Systolic blood pressure

收缩压
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) is an innovative procedure designed to regulate the renal sympathetic nervous system for the control of arterial hypertension (HTN). RDN has emerged as an alternative for patients with resistant HTN. However, the clinical efficacy of RDN remains incompletely elucidated.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of RDN with sham procedure or pharmacological treatment in patients with resistant HTN. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test I2 statistics. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled across trials. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The primary outcomes of interest were changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and serum creatinine.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs comprising 3345 patients were included in this meta-analysis, whereby 2004 (59.91%) received renal denervation and 1341 (40.09%) received pharmacological treatment or sham procedure. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 48 months. Compared to control group, RDN significantly reduced SBP (MD -3.53 mm Hg; 95% CI -5.94 to -1.12; p = 0.004; I2 = 74%) and DBP (MD -1.48 mm Hg; 95% CI -2.56 to -0.40; p = 0.007; I2 = 51%). Regarding serum creatinine (MD -2.51; 95% CI -7.90 to 2.87; p = 0.36; I2 = 40%), there was no significant difference between RDN and control groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with resistant HTN, RDN was associated with a reduction in SBP and DBP compared to sham procedure or pharmacological treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Die renale Denervierung (RDN) ist ein innovatives Verfahren zur Regulierung des renalen sympathischen Nervensystems zur Kontrolle der arteriellen Hypertonie (HTN). Die RDN stellt eine Alternative für Patienten mit therapieresistenter Hypertonie dar. Die klinische Wirksamkeit der RDN ist jedoch noch nicht vollständig erforscht.
    METHODS: Die Datenbanken PubMed, Embase und Cochrane wurden nach randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCTs) durchgesehen, in denen die Anwendung von RDN mit einem Sham-Verfahren bzw. einer pharmakologischen Behandlung bei Patienten mit therapieresistenter HTN verglichen wurde. Die statistischen Analysen wurden mit R Studio 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Wien, Österreich) durchgeführt, die Heterogenität mit dem Cochran-Q-Test und der I2-Statistik untersucht. Der mittlere Unterschied (MD) mit 95%-Konfidenzintervall (KI) wurde über die Studien hinweg gepoolt. P-Werte <0,05 wurden als statistisch signifikant angesehen. Die primären Endpunkte von Interesse waren die Veränderung des systolischen Blutdrucks (SBP), des diastolischen Blutdrucks (DBP) und des Serumkreatinins gegenüber dem Ausgangswert.
    UNASSIGNED: Einundzwanzig RCTs mit 3345 Patienten wurden in die Metaanalyse einbezogen, von denen 2004 (59,91%) eine renale Denervierung und 1341 (40,09%) eine pharmakologische Behandlung bzw. eine Sham-Behandlung erhalten hatten. Das Follow-up reichte von 2–48 Monaten. Im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe senkte die RDN den SBP (MD -3,53 mm Hg; 95%-KI -5,94 bis -1,12; p = 0,004; I2 = 74%) und DBP (MD -1,48 mm Hg; 95%-KI -2,56 bis -0,40; p = 0,007; I2 = 51%). Hinsichtlich des Serumkreatinins (MD -2,51; 95%-KI -7,90 bis 2,87; p = 0,36; I2 = 40%) gab es keinen signifikanten Unterschied zwischen der RDN- und der Kontrollgruppe.
    UNASSIGNED: In dieser Metaanalyse von RCTs bei Patienten mit therapieresistenter HTN war die RDN – im Vergleich zur Scheinbehandlung bzw. einer pharmakologischen Behandlung – mit einer Senkung des SBP und DBP verbunden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)的最新进展促使研究人员扩展到眼组学领域;视网膜与系统健康之间的关联。与在良好识别的视网膜特征上训练的传统AI模型不同,大多数眼组学模型使用的视网膜表型更微妙。因此,应用常规工具,比如显著性地图,要了解眼组学模型如何得出它们的推论是有问题的,并且容易产生偏见。我们假设神经元激活模式(NAP)可能是解释眼组学模型的替代方法,但是目前,大多数现有的实现侧重于故障诊断。在这项研究中,我们设计了一个新的NAP框架来解释眼组学模型.然后,我们将我们的框架应用于AI模型,从英国Biobank数据集中的眼底图像预测收缩压。我们发现,从我们的框架产生的NAP与心血管风险的临床相关终点相关。我们的NAP还能够在分配了相同预测收缩压的参与者中辨别出两个生物学上不同的组。这些结果证明了我们提出的NAP框架的可行性,可以更深入地了解眼组学模型的功能。需要进一步的工作来在外部数据集上验证这些结果。
    Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have prompted researchers to expand into the field of oculomics; the association between the retina and systemic health. Unlike conventional AI models trained on well-recognized retinal features, the retinal phenotypes that most oculomics models use are more subtle. Consequently, applying conventional tools, such as saliency maps, to understand how oculomics models arrive at their inference is problematic and open to bias. We hypothesized that neuron activation patterns (NAPs) could be an alternative way to interpret oculomics models, but currently, most existing implementations focus on failure diagnosis. In this study, we designed a novel NAP framework to interpret an oculomics model. We then applied our framework to an AI model predicting systolic blood pressure from fundus images in the United Kingdom Biobank dataset. We found that the NAP generated from our framework was correlated to the clinically relevant endpoint of cardiovascular risk. Our NAP was also able to discern two biologically distinct groups among participants who were assigned the same predicted systolic blood pressure. These results demonstrate the feasibility of our proposed NAP framework for gaining deeper insights into the functioning of oculomics models. Further work is required to validate these results on external datasets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多研究已经证明了食用奇亚籽对代谢因素的积极影响。然而,临床试验结果不一致.
    目的:本研究的目的是对现有的随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以探讨奇亚籽食用对体重(BW)的影响。身体成分,血压,和血糖控制。
    方法:对Scopus进行了全面搜索,PubMed,Medline通过Ovid,ISIWebofScience,和截至2023年8月的学者谷歌数据库。
    方法:感兴趣的结果包括收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP),BW,体重指数(BMI),身体脂肪百分比,腰围(WC),空腹血糖(FBG),和血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)。
    方法:使用加权平均差(WMD)和95%CI来确定效应大小。
    结果:共8项符合条件的研究纳入分析。研究结果表明,SBP(WMD:-7.19mmHg;95%CI,-10.63至-3.73;P<.001)和DBP(WMD:-6.04mmHg,95%CI,-9.58至-2.49;P=.001)。然而,对BW没有观察到显著影响,身体脂肪百分比,WC,BMI,FBG,和HbA1c。亚组分析表明,在基线SBP小于140mmHg的参与者中,chia种子对SBP的影响是显着的,但效果不依赖于给药剂量。
    结论:Chia种子消费对SBP和DBP有积极影响,但对BW没有显著影响,身体成分,或血糖参数。然而,在解释这些发现时,纳入研究的数据量有限应被视为一种局限性.
    背景:PROSPERO注册号。CRD42023462575。
    BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated the positive effects on metabolic factors of consuming chia seeds. However, the results of clinical trials have been inconsistent.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials to explore the effects of chia seed consumption on body weight (BW), body composition, blood pressure, and glycemic control.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on the Scopus, PubMed, Medline via Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and Scholar Google databases up to August 2023.
    METHODS: The outcomes of interest included systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), BW, body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, waist circumference (WC), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
    METHODS: Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CIs were used to determine the effect size.
    RESULTS: A total of 8 eligible studies were included in the analysis. The findings revealed a significant reduction in SBP (WMD: -7.19 mmHg; 95% CI, -10.63 to -3.73; P < .001) and DBP (WMD: -6.04 mmHg, 95% CI, -9.58 to -2.49; P = .001). However, no significant effects were observed on BW, body fat percentage, WC, BMI, FBG, and HbA1c. Subgroup analysis indicated that the effect of chia seed on SBP was significant in participants with a baseline SBP of less than 140 mmHg, but the effect was not dependent on the administered dose.
    CONCLUSIONS: Chia seed consumption has positive effects on SBP and DBP but does not significantly impact BW, body composition, or glycemic parameters. However, the limited amount of data from included studies should be considered as a limitation while interpreting these findings.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023462575.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    管理大血管闭塞患者的血压会影响梗死面积和临床结局。我们研究了在机械血栓切除术期间恢复血流如何影响全身血压。
    对2016年6月至2018年1月接受机械血栓切除术的前循环大血管闭塞患者进行筛查。我们纳入了在局部麻醉或清醒镇静下治疗的患者,并分析了标准化的麻醉方案,以评估整个过程中的收缩压和舒张压水平。主要结果是血压的变化,比较最后一次再通尝试前5分钟与后5分钟。成功的再灌注定义为脑梗死溶栓评分2b。
    在134名患者中,117(87%)成功实现血管造影再灌注,血流恢复后5分钟显示明显的收缩压下降(10.2±14.6vs3.24±8.65mmHg,p=0.009)。成功的血管造影再灌注是多变量逻辑回归降低的重要预测因子:OR=1.34(95%CI:1.03-1.73,p=0.0299)。在66名没有服用影响循环的药物的患者中,收缩压也显著降低(155±17mmHg至148±17mmHg;p<0.001).舒张压无明显变化。
    在局部麻醉或清醒镇静下接受机械再通的患者,血流恢复与收缩压值立即降低相关。这表明血管内中风治疗与心血管血流动力学之间存在复杂的相互作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Managing blood pressure in patients with large vessel occlusion affects infarct size and clinical outcomes. We examined how restoring blood flow impacts systemic blood pressure during mechanical thrombectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation undergoing mechanical thrombectomy between June 2016 and January 2018 were screened. We included those treated under local anesthesia or conscious sedation and analyzed standardized anesthesia protocols to assess systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels throughout the procedure. The primary outcome was the change of blood pressure, compared 5 min before versus 5 min after the last recanalization attempt. Successful reperfusion was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ⩾ 2b.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 134 patients, 117 (87%) achieved successful angiographic reperfusion, showing a notable systolic blood pressure drop 5 min after flow restoration (10.2 ± 14.6 vs 3.24 ± 8.65 mm Hg, p = 0.009). Successful angiographic reperfusion was a significant predictor for this decrease in multivariable logistic regression: OR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.03-1.73, p = 0.0299). Among 66 patients not given circulation-affecting meds, a significant systolic pressure reduction was also observed (155 ± 17 mm Hg to 148 ± 17 mm Hg ; p < 0.001). No diastolic pressure changes were significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Flow restoration was associated with an immediate reduction of systolic blood pressure values in patients undergoing mechanical recanalization under local anesthesia or conscious sedation. This suggests a complex interplay between endovascular stroke therapy and cardiovascular hemodynamics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卒中是一种常见的脑血管疾病。血压升高是初始和复发性中风的最重要的可控制因素。尽管远程医疗和移动健康技术(mHealth)在控制中风患者的血压方面具有潜在的好处,仍然存在怀疑。
    目的:本研究对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估远程医疗和移动健康干预在控制脑卒中患者血压方面的有效性。
    方法:我们确定了随机对照试验(RCT),从每个数据库的起始日期到2024年1月2日,评估远程医疗和mHealth技术干预对中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者血压的干预措施通过系统搜索PubMed,EMBASE,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆数据库。Cochrane偏差风险工具(ROB2.0)用于评估研究质量。通过元回归探索异质性的来源,亚组分析,敏感性分析和发表偏倚评估。采用R4.2.2统计软件进行Meta分析。
    结果:共纳入13项随机对照试验,共3803名参与者。荟萃分析发现,远程医疗和mHealth改善了两者的收缩压控制[MD=-4.37,95%CI(-5.50,-3.24),I2=43%,P<0.00001]和舒张压[MD=-1.72,95%CI(-2.45,-0.98),I2=0%,与常规护理组相比,脑卒中患者P<0.00001。接受远程医疗和mHealth干预的卒中患者的用药依从性比常规护理提高[SMD=0.52,95%CI(0.03,1.00),I2=90%,P<0.00001]。Meta回归和亚组分析确定了影响卒中患者收缩压和舒张压控制的几个关键因素。包括中风患者是否有高血压,采用的远程医疗和移动健康干预措施的具体形式,这些干预的持续时间,以及干预间隔的频率。
    结论:总体而言,远程医疗和mHealth使卒中患者的收缩压平均降低了4.37mmHg,舒张压平均降低了1.72mmHg,与常规治疗相比,药物依从性得到改善。作为一种新兴的医学模式,远程医疗和移动健康干预为未来脑卒中患者的血压管理创造了良好的前景。
    BACKGROUND: Stroke is a common cerebrovascular disease. Elevated blood pressure is the most significant manageable factor for both initial and recurrent strokes. Despite the potential benefits of telemedicine and mobile health technology (mHealth) in managing blood pressure among stroke patients, there remains skepticism.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the effectiveness of telemedicine and mHealth interventions in managing blood pressure in stroke patients.
    METHODS: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating telemedicine and mHealth technology interventions for blood pressure in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) from the inception date of each database up to January 2, 2024 by systematic searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2.0) was used to evaluate study quality. Sources of heterogeneity were explored through Meta-regression, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using R 4.2.2 statistical software.
    RESULTS: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials with 3803 participants were included. The meta-analysis found that telemedicine and mHealth improved control of both systolic [MD = -4.37, 95 % CI (-5.50, -3.24), I2 = 43 %, P<0.00001] and diastolic blood pressures [MD = -1.72, 95 % CI (-2.45, -0.98), I2 = 0 %, P<0.00001] in stroke patients compared to the conventional care group. Stroke patients who received telemedicine and mHealth interventions showed improved medication adherence than usual care [SMD=0.52, 95 % CI (0.03, 1.00), I2 = 90 %, P<0.00001]. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified several key factors influencing systolic and diastolic blood pressure control in stroke patients, including whether stroke patients have hypertension, the specific forms of telemedicine and mHealth interventions employed, the duration of these interventions, and the frequency of intervention intervals.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, telemedicine and mHealth reduced stroke patients\' systolic blood pressure by an average of 4.37 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by an average of 1.72 mm Hg and improved medication adherence compared with usual care. As an emerging medical model, telemedicine and mHealth intervention create a good prospect for the management of blood pressure in stroke patients in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在高血压患者中,收缩压(SBP)达到目标(TTR)的时间与较低的不良临床结局风险相关。短期24小时SBPTTR对预测普通人群心力衰竭(HF)风险是否有效仍不清楚.这项前瞻性研究旨在调查现实环境中24小时SBPTTR与HF的关联。基于开滦县的研究,用线性插值计算24小时SBP目标范围,定义为110-140mmHg。在分析中包括的5152名参与者中,186例(3.61%)发生在平均随访6.96年期间。与SBPTTR为0至<25%的参与者相比,那些TTR为75%至100%的人患HF的风险降低47%(危险比[HR],0.53;95%置信区间[CI],0.32-0.89)。受限样条曲线描绘了SBPTTR和入射HF之间的反比关系。此外,添加SBPTTR,而不是意味着SBP和SBP变化,传统的风险模型对HF的预测值有增量影响,综合判别改善值为0.31%(P=0.0003),无类别净重新分类改善值为19.79%(P=0.0081)。较高的SBPTTR与较低的HF事件风险相关。在110至140mmHg内达到SBP的努力可能是预防HF的有效策略。
    Systolic blood pressure (SBP) time in target (TTR) over months were associated with lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients, whether short-term of 24-h SBP TTR was effective in predicting heart failure (HF) risk in the general population remained unclear. This prospective study aimed to investigate the association of 24-h SBP TTR with HF in the real-world settings. Based on Kailuan study, 24-h SBP target range defined as 110-140 mmHg was calculated with linear interpolation. Among 5152 participants included in the analysis, 186 (3.61%) cases of incident HF occurred during a median follow-up of 6.96 years. Compared with participants with SBP TTR of 0 to <25%, those with TTR of 75% to 100% had 47% lower risk of HF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.89). The restricted spline curve depicted an inverse relationship between SBP TTR and incident HF. Additionally, the addition of SBP TTR, rather than mean SBP and SBP variation, to a conventional risk model had an incremental effect on the predictive value for HF, with integrated discrimination improvement value of 0.31% (P = 0.0003) and category-free net reclassification improvement value of 19.79% (P = 0.0081). Higher SBP TTR was associated with a lower risk of incident HF. Efforts to attain SBP within 110 to 140 mmHg may be an effective strategy to prevent HF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在采用双样本孟德尔随机化(TSMR)框架研究血压(BP)水平与脑动脉夹层(CAD)风险之间的潜在因果关系。
    方法:利用大规模全基因组关联研究(GWAS)检索的数据,我们采用了各种MR技术,包括逆方差加权(IVW),MR-Egger回归,加权中位数,和加权模式,确定BP对CAD的因果影响。计算MR-Egger截距以评估多效性的存在,通过科克伦的Q统计量确定异质性。
    结果:研究结果强调了收缩压升高(SBP;IVW:OR=3.09,95%CI:1.11-8.61,p=0.031)和舒张压升高(DBP;IVW:OR=2.17,95%CI:1.14-6.21,p=0.023)与CAD风险之间的显着关联。灵敏度分析加强了这些结果的稳健性和可靠性。
    结论:这项TSMR研究的结果表明,高SBP和DBP与CAD的可能性增加之间存在因果关系,这提供了在血压控制下降低CAD风险的遗传证据。
    BACKGROUND: We aim to investigate the potential causal link between blood pressure (BP) levels and cerebral artery dissection (CAD) risk employing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) framework.
    METHODS: Utilizing large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS)-retrieved data, we employed various MR techniques, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and weighted mode, to ascertain BP\'s causal impact on CAD. The MR-Egger intercept was calculated to assess pleiotropy presence, determining heterogeneity by Cochran\'s Q statistic.
    RESULTS: The findings highlighted a significant association between elevated systolic BP (SBP; IVW: OR=3.09, 95% CI: 1.11-8.61, p=0.031) and increased diastolic BP (DBP; IVW: OR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.14-6.21, p=0.023) with CAD risk. Sensitivity analyses reinforced the robustness and reliability of these results.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results from this TSMR study suggest a causal link between high SBP and DBP and the increased likelihood of CAD, which provide genetic evidence for a reduced risk of CAD under blood pressure control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽抑制剂(ARNI)对心力衰竭(HF)有效,射血分数降低,但低血压是一个严重的并发症.ARNI相关低血压的预测因素尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定对伴有ARNI的HF患者给予ARNI后低血压的预测因子。这项回顾性多中心观察研究分析了2020年8月至2021年7月期间使用ARNI治疗的138例连续HF患者的数据。治疗后由ARNI引起的低血压定义为(A)收缩压(SBP)低于第1四分位数≤25mmHg,(B)绝对SBP≤103mmHg。在基线测量SBP,ARNI治疗后,首次随访时作为门诊患者,第7天住院患者。心房颤动的存在,和更大的BUN/Cr比率,在多变量分析中,基线时的SBP是ARNI给药后低血压的重要独立预测因子.在43例房颤患者中,心电图上的细f波在低血压组中明显更普遍。ARNI给药后血压的稳健降低与AF和升高的BUN/Cr相关。这突出了对HF患者施用ARNI时需要谨慎。
    Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) are effective against heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, but hypotension is a significant complication. Predictors of ARNI-associated hypotension remain unclear. This study aimed to determine predictors of hypotension after administering an ARNI to patients with HF accompanied by ARNI.This retrospective multicenter observational study analyzed data from 138 consecutive patients with HF treated with an ARNI between August 2020 and July 2021. Hypotension attributed to an ARNI after treatment was defined as (A) systolic blood pressure (SBP) below the 1st quartile ≤ 25 mmHg, and as (B) absolute SBP ≤ 103 mmHg. SBP was measured at baseline, after ARNI treatment, at first follow-up as outpatients and on day 7 for inpatients. Presence of atrial fibrillation, and greater BUN/Cr ratio, and SBP at baseline were significant independent predictors for hypotension after ARNI administration on multivariate analyses. Among 43 patients with AF, fine f-waves on electrocardiograms were significantly more prevalent in the hypotensive group.A robust reduction in blood pressure after ARNI administration is associated with AF and elevated BUN/Cr. This highlights the need for caution when administering ARNI to patients with HF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经评估了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗可以减缓肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者的疾病进展,但迄今为止证据很少.因此,我们的荟萃分析旨在探讨ARB治疗作为HCM患者潜在的疾病改善治疗的疗效.
    使用PubMed进行了文献检索,Scopus,WebofScience,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库从开始到12月13日,2021年。我们仅纳入随机对照试验(RCTs)。纳入研究的质量通过Cochrane协作工具进行评估。主要结果包括左心室质量减少和心肌功能障碍的其他超声心动图特征改善。次要结果是收缩压净降低。使用合并标准化平均差(SMD)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)进行荟萃分析。
    共筛选了1286篇文章。7项RCTs符合纳入标准,共397例HCM患者(195例患者为ARB组)。ARB治疗与左心室质量显著降低相关(SMD:-0.77;95%CI:-1.40,-0.03;p=0.04)。ARB治疗还与收缩压的显着降低相关(SMD:-0.33;95%CI:-0.61,-0.05:p=0.02)。
    ARB治疗可显著降低肥厚型心肌病患者的左心室质量和收缩压。我们建议对更大的患者人群进行进一步研究,以证实我们的荟萃分析的结果。
    OSF注册管理机构,DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/DAS7C。
    UNASSIGNED: Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy has been evaluated to slow down the disease progression in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but there is scarce evidence available to date. Therefore, our meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of ARB therapy as a potential disease-modifying treatment in patients with HCM.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to December 13th, 2021. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality of included studies was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool. Primary outcomes included the reduction in left ventricular mass and improvement in other echocardiographic features of myocardial dysfunction. The secondary outcome was a net reduction in systolic blood pressure. Meta-analysis was performed using pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1286 articles were screened. Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria representing a total of 397 patients with HCM (195 patients were in the ARB group). ARB treatment was associated with significant reduction in left ventricular mass (SMD: -0.77; 95% CI: -1.40, -0.03; p = 0.04). ARB therapy was also associated with a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -0.61, -0.05: p = 0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: ARB therapy is associated with a marked reduction in left ventricular mass and systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We recommend further studies with a larger patient population size to confirm the findings of our meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: OSF Registries, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DAS7C.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:收缩压(SBP)是卒中早期神经功能恶化(END)的预测因子。我们对ARAMIS试验进行了二次分析,以研究基线SBP是否影响双联抗血小板与静脉注射阿替普酶对END的影响。
    方法:该事后分析包括治疗后分析集中的患者。根据SBP在入院时,患者分为SBP≥140mmHg和SBP<140mmHg亚组.在每个子组中,根据实际接受的研究药物,将患者进一步分为双重抗血小板治疗组和静脉注射阿替普酶治疗组.主要结果是结束,定义为在24小时内NIHSS评分从基线增加≥2。我们研究了双联抗血小板和静脉注射阿替普酶对SBP亚组END的影响及其与亚组的相互作用效应。
    结果:共纳入723例接受治疗的分析组患者:344例被分配到双重抗血小板组,379例被分配到静脉阿替普酶组。对于主要结果,在SBP≥140mmHg的亚组中,双联抗血小板的治疗效果更高(调整RD,-5.2%;95%CI,-8.2%至-2.3%;p<0.001),SBP<140mmHg亚组无影响(调整RD,-0.1%;95%CI,-8.0%至7.7%;p=0.97),但未发现亚组之间的显著交互作用(调整后p=0.20).
    结论:在轻度非致残性急性缺血性卒中患者中,当基线SBP≥140mmHg时,双重抗血小板在预防24小时内END方面可能优于阿替普酶.
    BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was a predictor of early neurological deterioration (END) in stroke. We performed a secondary analysis of ARAMIS trial to investigate whether baseline SBP affects the effect of dual antiplatelet versus intravenous alteplase on END.
    METHODS: This post hoc analysis included patients in the as-treated analysis set. According to SBP at admission, patients were divided into SBP ≥140 mmHg and SBP <140 mmHg subgroups. In each subgroup, patients were further classified into dual antiplatelet and intravenous alteplase treatment groups based on study drug actually received. Primary outcome was END, defined as an increase of ≥2 in the NIHSS score from baseline within 24 h. We investigated effect of dual antiplatelet vs intravenous alteplase on END in SBP subgroups and their interaction effect with subgroups.
    RESULTS: A total of 723 patients from as-treated analysis set were included: 344 were assigned into dual antiplatelet group and 379 into intravenous alteplase group. For primary outcome, there was more treatment effect of dual antiplatelet in SBP ≥140 mmHg subgroup (adjusted RD, -5.2%; 95% CI, -8.2% to -2.3%; p < 0.001) and no effect in SBP <140 mmHg subgroup (adjusted RD, -0.1%; 95% CI, -8.0% to 7.7%; p = 0.97), but no significant interaction between subgroups was found (adjusted p = 0.20).
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with minor nondisabling acute ischemic stroke, dual antiplatelet may be better than alteplase with respect to preventing END within 24 h when baseline SBP ≥140 mmHg.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号