in 1 patient, detected intraoperatively in 1 patient, and visualized on MRI scanning in the other 6 patients. Symptoms involved the medial plantar nerve area (n = 5), lateral plantar nerve area (n = 1), and medial and lateral plantar nerve areas (n = 2). The interval between symptom onset and surgery ranged from 4 to 168 months. Adhesion between large (≥20 mm) ganglia and surrounding tissue and nerves was observed intraoperatively in 4 patients. Of the 8 patients, 7 underwent total ganglion resection. There were no surgery-related complications. On their last postoperative visit, 3 patients with a duration of symptoms not exceeding 10 months reported favorable outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Because ganglia eliciting TTS are often undetectable by skin palpation, imaging studies may be necessary. Early surgical intervention appears to yield favorable outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Tarsal tunnel syndrome is well documented following lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy to manage varus hindfoot deformity. Traditionally, calcaneal osteotomy is performed with an oscillating saw. No studies have investigated the effect of alternative surgical techniques on postoperative tarsal tunnel pressure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in tarsal tunnel pressures following lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy performed using a high-torque, low-speed \"minimally invasive surgery\" (MIS) Shannon burr versus an oscillating saw.
METHODS: Lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy was performed on 10 below-knee cadaveric specimens. This was conducted on 5 specimens each using an oscillating saw (Saw group) or MIS burr (Burr group). The calcaneal tuberosity was translated 1 cm laterally and transfixed using 2 Kirschner wires. Tarsal tunnel pressure was measured before and after osteotomy via ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle barometer. Mean pre/post-osteotomy pressures were compared between groups. Differences were analyzed using Student\'s t test.
RESULTS: The mean pre-procedure tarsal tunnel pressure was 25.8 ± 5.1 mm Hg in the Saw group and 26.4 ± 4.3 mm Hg in the Burr group (p = 0.85). The mean post-procedure pressure was 63.4 ± 5.1 in the Saw group and 47.8 ± 4.3 in the Burr group (p = 0.01). Change in tarsal tunnel pressure was significantly lower in the Burr group (21.4 ± 4.5) compared to the Saw group (37.6 ± 12.5) (p = 0.03). The increase in tarsal tunnel pressure was 43% lower in the Burr group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric study, tarsal tunnel pressure increase after lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy was significantly lower when using a burr versus a saw. This is likely because the increased width (\"kerf\") of the 3 mm MIS burr, compared to the submillimeter saw blade width, causes calcaneal shortening. Given the smaller increase in tarsal tunnel pressure, using the MIS burr for lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy may decrease the risk of postoperative tarsal tunnel syndrome. Future research in vivo should explore this.