Introduction: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) stands as the most common cause of peripheral vertigo. Its treatment with repositioning maneuvers on an examination table is highly effective. However, patients with back or neck problems, paraplegia, or other conditions face challenges with these maneuvers, potentially experiencing longer healing times and creating additional difficulties for physicians diagnosing and treating BPPV in everyday practice. The emergence of mechanical rotational chairs (MRCs) offers a more convenient alternative for performing these maneuvers. Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of maneuvers on the examination table with those on MRCs in BPPV patients diagnosed in the emergency room and randomly classified into one of the treatment options. The secondary objectives included a comparison of patient quality of life during BPPV episodes and after their resolution and an analysis of recurrences and associated risk factors. Methods: This was a cohort study on sixty-three patients diagnosed with BPPV in the emergency department. Patients were classified into two cohorts depending on diagnostic and treatment maneuvers (MRC or conventional repositioning maneuvers (CRMs)) and received weekly follow-ups until positioning maneuvers became negative. Subsequent follow-ups were conducted at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the resolution of vertigo. Patients were classified into two groups based on their assigned treatment method. Results: Thirty-one patients were treated with CRMs and 32 with TRV. Mean age was 62.29 ± 17.67 years and the most affected canal was the PSC (96.8%). The mean number of required maneuvers was two, while 55.56% only required one maneuver until resolution. Recurrence was present in 26.98% of the patients during the 6-month follow-up. Comparing both cohorts, there were no statistically significant differences between treatments (TRV vs. CRM) regarding the number of maneuvers, number of recurrences, and days until remission of BPPV. Dizziness Handicap Inventory and Visual Analogue Scale values decreased considerably after BPPV resolution, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Age was identified as a covariable in the number of maneuvers and days until BPPV resolution, showing that an increase in age implies a greater need of maneuvers. Conclusions: There was no difference between the means of treatment for BPPV in our population ot There was no difference between the groups of treatments for BPPV in our population. The quality of life of patients improved six months after the resolution of BPPV, regardless of the treatment applied.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Vertigo is a subjective sensation of swaying, tilting, spinning, instability, or being off-balance [1]. The concept of vertigo is not a precise term due to the possibility of its being related to numerous variable, frequently co-occurring sensations as experienced by the patient. For this reason, diagnosing the origin of vertigo quite frequently poses a serious dilemma for physicians. Dizziness can be of peripheral or central origin. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of peripheral vertigo and is currently considered to account for about 14-42% of all cases of vertigo, depending on the authors [2-4]. However, this figure may be underestimated due to frequent misdiagnoses.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of this paper is to review the currently available international literature on the use of the TRV chair so as to assess its usefulness and effectiveness in the diagnostics and possibly subsequent treatment of BPPV and its components.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> Included in this literature review are peer-reviewed papers authored by various research teams as available in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The TRV chair is helpful in precise diagnosis and subsequent treatment of BPPV subtypes (canalithiasis and cupulolithiasis) as well as in the evaluation of the number of affected canals, as shown in the papers analyzed in this review.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> The use of TRV in the context of diagnosis and therapy of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo presents with potential for the improvement of diagnostic results, management protocols, and patients\' quality of lives.</br>.

UNASSIGNED: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common vestibular disease. Both therapeutic and diagnostic benefits with mechanical rotation chairs (MRCs) for management of BPPV have been reported. No previous studies have compared diagnostics in MRCs to traditional diagnostics on an examination bed.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate the agreement between BPPV diagnostics performed with an MRC and traditional diagnostics on an examination bed. Secondary objectives were to (1) examine if the two test modalities differ in diagnostic properties when diagnosing largely untreated patients referred from general practitioners (uncomplicated BPPV) compared to patients referred from private ENTs (complicated BPPV) and (2) examine whether impaired participant cooperation during Manual Diagnostics (MDs) alters agreement, sensitivity and specificity.
UNASSIGNED: Prospective randomized clinical trial in which patients with a case history of BPPV were recruited by referrals from general practitioners, otorhinolaryngologists and other hospital departments in the Northern Region of Denmark. Participants underwent diagnostic examinations twice: once by traditional MDs on an examination bed and once with an MRC. Initial examiner and order of test modality were randomized. Examiners were blinded to each other\'s findings.
UNASSIGNED: When testing the ability to diagnose BPPV, agreement between the two test modalities, was 0.83, Cohen\'s kappa 0.66. When comparing MD diagnostics to MRC diagnostics (set as gold standard diagnostics following test result interpretation), values for MDs were: sensitivity 71%, specificity 98%, Negative Predictive Value 73%, and Positive Predictive Value 97%. Agreement regarding BPPV subtype classification was found to be 0.71, and Cohen\'s kappa 0.58. Agreement when isolating the diagnosis to posterior canalolithiasis (p-CAN) was 0.89, Cohen\'s kappa 0.78.
UNASSIGNED: Diagnostics, aided by an MRC, are more sensitive than traditional manual BPPV diagnostics. The overall agreement level between test modalities was found to be weak to moderate. When isolating diagnostics to p-CAN, the level of agreement increased to \"moderate-strong.\" Results also showed higher agreement between test modalities and a significantly higher negative predictive value for MDs when examining patients referred directly from General Practitioners following no- or a single treatment attempt. The diagnostic properties of MDs improved in patients with a higher degree of cooperation.

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is one of the most common causes of peripheral vertigo and can manifest in different forms. Multicanal BPPV is rare and difficult to treat. TRV Chair is a method that offers diagnosis and treatment at the same time. The aim was to analyze the outcomes of treatment of multicanal BPPV by means of TRV Chair and compare those results with manual maneuvers.
Forty-nine subjects aged 26-73 and diagnosed with multicanal BPPV were included. Appropriate maneuvers were performed on affected canals either by TRV Chair or manually. The number of maneuvers required by TRV Chair and manual maneuver were analyzed and compared.
The mean number of maneuvers performed until the treatment was completed in manual treatment group was 2.57 ± 1.03, and in TRV group, it was 2.25 ± 1.16. No significant difference was observed between the number of maneuvers performed in either group until the end of the treatment (p > 0.05).
Neither TRV Chair nor manual maneuvers were superior to the other in the treatment of multicanal BPPV cases.

UNASSIGNED: Throughout the last decade, several mechanical rotational chairs have been developed for diagnostics and treatment of patients with a typical case history of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Sparse evidence, however, exists in terms of diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency with these mechanical rotational chairs. Also, recommendations for optimal use of these chairs are yet to be determined.
UNASSIGNED: Primary objective was to evaluate overall treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with a mechanical rotational chair and secondary objectives included description of patient- and BPPV characteristics, determination of subjective and objective outcomes, as well as analyzation of recurrence- and recurrence-related risk factors following successful treatment.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort study with 635 patients diagnosed with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and treated by means of a mechanical rotational chair during a 7-year period from 2014 to 2021 at a tertiary University hospital. Patient- and disease-specific characteristics, treatment and recurrence data were collected through reviewing of patient records.
UNASSIGNED: The mean number of required treatments was 2.7 when accounting for a six percent treatment failure rate (defined as a need of more than 10 treatments), and 3.7 when not. Bilateral mono-canal affection required 3.8 treatments, unilateral multi-canal 3.5 treatments, and the combination of bilateral and multi-canal affection 5.2 treatments. All these scenarios were associated with significantly higher numbers of required treatments when compared to unilateral mono-canal affection, which required 1.9 treatments. The overall recurrence rate was 25.4 percent.
UNASSIGNED: A mechanical rotational chair provides successful treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Mechanical rotational chairs should primarily be reserved for the treatment of retractable and atypical benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients. Many aspects of the optimal use of these chairs still require elaborative assessment.

The objective was to evaluate the clinical value of repositioning chairs in management of refractory benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and to study how different BPPV subtypes respond to treatment. We performed a retrospective chart review of 150 consecutive cases with refractory vertigo referred to our clinic within a 10-month period. The BPPV patients were managed with classical manual manoeuvres, the Epley Omniax(®) rotator (EO) or the TRV chair (TRV). In addition, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed. BPPV was identified in 95 cases. The number of needed treatments for posterior canalolithiasis versus posterior cupulolithiasis, horizontal cupulolithiasis and multi-canal affection was significant (p < 0.01). Thirty-seven (38 %) patients required only one repositioning manoeuvre and the overall symptom relief was 91.7-100 % after 3 treatments. Eleven patients (12 %) experienced relapse within the ½-year follow-up period. Horizontal cupulolithiasis and multi-canal affection constituted the most resilient cases. The literature search identified 9 repositioning chair studies. The EO and the TRV are highly valuable assets in diagnosis and management of BPPV of particularly complex and refractory cases. However, further validation is anticipated through controlled clinical trials.