OBJECTIVE: Preclinical data demonstrated that the use of proton minibeam radiotherapy reduces the risk of toxicity in healthy tissue. Ventricular tachycardia radioablation is an area under clinical investigation in proton beam therapy. We sought to simulate a ventricular tachycardia radioablation with proton minibeams and to demonstrate that it was possible to obtain a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone with this technique.
METHODS: An arrhythmogenic target volume was defined on the simulation CT scan of a patient, localized in the lateral wall of the left ventricle. A dose of 25Gy was planned to be delivered by proton minibeam radiotherapy, simulated using a Monte Carlo code (TOPAS v.3.7) with a collimator of 19 0.4 mm-wide slits spaced 3mm apart. The main objective of the study was to obtain a plan ensuring at least 93% of the prescription dose in 93% of the planning target volume without exceeding 110% of the prescribed dose in the planning target volume.
RESULTS: The average dose in the planning treatment volume in proton minibeam radiotherapy was 25.12Gy. The percentage of the planning target volume receiving 93% (V93%), 110% (V110%), and 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 94.25%, 0%, and 92.6% respectively. The lateral penumbra was 6.6mm. The mean value of the peak-to-valley-dose ratio in the planning target volume was 1.06. The mean heart dose was 2.54Gy versus 5.95Gy with stereotactic photon beam irradiation.
CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study shows that proton minibeam radiotherapy can achieve a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone, reducing the dose at the normal tissues. This technique, ensuring could theoretically reduce the risk of late pulmonary and breast fibrosis, as well as cardiac toxicity as seen in previous biological studies in proton minibeam radiotherapy.

METHODS: A 71-year-old presented at the outpatient clinic with palpitations and NYHA II functional class. 12-lead ECG exhibited Upper septal idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia (US-ILVT). Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was interrupted with Verapamil administration, no further recurrences were documented after beta-blockers therapy was started. No coronary artery stenosis were detected. The US-ILVT was successfully treated by ablating the proximal site of the left anterior fascicle (LAF), where diastolic potential (P1) and pre-systolic potential (P2) with inverted sequence were detected during the electrophysiology study (EP) study. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed with demonstration of intramyocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at the level of middle-basal portions of interventricular septum and basal portion of infero-lateral wall and no edema detection. A single catheter implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted as secondary prevention. VT has never recurred during 3 months of follow-up with remote control of ICD.
CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in which US-ILVT was associated with ventricular septal LGE, suggestive of previous myocarditis, as substrate of re-entrant circuit. Scar-related ventricular tachycardia circuit is also suggested by the evidence of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) as trigger of recurrent VT in our case.

Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are common. Although often benign, they can also be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review was to assess the risk evaluation of PVCs in patients with or without structural heart disease and discuss the management of this arrhythmia. Reports published in English were searched in PubMed with the following search terms: premature ventricular contraction, ectopic ventricular beat, ventricular extrasystole, antiarrhythmic drugs, ablation, ventricular arrhythmia, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and torsade de pointe. This analysis suggests that all patients with frequent PVCs should be assessed for PVC burden, symptom status and the presence of structural heart disease. PVCs in patients with structurally normal hearts was once considered a benign phenomenon. Uncommonly, PVCs may provoke life-threatening arrhythmias. Ventricular fibrillation is the initial mode of malignant rapid ventricular arrhythmias (MRVAs). Patients with malignant PVC and PVC burden >10% are at increased risk of MRVA in case of myocardial infarction and heart failure. MRVA is the primary cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with and without structural heart disease. Therapeutic options include medical therapy and catheter ablation, the latter more effective and potentially curable, particularly in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The timely recognition and effective treatment of malignant PVCs in symptomatic patients with underling cardiomyopathy are mandatory to initiate early therapies before the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes and to improve the long-term prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Electrical storms (ES) are serious cardiac emergencies associated with increased short-term mortality. The true incidence of ES in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still difficult to estimate because of the heterogeneous definition. The clinical presentation is variable and its management is multidisciplinary.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the epidemiological profile and evolution of a group of patients implanted with an ICD who had electrical storms detected by a home monitoring system.
METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study, which included 14 patients who were implanted with ICDs, for primary or secondary prevention between 2008 and 2021. All of them were followed by home monitoring. All these patients had an ES detected by home monitoring and authenticated by ECG.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients at the time of onset of the electrical storm was 75.4 ± 14.5 years, with extremes ranging from 49 to 101 years. Most of patients (n = 11) were male. The majority of them had underlying ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n = 12). In a third of cases (n = 5) patients were implanted for secondary prevention. The electrical storm was related to recurrent episodes of VT. No cases of VF were detected. Syncope was the most frequent clinical presentation (four patients). Nine patients received internal shocks, with an average of four shocks per patient. The triggering factor was myocardial ischaemia in four cases. Majority of patients were managed in the cardiac intensive care unit. Two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. In addition to anti-arrhythmic treatment with amiodarone and beta blockers. Nine patients underwent ablation of ventricular tachycardia focus. Mortality was high (in half of the cases) mainly due to a cardiogenic shock.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that OR remain rare, but are still associated with high mortality. Home monitoring makes it possible to manage them earlier.

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease whose diagnosis is suggested by clinical and paraclinical signs and confirmed by histological evidence showing granulomatosis without caseous necrosis. The clinical presentation is sometimes misleading and the diagnosis difficult to confirm. We report here the case of a young woman with cardiac sarcoidosis of difficult diagnosis, revealed by a myocardial infarction with normal coronary angiography and recurrent ventricular tachycardia. Multimodal imaging, combined with left ventricular endomyocardial biopsies guided by electrophysiological analysis and endocavitary mapping, finally confirmed the diagnosis, and allowed effective medical treatment.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a hereditary myocardial condition in most cases that affects the right ventricle, but also the left ventricle with variable degree. It predisposes patients to ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure and sudden death. Its diagnosis remains challenging and is mostly based on reference task-force criteria. The latter, divided between major and minor criteria, include structural abnormalities (visualized on echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance), electrocardiographic anomalies, ventricular arrythmia documentation, histological proof of fibro-fatty infiltrates within myocardial tissue and family history. Following a correct diagnosis, patient-tailored care is essential. First, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is recommended in case of history of sudden death, sustained ventricular tachycardia or advanced right/left ventricular dysfunction. It should be considered in case of cardiac syncope or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Secondly, eviction of high intensity physical activity is mandatory. Finally, beta-blockers are recommended for all patients with clinically manifest arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients according to atrial fibrillation is limited.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.
METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used, including all ICD recipients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation from 2002 to 2016. Patients with atrial fibrillation were compared to those without atrial fibrillation. The primary endpoint was first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at 5 years. Secondary endpoints comprised recurrences of ICD-related therapies, first cardiac rehospitalization and all-cause mortality at 5 years. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were applied.
RESULTS: A total of 592 consecutive ICD recipients were included (33% with atrial fibrillation). Atrial fibrillation was associated with reduced freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (42% vs. 50%, log-rank P=0.004; hazard ratio 1.445, 95% confidence interval 1.124-1.858), mainly attributable to recurrent ventricular fibrillation in secondary-preventive ICD recipients. Accordingly, atrial fibrillation was associated with reduced freedom from first appropriate ICD therapies (31% vs. 42%, log-rank P=0.001; hazard ratio 1.598, 95% confidence interval 1.206-2.118). Notably, the primary endpoint of freedom from first episode of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias was still reduced in those with atrial fibrillation compared to those without atrial fibrillation after propensity score matching. Regarding secondary endpoints, patients with atrial fibrillation still showed a trend towards reduced freedom from appropriate ICD therapies.
CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation was associated with increased rates of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate device therapies in ICD recipients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Ventricular tachycardia has a significant recurrence rate after ablation for several reasons, including inaccessible substrate. A non-invasive technique to ablate any defined areas of myocardium involved in arrhythmogenesis would be a potentially important therapeutic improvement if shown to be safe and effective. Early feasibility studies of single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy have demonstrated encouraging results, but rigorous evaluation and follow-up are required. In this document, the basic concepts of stereotactic body radiotherapy are summarized, before focusing on stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation. We describe the effect of radioablation on cardiac tissue and its interaction with intracardiac devices, depending on the dose. The different clinical studies on ventricular tachycardia radioablation are analysed, with a focus on target identification, which is the key feature of this approach. Our document ends with the indications and requirements for practicing this type of procedure in 2020. Finally, because of the limited number of patients treated so far, we encourage multicentre registries with long-term follow-up.

Myocardial scar-related ventricular tachycardia is a serious and potentially life-threatening arrhythmia. The prevention of sudden rhythmic death and ventricular tachycardia recurrence relies on implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), anti-arrhythmic drugs and more recently on radiofrequency catheter ablation. Nevertheless, these approaches have their own risk of adverse events and complications, with a recurrence rate up to 50 % at 2 years. Stereotactic body radiotherapy, delivered in a single dose of 25Gy, has emerged as a new therapeutic tool in the management of highly refractory ventricular tachycardia. In 2017, the very first prospective 5-patient cohort suffering from recurrent ventricular tachycardia on structural heart disease (40 % of ischemic cardiomyopathy) who benefited from cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy was published. After stereotactic body radiotherapy, the authors observed a strong ventricular tachycardia burden reduction at 12 months, with no major side effects. Since then, around 100 cases have been described in the literature, particularly in the prospective ENCORE-VT study, with positive short- and medium-term outcomes in terms of safety and ventricular tachycardia burden reduction. Recently, another American prospective 5-patient series, published in March 2020, mitigated these results since all patients presented a ventricular tachycardia recurrence at 12 months despite an initial reduction in ventricular tachycardia burden. This article describes the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in refractory VT, the rationale of the technique, its implementation, preliminary results and potential acute and long-term consequences.

This report presents the case of a young man of 24 years old with Asperger syndrome who ingest quantities of medication whose flecainide. Resume of his stay in intensive care unit, notably serious adverse effect which ventricular tachycardia with membrane stabilizing effect and lengthening of stay in intensive care unit. Study of literature of different take care already published, with notion of mid-term leaching of flecainide which were ingest days before, at different levels all over the world.