TCP, Tumor control probability

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:点阵放射治疗(LRT)是一种创新类型的空间分割放射治疗。其目的是通过施用消融剂量而不增加毒性来增加大肿瘤控制概率。考虑到越来越多的积极的临床经验,这项工作的目的是评估LRT的安全性和有效性.
    UNASSIGNED:通过在四个不同数据库上进行的系统回顾,确定了有关LRT临床经验的报告(即,Medline,Embase,Scopus,和Cochrane图书馆)到2022年8月。只有以英文发表的LRT临床报告并可访问手稿全文才被认为是合格的。遵循2020年更新版本PRISMA声明。
    UASSIGNED:从12条符合条件的记录中提取数据,包括7例病例报告,1个案例系列,4项临床研究。81例患者(84个病灶)的大病灶范围为63.2cc至3713.5cc,混合动力车,和代谢引导LRT。排除两种与轻轨有可疑关系的非常严重的毒性,现有的临床经验似乎证实了LRT的安全性.当LRT后3-6个月未达到完全缓解时,中位病变减少约≥50%.
    未经评估:此系统评价似乎表明轻轨安全性,特别是独家轻轨。非常低的证据水平和研究的异质性阻碍了对轻轨疗效得出明确的结论,尽管已经描述了病变减少方面的有趣趋势。
    UNASSIGNED: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed.
    UNASSIGNED: Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3-6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于仅头颈颌骨强度调节放射治疗(JO-IMRT)和3D适形放射治疗(3D-CRT)的仅颌骨强度调节放射治疗(JO-IMRT)技术的剂量学和放射生物学评估。为了比较利用JO-IMRT和3D-CRT技术的头颈部治疗方法,计算了不同的辐射剂量指数,包括:符合性指数(CI)、同质性指数(HI),和放射生物学变量,例如Niemierko的基于等效均匀剂量的肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的计划目标体积(PTV),危险器官(OAR)的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)(脑干,脊髓,和腮腺盛大)。
    使用ProwessPanther治疗计划系统(ProwessInc)研究了25例鼻咽患者。将结果与使用3D-CRT获得的剂量分布进行比较。
    关于肿瘤覆盖率和CI,JO-IMRT显示出比3D-CRT更好的结果。PTV接受的平均剂量非常相似:3D-CRT为72.1±0.8Gy,JO-IMRT计划为72.5±0.6Gy(p>0.05)。腮腺接受3D-CRT的平均剂量为56.7±0.7Gy,JO-IMRT的平均剂量为26.8±0.3Gy(p>0.05)。3D-CRT的HI和CI分别为0.13±0.01和0.14±0.05和(p>0.05),JO-IMRT的HI和CI分别为0.83±0.05和0.73±0.10(p<0.05)。3D-CRT的PTV平均TCP为0.82±0.08,JO-IMRT为0.92±0.02。此外,腮腺的NTCP,脑干,使用JO-IMRT的脊髓低于3D-CRT计划。与3D-CRT方法相比,JO-IMRT技术能够提高PTV的剂量覆盖率,改善目标\'sCI和HI,保留腮腺.这表明JO-IMRT相对于3D-CRT在头颈部放射治疗中的功能。
    UNASSIGNED: Dosimetric and radiobiological evaluations for the Jaws-only Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (JO-IMRT) technique for head and neck jaws-only intensity-modulated radiation therapy (JO-IMRT) and 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). To compare the head-and-neck therapeutic approaches utilizing JO-IMRT and 3D-CRT techniques, different radiation dose indices were calculated, including: conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and radiobiological variables like Niemierko\'s equivalent uniform dose based tumor control probability (TCP) of planning target volume (PTV), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of organs at risk (OAR) (brainstem, spinal cord, and parotid grand).
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-five nasopharynx patients were studied using the Prowess Panther Treatment Planning System (Prowess Inc). The results were compared with the dose distribution obtained using 3D-CRT.
    UNASSIGNED: Regarding tumor coverage and CI, JO-IMRT showed better results than 3D-CRT. The average doses received by the PTVs were quite similar: 72.1 ± 0.8 Gy by 3D-CRT and 72.5 ± 0.6 Gy by JO-IMRT plans (p > 0.05). The mean doses received by the parotid gland were 56.7 ± 0.7 Gy by 3D-CRT and 26.8 ± 0.3 Gy by JO-IMRT (p > 0.05). The HI and CI were 0.13 ± 0.01 and 0.14 ± 0.05 and (p > 0.05) by 3D-CRT and 0.83 ± 0.05 and 0.73 ± 0.10 by JO-IMRT (p < 0.05). The average TCP of PTV was 0.82 ± 0.08 by 3D-CRT and 0.92 ± 0.02 by JO-IMRT. Moreover, the NTCP of the parotid glands, brain stem, and spinal cord were lower using the JO-IMRT than 3D-CRT plans. In comparison to the 3D-CRT approach, the JO-IMRT technique was able to boost dose coverage to the PTV, improve the target\'s CI and HI, and spare the parotid glands. This suggests the power of the JO-IMRT over 3D-CRT in head-and-neck radiotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:后颅窝肿瘤占儿童脑肿瘤的三分之二。尽管在过去几年中,治疗的进展提高了生存率,幸存者的长期记忆障碍很常见,对学业成绩有影响.海马,小脑和小脑-皮层网络在几种记忆系统中起作用。它们不仅受到肿瘤本身的位置和手术切除的影响,还有补充治疗的幕上效应,特别是放疗。IMPALA研究将调查辐射剂量对参与记忆的大脑结构的影响,尤其是海马和小脑.
    方法:在这项单中心前瞻性行为和神经影像学研究中,90名参与者将被分为三组。前两组将包括儿童时期接受后颅窝脑瘤手术的患者,被认为是可以治愈的,至少5年前完成治疗,放疗(侵袭性脑肿瘤;第1组)或不放疗(低度脑肿瘤;第2组)。第3组将包括与第1组年龄相匹配的对照参与者,性别,和惯用手。所有参与者将进行一系列广泛的神经心理学测试,包括对主存储器系统的评估,并接受多模态3TMRI检查。将从初始放射治疗剂量测定中收集对记忆中涉及的不同大脑结构的照射剂量。
    结论:这项研究将提供有关四种不同记忆系统(工作记忆,情景记忆,语义记忆,和程序记忆)和认知功能(注意力,语言,执行功能)可能会干扰它们,为了更好地描述脑肿瘤幸存者的记忆缺陷。我们将研究结构(3DT1)的神经心理学和神经影像学数据之间的相关性,微观结构(DTI),功能(rs-fMRI),血管(ASL)和代谢(光谱学)对肿瘤和辐射剂量的影响。因此,这项研究将为与认知和记忆功能发展相关的备用区域提供剂量限制的设置。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04324450,于2020年3月27日注册,于1月25日更新,2021年。追溯登记,https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04324450.
    BACKGROUND: Posterior fossa tumors represent two thirds of brain tumors in children. Although progress in treatment has improved survival rates over the past few years, long-term memory impairments in survivors are frequent and have an impact on academic achievement. The hippocampi, cerebellum and cerebellar-cortical networks play a role in several memory systems. They are affected not only by the location of the tumor itself and its surgical removal, but also by the supratentorial effects of complementary treatments, particularly radiotherapy. The IMPALA study will investigate the impact of irradiation doses on brain structures involved in memory, especially the hippocampi and cerebellum.
    METHODS: In this single-center prospective behavioral and neuro-imaging study, 90 participants will be enrolled in three groups. The first two groups will include patients who underwent surgery for a posterior fossa brain tumor in childhood, who are considered to be cured, and who completed treatment at least 5 years earlier, either with radiotherapy (aggressive brain tumor; Group 1) or without (low-grade brain tumor; Group 2). Group 3 will include control participants matched with Group 1 for age, sex, and handedness. All participants will perform an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests, including an assessment of the main memory systems, and undergo multimodal 3 T MRI. The irradiation dose to the different brain structures involved in memory will be collected from the initial radiotherapy dosimetry.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study will provide long-term neuropsychological data about four different memory systems (working memory, episodic memory, semantic memory, and procedural memory) and the cognitive functions (attention, language, executive functions) that can interfere with them, in order to better characterize memory deficits among the survivors of brain tumors. We will investigate the correlations between neuropsychological and neuroimaging data on the structural (3DT1), microstructural (DTI), functional (rs-fMRI), vascular (ASL) and metabolic (spectroscopy) impact of the tumor and irradiation dose. This study will thus inform the setting of dose constraints to spare regions linked to the development of cognitive and memory functions.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04324450, registered March 27, 2020, updated January 25th, 2021. Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04324450.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号