暂无摘要。

Background/Objectives: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immuno-mediated cutaneous disease characterized by a prominent TNFα-IL23/IL17 immune axis. In recent years, targeted therapies have become standard practice for managing moderate-to-severe psoriasis and have demonstrated efficacy. At the same time, identifying factors associated with the success or failure of TNFα inhibitor therapy remains one of the most difficult aspects in psoriasis treatment. Methods: A clinical, non-randomized study was conducted to evaluate the impact of TNFα inhibitors on the plasma cytokine profiles in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris (ICD-10 code L40.0). The patients were treated with either etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab for 16 weeks. Plasma cytokine profiles were assessed using a BioPlex200 System. Results: By the 16th week of therapy, a positive treatment response (PASI ≥ 75) was observed in 51 patients (63%), while 30 patients (37%) showed no response (PASI ≤ 50). When using etanercept, a positive effect was observed in 11 patients (41%), in 14 patients (52%) using adalimumab, and in 26 patients (96%) using infliximab. Analysis of the baseline cytokine levels revealed no differences between the \"positive effect\" and \"no effect\" groups, except for IL20, which was 2.61 times higher in the \"positive effect\" group compared to the \"no effect\" group, suggesting its potential predictive role in the effectiveness of therapy with TNFα inhibitors. Treatment led to a decrease in IL17F, IL31, sCD40L, and VEGF for all patients, and in IL20 for the \"positive effect\" group. The increase in ICAM1 in the \"no effect\" group suggests the possible retention of active migration and the fixation of T cells in the affected skin in these patients. No significant difference in cytokine levels was observed when categorizing patients into subgroups based on the effectiveness of therapy with etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab; only a pre- and post-treatment difference in the whole cohort was noted. A random forest model showed the importance of VEGF, sCD40L, and ICAM1. Conclusions: The baseline levels of VEGF, sCD40L, and ICAM1, as well as IL20, could serve as potential predictors of treatment effectiveness using TNFa inhibitors. However, this hypothesis requires confirmation with a larger patient population.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is involved in the occurrence of negative pregnancy outcomes. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the immunosuppressive TNFα inhibitors (TNFαi) in the treatment of patients with a history of recurrent reproductive failure in the context of COVID-19 pandemics. We reviewed 85 patients who received TNFαi (certolizumab pegol) during Mainland China\'s first wave of COVID-19 pandemic, from 21st Nov 2022-11 th Jan 2023. We also collected corresponding data from 130 pregnant patients who never used TNFαi for comparison. There were no significant differences in the history of previous pregnancy loss, miscarriage, embryo implantation failure, comorbidities and doses of COVID-19 vaccination. 82.2% and 87.7% pregnant patients contracted primary COVID-19 with symptoms in TNFαi group and no-TNFαi group. Duration of symptoms was significantly longer in TNFαi group and the incidences of cough and lethargy was significantly higher in TNFαi group. Both groups reported similar severity to same-aged close contacts, similar rates of other symptoms and hospitalization. No deaths were reported. In the in vitro fertilization (IVF) subgroup, we achieved a biochemical pregnancy loss rate of 17.4%, miscarriage rate of 21.7%, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate of 34.2%. COVID-19 did not influence the live birth rate. We concluded that TNFαi administration in pregnancy was not associated with increased susceptivity to and severity of COVID-19. However, TNFαi users showed more prominent symptoms and longer recovery time. The pregnancy outcomes with TNFαi in such high-risk group for pregnancy loss was satisfactory.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is a pivotal cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of certain inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthropathies, and inflammatory bowel diseases. In the last two decades, TNFα inhibitors (TNFi) have revolutionized the treatment and outcome of the above disorders. However, the use of TNFi has been associated with the development of many autoimmune phenomena and paradoxical skin manifestations that may present as the same type of clinical indications for which the TNFi effectively used. Thus, they may display as arthritis, uveitis, colitis, psoriasis, and several other cutaneous clinical manifestations, among them the development of morphea, a localized scleroderma skin lesion.
METHODS: We describe a 58-year-old woman with seronegative RA, refractory to methotrexate, who was treated with ABP-501 (Hefiya), an adalimumab (ADA) biosimilar and developed an oval-shaped, deep skin lesion of approximately 3.5cm in size, affecting the left part of her back compatible with morphea 3 months after the initiation of therapy. ADA biosimilar was discontinued and two months later, she had substantial skin improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of morphea manifestation during TNFi biosimilar since the patient had no other trigger factors for morphea development like trauma and infections. Physicians dealing with patients treated with TNFi biosimilars should be aware of paradoxical skin reactions, among them morphea; thus, close monitoring, a minute and careful clinical examination, and a follow- up check are required.

The imbalance between the kynurenine and serotonin pathways can have serious consequences, e.g., depression. One of the factors leading to the imbalance between the pathways of tryptophan metabolism is inflammation. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of treatment with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα)-inhibitors on tryptophan metabolism in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Forty patients with AS (twenty-eight males, twelve females; mean age 40 ± 11 years), qualified to receive anti-TNF-α treatment, were prospectively assessed. As a control group, 20 healthy volunteers (7 males and 13 females, mean age 38 ± 5 years) were recruited from the general population. Patients underwent full clinical and biochemical assessment before and after 6 months of therapy. Disease activity was assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). The presence of depressive disorders was assessed with Beck\'s Depression Inventory (BDI) scale. Serum concentrations of tryptophan, serotonin, kynurenine, and quinolinic acid were measured. The predominance of the kynurenine pathway in AS patients (compared to the control group) was demonstrated (p < 0.001). Surprisingly, no significant changes in serum levels of tryptophan and its metabolites in AS patients after treatment were found, despite clinical improvement. Moreover, the components of tryptophan metabolism did not correlate significantly with the clinical activity of AS, depression nor laboratory inflammatory markers. Probably some other factors influence the pathways of tryptophan metabolism in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Introduction: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol) have revolutionized the treatment of severe immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn\'s disease, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and ulcerative colitis. This study assessed adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after the use of TNFα inhibitors in VigiAccess of the World Health Organization (WHO) and compared the adverse reaction characteristics of five inhibitors to select the drug with the least risk for individualized patient use. Methods: The study was a retrospective descriptive analysis method in design. We sorted out five marketed anti-TNFα drugs, and their ADR reports were obtained from WHO-VigiAccess. Data collection included data on the age groups, sex, and regions of patients worldwide covered by ADR reports, as well as data on disease systems and symptoms caused by ADRs recorded in annual ADR reports and reports received by the WHO. By calculating the proportion of adverse reactions reported for each drug, we compared the similarities and differences in adverse reactions for the five drugs. Results: Overall, 1,403,273 adverse events (AEs) related to the five anti-TNFα agents had been reported in VigiAccess at the time of the search. The results show that the 10 most commonly reported AE manifestations were rash, arthralgia, rheumatoid arthritis, headache, pneumonia, psoriasis, nausea, diarrhea, pruritus, and dyspnea. The top five commonly reported AE types of anti-TNFα drugs were as follows: infections and infestations (184,909, 23.0%), musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (704,657, 28.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (122,373, 15.3%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (108,259, 13.5%), and nervous system disorders (88,498, 11.0%). The preferred terms of myelosuppression and acromegaly were obvious in golimumab. Infliximab showed a significantly higher ADR report ratio in the infusion-related reaction compared to the other four inhibitors. The rate of ADR reports for lower respiratory tract infection and other infections was the highest for golimumab. Conclusion: No causal associations could be established between the TNFα inhibitors and the ADRs. Current comparative observational studies of these inhibitors revealed common and specific adverse reactions in the ADR reports of the WHO received for these drugs. Clinicians should improve the rational use of these high-priced drugs according to the characteristics of ADRs.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the axial skeleton (axSpA) and/or the peripheral joints (p-SpA) and entheses. The natural history of SpA in the decades of the 80 and 90 s involved a progressive disease with pain, spinal stiffness, ankylosis of the axial skeleton, structural damage of peripheral joints, and a poor prognosis. In the last 20 years, enormous advances in understanding and managing SpA have occurred. With the introduction of the ASAS classification criteria and MRI, early disease recognition is now possible. The ASAS criteria widened the spectrum of SpA to include all the disease phenotypes, such as radiographic (r-axSpA), non-radiographic (nr-axSpA), and p-SpA and extraskeletal manifestations. Nowadays, the treatment of SpA is based on a shared decision between patients and rheumatologists and includes non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies. Moreover, the discovery of TNFα, IL-17, which play a pivotal role in disease pathophysiology, has revolutionized disease management. Thus, new targeted therapies and many biological agents are now available and used in SpA patients. TNFα inhibitors (TNFi), IL-17, and JAK inhibitors were proven to be efficacious, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Overall, their efficacy and safety are comparable with some differences. Sustained clinical disease remission, low disease activity, improvement of patient\'s quality of life, and prevention of progression of structural damage, are the results of the above interventions. The concept of SpA has changed in the last 20 years. The disease burden can be ameliorated by early and accurate diagnosis and targeting therapies.

Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a rare but severe form of sarcoidosis. NS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mortality is about 10% at 10 years with more than 30% of patients who have a significant disability. The most frequent features are cranial neuropathy (the facial and optic nerve most commonly affected), cranial parenchymal lesions, meningitis, spinal corn abnormalities (20-30%) and more rarely peripheral neuropathy (approximately 10-15%). The challenge of diagnosis is to eliminate other diagnoses. Atypical presentations should make to discuss the need for cerebral biopsy in order to highlight the presence of granulomatous lesions while eliminating alternative diagnosis. Therapeutic management is based on corticosteroid therapy and immunomodulators. There are no comparative prospective study to allow us to define the first-line immunosuppressive treatment and the therapeutic strategy in refractory patients. Conventional immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide are commonly used. Data on the efficacy of anti-TNFα (including infliximab) in refractory and/or severe forms are increasing during the last ten years. Additional data is necessary to assess their interest in first line in patients with severe involvement and a significant risk of relapse.

暂无摘要。

Novel biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Although they are generally safe, they are immunomodulatory and therefore unique considerations apply in regards to infections and vaccine administration. This review aims to provide a clear and practical guide for dermatologists or other healthcare providers to reference when caring for psoriasis or atopic dermatitis patients being treated with biologic therapies using currently available guidelines and clinical data. Vaccinations for approved biologics including TNFα, IL-12/23, IL-23, IL-17, and IL-4/13 inhibitors will be discussed, with a special note on current COVID-19 vaccination recommendations.