The influence of the interventional treatment approach for transarterial radioembolization (TARE) on the incidence of extrahepatic microsphere depositions and to angiographic complications was evaluated. In total, 398 TARE cycles were analyzed. Interventional treatment approaches were classified as single treatment position (TP) with interventional occlusion (IO), multiple TPs without IO, and multiple TPs with IO. Correlations with extrahepatic microsphere depositions, angiographic complications, and periprocedural clinical events were performed. Alternative treatment strategies were evaluated. Applications from multiple TPs could have ensured the safe application of microspheres in 48.2% of cases that were originally performed from a single TP after IO. Extrahepatic microsphere accumulations were detected after 5.2%, 5.3%, and 1.5% of TARE procedures from a single TP without IO, a single TP with IO, and multiple TPs without IO, respectively. Applications from multiple TPs did not increase angiographic complications. During the 30-day follow-up, nausea/vomiting and upper abdominal discomfort were observed more frequently in the group with IO than in the group without IO (7.9%/4.6% and 9.2%/5.9%, respectively). In many TARE procedures, the same target liver can be treated from multiple TPs instead of a single TP, reducing the need for the interventional occlusion of aberrant arteries and potential extrahepatic microsphere depositions.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial radio-embolization (TARE) became a routine procedure for non-resectable liver tumor mainly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Personalized dosimetry to the index lesion increased tumor response rate. However, there is no requirement to measure the precise activity injected during TARE. We measured 90Y-glass microspheres residue (90Y-Res) in the application system after TARE and assessed its potential impact on the tumor absorbed dose (AD) previously planned with 99mTc MAA SPECT/CT.
METHODS: We measured 90Y-Res using PET/CT in all patients that underwent TARE using 90Y-glass-microspheres for non-resectable liver tumors over one year.
RESULTS: 90Y-Res was measured in 34 patients (HCC n = 22) with 61 injections, 93.1 ± 94.6 MBq [2-437] that was 4.8 ± 3.5% [0.2-13.7] in comparison to the activity measured in the sealed TheraSphere™ vial (ρ = 0.697; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We reported an average of 5% 90Y-Res using PET/CT after TARE with the strongest association to the activity in the TheraSphere™ vial. Therefore, when a high 90Y-Res is suspected on the survey meter, a 90Y-PET/CT scan of 90Y-Res might be useful as a first step to estimate if the target lesion received the recommended AD, especially in HCC patients with borderline tumor dosimetry on the pre-treatment 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to report the safety and tumor response rate of combined transarterial radioembolization (TARE) through the intrahepatic arteries and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) through the extrahepatic feeding arteries (EHFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
UNASSIGNED: Patients with HCC, who had both intrahepatic and extrahepatic arterial supply visible on preinterventional multiphase CT and were treated between 2016 and 2021 with a combination of TACE and TARE on the same nodule, were retrospectively included. Epidemiological, clinical, biological, and radiological characteristics were recorded. Safety and tumor response were assessed at 6 months.
UNASSIGNED: Nine patients (8 men, median age 62 years [IQR: 54-72 years]) were included. Seven patients had previous treatments on the target nodule (TARE: 5; TACE: 2). The median longest axis (LA) of the lesion was 70 mm (IQR: 60-79 mm). Three patients had portal vein invasion (VP3). The EHFA originated from the right diaphragmatic artery (n = 6), the right adrenal artery (n = 2), and the left gastric artery (n = 1). The LA of the tumor portion treated with TACE was 47 mm (range: 35-64 mm). The ratio between the LA of the entire lesion and the LA treated with TACE was 1.44 (range: 1.27-1.7). One major complication occurred: acute on chronic liver failure. Median follow-up was 23 months (range: 16-29 months). Seven patients underwent further treatment: on the same lesion (n = 2), on newly appeared nodules (n = 2), and systemic treatment (n = 3). At 6-month follow-up, seven patients showed a local objective response. Time-to-progression was 13 (3.5-19) months.
UNASSIGNED: The combination of TARE and extrahepatic TACE for HCC with both intrahepatic and extrahepatic arterial supplies seems feasible and safe. Further studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of these preliminary results.

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with 166Ho-loaded microspheres is an established locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), introduced in 2010. This study evaluates the clinical outcome of patients with HCC who underwent 166Ho-TARE with personalized dosimetry. Twenty-seven patients with 36 TARE procedures were analyzed. Treatment planning, execution, and evaluation was possible without complications in all cases. At the 3-month follow-up, disease control in the treated liver was achieved in 81.8% of patients (complete remission, partial remission, and stable disease in 36.4%, 31.8%, and 13.6%, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) was 17.2 months, and progression-free survival (PFS) in the treated liver was 11 months. Statistically significant positive correlations were observed between the achieved radiation dose for the tumor and both PFS (r = 0.62, p < 0.05) and OS (r = 0.48, p < 0.05), suggesting a direct dose-response relationship. The calculated achieved dose was 8.25 Gy lower than the planned dose, with relevant variance between planned and achieved doses in individual cases. These results confirm the efficacy of the 166Ho-TARE holmium platform and underscore the potential of voxel-based, personalized dosimetry to improve clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the response and survival outcomes of yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (90Y-TARE) for unresectable, liver-dominant metastases from primary neoplasms other than colorectal carcinoma.
METHODS: This study included 1474 patients enrolled in the RESiN registry who received resin 90Y-TARE as part of their oncologic management for unresectable primary or secondary liver tumors (NCT02685631). 33% (481/1474) were treated for liver metastases of non-colorectal origin (m-nonCRC), compared to 34% (497/1474) treated for colorectal liver metastases (mCRC) and 34% (496/1474) treated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment response and cancer survival probabilities were computed and compared for each primary cancer type. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare survival outcomes.
RESULTS: Radiological responses were observed in 12 unique cancer types, mostly heavily pre-treated malignancies refractory to multiple lines of systemic therapies. The overall use of resin 90Y-TARE in m-nonCRC resulted in better treatment outcomes in terms of duration of response, progression free survival, time to progression and overall survival (P = 0.04, P = 0.02, P = 0.01, P = 0.04). Analyses of cancer cell types revealed that metastatic neuroendocrine tumor, sarcoma, and ovarian, renal, prostate, and breast cancers were associated with superior treatment outcomes, whereas worse treatment outcomes were observed in metastatic lung, gastric, pancreatic and esophageal cancers.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data demonstrate the use of resin 90Y-TARE in m-nonCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy. For some cell types, this expanded use achieved superior treatment outcomes relative to the reference standard of mCRC, suggesting the need for inquiry into broadened indications for 90Y-TARE.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver who have progressed on first-line chemotherapy (EPOCH) demonstrated superior outcomes using yttrium-90 glass microspheres plus chemotherapy (TARE/Chemo) vs chemotherapy (Chemo) to treat colorectal liver metastases. Additional exploratory analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of TARE/Chemo on efficacy, safety, time to subsequent therapy, time to deterioration in quality of life (QoL), and identify criteria for improved patient selection.
METHODS: Time to deterioration in QoL was analyzed for the primary study population. Subsequently, a post hoc analysis was undertaken to identify subgroups for which time to deterioration in QoL was improved with TARE/Chemo vs Chemo. Progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic (h)PFS, time to subsequent therapy, and safety outcomes were compared between treatments.
RESULTS: The primary population showed no significant difference in time to deterioration in QoL between treatment arms; however, significance was seen in 2 identified subgroups, namely: Subgroup A (N = 303) which excluded patients with both Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 1 and baseline CEA ≥ 35 ng/mL from both treatment arms; subgroup B (N = 168) additionally excluded patients with KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma) mutation. In subgroup A, TARE/Chemo patients (N = 143) demonstrated superior outcomes vs Chemo (N = 160): PFS (9.4 vs. 7.6 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 1-sided P = .0020), hPFS (10.8 vs. 7.6 months, HR: 0.53; 1-sided P < .0001), time to deterioration in QoL (5.7 vs. 3.9 months, HR: 0.65; 1-sided P = .0063), and time to subsequent therapy (21.2 vs. 10.5 months, HR: 0.52; 1-sided P < .0001). Subgroup B patients showed similar but larger significant differences between treatment arms. Median PFS, hPFS, and time to deterioration in QoL were numerically greater for TARE/Chemo in both subgroups vs the primary population, with the greatest magnitude of difference in subgroup B. Both subgroups exhibited higher percentage of CEA responders and improved ORR with TARE/Chemo vs chemo alone. Safety (reported as event rate/100 patient-years) was higher with Chemo in all populations. Additional efficacy analyses in the primary population are also reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Careful patient selection, including consideration of the prognostic factors ECOG, baseline CEA, and KRAS status, sets outcome expectations in patients with colorectal liver metastases suitable for TARE/Chemo as second-line treatment (Trial Registry Number: NCT01483027).

OBJECTIVE: To determine 6-month interim safety, effectiveness, and multimodal imageability of imageable glass microsphere yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a first-in-human trial.
METHODS: Imageable microspheres (Eye90 Microspheres; ABK Biomedical, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada), a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Breakthrough-Designated Device consisting of glass radiopaque 90Y microspheres visible on computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission CT (SPECT), were used to treat 6 subjects with unresectable HCC. Patients underwent selective (≤2 segments) treatment in a prospective open-label pilot trial. Key inclusion criteria included liver-only HCC, performance status ≤1, total lesion diameter ≤9 cm, and Child-Pugh A status. Prospective partition dosimetry was utilized. Safety (measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v5), multimodal imageability on CT and SPECT, and 3- and 6-month imaging response by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were evaluated.
RESULTS: Seven tumors in 6 subjects were treated and followed to 180 days. Administration success was 100%. Microsphere distribution measured by radiopacity on CT correlated with SPECT. Ninety-day target lesion complete response (CR) was observed in 3 of 6 subjects (50%) and partial response (PR) in 2 (33.3%). At 180 days, target lesion CR was maintained in 3 subjects (50%) and PR in 1 (16.7%). Two subjects could not be reassessed, having undergone intervening chemoembolization. All subjects reported adverse events (AEs), and 5 reported AEs related to treatment. There were no treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization using imageable microspheres was safe and effective in 6 subjects with unresectable HCC at 6-month interim analysis. Microsphere distribution by radiopacity on CT correlated with radioactivity distribution by SPECT, providing previously unavailable CT-based tumor targeting information.

Transcatheter arterial radioembolization (TARE) is a common locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. It is associated with peptic ulcer disease in up to 5% of patients. A 70-year-old man with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and liver cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TARE 6 months earlier was evaluated for continued melena and was found to have an ulcer in the excluded stomach. This was successfully treated with liquid proton pump inhibitor through gastrostomy tube to the excluded stomach. This represents a unique case of successful management of TARE-induced peptic ulcer disease in the excluded stomach of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patient.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The prognosis for HCC depends on the tumor stage, and curative therapies are more accessible in the early stages. However, effective treatments are available even in advanced stages. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an alternative to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with reduced risk and extended disease progression time. Identifying prognostic indicators and treatment response biomarkers remains crucial. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between biomarkers related to fibrosis, liver function, and immune inflammation with tumor response to yttrium 90 transarterial radiotherapy (Y90 or TARE) in patients with HCC.
METHODS: This study enrolled patients who underwent Y90 radiotherapy for bridging, downstaging, or palliative treatment after discussion in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), tumor response was classified into two groups: \"responders\" (complete and partial response) and \"non-responders\" (stable and progressive disease). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between predictors, biomarkers such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, MELD sodium, and the systemic immune-inflammatory indexes, at established cut-offs and tumor response.
RESULTS: Of 35 patients, 22 (63%) were Whites and non-Hispanics, 32 (91%) were diagnosed with cirrhosis, and 14 (40%) of these had a viral etiology. According to mRECIST, 18 (51%) patients were classified as \"responders.\" In multivariable logistic regression analysis, biomarkers associated with tumor response were ALBI score ≤-2.8 (odds ratio (OR) 6.1, 95%CI 2.7-14.4) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≤ 1.92 (OR 5.1, 95%CI 0.8-11.9). Biomarkers had moderate accuracy in predicting tumor response (C-statistic 0.75).
CONCLUSIONS: The ALBI score is a reliable predictor of treatment response following TARE. The NLR index may offer further prognostic information, and both biomarkers can be used in combination; however, further research in larger sample sets is needed.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study is to explore the relationship between changes in sarcopenia before and after one to three months of Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) treatment with Holmium-166 (166Ho) and its effect on the rate of local response. Our primary objective is to assess whether the worsening of sarcopenia can function as an early indicator of a subgroup of patients at increased risk of disease progression in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 25 patients with HCC who underwent 166Ho-TARE. Sarcopenia status was defined according to the measurement of the psoas muscle index (PMI) at baseline, one month, and three months after TARE. Radiological response according to mRECIST criteria was assessed and patients were grouped into responders and non-responders. The loco-regional response rate was evaluated for all patients before and after treatment, and was compared with sarcopenia status to identify any potential correlation.
RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were analyzed. According to the sarcopenia status at 1 month and 3 months, two groups were defined as follows: patients in which the deltaPMI was stable or increased (No-Sarcopenia group; n = 12) vs. patients in which the deltaPMI decreased (Sarcopenia group; n = 8). Three months after TARE, a significant difference in sarcopenia status was noted (p = 0.041) between the responders and non-responders, with the non-responder group showing a decrease in the sarcopenia values with a median deltaPMI of -0.57, compared to a median deltaPMI of 0.12 in the responder group. Therefore, deltaPMI measured three months post-TARE can be considered as a predictive biomarker for the local response rate (p = 0.028). Lastly, a minor deltaPMI variation (>-0.293) was found to be indicative of positive treatment outcomes (p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The decline in sarcopenia three months post-TARE with Holmium-166 is a reliable predictor of worse loco-regional response rate, as evaluated radiologically, in patients with HCC. Sarcopenia measurement has the potential to be a valuable assessment tool in the management of HCC patients undergoing TARE. However, further prospective and randomized studies involving larger cohorts are necessary to confirm and validate these findings.