Superficial cervical plexus block

颈浅丛阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉内膜切除术用于有症状的颈动脉闭塞患者。手术可以在全身和区域麻醉下进行。传统上,手术是在深颈丛阻滞下进行的,这在技术上是很难进行的,并且会引起严重的并发症。本病例系列描述了5例病例,其中中间颈丛阻滞与浅表颈丛阻滞联合用于颈动脉内膜切除术。
    方法:5名被归类为美国麻醉医师协会2-3的患者因症状和超过70%的颈动脉闭塞而计划进行颈动脉内膜切除术。这些程序是在大学教学医院-Peradeniya进行的,斯里兰卡。所有患者均给予浅颈丛阻滞,然后使用2%利多卡因和0.5%布比卡因进行中间颈丛阻滞。
    结果:有4例患者获得了充分的麻醉,1例患者需要局部浸润。两个病人出现声音嘶哑,在手术后2小时稳定下来。5例患者均出现血流动力学波动。无严重并发症发生。所有5例患者均恢复顺利。
    结论:CEA的区域麻醉在医学上复杂的患者或无法进行脑监测的患者中是优选的。文献中描述了中间颈丛阻滞用于甲状腺手术,但关于它在颈动脉手术中的用途没有太多的细节。深颈丛阻滞几乎没有严重的并发症,而ICPB的使用使其成为CEA手术的良好替代品。
    结论:颈浅丛阻滞和中间颈丛阻滞可有效用于颈动脉内膜切除术患者的麻醉。它比深颈丛阻滞更安全,更容易进行,并且可以监测脑功能。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy is performed for patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusions. Surgery can be performed under general and regional anesthesia. Traditionally, surgery is performed under deep cervical plexus block which is technically difficult to perform and can cause serious complications. This case series describes 5 cases in which an intermediate cervical plexus block was used in combination with a superficial cervical plexus block for Carotid endarterectomy surgery.
    METHODS: Five patients who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists 2-3 were scheduled for Carotid endarterectomy due to symptoms and more than 70% occlusion of the carotid arteries. The procedures were carried out in the University Teaching Hospital- Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. All patients were given superficial cervical plexus block followed by intermediate cervical plexus block using 2% lignocaine and 0.5% plain bupivacaine.
    RESULTS: Adequate anesthesia was achieved in 4 patients, and local infiltration was necessary in 1 patient. Two patients developed hoarseness of the voice, which settled 2 h after surgery. Hemodynamic fluctuations were observed in all 5 patients. No serious complications were observed. All 5 patients had uneventful recoveries.
    CONCLUSIONS: Regional anesthesia for CEA is preferable in patients who are medically complicated to undergo anesthesia or in patients for whom cerebral monitoring is not available. Intermediate cervical plexus block is described for thyroid surgeries in literature, but not much details on its use for carotid surgeries. Deep cervical plexus blocks has few serious complications which is not there with the use of ICPB making it a good alternative for CEA surgeries .
    CONCLUSIONS: Superficial cervical plexus block and intermediate cervical plexus block can be used effectively for providing anesthesia for patients undergoing Carotid endarterectomy. It is safe and easier to conduct than deep cervical plexus block and enables monitoring of cerebral function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    锁骨骨折占成人肩关节损伤的三分之一以上,占所有骨折的3.3%。虽然这些骨折中的大多数可以非手术治疗,在某些情况下进行手术干预。区域麻醉(RA)可以作为全身麻醉(GA)的首选替代方案,以避免该手术中的并发症和高成本。此外,确定RA的最佳治疗方法仍然具有挑战性。
    本研究旨在比较有和没有浅颈丛阻滞(SCPB)的肌间沟阻滞(ISB)作为锁骨骨折手术的麻醉技术的疗效。
    这种双盲,对120例患者进行了非劣效性临床试验,随机分为两组:一组接受ISB,另一组接受ISB和SCPB。主要结果定义为转换为GA。记录了各种因素,包括手术时间,神经阻滞启动,麻醉后监护病房(PACU)所需的镇痛药,手术期间的镇静。在PACU中使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛。使用SPSS26版进行统计分析,进行描述性分析,学生的t检验,和Mann-WhitneyU检验比较两组之间的非参数变量。具有统计学意义的结果具有小于0.05的P值。
    共120例患者随机分为2组,每个由50名男性和10名女性组成。干预组和病例组的平均年龄分别为37.23±13.30岁和38.43±11.95岁,分别。在进行统计检验(学生t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验)后,神经阻滞的起始时间没有显着差异,手术开始时间,手术持续时间,所需的镇静剂量,VAS评分,和哌替啶消耗量(P>0.05)。两组患者均不需要转换为GA。
    在所有包含的案例中都实现了主要目标,没有患者需要转换为GA。无论是否与SCPB组合,ISB的功效都是相同的。肌间沟阻滞是治疗锁骨骨折的另一种方法。因此,单独的ISB与当与SCPB组合使用时一样有效。
    UNASSIGNED: Clavicle fractures account for over one-third of shoulder injuries and up to 3.3% of all fractures in adults. While the majority of these fractures can be managed non-surgically, there are instances where surgical intervention is performed. Regional anesthesia (RA) can be a preferred alternative to general anesthesia (GA) to avoid complications and high costs in this surgery. Moreover, the identification of the most optimal approach for RA remains challenging.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of interscalene block (ISB) with and without superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as an anesthetic technique for clavicular fracture operation.
    UNASSIGNED: This double-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted on 120 patients randomly divided into 2 groups: One receiving ISB and the other receiving ISB with SCPB. The primary outcome was defined as the conversion to GA. Various factors were recorded, including surgery duration, nerve block initiation, analgesics required in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and sedation during surgery. Pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in PACU. SPSS version 26 was used for statistical analysis, performing descriptive analysis, Student\'s t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare non-parametric variables between the 2 groups. Statistically significant results had a P value of less than 0.05.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 120 patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups, each consisting of 50 males and 10 females. The mean age of intervention and case groups were 37.23 ± 13.30 and 38.43 ± 11.95 years, respectively. After performing statistical tests (Student\'s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test), there was no significant difference in the initiation time of nerve block, surgery initiation time, surgery duration, the amount of required sedation, VAS scores, and meperidine consumption (P > 0.05). None of the patients in both groups required conversion to GA.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary goal was achieved in all included cases, and no patients required conversion to GA. The efficacy of ISB is the same whether or not it is combined with a SCPB. Interscalene block is an alternative RA approach for clavicle fractures. Thus, ISB alone is as efficient as when used in combination with SCPB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    手术后神经性疼痛仍然是一种未被诊断的医学状况,在接受手术的患者中有10-50%的持续疼痛发生。我们介绍了一个52岁的患者,患有持续性宫颈旁,锁骨上,切除巨大的右颈部深部肿瘤后的上胸部神经性疼痛,结论是副脊神经神经鞘瘤.彻底的物理和超声检查有助于得出浅表颈丛损伤的结论。因此,在颈浅丛水平进行了几个神经瘤的超声引导下的水解剖。经过三个程序,疼痛和生活质量评分得到改善,减少焦虑和抑郁症状。由于积极响应,患者被转诊为周围神经刺激器植入,允许自我控制疼痛,在家庭环境中。
    Post-surgical neuropathic pain is still an underdiagnosed medical condition with persistent pain occurring in 10-50% of patients submitted to surgery. We present a case of a 52-year-old patient with persistent paracervical, supraclavicular, and upper chest neuropathic pain after the excision of a massive deep right cervical tumor, concluded to be an accessory spinal nerve schwannoma. A thorough physical and ultrasound examination helped conclude injury of the superficial cervical plexus. Therefore, an ultrasound-guided hydrodissection of several neuromas was performed at the level of the superficial cervical plexus. After three procedures, pain and quality of life scores improved, with a reduction of anxiety and depression symptoms. Due to the positive response, the patient was referred for a peripheral nerve stimulator implantation, allowing self-control of pain, in a home setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了一例在全身麻醉下接受右上颌部分切除术和颈部清扫术的患者,使用罗哌卡因进行超声引导的颅颈神经阻滞用于围手术期局部/区域麻醉。该患者是一名85岁的女性,患有多种医学合并症,其中使用非甾体类抗炎药和阿片类药物进行镇痛有望增加术后并发症的风险。进行双侧超声引导的上颌(V2)神经阻滞和右侧浅颈丛阻滞,提供了充分的围手术期麻醉,避免了术后并发症。使用超声引导的颅颈神经阻滞与罗哌卡因可以提供延长围手术期局部麻醉和镇痛的有效方法。最大限度地减少对其他潜在有问题的镇痛药的需求。
    We report a case of ultrasound-guided craniocervical nerve blocks performed with ropivacaine for perioperative local/regional anesthesia in a patient who underwent right partial maxillary resection and neck dissection under general anesthesia. The patient was an 85-year-old woman with multiple medical comorbidities in whom analgesia using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids was expected to increase the risk of postoperative complications. Bilateral ultrasound-guided maxillary (V2) nerve blocks and a right superficial cervical plexus block were performed, which provided adequate perioperative anesthesia and avoided postoperative complications. The use of ultrasound-guided craniocervical nerve blocks with ropivacaine can be an effective approach for providing prolonged perioperative local anesthesia and analgesia, minimizing the need for other potentially problematic analgesics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    锁骨的感觉神经支配很复杂,锁骨手术的最佳区域阻滞技术尚未确定。目的比较超声引导下颈浅丛阻滞联合胸肌筋膜平面阻滞与肌间沟臂丛阻滞在锁骨手术中的应用效果。选择择期锁骨骨折内固定手术患者50例,随机分为两组(每组25例):I组和II组。Ⅰ组采用浅表颈丛阻滞联合胸肌筋膜平面阻滞,第二组采用颈浅丛阻滞联合肌间沟臂丛阻滞。主要结果指标是镇痛持续时间。Ⅰ组镇痛时间明显长于Ⅱ组(P<0.05)。Ⅱ组改良Bromage量表功能评分低于Ⅰ组(P<0.01)。阻滞后30min皮针痛评分和术后6、12h视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分差异无统计学意义。然而,I组24hVAS评分低于II组(P<0.05)。Ⅱ组膈肌麻痹发生率明显增高(P<0.01)。超声引导下颈浅丛阻滞联合胸肌筋膜平面阻滞可用于锁骨手术。术后镇痛时间长,可以保留上肢的运动功能,并且不会引起膈肌麻痹。临床试验编号和注册网址:ClinicalTrials.gov;试验注册编号:ChiCTR2000039383;注册日期:2020年10月25日。
    The sensory innervation of the clavicle is complex, and the best regional block technology for clavicular surgery has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to compare the application of ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block combined with clavipectoral fascial plane block verses interscalene brachial plexus block in clavicular surgery. Fifty patients undergoing internal fixation surgery for elective clavicle fractures were randomly divided into two groups (n = 25 for each group): group I and group II. Superficial cervical plexus block combined with clavipectoral fascial plane block was used in group I, and superficial cervical plexus block combined with interscalene brachial plexus block was used in group II. The primary outcome measure was the duration of analgesia. The duration of analgesia in group I was significantly longer than that in group II (P < 0.05). The modified Bromage scale function score in group II was lower than that in group I (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the skin acupuncture pain score 30 min after block and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 6 and 12 h after surgery. However, the 24 h VAS score in group I was lower than that in group II (P < 0.05). The incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis was significantly increased in group II (P < 0.01). Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block combined with clavipectoral fascial plane block can be used for clavicular surgery. It has a long postoperative analgesia time, can retain the motor function of the involved upper limb and does not cause hemidiaphragmatic paresis.Clinical trial number and registry URL: Clinical Trials.gov; Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000039383; Date of registration: 25 October 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:锁骨骨折通常在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,因为它们需要密集的麻醉,术中难以进入气道。锁骨骨折没有确定的区域麻醉(RA)技术,也因为神经支配是有争议的。已经使用RA技术进行了一些研究,但它们都是小案例。RA在很多方面都优于GA,我们特别希望在COVID-19大流行期间避免GA。
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究旨在使用周围神经刺激器和基于地标的技术,将肌间沟阻滞(ISB)和颈浅丛阻滞(SCPB)作为唯一的麻醉剂用于COVID-19大流行期间的锁骨骨折手术。
    UNASSIGNED:这是一项在印度东部三级护理教学医院进行的前瞻性观察性研究。
    UASSIGNED:在我们的伦理委员会批准和知情同意后,30名美国麻醉医师协会I级或II级患者,18-65岁,排除标准后选择必须接受锁骨手术的患者.制作了三个10毫升的注射器,每个用5毫升0.75%的罗哌卡因,2毫升2%利多卡因与1:200,000肾上腺素,和3mL盐水。使用HNS刺激(B.BraunMelsungen公司,Melsungen,德国)神经刺激器,对于ISB给予20mL,对于SCPB给予5mL。如果没有转化为GA并且可以进行手术,则认为RA是成功的。
    未经批准:起效时间为6.53±2.17分钟,我们所有患者都获得了良好的手术条件。在两名患者中发现了霍纳综合征。所有30例RA患者均成功进行了手术。术后疼痛缓解持续5±0.92h。
    UNASSIGNED:ISB联合SCPB作为锁骨手术的唯一麻醉药是安全有效的。在COVID-19大流行期间,我们成功地避免了这些患者使用全身麻醉药,并为他们提供了安全有效的替代方案。
    UNASSIGNED: Fractures of the clavicle are usually operated under general anesthesia (GA) as they need dense anesthesia, and the airway is difficult to access intraoperatively. There is no established regional anesthesia (RA) technique for clavicular fractures, also as the innervation is contentious. Some studies have been done using RA techniques, but they are all small case numbers. RA is superior to GA in many ways, and we wished to avoid GA specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to use a peripheral nerve stimulator and a landmark-based technique to give interscalene block (ISB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as a sole anesthetic for clavicular fracture surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a prospective observational study in a tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India.
    UNASSIGNED: After approval from our ethics committee and informed consent, thirty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I or II, aged 18-65 years, after exclusion criteria were selected who had to undergo clavicular surgery. Three 10-mL syringes were made, each with 5 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, 2 mL of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline, and 3 mL of saline. Using the HNS Stimuplex (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) nerve stimulator, 20 mL was given for an ISB and 5 mL for the SCPB. RA was considered successful if there was no conversion to GA and surgery could be performed.
    UNASSIGNED: With an onset time of 6.53 ± 2.17 min, good operating conditions were obtained in all our patients. Horner\'s syndrome was noted in two patients. Surgery was successfully carried out in all thirty patients under RA. Pain relief lasted postoperatively for 5 ± 0.92 h.
    UNASSIGNED: ISB combined with SCPB is safe and effective as a sole anesthetic for clavicular surgery. We successfully avoided the use of a general anesthetic in these patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and gave them a safe and effective alternative.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    颈浅丛阻滞(SCPB)是公认的,接受下颌下区域区域麻醉,颈部区域,和耳垂。这是一种可能的有价值的麻醉技术,适用于耳垂撕裂等情况下进行手术的个人,颌下脓肿,以及下颌或颈部的创伤。它在口腔颌面外科中的应用是下颌周区的各种外科手术,下颌骨浅表病变切除,耳垂,颈部区域,和缝合相应区域的皮肤。我们说明了在浅表颈丛阻滞下手术的下颌骨骨折不愈合的情况,没有任何并发症。
    The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) is well acknowledged, accepted for regional anesthetic for the submandibular area, neck region, and ear lobe. It is a possible valuable anesthetic technique in individuals to be operated on with conditions such as ear lobe lacerations, submandibular abscesses, and trauma to the mandibular or the neck region. Its application in oral and maxillofacial surgery is for various surgical procedures in the peri-mandibular area, excision of superficial lesions in the mandibular, ear lobe, neck region, and suturing of the skin in the corresponding region. We illustrate a case of non-union of mandibular fracture operated under superficial cervical plexus block without any complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Animal bite injuries are prevalent worldwide. Camel bites, as a cause, are relatively rare. Male camels are particularly aggressive, especially during the rutting season. These injuries, when inflicted over the face, have a disfiguration effect with possible psychological repercussions to the patient. The surgical management of facial camel bite is described sporadically and remains a source of deliberation. Our paper reports the mechanism and management of facial soft tissue injury inflicted by camel bite over the face in an adult male with long-time follow-up for the patient post surgical repair without any documented complications. This case report demonstrates the complex nature of camel bite injuries over the face. Inappropriate wound management may result in long-term sequelae, which may affect the patient\'s quality of life. Individuals should apply caution when dealing with camels, mainly in the rutting season. Primary skin closure, especially to the face or neck, and proper wound management will decrease the risk of permanent scars and infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Parathyroidectomy has been proposed as a method for reducing parathyroid hormone levels. We evaluated the effects of ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) on the quality of recovery of uremia patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) following parathyroidectomy.
    Eighty-two uremia patients who underwent parathyroidectomy and exhibited SHPT were randomly allocated to the BSCPB group or the control group (CON group). The patients received ultrasound-guided BSCPB with 7.5 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% on each side (BSCPB group) or equal amount of 0.9% normal saline (CON group). The primary outcome of the Quality of Recovery-40(QoR-40) score was recorded on the day before surgery and postoperative day 1(POD1). Secondary outcomes including total consumption of remifentanil, time to first required rescue analgesia, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, and total consumption of tramadol during the first 24 h after surgery were recorded. The occurrence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed and recorded.
    The scores on the pain and emotional state dimensions of the QoR-40 and the total QoR-40 score were higher in the BSCPB group than in the CON group on POD1 (P = 0.000). Compared with the CON group, the total consumption of remifentanil was significantly decreased in the BSCPB group (P = 0.000). The BSCPB group exhibited longer time to first required rescue analgesia (P = 0.018), fewer patients requiring rescue analgesia (P = 0.000), and lower postoperative total consumption of tramadol during the first 24 h after surgery (P = 0.000) than the CON group. The incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the BSCPB group than in the CON group (P = 0.013). The VAS scores in the BSCPB group were lower than those in the CON group at all time-points after surgery (P = 0.000).
    Ultrasound-guided BSCPB with ropivacaine 0.5% can enhance the quality of recovery, postoperative analgesia, and reduce the incidence of PONV in uremia patients with SHPT following parathyroidectomy.
    ChiCTR1900027185 . (Prospective registered). Initial registration date was 04/11/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号