BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death in rural America. Rural populations are large and heterogeneous, yet patient-related drivers of inequities in CRC access are understudied. This study aimed to identify vulnerable rural populations at lower odds of undergoing elective CRC surgery.
METHODS: Evaluation of the Policy Map and United States Census Bureau identified factors associated with poor surgical access in the most populous states (by total rural population). To assess whether these identified factors were associated with reduced access to elective CRC surgery, the 2007 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample was used to evaluate 69,212 hospitalizations of rural patients undergoing CRC surgery. Rural was defined as counties with a population of <250,000. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed predictors of elective CRC surgery. Patient- and hospital-level factor interactions were specified a priori.
RESULTS: More than 72% of hospitalizations of rural patients were elective. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that older age, multimorbidity, Black race, Latino-Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid insurance, and rural hospitals predicted lower odds of elective CRC surgery. On interaction analyses, high-risk patients were less likely to undergo elective CRC surgery in urban facilities relative to rural.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large study of rural dwellers, ethnoracial minorities, elders, and Medicaid beneficiaries had profoundly less access to elective CRC surgery, especially when care was received in urban settings. Future studies should focus on exploring actionable social drivers of health in these rural populations. Findings underscore the need for multilevel interventions to enhance rural access to equitable and quality surgical cancer care.

BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with lower rates of mortality and fewer complications. This study evaluates whether the decision to undergo SSRF is associated with age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status and assesses associated clinical outcomes.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients ≥45 y old with rib fractures who underwent SSRF in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2016 to 2020. Race, ethnicity, and insurance statuses were collected. Age in years was dichotomized into two groups: 45-64 and 65+. Outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned endotracheal intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR) after major complications, and FTR after respiratory complications. Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate outcomes, controlling for gender, body mass index, Injury Severity Score, flail chest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and smoking.
RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred thirty-nine patients aged 45-64 and 1828 patients aged 65+ underwent SSRF. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was noted between these groups. Analysis showed that the association of SSRF with ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, FTR after a major complication, or FTR after a respiratory complication did not vary by age (P > 0.05). Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.77; P < 0.001), Hispanic (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91; P < 0.001), and Medicaid (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.95; P = 0.005) patients were less likely to receive SSRF.
CONCLUSIONS: No differences in clinical outcomes were measured between adults aged 45-64 and ≥65 who underwent SSRF. Older age should not preclude patients from receiving SSRF. Further work is needed to improve underutilization in Black, Hispanic and Medicaid patients.

BACKGROUND: Imaging guidelines recommend an ultrasound (US)-first approach to evaluate appendicitis to minimize radiation. However, the association between US and computed tomography (CT) utilization remains unclear. We aimed to determine how increased US utilization correlated with the rate of CT evaluation of pediatric acute appendicitis.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Eligible patients were aged less than 18 y with a diagnosis of appendicitis. Imaging was determined by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Concurrent imaging was defined as US and CT use during the same encounter. We calculated the hospital rate of concurrent imaging and categorized hospitals into tertiles: low (< 20%), medium (20%-40%), and high (> 40%). We developed generalized ordinal logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting to assess patient characteristics and hospital rates of concurrent imaging associations.
RESULTS: Our analysis included 485 hospitals and 23,976 patients. Thirty four percent were treated at hospitals in the lowest, 35% at the middle, and 31% at the highest tertile hospitals. We observed a negative correlation (-0.27, P < 0.001) between increasing US use and concurrent imaging use. The odds of presenting to a higher concurrent imaging rate hospital were significantly lower for Blacks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.6, [0.4-0.9]) and Hispanics (aOR [95% CI]: 0.7 [0.5-0.9]) in comparison to Whites. The odds of presenting to a higher concurrent imaging rate hospital were higher for patients in the second (aOR [95% CI]: 1.9 [1.2-3.2]) and lowest income quartile (aOR [95% CI]: 3.7 [1.1-13.1]) compared to the highest income quartile.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased US use correlated with decreased CT utilization for diagnosing appendicitis. White children and those in lower socioeconomic neighborhoods are more likely to visit hospitals with high concurrent imaging use.

BACKGROUND: The 2024 GI Surgery Summit brought together Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT), Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO), and Society of University Surgeons (SUS) members to assess the current state of gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. This report reviews the key discussions and recommendations after the dedicated plenary session that addressed challenges in providing high-quality, accessible GI surgery for all patients.
METHODS: The Summit took place from January 14 to 16. During the plenary session \"Defining the role and impact of specialty surgeons in ensuring high-quality, accessible abdominal surgery,\" leaders, rising leaders, and members of SSAT, SSO, and SUS met and discussed challenges in providing high-quality, accessible GI surgery.
RESULTS: Actionable recommendations to address the challenges in providing high-quality, accessible GI surgical care were made, including engaging communities and patients, building alliances across hospitals and surgeons, and establishing standards of GI surgical care.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons, hospital systems, and surgical societies can improve healthcare access and outcomes for all GI surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Socioecological determinants of health (SEDOHs) influence disparities in surgical outcomes. However, SEDOHs are challenging to measure, limiting our ability to address disparities. Using a validated survey (SEDOH-88), we assessed SEDOHs in three rural communities in Alabama. We hypothesized that SEDOHs would vary significantly across sites but measuring them would be acceptable and feasible.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database involving surgical patients who completed the SEDOH-88 and a secondary survey assessing it\'s acceptability or feasibility from August 2021 to July 2023. Included patients underwent endoscopic, minimally invasive, or open surgery at three rural hospitals: Demopolis (DM), Alexander City (AC), and Greenville (GV).
RESULTS: The 107 participants comprised 48 (44.9%) from DM, 27 (25.2%) from AC, and 32 (29.9%) from GV, respectively. The median age was 64 y, and 65.6% were female. When comparing DM to AC and GV by individual factors, DM had the largest Black population (78.7 versus 22.2 versus 48.3%, P < 0.001) and more often required help reading hospital materials (20.5 versus 3.7 versus 10.3%, P = 0.007). When comparing DM to AC and GV by structural and environmental factors, DM had more Medicaid enrollees (27.3 versus 3.7 versus 6.9%, P = 0.033) and lacked fresh produce (18.2 versus 25.9 versus 39.3%, P = 0.033) and internet access (63.6 versus 100.0 versus 86.2%, P < 0.001). The SEDOH-88 had an overall 90.9% positive acceptability and feasibility score.
CONCLUSIONS: SEDOHs varied significantly across rural communities regarding individual (race or health literacy), structural (insurance), and environmental-level factors (nutritious food or internet access). The high acceptability and feasibility of the SEDOH-88 shows it\'s potential utility in identifying targets for future disparity-reducing interventions.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status, measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), and short-term outcomes following colon resection.
METHODS: Utilizing the Maryland State Inpatient Sample database (SID 2018-2020), we determined the association between DCI and post-op outcomes following colon resection including length of stay, readmissions, 30-day in-hospital mortality, and non-routine discharges. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to control for potential confounding factors.
RESULTS: Of the 13,839 patients studied, median age was 63, with 54.3 ​% female and 64.5 ​% elective admissions. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 36.9 ​% cases, with a median hospital stay of 5 days. Patients in distressed communities faced higher risks of emergency admission (OR: 1.31), prolonged hospitalization (OR: 1.29), non-routine discharges (OR: 1.36), and readmission (OR: 1.33). Black patients had longer stays than White patients (OR: 1.3). Despite adjustments, in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ among neighborhoods.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that patients residing in distressed neighborhoods face a higher risk of prolonged hospitalization, non-routine discharges, and readmission rate after colon resection.

BACKGROUND: When evaluating the timeliness of orchiopexy for cryptorchidism, health disparities are apparent among Hispanic and African American males and those with public insurance. Since the publication of these data, the COVID-19 pandemic has stressed our healthcare system and significantly affected the provision of pediatric urology care.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess if certain groups were disproportionately affected in progression to orchiopexy after the diagnosis of cryptorchidism during and after the pandemic in US freestanding children\'s hospitals.
METHODS: Using the PHIS database, pediatric patients ≤5 years who underwent orchiopexy between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria included prematurity, retractile testes, and testicular torsion. Primary outcomes were age at orchiopexy and the proportion of individuals undergoing timely orchiopexy for cryptorchidism.
RESULTS: Over the study period 3140 patients ≤5 years old underwent orchiopexy for cryptorchidism. Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics were significantly less likely to have timely orchiopexy and underwent orchiopexy 2.13 and 3.60 months later compared to whites (p < 0.01). As compared to pre-COVID-19, during the pandemic the proportion of patients who had timely surgery was higher and the median age was significantly lower (p = 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively) in white patients only. Over the study period, patients with public insurance were less likely to have timely orchiopexy and underwent orchiopexy 2.94 months later (p < 0.01) than patients with private insurance. Compared to during the pandemic, post-pandemic a significantly lower proportion of publicly insured patients have since undergone timely orchiopexy (p = 0.04). Patients in the West were less likely to have timely orchiopexy and had a higher age at time of orchiopexy (p < 0.01) than other regions. However, in the West during the pandemic, the proportion of children who had timely surgery was higher compared to pre-and post-COVID-19 (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, regardless of insurance status, race, or location, a significant proportion of patients did not undergo timely orchiopexy. During the pandemic white patients had a lower median age and an increased proportion underwent timely orchiopexy, despite the number of orchiopexies remaining constant. Disparities in the post-COVID-19 era have been further exacerbated for publicly insured patients, who a significantly lower proportion of have since undergone timely orchiopexy. Specific efforts are required across the United States to increase timely orchiopexy for all boys.
CONCLUSIONS: Progression to timely orchiopexy remains low for all boys in the era surrounding COVID-19; certain groups appear to be more adversely affected.

BACKGROUND: Some academic textbooks have previously disseminated simplistic or even incorrect conceptions of race. Propagation of such ideas in General Surgery could contribute to gaps in quality of care received by minority patients. This study aims to determine whether General Surgery textbooks provide a thorough understanding of racial disparities.
METHODS: General Surgery texts were drawn from Doody\'s list, an industry-standard list of textbooks for medical education. Technical guides, atlases, and books for non-General Surgery professionals were excluded. Passages mentioning medical differences amongst racial and ethnic groups were extracted. Six binary classifications were made, based on whether passages (a) described interventions to alleviate difference; (b) addressed environmental mediators of difference; (c) described the contribution of racism or discrimination; (d) used causal language to connect race to difference; (e) referred to known, heritable genetic mechanisms; and (f) directly provided a reference. Types of intervention were also extracted. A heuristic scale was calculated granting one point each for classifications a-c and losing one point for classification d. Three authors performed classifications, and raw agreement and Cohen\'s kappa were used to assess inter-rater reliability.
RESULTS: Thirteen textbooks from Doody\'s list contained 511 passages discussing medical differences among racial/ethnic groups. Among passages, 25% discussed white people, 22% Black people/African Americans, 19% Asians, 9% Latinos, 4% Jewish/Ashkenazi people, 3% Native Americans, and 18% other. Fifteen passages (2.9%) used language indicating race was the cause of medical difference, and only two explicitly discussed racism or discrimination. Most passages (370, 72.3%) received a scale of 0. 120 (23.5%) received a scale of 1, eight (1.2%) received a scale of 2, and zero received a scale of 3. The mean passage scale was 0.24 and is not changing with time (regression coefficient -0.006/year, p = 0.538). Agreement was 91.2% across all categories and overall Kappa was 0.62.
CONCLUSIONS: General Surgery textbooks do not provide readers with scientifically thorough understanding of health disparities. Teaching more comprehensive conceptions, including systemic causes and the role of racism, may prevent reflexive association of minority patients with poor outcomes. Future editions should include these details where disparities are discussed in an independent, comprehensive section.

OBJECTIVE: Colon cancer (CC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, for which colectomy represents the standard of care. Yet, the impact of delayed resection on survival outcomes remains controversial. We assessed the association between time to surgery and 10-year survival in a national cohort of CC patients.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified all adults who underwent colectomy for Stage I-III CC in the 2004-2020 National Cancer Database. Those who required neoadjuvant therapy or emergent resection < 7 days from diagnosis were excluded. Patients were classified into Early (< 25 days) and Delayed (≥ 25 days) cohorts after an adjusted analysis of the relationship between time to surgery and 10-year survival. Survival at 1-, 5-, and 10-years was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusting for age, sex, race, income quartile, insurance coverage, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, disease stage, location of tumor, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, as well as hospital type, location, and case volume.
RESULTS: Of 165,991 patients, 84,665 (51%) were classified as Early and 81,326 (49%) Delayed. Following risk adjustment, Delayed resection was associated with similar 1-year [hazard ratio (HR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.04, P = 0.72], but inferior 5- (HR 1.24, CI 1.22-1.26; P < 0.001) and 10-year survival (HR 1.22, CI 1.20-1.23; P < 0.001). Black race [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.36, CI 1.31-1.41; P < 0.001], Medicaid insurance coverage (AOR 1.34, CI 1.26-1.42; P < 0.001), and care at high-volume hospitals (AOR 1.12, 95%CI 1.08-1.17; P < 0.001) were linked with greater likelihood of Delayed resection.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CC who underwent resection ≥ 25 days following diagnosis demonstrated similar 1-year, but inferior 5- and 10-year survival, compared to those who underwent surgery within 25 days. Socioeconomic factors, including race and Medicaid insurance, were linked with greater odds of delayed resection. Efforts to balance appropriate preoperative evaluation with expedited resection are needed to optimize patient outcomes.

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been rising. This manuscript looks to explore racial disparities in the surgical management of OPSCC.
A cancer database was queried for patients with OPSCC diagnosed from 2004 to 2017. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations between patient race/ethnicity, surgical treatment, and reasons for lack of surgery.
37 306 (74.3%) patients did not undergo surgery, while 12 901 (25.7%) patients did. Non-Hispanic black (NHB) patients were less likely to undergo surgery than other races (17.9% vs. 26.5%; p < 0.0001). In clinical discussions, the Asian, Native American, Hawaiian, Pacific Islander (ANAHPI), and unknown race group was more likely to directly refuse surgery when recommended (2.5% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.015).
Racial differences exist in treatment for OPSCC. NHB patients are less likely to actually undergo surgical management for OPSCC, while other patients are more likely to directly \"refuse\" surgery outright when offered.