Target non-attainment

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的主要目的是评估危重患者中与亚胺培南目标浓度(非)达到相关的预测因子。次要目的是探讨达到亚胺培南目标浓度与治疗临床结果之间的相关性。在接受亚胺培南治疗的危重患者中进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从患者的电子病历中提取临床数据。药代动力学/药效学目标定义为在给药间隔的100%(100%fT>MIC)时高于病原体的最小抑制浓度(MIC)的游离亚胺培南浓度。使用二项逻辑回归评估与未达到目标浓度相关的因素。使用Kaplan-Meier分析来研究(非)达到目标与30天死亡率之间的相关性。共纳入406例患者,55.4%达到100%fT>MIC的目标。回归分析确定亚胺培南的初始日剂量≤2g/天,增强肾脏清除率,年龄≤60岁,最近的手术,以及缺乏阳性微生物学培养作为目标未达到的危险因素。达到100%fT>MIC目标与临床疗效显著相关,但与30天死亡率无关。在危重患者亚胺培南治疗早期选择性应用治疗药物监测可改善临床预后。进一步的研究应探索TDM指导的亚胺培南给药策略在重症监护环境中的潜在益处。
    The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the predictors associated with target concentration (non-)attainment of imipenem in critically ill patients. The secondary objective was to explore the correlation between achieving imipenem target concentrations and clinical outcomes of therapy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in critically ill patients treated with imipenem. Clinical data were extracted from the patients\' electronic medical records. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target was defined as free imipenem concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen at 100% (100%fT>MIC) of the dosing interval. Factors associated with the non-attainment of target concentrations were evaluated using binomial logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to investigate the correlation between (non-)attainment targets and 30-day mortality. A total of 406 patients were included, and 55.4% achieved the target of 100%fT>MIC. Regression analysis identified an initial daily dose of imipenem ≤ 2 g/day, augmented renal clearance, age ≤ 60 years, recent surgery, and absence of positive microbiology culture as risk factors for target non-attainment. Achieving the 100%fT>MIC target was significantly associated with clinical efficacy but not with 30-day mortality. Selective application of therapeutic drug monitoring in the early stages of imipenem treatment for critically ill patients can improve clinical outcomes. Further research should explore the potential benefits of TDM-guided dosing strategies for imipenem in critical care settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    后续护理对于疾病管理至关重要,但具有挑战性,特别是在医疗保健资源和临床能力有限的农村地区。然而,从农村初级保健医生(PCP)的角度进行的研究很少。我们评估了农村PCP对高血压和2型糖尿病(两种最常见的长期疾病)进行随访的频率。
    我们进行了一个多中心,自我管理的调查研究建立在四个省农村PCP现有的一般实践课程计划的基础上。有关后续护理服务的信息是从参加集中课堂教学的农村PCP中收集的,多项选择题。进行二元logistic回归分析,以检查与未达到高血压和2型糖尿病随访目标频率相关的医师水平因素。分别。最终样本包括来自52个乡镇地区的农村PCP。在统计分析中使用复杂样品模块以说明多级样品设计。
    总有效率为91.4%。在农村实践中,约有五分之一的PCP没有达到随访护理的目标频率(高血压为18.7%;2型糖尿病为21.6%)。医生的教育水平较高,每天看到的患者数量增加,未提供家庭访视是未达到两种情况的目标随访频率的危险因素.此外,在2型糖尿病管理中,工作经验较少的乡村医生往往不太频繁地提供后续护理.
    鉴于可能存在临床惯性和工作量相关因素,仅致力于加强乡村医生教育的努力可能不会直接转化为对服务提供的强烈动机和积极承诺。在后续护理服务中确定的未达到目标的风险因素可能为农村初级保健实践中的能力建设计划提供了领域。
    Follow-up care is crucial but challenging for disease management particularly in rural areas with limited healthcare resources and clinical capacity, yet few studies have been conducted from the perspective of rural primary care physicians (PCPs). We assessed the frequency of follow-up care delivered by rural PCPs for hypertension and type 2 diabetes - the two most common long-term conditions.
    We conducted a multi-centre, self-administered survey study built upon existing general practice course programmes for rural PCPs in four provinces. Information on follow-up care delivery were collected from rural PCPs attending centralised in-class teaching sessions using a set of close-ended, multiple choice questions. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to examine physician-level factors associated with non-attainment of the target frequency of follow-up care for hypertension and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The final sample consisted of rural PCPs from 52 township-level regions. The Complex Samples module was used in the statistical analysis to account for the multistage sample design.
    The overall response rate was 91.4%. Around one fifth of PCPs in rural practices did not achieve the target frequency of follow-up care delivery (18.7% for hypertension; 21.6% for type 2 diabetes). Higher education level of physicians, increased volume of daily patients seen, and no provision of home visits were risk factors for non-attainment of the target frequency of follow-up care for both conditions. Moreover, village physicians with less working experiences tended to have less frequent follow-up care delivery in type 2 diabetes management.
    Efforts that are solely devoted to enhancing rural physicians\' education may not directly translate into strong motivation and active commitment to service provision given the possible existence of clinical inertia and workload-related factors. Risk factors identified for target non-attainment in the follow-up care delivery may provide areas for capacity building programmes in rural primary care practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号