Symptom score

症状评分
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于广泛的可变临床症状与其他疾病和在治疗期间迅速恢复正常的诊断性生物标志物重叠,因此很难识别维生素B12缺乏症并评估B12治疗的效果。这带来了延迟诊断的风险和统一监测B12治疗效果的挑战。需要一种适用于临床实践和临床评估研究的新的临床结果度量。
    开发患者报告的结果测量(PROM),以测量维生素B12缺乏症状的严重程度。
    B12PROM是通过(1)收集专家和文献综述的输入来定义构造并开发概念模型,(2)处理来自医疗保健提供者的输入,科学家,和患者制定项目和反应选择,(3)根据外行人的反馈改进项目,测试面试,对患者进行半结构化认知访谈,以及向前和向后平移(ENG-NL)。
    B12PROM包括62个项目,分为与维生素B12缺乏相关的8类症状(一般,感官,思考,在四肢和/或面部,运动,情感,口和腹部,尿路和生殖器官)。认知访谈表现出良好的可理解性和全面性。
    这项研究是针对维生素B12缺乏的疾病特异性PROM发展的第一步,以测量症状的负担。在PROM可以应用于临床实践和研究之前,需要进一步的验证和可靠性测试。
    简单的语言标题制定用于临床实践和研究的维生素B12缺乏问卷简单的语言摘要本研究是制定维生素B12缺乏问卷以衡量维生素B12缺乏症状严重程度的第一步。问卷包括62个项目,分为8类与维生素B12缺乏相关的症状(一般,感官,思考,在四肢和/或面部,运动,情感,口和腹部,尿路和生殖器官)。对患者的访谈表明问卷具有良好的可理解性和全面性。在将问卷应用于临床实践和研究之前,需要进一步的测试。
    UNASSIGNED: It is difficult to recognize vitamin B12 deficiency and to evaluate the effect of B12 treatment due to a broad range of variable clinical symptoms overlapping with other diseases and diagnostic biomarkers that quickly normalize during treatment. This poses a risk of delay in diagnosis and a challenge to uniformly monitor the effect of B12 treatment. There is a need for a new clinical outcome measure suitable for clinical practice and clinical evaluation studies.
    UNASSIGNED: To develop a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) which measures the severity of vitamin B12 deficiency symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: The B12 PROM was developed by (1) gathering input from experts and literature review to define a construct and develop a conceptual model, (2) processing input from health care providers, scientists, and patients to develop items and response options, and (3) improving items based on the feedback from laypersons, test interviews, semi-structured cognitive interviews with patients, and forward and backward translation (ENG-NL).
    UNASSIGNED: The B12 PROM includes 62 items grouped into 8 categories of symptoms related to vitamin B12 deficiency (General, Senses, Thinking, In limbs and/or face, Movement, Emotions, Mouth & Abdomen, Urinary tract & Reproductive organs). Cognitive interviews demonstrated good comprehensibility and comprehensiveness.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is the first step in the development of a disease-specific PROM for vitamin B12 deficiency to measure the burden of symptoms. Further validation and reliability testing are necessary before the PROM can be applied in clinical practice and research.
    Plain language titleDevelopment of a Vitamin B12 Deficiency Questionnaire for Clinical Practice and ResearchPlain language summaryThis study is the first step in the development of a questionnaire for vitamin B12 deficiency to measure the severity of vitamin B12 deficiency symptoms. The questionnaire includes 62 items grouped into 8 categories of symptoms related to vitamin B12 deficiency (General, Senses, Thinking, In limbs and/or face, Movement, Emotions, Mouth & Abdomen, Urinary tract & Reproductive organs). Interviews with patients demonstrated good comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the questionnaire. Further testing is necessary before the questionnaire can be applied in clinical practice and research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:前列腺癌是老年男性最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,根治性前列腺切除术是局部疾病的既定治疗方法。接受这种手术的患者在围手术期经常会经历负面情绪和症状的增加。可能是由于对疾病及其治疗的担忧。本研究旨在研究涉及全过程可视化和协作护理讨论的新型教育方法对前列腺癌根治术患者围手术期症状和情绪健康的影响。
    方法:前瞻性收集了2021年6月至2023年12月期间入院的310例患者的数据,所有这些患者均计划接受根治性前列腺切除术。这些患者被随机分为干预组(接受新模式教育)或对照组(接受常规教育),每组155名患者。这项研究比较了基本的人口统计信息,焦虑和抑郁评分,对疾病进展分数的恐惧,生活质量分数,主要症状评分,两组围手术期生命体征的变化。
    结果:两组在年龄方面无统计学差异,合并症,保险类型,教育水平,收入,肿瘤病史(P>0.05)。同样,焦虑和抑郁评分没有显著差异,焦虑和抑郁患者的比例,生命体征,在时间1阶段,两组患者对疾病进展的恐惧评分(P>0.05)。在时间2和时间3阶段,干预组表现出更低的焦虑和抑郁评分,焦虑和抑郁患者的比例较低,血压和心率波动明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。根治性前列腺切除术后,患者的主要症状,如疼痛,恶心,和疲劳,在手术后第1-3天使用MADIS症状评估量表进行评估。干预组3种症状评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);在第4阶段,与对照组相比,干预组患者的生活质量评分也有显著改善(P<0.05).此外,患者的血压和心率在时间4阶段恢复到基线水平,两组间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。然而,干预组在时间4阶段的焦虑和抑郁评分仍显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,两组患者对疾病进展的恐惧评分均低于时间1阶段,与对照组相比,干预组的改善更为明显(P<0.05)。
    结论:被诊断为恶性肿瘤的患者通常会对疾病的进展和即将进行的手术感到恐惧和焦虑。以及围绕他们的治疗和预后的不确定性。在围手术期,这种情绪困扰加剧可能会导致更大的症状负担。利用全过程可视化和协作护理讨论方法,与传统的沟通方式相比,已经被证明可以减轻病人的恐惧,减少焦虑和抑郁,并最终减轻围手术期的症状负担。最终,这种方法可以提高恶性肿瘤患者的整体生活质量。
    OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant neoplasms in elderly males, with radical prostatectomy being the established therapeutic approach for localized disease. Patients undergoing this surgical procedure frequently experience increased negative emotions and symptomatology during the perioperative period, likely due to concerns about the illness and its treatment. The present study aims to investigate the effects of a novel educational approach involving a whole-process visualization and collaborative nursing discussions on perioperative symptoms and emotional well-being in radical prostatectomy patients.
    METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 310 patients admitted to the hospital between June 2021 and December 2023, all of whom were scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy. These patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving new model education) or the control group (receiving conventional education), with 155 patients in each group. The study compared basic demographic information, anxiety and depression scores, fear of disease progression scores, quality-of-life scores, main symptom scores, and changes in perioperative vital signs between the two groups.
    RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, comorbidities, insurance type, education level, income, and tumor history (P > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in anxiety and depression scores, proportion of patients with anxiety and depression, vital signs, and fear of disease progression scores between the two groups at Time 1 stage (P > 0.05). During stages Time 2 and Time 3, the intervention group exhibited lower anxiety and depression scores, a lower proportion of anxious and depressed patients, as well as significantly reduced blood pressure and heart rate fluctuations compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Following radical prostatectomy, the main symptoms of patients, such as pain, nausea, and fatigue, were assessed using the MADIS Symptom Assessment Scale on days 1-3 post-surgery. The intervention group exhibited significantly lower scores for three symptoms compared to the control group (P < 0.05); at Time 4 stage, the patients in the intervention group also demonstrated significantly improved quality-of-life scores compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, blood pressure and heart rate of patients returned to baseline levels at Time 4 stage, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, the anxiety and depression scores in the intervention group at the Time 4 stage remained significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the fear of disease progression scores in both groups were lower than those at the Time 1 stage, with a more pronounced improvement observed in the intervention group compared to the control group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with malignant tumors often experience fear and anxiety regarding the progression of their disease and upcoming surgery, as well as uncertainty surrounding their treatment and prognosis. This heightened emotional distress can contribute to a greater symptom burden during the perioperative period. Utilizing a whole-process visualization and collaborative nursing discussion approach, as compared to traditional communication methods, has been shown to alleviate patients\' fears, reduce anxiety and depression, and ultimately lessen the symptom burden experienced during the perioperative phase. Ultimately, this approach can enhance the overall quality of life for patients facing malignant tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了进行慢性睾丸疼痛症状指数(COSI)的翻译和验证研究,在三个领域有12个问题疼痛(P),性症状(SS),和生活质量(QoL),土耳其语。
    该研究共纳入了2023年1月至2024年1月期间诊断为慢性阴囊内容疼痛(CSCP)的175例患者。除了人口统计数据,记录COSI问卷和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的评分.使用Cronbachα系数评估内部一致性。使用测试-重测相关方法评估可靠性。
    患者的平均年龄为37.2±14.1岁,疼痛的中位持续时间(IQR)为5.5(9)个月。P的COSI总分中位数为13(13),子得分中位数为7(7),1(2)对于SS,和5(6)的QoL。确定每个项目的测试-重测相关系数高于r=0.80(p<0.001)。子分数的Cronbachα值为P的0.80,SS为0.71,QoL为0.80。确定VAS评分与COSIP之间存在统计学上的显着正相关,SS,QoL,和总分(r:0.63,p<0.001;r=0.32,p<0.001;r=0.56,p<0.001;r=0.59,p<0.001)。根据VAS评分,确定COSI总分的最佳截止点是16.5分(AUC:0.77,p<0.001),用于确定经历严重疼痛的患者(7.5)。
    COSI问卷的土耳其语版本是有效的,可靠,和可重复的问卷,可用于评估症状严重程度对CSCP患者的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: To conduct a translation and validation study of the Chronic Orchialgia Symptom Index (COSI), which has 12 questions in three domains pain (P), sexual symptoms (SS), and quality of life (QoL), in the Turkish language.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included a total of 175 patients diagnosed with chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP) between January 2023 and January 2024. In addition to demographic data, the scores obtained on the COSI questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were recorded. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach alpha coefficients. Reliability was evaluated using the test-retest correlation method.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age of the patients was 37.2 ± 14.1 years and the median (IQR) duration of pain was 5.5 (9) months. The median total COSI score was determined as 13 (13) and the median subscores were 7 (7) for P, 1 (2) for SS, and 5 (6) for QoL. The test-retest correlation coefficient for each item was determined to be higher than r = 0.80 (p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha values for the subscores were 0.80 for P, 0.71 for SS, and 0.80 for QoL. There was determined to be a statistically significant positive correlation between the VAS score and the COSI P, SS, QoL, and total scores (r: 0.63, p < 0.001; r = 0.32, p < 0.001; r = 0.56, p < 0.001; r = 0.59, p < 0.001, respectively). The optimal cutoff point of the COSI total score was determined to be 16.5 points (AUC:0.77, p < 0.001) for the determination of patients experiencing severe pain (⩾ 7.5) according to the VAS score.
    UNASSIGNED: The Turkish version of the COSI questionnaire is a valid, reliable, and repeatable questionnaire that can be used to evaluate the effects of symptom severity in patients with CSCP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种多因素,无处不在,神经发育障碍,其中肠道症状是最常见的合并症之一。
    方法:在本研究中,来自中国13个城市的1,222名ASD儿童和1,206名2-7岁的典型发展(TD)儿童。对ASD和TD儿童进行身体测量和基本信息问卷。儿童自闭症评定量表(CARS),社会反应量表(SRS),和孤独症行为清单(ABC)用于评估ASD儿童的临床症状。采用6项胃肠道严重程度指数(6-GSI)评价两组患者的肠道症状发生率。
    结果:便秘的检出率,大便气味,ASD儿童的总肠道症状明显高于TD儿童(40.098%vs.25.62%,17.021%与9.287%,和53.601%与41.294%,分别)。表现为肠道合并症的自闭症儿童在ABC上的得分明显更高,SRS,汽车,与没有肠道症状的自闭症儿童相比,提示肠道共病可能加剧ASD儿童的核心症状。
    结论:孤独症患儿的肠功能障碍明显多于TD患儿。这种功能障碍可能会加重ASD儿童的核心症状。
    BACKGROUND: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a multifactorial, pervasive, neurodevelopmental disorder, of which intestinal symptoms collectively represent one of the most common comorbidities.
    METHODS: In this study, 1,222 children with ASD and 1,206 typically developing (TD) children aged 2-7 years were enrolled from 13 cities in China. Physical measurement and basic information questionnaires were conducted in ASD and TD children. The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC) were used to evaluate the clinical symptoms of children with ASD. The six-item Gastrointestinal Severity Index (6-GSI) was used to evaluate the prevalence of intestinal symptoms in two groups.
    RESULTS: The detection rates of constipation, stool odor, and total intestinal symptoms in ASD children were significantly higher than those in TD children (40.098% vs. 25.622%, 17.021% vs. 9.287%, and 53.601% vs. 41.294%, respectively). Autistic children presenting with intestinal comorbidity had significantly higher scores on the ABC, SRS, CARS, and multiple subscales than autistic children without intestinal symptoms, suggesting that intestinal comorbidity may exacerbates the core symptoms of ASD children.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal dysfunction was significantly more common in autistic than in TD children. This dysfunction may aggravate the core symptoms of children with ASD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor(ETI)是一部小说,高效的CFTR调节剂组合被证明可以增强患有F508del突变的囊性纤维化(pwCF)患者的肺功能和体重。最近,我们发现德国人的腹部症状(AS)显着减少,英国,和爱尔兰pwCF后24-26周的ETI使用CFAbd评分,第一个患者报告的结局指标(PROM)是根据FDA指南专门为pwCF开发和验证的.值得注意的是,许多pwCF报告在新治疗的第一天AS发生了明显变化.为了捕捉这些直接影响,我们开发了CFAbd-day2day,CF特定的GI日记,遵循FDA和COSMIN指南。目的:在ETI开始前14天和后14-28天,使用CFAbd-day2day前瞻性地捕获AS的即时动态。此外,我们的目标是提供有关变化敏感性的新型PROM的验证步骤.方法:开发CFAbd-day2day,反复咨询焦点小组(社区语音=pwCF及其代理人和来自不同领域的CF专家)。在新的ETI治疗之前和期间,pwCF用CFAbd-day2day每天对AS进行前瞻性评分。结果:总之,在五个CF中心参加的45个pwCF在ETI开始之前(平均±sd:14±7天)和之后(平均±sd:28±23天)前瞻性地完成了CFAbd-day2天。一方面,在ETI启动后的3-4周时间范围内,累积分数显着下降,与治疗前2周相比。另一方面,许多在ETI之前表现出相对稳定的AS水平的患者报告说,在使用高效CFTR调节剂治疗的头几天发生了变化.在治疗的前14天,疼痛和肠胃气胀等因素在高达21%的患者中增加,但在15-27天改善了.结论:CFAbd-day2day,专门开发并在验证过程中前瞻性捕获pwCF中的胃肠道症状,为接受ETI新疗法的pwCF中AS的动力学提供了新的实质性见解。这种新颖的工具也有助于前瞻性地监测患有特定胃肠道问题的患者。日记的国际实施和进一步的验证步骤正在进行中。
    Background: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) is a novel, highly effective CFTR modulator combination proven to enhance lung function and body weight in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) carrying a F508del mutation. Recently, we revealed significant reductions in abdominal symptoms (AS) in German, British, and Irish pwCF after 24-26 weeks of ETI using the CFAbd-Score, the first patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically developed and validated for pwCF following FDA guidelines. Notably, many pwCF reported marked changes in their AS during the first days of the new treatment. To capture these immediate effects, we developed the CFAbd-day2day, a CF-specific GI-diary, following FDA and COSMIN guidelines. Aim: To prospectively capture the immediate dynamics of AS using the CFAbd-day2day 14 days before and 14-28 days after ETI initiation. In addition, we aim to provide validation steps of the novel PROM concerning sensitivity to changes. Methods: To develop the CFAbd-day2day, focus groups (community voice = pwCF and their proxies and CF specialists from different fields) were repeatedly consulted. Before and during the new ETI therapy, pwCF prospectively scored AS on a daily basis with the CFAbd-day2day. Results: Altogether, 45 pwCF attended in five CF centers prospectively completed the CFAbd-day2day before (mean ± sd:14 ± 7 days) and after (mean ± sd: 28 ± 23 days) ETI initiation. On the one hand, cumulative scores significantly decreased during the 3-4-week time frame after ETI initiation, compared to 2 weeks prior to therapy. On the other hand, many patients who revealed a relatively stable level of AS before ETI reported changes during the first days of treatment with the highly effective CFTR modulators. Factors like pain and flatulence increased in up to 21% of patients during the first 14 days of therapy, but they improved during days 15-27. Conclusion: The CFAbd-day2day, specifically developed and in the process of validation to prospectively capture GI symptoms in pwCF, provides new substantial insights into the dynamics of AS in pwCF receiving a new treatment with ETI. This novel tool is also helpful in prospectively monitoring patients with specific GI problems. International implementation and further validation steps of the diary are ongoing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癌症患者的预后对于绝症患者的支持治疗尤其重要。我们以前发现症状评分作为患者报告的结果(PRO)-例如呼吸困难和疲劳评分-一些生化参数,姑息表现量表(PPS)得分,症状群是有用的预后因素;然而,基于这些因素的预后的可预测性仍不清楚.
    为了确定合适的三周生存预测因子,在性能方面,绝症患者。
    我们使用日本版本的欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷核心15姑息治疗(EORTCQLQ-C15-PAL)收集症状评分作为PRO。
    我们使用的数据来自癌症绝症患者,这些患者在Higashisumiyoshi-Morimoto医院的姑息治疗单位住院(大阪,日本)从2018年6月到2019年12月(n=130),以及从2020年1月至3月的同一临床研究获得的其他数据(n=31)。
    为了评估预测性能,灵敏度等指标,特异性,正预测值,负预测值,并计算了总体精度。
    我们发现症状群的存在显示出较高的敏感性,但特异性较低,较高的PPS值(>30)显示出较高的特异性,但敏感性较低,提示这些因素可以为生存预后(小于或等于3周)提供相关信息.
    从患者获得的症状聚类对于对绝症患者的有效支持治疗很重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Prognostics for patients with cancer is especially important for the supportive care of those who are terminally ill. We previously found that symptom scores as patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-such as dyspnea and fatigue scores-some biochemical parameters, the palliative performance scale (PPS) scores, and symptom clusters were useful prognostic factors; however, the predictability of a prognosis based on these factors remains unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: To identify appropriate three-week survival predictive factor(s), in terms of performance, in patients who were terminally ill.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected symptom scores as PROs using the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL).
    UNASSIGNED: We used data from terminally ill patients with cancer who were hospitalized at the palliative care unit of the Higashisumiyoshi-Morimoto Hospital (Osaka, Japan) from June 2018 to December 2019 (n = 130), as well as additional data obtained from the same clinical study from January to March 2020 (n = 31).
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate predictive performance, indices such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: We found that the presence of a symptom cluster showed high sensitivity but low specificity and that a higher PPS value (>30) showed high specificity but low sensitivity, suggesting that these factors could provide relevant information for survival prognosis (less than or equal to three weeks).
    UNASSIGNED: Symptom clusters obtained from patients is important for effective supportive care of those who are terminally ill.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)是慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的主要表型之一,具有高症状负担。强力霉素可用作CRSwNP的附加疗法。我们的目的是评估口服多西环素对CRSwNP的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和SNOT-22(鼻塞结局测试)评分的短期疗效。
    在这项回顾性队列研究中,分析了28例诊断为CRSwNP并接受100mg多西环素治疗21天的患者的鼻部症状的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和SNOT-22总分。还在根据哮喘确定的亚组中评估了强力霉素的疗效,特应性的存在,总IgE和嗜酸性粒细胞水平。
    强力霉素治疗21天后,鼻后滴注的VAS评分有显著改善,鼻腔分泌物,鼻塞,打喷嚏,和SNOT-22总评分(分别为p=0.001,p<0.001,p<0.001,p<0.001,p<0.001)。在气味损失的VAS评分中没有观察到显著改善(p=0.18)。在哮喘亚组中,多西环素治疗后所有VAS评分和SNOT-22总分均有显著改善.在非哮喘亚组中,任何VAS评分都没有显著变化,但SNOT-22总得分显着提高(42[21-78]vs.18[9-33];p=0.043)。仅在某些亚组(如哮喘患者)中,嗅觉丧失的VAS评分的改善才显着。非特应性患者,和嗜酸性粒细胞>300细胞/微升的患者。
    多西环素可被认为是控制症状的附加治疗,尤其是CRSwNP合并哮喘患者。
    Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) is one of the major phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with a high symptom burden. Doxycycline can be used as add-on therapy in CRSwNP. We aimed to evaluate short-term efficacy of oral doxycycline on visual analog scale (VAS) and SNOT-22 (Sino-nasal outcome test) score for CRSwNP.
    Visual analog score (VAS) for nasal symptoms and total SNOT-22 scores of 28 patients who applied with the diagnosis of CRSwNP and received 100 mg doxycycline for 21 days were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Doxycycline efficacy was also evaluated in subgroups determined according to asthma, presence of atopy, total IgE and eosinophil levels.
    After 21-day doxycycline treatment, there was a significant improvement in VAS score for post-nasal drip, nasal discharge, nasal congestion, and sneeze, and total SNOT-22 score (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant improvement was observed in VAS score for the loss of smell (p = 0.18). In the asthmatic subgroup, there were significant improvements in all VAS scores and total SNOT-22 score after doxycycline. In the non-asthmatic subgroup, there was no significant change in any of the VAS scores, but total SNOT-22 score was significantly improved (42 [21-78] vs. 18 [9-33]; p = 0.043). Improvement in VAS score for loss of smell is significant in only some subgroups like asthmatic patients, non-atopic patients, and patients with eosinophil >300 cell/µL.
    Doxycycline can be considered as an add-on treatment for symptom control in patients especially with CRSwNP comorbid with asthma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    IgE介导的特应性疾病如过敏性鼻炎和鼻结膜炎是西方世界常见的慢性疾病。变应原免疫疗法(AIT)通过调节潜在的免疫机制在变应性患者的治疗中起着重要作用。尽管这种治疗在全球范围内都融入了实践模式,由于不同的方法,AIT在国家或国际层面的应用存在许多差异,并在世界不同地区给出临床建议。来自欧洲和美国的作者的这篇综述强调了AIT在两个全球地区应用的重要方面的差异和相似之处。首先,在营销授权和许可方面,监管情况有所不同。其次,差异在制造实践中得到了阐述,AIT产品的营销分销和配方。第三,当前指南中的临床管理模式显示AIT的适应症和禁忌症相似,但在一些实际方面也存在分歧。向读者通报相似之处,以及美国和欧洲AIT标准的差异,作者强调了彻底协调AIT标准的未满足需求,因为它是过敏性鼻炎和鼻结膜炎患者唯一的疾病修饰治疗选择。
    IgE-mediated atopic diseases such as allergic rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis are common chronic diseases in the western world. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) plays a fundamental role in the treatment of allergic patients by modulating the underlying immune mechanisms. Though this treatment is integrated in practice-patterns globally, many differences are found in the application of AIT on the national or international level due to heterogeneous methods, and clinical recommendations are given in different parts of the world. This review from authors in Europe and the United States highlights differences and similarities in important aspects of AIT application in the 2 global regions. First, the regulatory situation differs regarding marketing authorization and licensing. Secondly, differences are elaborated in manufacturing practices, marketing distribution and formulations of AIT products. Thirdly, clinical administration patterns in the current guidelines show similarities in indications and contraindications of AIT, but also are divergent in some practical aspects. Informing the readership on similarities, as well as differences of standards in AIT in the United States and Europe, the authors highlight the unmet need of thorough harmonization of standards of AIT, as it is the only disease modifying treatment option available for patients with allergic rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fhar.202.877118。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.877118.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19后心理障碍很常见。然而,关于先前存在的心理障碍是否与COVID-19的严重程度和演变相关的信息不多。我们旨在探讨感染前常规使用精神药物(PM)作为情绪或焦虑症与COVID-19恢复轨迹的替代指标之间的关联。我们使用了Predi-COVID研究的数据。我们跟踪成年人,SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性,并收集了人口统计数据,临床特征,纳入后14天的合并症和每日症状。我们根据16种症状计算了一个分数,并对潜在的类轨迹进行了建模。我们进行了多项式逻辑回归,以PM为主要暴露量,以不同的轨迹为结果。我们包括791名参与者,51%是男性,5.3%的患者在感染前报告有规律的PM。我们确定了四种表征恢复动态的轨迹:“几乎无症状,\"\"快速恢复,\"\"恢复缓慢,\"和\"持续症状\"。有了一个完全调整的年龄模型,性别,社会经济,生活方式和合并症,我们观察到PM与处于更严重轨迹的风险之间的关联比“几乎无症状”:“快速恢复”(相对风险(95%置信区间)3.1(2.7,3.4),“缓慢恢复”5.2(3.0,9.2),和“持续症状”11.7(6.9,19.6)轨迹。我们观察到感染前PM与前14天恢复缓慢或无恢复的风险之间的风险梯度。这些结果表明,预先存在的心理状况会增加COVID-19进化较差的风险,并可能增加长COVID的风险。我们的发现有助于对COVID-19患者进行个性化护理。
    Psychological disturbances are frequent following COVID-19. However, there is not much information about whether pre-existing psychological disorders are associated with the severity and evolution of COVID-19. We aimed to explore the associations between regular psychotropic medication use (PM) before infection as a proxy for mood or anxiety disorders with COVID-19 recovery trajectories. We used data from the Predi-COVID study. We followed adults, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and collected demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities and daily symptoms 14 days after inclusion. We calculated a score based on 16 symptoms and modeled latent class trajectories. We performed polynomial logistic regression with PM as primary exposure and the different trajectories as outcome. We included 791 participants, 51% were men, and 5.3% reported regular PM before infection. We identified four trajectories characterizing recovery dynamics: \"Almost asymptomatic,\" \"Quick recovery,\" \"Slow recovery,\" and \"Persisting symptoms\". With a fully adjusted model for age, sex, socioeconomic, lifestyle and comorbidity, we observed associations between PM with the risks of being in more severe trajectories than \"Almost Asymptomatic\": \"Quick recovery\" (relative risk (95% confidence intervals) 3.1 (2.7, 3.4), \"Slow recovery\" 5.2 (3.0, 9.2), and \"Persisting symptoms\"11.7 (6.9, 19.6) trajectories. We observed a gradient of risk between PM before the infection and the risk of slow or no recovery in the first 14 days. These results suggest that a pre-existing psychological condition increases the risk of a poorer evolution of COVID-19 and may increase the risk of Long COVID. Our findings can help to personalize the care of people with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号