BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) benefits patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but the underlying biological processes are unclear. We conducted an epigenome-wide association study in 32 TRD patients undergoing ECT to depict ECT-associated methylation changes. Illness severity and ECT outcomes were assessed with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale at baseline (T0) and 1 month after its end (T1). Methylation was profiled at T0 and T1 with the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip array.
RESULTS: Longitudinal T0-T1 analyses showed 3 differentially methylated probes (DMPs) with nominal p values ≤ 10-5, with 2 annotated in the genes CYB5B and PVRL4. Including covariates, we found 4 DMPs for symptoms variation, annotated in FAM20C, EPB41, OTUB1 and ADARB1, and 3 DMPs for response status, with 2 annotated in IQCE and FAM20C. Regional analysis revealed 54 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) with nominal p value area ≤ 0.05, with 9 presenting adjusted p-value area ≤ 0.10, annotated in MCF2L, SLC25A24, RUNX3, MIR637, FOXK2, FAM180B, POU6F1, ALS2CL and CCRL2. Considering covariates, we found 21 DMRs for symptoms variation and 26 DMRs for response (nominal p value area ≤ 0.05), with 4 presenting adjusted p-value area ≤ 0.10 for response, annotated in SNORD34, NLRP6, GALNT2 and SFT2D3. None remained significant after false discovery rate correction. Notably, ADARB1 variants are associated with suicide attempt in patients with psychiatric disorders, and SLC25A24 relates to conduct disorder. Several DMPs and DMRs are annotated in genes associated with inflammatory/immune processes. Longitudinal analyses on females (n = 22) revealed statistically significant DMRs (adjusted p value area ≤ 0.05) and trend-significant DMRs (adjusted p value area ≤ 0.07) for symptoms variation and response status, annotated in genes related to psychiatric disorders (ZFP57, POLD4, TRIM10, GAS7, ADORA2A, TOLLIP), trauma exposure (RIPOR2) and inflammatory/immune responses (LAT, DLX4, POLD4, FAM30A, H19). Pathway analysis on females revealed enrichment for transcriptional activity, growth factors, DNA maintenance, and immune pathways including IRF7 and IRF2.
CONCLUSIONS: Although no significant results were found for the whole cohort, the study provides insights into ECT-associated methylation changes, highlighting DMPs and DMRs related to ECT outcomes. Analyses on females revealed significant DMRs and pathways related to psychiatric disorders and inflammatory/immune processes.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch\'s 2-sample t tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9-15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.
RESULTS: Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (n = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (n = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (n = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (n = 11), lateral habenula (n = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (n = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (p < .001) and last follow-up (p = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, p = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, p = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (p = .044).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.

Calophaca sinica is a rare plant endemic to northern China which belongs to the Fabaceae family and possesses rich nutritional value. To support the preservation of the genetic resources of this plant, we have successfully generated a high-quality genome of C. sinica (1.06 Gb). Notably, transposable elements (TEs) constituted ~73% of the genome, with long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) dominating this group of elements (~54% of the genome). The average intron length of the C. sinica genome was noticeably longer than what has been observed for closely related species. The expansion of LTR-RTs and elongated introns emerged had the largest influence on the enlarged genome size of C. sinica in comparison to other Fabaceae species. The proliferation of TEs could be explained by certain modes of gene duplication, namely, whole genome duplication (WGD) and dispersed duplication (DSD). Gene family expansion, which was found to enhance genes associated with metabolism, genetic maintenance, and environmental stress resistance, was a result of transposed duplicated genes (TRD) and WGD. The presented genomic analysis sheds light on the genetic architecture of C. sinica, as well as provides a starting point for future evolutionary biology, ecology, and functional genomics studies centred around C. sinica and closely related species.

Ketamine has been repeatedly demonstrated to be an effective treatment in the management of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). An important question is whether it is equally or more effective than the current gold standard of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), as the adverse effects of ECT can lead to memory loss and neurocognitive deficits. A literature search was conducted for trials that directly compared the efficacy and adverse effects of ketamine and ECT via PubMed and Google Scholar. A total of 56 articles were identified with six included in this review. The studies included differed significantly in their quality and with differing levels of potential for bias. Ketamine has a more immediate effect when compared to ECT, but the antidepressant effects are shorter-lasting. Cognitive deficits were less pronounced in patients undergoing ketamine therapy. Many studies had a small number of participants and varied widely in the type of ECT used. Allocation bias seems likely in nonrandomized studies. Follow-up times were also short in some studies. The existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to support the usage of ketamine over that of ECT for TRD, as remission rates were significantly higher over extended periods in ECT groups. Cognitive adverse effects were more pronounced in patients undergoing ECT. More high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing these two treatment modalities are required before drawing any firm conclusions.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine is the prototypal rapid-acting antidepressant (RAAD) for TRD with approved indication for esketamine-nasal spray (ESK-NS). Distinctly, arketamine (R-KET) demonstrates enhanced antidepressant effects and neuroplasticity changes compared to esketamine, with fewer dissociative side effects and abuse potential. This study focuses on R-ketamine\'s therapeutic implications, safety, and tolerability in TRD treatment.
METHODS: We report on a year-long follow-up of three TRD patients post-single IV R-KET administration. The study, conducted under the clinical trial PCN-101 (NCT05414422), observed these subjects for healthcare resource utilization and social support system impact. Participants, adults diagnosed with recurrent major depressive disorder without psychotic features, were observed in a year-long follow-up period for safety.
RESULTS: Case analyses revealed significant symptom reduction and improved social and vocational functioning, with reduced sick leaves and hospitalizations post-treatment. However, one case developed a substance use disorder, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring. The study highlights R-KET\'s transformative potential in managing depression, indicating a shift in TRD treatment strategies towards early, aggressive interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite promising findings, the study faces limitations due to its small sample size, lack of randomization, and potential observational design biases. The results, while aligning with existing ketamine research, require cautious interpretation and warrant further investigation with larger, more robust studies. This exploration of R-KET\'s role in home-based TRD treatment opens avenues for future research, particularly focusing on its long-term effectiveness and safety in diverse patient populations. This study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06232291.

Management of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a major public health challenge, also due to the lack of a consensus around TRD definition. We investigated the impact of different definitions of TRD on identifying patients with distinct features in terms of baseline characteristics, treatment strategies, and clinical outcome. We conducted a prospective naturalistic study on 538 depressed inpatients. Patients were screened for treatment resistance by two TRD definitions: looser criteria (lTRD) and stricter criteria (sTRD). We compared baseline characteristics, treatment and clinical outcome between the TRD groups and their non-TRD counterparts. 52.97 % of patients were identified as lTRD, only 28.81 % met the criteria for sTRD. sTRD patients showed lower rates of remission and slower symptom reduction compared to non-TRD patients and received more challenging treatments. Surprisingly, patients identified as sTRD also exhibited lower rates of psychiatric comorbidities, including personality disorders, substance abuse, or alcohol misuse. Stricter TRD criteria identify patients with worse clinical outcomes. Looser criteria may lead to overdiagnosis and over treatment. Clinical features known to be possible risk factors for TRD, as psychiatric comorbidities, showed to be more suggestive of a \"difficult to manage\" depression rather than a proper TRD.

BACKGROUND: Due to its rapid antidepressant effect, ketamine has recently been clinically translated for people with treatment-resistant depression. However, its cognitive profile remains unclear, particularly with repeated and higher doses. In the present study, we report the cognitive results from a recent large multicentre randomised controlled trial, the Ketamine for Adult Depression Study (KADS).
METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel group, multicentre phase 3 trial study we investigated potential cognitive changes following repeated treatment of subcutaneous racemic ketamine compared to an active comparator, midazolam, over 4 weeks, which involved two cohorts; Cohort 1 involved a fixed dose treatment protocol (0.5 mg/kg ketamine), Cohort 2 involved a dose escalation protocol (0.5-0.9 mg/kg) based on mood outcomes. Participants with treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) were recruited from 7 mood disorder centres and were randomly assigned to receive ketamine (Cohort 1 n = 33; Cohort 2 n = 53) or midazolam (Cohort 1 n = 35; Cohort 2 n = 53) in a 1:1 ratio. Cognitive measurements were assessed at baseline and at the end of randomised treatment.
RESULTS: Results showed that in Cohort 1, there were no differences between ketamine and midazolam in cognitive outcomes. For Cohort 2, there was similarly no difference between conditions for cognitive outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The study included two Cohorts with different dosing regimes.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the cognitive safety of repeated fixed and escalating doses at least in the short-term in people with treatment resistant MDD.

BACKGROUND: Treatment resistant depression (TRD) is considered when an individual fails to respond to two or more different antidepressants in adequate doses, duration and with adequate adherence within the same major depressive episode.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical profiles of TRD patients through data from electronic healthcare records and compare characteristics and treatment pathways of ethnic minority and non-minority patients in UK.
METHODS: A retrospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study of patients with TRD was carried out in 10 Mental Health NHS Foundation Trusts in the Akrivia Health/UK Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) system network. The CRIS system was used as a means of analysing de-identified data across 3.2 million anonymised patients\' records.
RESULTS: 10,048 patient records were deemed eligible for this study, of which 20.2 % of patients identified as BAME, and 79.8 % patients identified as White. Overall, around half of the patients were likely to be prescribed an antidepressant within 2 months of the MDD diagnosis. White patients were prescribed more antidepressants than the BAME group (p < 0.001), with a significant effect size for comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: The nature of the data source limited the ability to filter for short treatment durations as clinicians did not often record concrete medication end-dates in clinical note fields.
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in care pathways between ethnic groups in relation to TRD patients. It is vital to understand factors causing these potential clinical biases and increase awareness and education to deliver the most effective treatments for TRD in ethnic minority patients.

BACKGROUND: Deficiency of C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) protein, caused by pathogenic variants in the Serpin family G member 1 (SERPING1) gene, is the commonest pathophysiological abnormality (in ∼95 % cases) in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE). C1-INH protein provides negative control over kallikrein-kinin system (KKS). Although the inheritance of the HAE-C1-INH is autosomal dominant, female predominance has often been observed in patients with HAE.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk of transmission of SERPING1 gene variant from father or mother to their offspring.
METHODS: Pedigree charts of 42 families with a confirmed diagnosis of HAE-C1-INH and a pathogenic variant in the SERPING1 gene were analysed. Patients with HAE who had had at least one child were included for analyses to assess the risk of transmission from the father or mother to their offspring.
RESULTS: Overall, 49 % (189/385) of all offspring inherited the genetic defect. In the subgroup analyses, 54.8 % (90/164) female offspring and 44.8 % (99/221; p < 0.02) male offspring inherited the genetic defect. Inheritance of the genetic defect was significantly lower in male offspring. Fathers with SERPING1 gene variant had a statistically significant skewed transmission of the wild type to the male offspring as compared to the variant (57.8 % wild type vs. 42.1 % variant; p < 0.02), whereas no statistically significant difference was found when a father transmitted the variant to a female offspring. Mothers with SERPING1 gene variant had no statistically significant difference in variant transmission to male or female offsprings.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study suggest that the transmission pattern of SERPING1 gene variant favours the transmission of wild-type alleles in males, especially when the father is the carrier; hence, overall, fewer males and more female offspring inherited the variant. This could be because of a selection of wild-type male sperms during spermatogenesis, as the KLK system has been reported to play a crucial role in the regulation of spermatogenesis. Although, a similar pattern was observed in the maternal transmission of the SERPING1 gene variant; the difference was not statistically significant, likely because of a small sample size.