BACKGROUND: Vertical mammoplasty techniques have been widely used for breast reduction. The authors present the combination of superior pedicle vertical mammoplasty with liposuction in different regions in the treatment of severe breast hypertrophy in obese patients. We also propose some innovative methods in terms of surgical approach, breast parenchymal anatomy pattern and liposuction.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 50 female patients with severe hypertrophic breasts and obesity who underwent breast reduction in our department from February 2019 to February 2022 was performed. Pre- and postoperative photographs, breast parenchyma distribution and postoperative patient satisfaction were recorded.
RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent breast reduction. Through clinical examination, patient photo evaluation and satisfaction survey results. Good breast shape and projection, full upper pole of the breast, and high satisfaction results were obtained. There were no serious complications.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique is acceptable and reproducible. It is suitable for patients with varying degrees of breast hypertrophy, especially those with severe hypertrophic breasts and obesity. There are fewer associated complications and a lower rate of re-repair.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

UNASSIGNED: Breast conservation therapy typically consists of lumpectomy, which often leads to poor cosmetic outcomes. Concurrent oncoplastic reductions are performed to maximize aesthetics and patient outcome. We present an oncoplastic breast reconstruction in a breast re-reduction case in this study.
UNASSIGNED: A 62-year-old female was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left upper outer breast by core needle biopsy. The patient had a prior bilateral breast reduction using a superior-central pedicle approach 15 years ago and desired breast conservation therapy.
UNASSIGNED: The oncoplastic reconstruction technique used was a superomedial pedicle Wise-pattern bilateral breast reduction. The lump was excised lateral to the pedicle after initial de-epithelialization and incision of the superomedial pedicle\'s lateral aspect. The remainder of the pedicle was developed, and the same procedure was performed on the right breast at the same time. Excess tissue was excised bilaterally from the medial, superior, and inferior, and the optimal new nipple position was obtained. Both nipples were viable and well perfused following closure of the incisions.
UNASSIGNED: Breast cancer is uncommon in patients who have had bilateral breast reductions. Oncoplastic reduction is an uncommon procedure used in patients who want to preserve their breasts while maintaining their aesthetic appearance. There is currently no agreement on the most effective and safest surgical technique for breast re- reduction surgery, and no reports on oncoplastic reconstruction in patients requiring breast re-reductions. In an oncoplastic reconstruction case, we achieved an acceptable outcome with our superomedial pedicled Wise-pattern bilateral breast reduction technique.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of the superior pedicles in breast reduction, there are some limitations with this technique. The mobility of the pedicle may be augmented by liposuction in the pedicle area which may relieve tissue resistance and decrease pedicle compression in order to overcome circulation problems. In fact, the indications of breast reduction using superior pedicles may be expanded by liposuction in the pedicle area.
METHODS: The patients who underwent breast reduction with superior pedicle techniques between March 2014 and November 2020 and whose pedicle resistances were decreased by liposuction were included in this study. Internal breast morphology was classified into three groups based on the morphology of the periareolar tissues. Group 1 breasts were lipomatous, Group 2 breasts were lipo-glandular and Group 3 breasts were fibroglandular. During the short-term follow-up, the circulation of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) was evaluated both clinically and with an hand held Doppler device. The long-term aesthetic results were evaluated at the postoperative twelfth month with a visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients with either Group 1 or Group 2 breasts were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 38.3 years. The mean follow-up period was 31.7 months. Neither partial nor total NAC loss was observed and none of the patients had bottoming-out deformity.
CONCLUSIONS: Liposuction to the pedicle area is an effective and reliable method that both reduces the resistance in the pedicle and overcomes the circulation problems in certain patient groups (groups 1 and 2), increases the mobilization of the pedicle, reduces the breast to the desired size and prevents bottoming-out in the long term and increases the use of superior pedicle techniques. According to our clinical results, it was demonstrated that pedicle vascular mapping with preoperative Doppler sonography was not necessary in these patients.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

UNASSIGNED: Most of patients undergo reduction mammaplasty for aesthetic or therapeutic reasons without consider the effect on breastfeeding function. Vertical scar mammaplasty with superior pedicle is expected to be a breast reduction procedure that can keep maintain the function of breastfeeding. This is the first recorded report of breastfeeding after vertical scar reduction mammaplasty with superior pedicle in Indonesia.
UNASSIGNED: A 23 years old woman presented to the outpatient clinic with enlargement of both breast for 3 years. Physical examination showed bilateral breast enlargement. No tenderness, nodules, nor axillary lymph node enlargement were found. The patient was managed with vertical scar mammaplasty with superior pedicle. The patient was followed up with complication of skin excess and scarring on the bilateral submammary folds. We performed excision and resection procedures to eliminate the skin excess and scars without further complications. The patient was married and gave birth to her first and second child after two and five years following mammaplasty. The patient was able to provide exclusive breastfeeding for both of her children.
UNASSIGNED: Vertical scar mammaplasty with superior pedicle surgery is a surgical technique that combines a superior pedicle for the areola and performs a central-inferior quadrant resection for breast reduction. It only takes the tissue and glands that are located in the lower quadrant and still maintains the surrounding tissue and glands. This technique also maintains the integrity of nipple-areola complex (NAC) which also important in the lactation process.
UNASSIGNED: Vertical scar mammaplasty with superior pedicle can be one of the superior techniques in breast reduction which can maintain the breastfeeding function thereby increasing patient satisfaction.

Surgical treatment of breast cancer has changed during the last few decades. Long-term evaluation of several studies performed worldwide have confirmed that conservative surgery (CS) and radical mastectomy have similar survival rates. Due to CS being the gold standard for treatment for most women with breast cancer, advances in materials, mastectomy and reconstructive surgery techniques, now give us the possibility to perform on our patients a great outcome with oncological security. Both advances, in plastic and oncologic surgery, created a new discipline, called oncoplastic breast surgery, that allow surgeons to resect large breast specimens preventing subsequent deformities with the correct previous planning. This is particularly important when more than 30% of the breast volume will be resected because it allows for planning CS depending on the site of the lesion and for establishing the limits between CS and mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Gigantomastia is defined as extreme hypertrophy of the female breast. It is a disabling condition that presents unique challenges to plastic surgeons. Initial breast volume is an important factor affecting the success of the reduction. Usually, it is difficult to achieve small-sized breasts, and long-term results are often unsatisfactory, resulting in complications such as \"bottoming-out\" deformities.
METHODS: This paper presents a case series involving 40 patients (mean age 44.2 ± 12.5) with gigantomastia. Reductions were performed by superior nipple-areola complex pedicle with or without liposuction. Total resection weight ranged from 2050 to 5398 g (mean 3066 ± 944.2). Generally, the literature emphasizes the unreliability of the long superior pedicle when used to reduce the size of very large breasts. The technical steps for this procedure have been clearly described, and ways in which to overcome technical difficulties and attain effective volume reduction with minimal complications were presented.
RESULTS: The technique described here is applicable to all gigantomastia cases; even very large, pendulous breasts could be effectively reduced. Physical symptoms rapidly improved during the early postoperative period, patients\' aesthetic satisfaction scores were high (4.6/5), and none of the patients complained of flat breasts. The rate of partial areola necrosis was 5%, and the rate of complete areola necrosis was 2.5%. These rates are comparable to those in the literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the technique described above, superior pedicle can be applied to all gigantomastia cases and enhanced aesthetic results can be obtained with minimal complications.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

BACKGROUND: Postoperative changes following superior pedicle breast reduction are closely related to the pattern of skin resection. We have observed that the superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reduction technique provides a stable breast shape in the long term. We test the validity of our clinical observations through objective analysis of postoperative dimensional changes following superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reduction.
METHODS: Of 42 patients who underwent superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reductions between January 2011 and June 2012, 38 (75 breasts) were available for long-term follow-up. The midclavicular point-to-superior areolar border distance (A), the inferior areolar border-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance (B), and the areolar diameter (C) were measured and recorded at the time of (1) preoperative markings, (2) first postoperative visit, and (3) 2-year postoperative follow-up visit. The specifications of the preoperative markings were recorded to analyze their correlation with actual breast dimensions.
RESULTS: The superior border of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) was located, on average, 1.2 cm higher at the first postoperative visit when compared with the markings (P < 0.001). The nipple-areola position did not change significantly in the long term (P = 0.224). The average postoperative increase in the IMF-to-inferior areolar border distance between the first postoperative visit and the long-term follow-up visit was 0.3 cm (P < 0.001). Although statistically significant, this extent of change (4.5 %) in the lower pole vertical length was clinically unidentifiable, and pseudoptosis did not occur after superior pedicle, short horizontal scar mammaplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term stability of the NAC position and lower breast pole length makes superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reduction a predictable and dependable option for primary breast reduction/mastopexy and for a matching procedure.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .