TRAVEL

Travel
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们评估并预测了卡利居民获得放射治疗服务的累积机会,哥伦比亚,在考虑交通拥堵的同时,使用以公平为重点的以人为本的新方法。此外,我们确定了1-2个最佳地点,在这些地点,新服务将最大限度地提高可访问性。我们利用开放数据和公开的大数据。卡利是南美洲受交通拥堵影响最大的城市之一。
    方法:采用以人为本的方法,我们测试了通过迭代参与式设计开发的基于网络的数字平台。该平台集成了开放数据,包括放射治疗服务的位置,人口和居住地的分类社会人口微观数据,以及来自GoogleDistanceMatrixAPI的旅行时间大数据。我们使用遗传算法来确定新服务的最佳位置。我们预测了交通的无障碍累积机会(ACO),从高峰拥堵到自由流量条件,并对2020年7月6日至12日和2020年11月23日至29日进行了每小时评估。交互式数字平台是公开可用的。
    方法:我们根据汽车旅行的20分钟可达性累积机会(ACO)等时线,提供描述性统计和人口分布热图。这些旅行时间阈值没有设定的国家或国际标准。大多数关键线人认为20分钟的阈值是合理的。这些等时线将居住地交通分析区的人口加权质心连接到放射治疗服务的相应区域,在从自由流量到高峰交通拥堵水平的变化交通状况下,旅行时间最短。此外,我们进行了时间序列双变量分析,以评估基于经济阶层的地理可达性。我们确定了1-2个最佳位置,在这些位置中,新服务将在高峰交通拥堵期间最大化20分钟的ACO。
    结果:交通拥堵显著降低了放射治疗服务的可及性,尤其影响到弱势群体。例如,在2020年7月6日至12日的一周内,乘坐汽车20分钟ACO的城市人口从20分钟内到达服务的卡利城市人口的91%下降到高峰交通期间的31%。百分比代表从其住所到放射治疗服务的20分钟车程内的人口。具体的民族,受教育程度较低的人,卡利郊区的居民经历了不成比例的影响,在高峰交通期间,可达性下降到11%,而在低收入家庭的自由流动交通期间,可达性下降到81%。我们预测,战略性地在东部卡利的1-2个地点增加足够的服务将显着增强可访问性并减少不平等现象。在我们的两个测量中,新服务的推荐位置保持一致。这些发现强调了在医疗保健可及性方面优先考虑公平和全面护理的重要性。它们还提供了一种实用的方法来优化服务位置以减轻差距。将这种方法扩展到包括其他运输方式,服务,和城市,或更新测量,是可行的和负担得起的。新方法和数据对规划当局和城市发展行为者特别相关。
    In this study, we evaluated and forecasted the cumulative opportunities for residents to access radiotherapy services in Cali, Colombia, while accounting for traffic congestion, using a new people-centred methodology with an equity focus. Furthermore, we identified 1-2 optimal locations where new services would maximise accessibility. We utilised open data and publicly available big data. Cali is one of South America\'s cities most impacted by traffic congestion.
    METHODS: Using a people-centred approach, we tested a web-based digital platform developed through an iterative participatory design. The platform integrates open data, including the location of radiotherapy services, the disaggregated sociodemographic microdata for the population and places of residence, and big data for travel times from Google Distance Matrix API. We used genetic algorithms to identify optimal locations for new services. We predicted accessibility cumulative opportunities (ACO) for traffic ranging from peak congestion to free-flow conditions with hourly assessments for 6-12 July 2020 and 23-29 November 2020. The interactive digital platform is openly available.
    METHODS: We present descriptive statistics and population distribution heatmaps based on 20-min accessibility cumulative opportunities (ACO) isochrones for car journeys. There is no set national or international standard for these travel time thresholds. Most key informants found the 20-min threshold reasonable. These isochrones connect the population-weighted centroid of the traffic analysis zone at the place of residence to the corresponding zone of the radiotherapy service with the shortest travel time under varying traffic conditions ranging from free-flow to peak-traffic congestion levels. Additionally, we conducted a time-series bivariate analysis to assess geographical accessibility based on economic stratum. We identify 1-2 optimal locations where new services would maximize the 20-min ACO during peak-traffic congestion.
    RESULTS: Traffic congestion significantly diminished accessibility to radiotherapy services, particularly affecting vulnerable populations. For instance, urban 20-min ACO by car dropped from 91% of Cali\'s urban population within a 20-min journey to the service during free-flow traffic to 31% during peak traffic for the week of 6-12 July 2020. Percentages represent the population within a 20-min journey by car from their residence to a radiotherapy service. Specific ethnic groups, individuals with lower educational attainment, and residents on the outskirts of Cali experienced disproportionate effects, with accessibility decreasing to 11% during peak traffic compared to 81% during free-flow traffic for low-income households. We predict that strategically adding sufficient services in 1-2 locations in eastern Cali would notably enhance accessibility and reduce inequities. The recommended locations for new services remained consistent in both of our measurements.These findings underscore the significance of prioritising equity and comprehensive care in healthcare accessibility. They also offer a practical approach to optimising service locations to mitigate disparities. Expanding this approach to encompass other transportation modes, services, and cities, or updating measurements, is feasible and affordable. The new approach and data are particularly relevant for planning authorities and urban development actors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    国家综合癌症网络指南为最佳个体部位和阶段特异性治疗提供了循证共识。这是2010年至2016年国家癌症数据库中11,121例晚期口腔癌患者的队列研究。我们假设患者的旅行距离可能会影响治疗选择和结果。我们将旅行距离(英里)分成四分位数(D1-4)并评估治疗选择,设施类型,和生存结果与旅行距离的关系。单变量和多变量分析解决了特定变量的贡献。与黑人患者(D1)相比,白人患者最有可能旅行最远(D4)进行治疗。城市地区的患者比农村地区的患者旅行距离短。更大的旅行距离与在学术中心接受手术治疗和治疗的患者相关。D1患者的中位生存期在所有距离四分位数中最低。基于手术的多模式治疗(手术和放疗)的中位生存期明显高于非手术治疗。包括旅行距离和治疗设施在内的几个因素与晚期口腔癌的生存结果相关。考虑这些因素可能有助于改善该患者人群的预后。
    The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines provide evidence-based consensus for optimal individual site- and stage-specific treatments. This is a cohort study of 11,121 late-stage oral cancer patients in the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016. We hypothesized that patient travel distance may affect treatment choices and impact outcome. We split travel distance (miles) into quartiles (D1-4) and assessed treatment choices, type of facility, and survival outcome in relation to distance traveled. Univariate and multivariate analyses addressed contributions of specific variables. White patients were most likely to travel farthest (D4) for treatment compared to Black patients (D1). Urban area patients traveled shorter distances than those from rural areas. Greater travel distance was associated with patients undergoing surgical-based therapies and treatment at academic centers. Patients in D1 had the lowest median survival of all distance quartiles. Surgery-based multimodality treatment (surgery and radiation) had a median survival significantly greater than for non-surgical therapy. Several factors including travel distance and treatment facility were associated with survival outcomes for late-stage oral cavity cancers. Consideration of these factors may help improve the outcome for this patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不同地点之间的旅行时间构成了大多数当代空间可达性衡量标准的基础。旅行时间允许估计人与地方之间互动的潜力,因此是理解功能的重要措施,可持续性和城市的公平。这里,我们提供了一个开放的旅行时间矩阵数据集,该数据集描述了覆盖赫尔辛基都会区的网格(N=13,132)中所有单元格的质心之间的旅行时间,芬兰。数据集中记录的旅行时间遵循门到门的方法,为步行提供可比的旅行时间,骑自行车,公共交通和汽车旅行,包括每种模式的每次行程的所有行程,比如步行到公共汽车站,或者寻找停车位。我们使用了r5pyPython包,我们专门为这种计算开发的。数据对昼夜变化和人之间的变化(例如,缓慢和快速的步行速度)敏感。我们根据GoogleDirectionsAPI验证了数据,并从规划实践中展示了用例。指导数据集设计和生产的五个关键原则-可比性,简单,再现性,可转移性,以及对时间和人际变化的敏感性-确保城市和交通规划者,企业和研究人员都可以在广泛的应用程序中使用这些数据。
    Travel times between different locations form the basis for most contemporary measures of spatial accessibility. Travel times allow to estimate the potential for interaction between people and places, and is therefore a vital measure for understanding the functioning, sustainability, and equity of cities. Here, we provide an open travel time matrix dataset that describes travel times between the centroids of all cells in a grid (N = 13,132) covering the metropolitan area of Helsinki, Finland. The travel times recorded in the dataset follow a door-to-door approach that provides comparable travel times for walking, cycling, public transport and car journeys, including all legs of each trip by each mode, such as the walk to a bus stop, or the search for a parking spot. We used the r5py Python package, that we developed specifically for this computation. The data are sensitive to diurnal variations and to variations between people (e.g. slow and fast walking speed). We validated the data against the Google Directions API and present use cases from a planning practice. The five key principles that guided the data set design and production - comparability, simplicity, reproducibility, transferability, and sensitivity to temporal and interpersonal variations - ensure that urban and transport planners, business and researchers alike can use the data in a wide range of applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    估计24小时紧急服务的旅行时间是模拟卫生服务可及性的重要组成部分,尤其是农村地区。然而,用于估计旅行时间的方法差异很大,不能代表居住人口,并且没有公开验证。这使得研究之间基于旅行的可访问性指标的评估无法比较。为了解决这一问题,并制定应急服务准入的标准化测量,这项研究利用了小地理单位(传播区-DA)和代表市政等效物的地理边界(人口普查细分-CSD)。使用每个CSD生成的人口加权旅行时间,计算了居住DA的质心到每个24小时急诊科之间的估计旅行时间。该数据集提供了与紧急服务的接近度的全国一致测量,其中包括旅行路径和人口分布。该方法可以扩展为其他医疗保健资源生成估计的最短旅行路线,或根据个人对医疗保健系统的经验开发实际旅行路线。
    Estimating travel time to 24-hour emergency services is an important component to modelling accessibility of health services, particularly for rural areas. However, methods used to estimate travel time vary significantly, are not representative of the residential population, and are not openly validated. This makes the assessment of travel-based accessibility metrics between studies incomparable. To address this issue and develop a standardized measurement of emergency service access, this study utilized small geographic units (Dissemination Areas - DA) and geographical boundaries representative of municipal equivalents (Census Subdivision - CSD). Estimated travel times between the centroid of an inhabited DA to each 24-hr emergency department was computed with population-weighted travel times generated for each CSD. This dataset provides a nationally consistent measurement of proximity to emergency services accounting for travel pathing and population distribution. This methodology can be extended to generate estimated shortest travel routes for other healthcare resources or develop actual travel routes based on individuals\' experiences with the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    寨卡病毒感染,最常导致良性虫媒病毒病或无症状感染,很少有格林-巴利综合征,会成为孕妇的问题,由于胎儿畸形的风险,特别是小头畸形与它的神经嗜性有关。在2015年至2017年期间,在整个拉丁美洲观察到了最近的大规模流行病,造成了数十万例病例。传播主要是矢量传播,但是已经描述了性传播,主要是旅行者,尽管它无疑在疫区传播中占很大比例。这篇综述的目的是描述这种性传播,主要是通过与拉丁美洲这种大规模流行病有关的例子,来描述与生殖器分泌物中传染性病毒颗粒长期排泄的联系,尤其是精液,还有阴道分泌物,并强调除了媒介传播之外的可能的预防措施,特别是孕妇或希望怀孕的妇女需要避免访问描述寨卡病毒传播的国家。
    Zika virus infection, most oft n responsible for a benign arboviral disease or an asymptomatic infection, rarely Guillain-Barré syndrome, can become problematic in pregnant women, due to a risk of fetal malformations, in particular microcephaly linked to its neurotropism. The most recent large-scale epidemic was observed throughout Latin America between 2015 and 2017, causing several hundred thousand cases. Transmission is predominantly vector-borne, but sexual transmission has been described, mainly among travelers, although it undoubtedly accounts for a significant proportion of transmission in epidemic areas. The aim of this review is to describe this sexual transmission, mainly through examples linked to this large-scale epidemic in Latin America, to describe the link with prolonged excretion of infectious viral particles in genital secretions, especially semen but also vaginal secretions, and to highlight possible preventive measures apart from vector transmission, in particular the need for pregnant women or women wishing to become pregnant to avoid visiting countries where circulation of Zika virus is described.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Vasdeki,Dimitra,GeorgiosTsamos,KleonikiI.Athanasiadou,瓦西里基·米歇尔,EvangelosBotsarakos,MichaelDoumas,KalliopiKotsa,还有TheocharisKoufakis.在糖尿病的云层之上:从病理生理考虑到安全飞行的实际建议。高AltMedBiol。00:00-00,2024.背景:近几十年来,糖尿病的患病率一直呈上升趋势,导致越来越多的糖尿病旅行者寻求医疗专业人员的旅行前建议。方法:这篇叙述性综述总结了糖尿病与航空旅行之间有趣关联的现有证据,分析安全和认证协议,并为飞行期间的糖尿病管理提供实用建议。结果:在航空旅行期间,糖尿病患者面临饮食选择不当带来的挑战,限制获得药物和医疗保健服务,药物给药间隔的中断,和暴露在飞机机舱的低压条件下。此外,糖尿病患者,尤其是那些用胰岛素治疗的人,传统上被认为没有资格成为专业飞行员。然而,这种方法逐渐改变,许多国家现在正在实施严格的协议,以确定糖尿病飞行员是否有资格运营航班。结论:鉴于在日常临床实践中越来越多地使用技术和新药,有必要在该领域进行进一步的研究,以揭示现有的知识差距,并确保糖尿病患者的安全飞行。
    Vasdeki, Dimitra, Georgios Tsamos, Kleoniki I. Athanasiadou, Vasiliki Michou, Evangelos Botsarakos, Michael Doumas, Kalliopi Kotsa, and Theocharis Koufakis. Above the clouds with diabetes: From pathophysiological considerations to practical recommendations for safe flights. High Alt Med Biol. 00:00-00, 2024. Background: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been following an increasing trend in the last decades, leading to a growing number of travelers with diabetes seeking pretravel advice from medical professionals. Methods: This narrative review summarizes the existing evidence on the intriguing association between diabetes and air travel, analyzes safety and certification protocols, and provides practical recommendations for the management of diabetes during flights. Results: During air travel, individuals with diabetes face challenges arising from inappropriate dietary options, restricted access to medications and healthcare services, disruption of medication dosing intervals, and exposure to hypobaric conditions in the airplane cabin. In addition, people with diabetes, especially those treated with insulin, have traditionally been considered ineligible to become professional pilots. However, this approach gradually changes and numerous countries are now implementing strict protocols to determine the eligibility of pilots with diabetes to operate flights. Conclusions: Given the increasing use of technology and new drugs in daily clinical practice, there is a need for further research in the field to shed light on existing knowledge gaps and ensure safe flights for people with diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对COVID-19大流行期间有效使用国际旅行措施的评估侧重于公共卫生目标,即限制病毒的引入和继续传播。然而,基于风险的方法包括将公共卫生目标与潜在的社会,经济和其他次要影响。因此,推进基于风险的方法需要更充分地了解有关此类影响的现有证据。
    方法:我们对COVID-19大流行期间国际旅行措施的社会影响的现有研究进行了范围审查。应用标准化的旅行措施类型,和五类社会影响,我们检索了9个数据库,涉及公共卫生和社会科学的多个学科.我们确定了26项纳入研究,并审查了它们的范围,方法,旅行措施的类型,并分析了社会影响。
    结果:这些研究涵盖了各种国家环境,重点关注高收入国家。研究了广泛的人群,在他们的出境或入境旅行中受到阻碍。大多数研究集中在2020年,当旅行限制被广泛引入时,但是对长期使用的更广泛影响的关注有限。研究主要使用定性或混合方法,适应公共卫生措施。大多数研究集中在旅行限制上,作为一种旅行措施,通常与国内公共卫生措施相结合,这使得很难确定其具体的社会影响。所有五类社会影响都被观察到,尽管人们非常强调负面的社会影响,包括家庭分离,工作机会减少,生活质量下降,无法满足文化需求。少数国家确定了积极的社会影响,例如恢复了工作与生活的平衡以及对安全和保障的看法增加。
    结论:虽然国际旅行措施是COVID-19大流行期间最具争议的干预措施之一,鉴于它们的长期使用和对个人和人群的广泛影响,对其次要影响的研究仍然有限。如果要推进基于风险的方法,涉及公共卫生和其他政策目标之间的知情选择,有必要更好地理解这些影响,包括它们在不同人群和环境中的不同影响。
    BACKGROUND: Assessment of the effective use of international travel measures during the COVID-19 pandemic has focused on public health goals, namely limiting virus introduction and onward transmission. However, risk-based approaches includes the weighing of public health goals against potential social, economic and other secondary impacts. Advancing risk-based approaches thus requires fuller understanding of available evidence on such impacts.
    METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of existing studies of the social impacts of international travel measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applying a standardized typology of travel measures, and five categories of social impact, we searched 9 databases across multiple disciplines spanning public health and the social sciences. We identified 26 studies for inclusion and reviewed their scope, methods, type of travel measure, and social impacts analysed.
    RESULTS: The studies cover a diverse range of national settings with a strong focus on high-income countries. A broad range of populations are studied, hindered in their outbound or inbound travel. Most studies focus on 2020 when travel restrictions were widely introduced, but limited attention is given to the broader effects of their prolonged use. Studies primarily used qualitative or mixed methods, with adaptations to comply with public health measures. Most studies focused on travel restrictions, as one type of travel measure, often combined with domestic public health measures, making it difficult to determine their specific social impacts. All five categories of social impacts were observed although there was a strong emphasis on negative social impacts including family separation, decreased work opportunities, reduced quality of life, and inability to meet cultural needs. A small number of countries identified positive social impacts such as restored work-life balance and an increase in perceptions of safety and security.
    CONCLUSIONS: While international travel measures were among the most controversial interventions applied during the COVID-19 pandemic, given their prolonged use and widespread impacts on individuals and populations, there remains limited study of their secondary impacts. If risk-based approaches are to be advanced, involving informed choices between public health and other policy goals, there is a need to better understand such impacts, including their differential impacts across diverse populations and settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号