BACKGROUND: Subtalar arthroereisis (SA) is an increasingly applied minimally invasive approach for flexible flat foot (FFF) not responsive to conservative treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of SA in pediatric patients with symptomatic FFF.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients (11.9 ± 1.6yy) underwent SA (74 feet), with outcomes assessed after a mean 10-year follow-up. Pain, quality of life, foot functionality, and alignment were evaluated using validated tools and radiographic parameters, calculated on weightbearing x-rays pre- and post-operatively.
RESULTS: Clinical outcomes reached excellent postoperative results (FFI: 9.1, AOFAS: 94.5) with a low 0.9 NRS pain (p < 0.01) and a 92 % satisfaction. All radiographic parameters improved significantly towards normal values: CP 17.5 ± 3.9, MA 4.3 ± 5.8, TCA 42.8 ± 6.2, TNCA 21.1 ± 8.5, TNU% 26.6 ± 8.4 (all p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: SA with a metallic endosinotarsal device provided significant long-term clinical and radiographic improvements, with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction, supporting its efficacy as a treatment option for pediatric symptomatic FFF.
METHODS: IV.

OBJECTIVE: Subtalar arthroereisis is a procedure commonly performed in children with flat feet. The procedure is performed when conservative treatment did not have the desired effect,or when the patient\'s abnormal symptoms are very severe and make it difficult for them to function normally in daily life. The aim of this study was to assess whether subtalar arthroereisis and physiotherapy improve the quality of life among children with flat feet.
METHODS: The study comprised 79 patients (140 operated feet) diagnosed with a flat foot defect who underwent a subtalar arthroereisis procedure. A self-administered questionnaire and a shortened version of the standardised WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire were used in the research.
RESULTS: The study confirmed that the patients\' quality of life after surgery was high in all the areas regarding the somatic, psychological, social and environmental domains. In the group of children assessed 13-24 months after surgery. it was also found that rapid fatigue after exercise (30% ± 9%) and Achilles tendon contracture (7% ± 4%) were significantly reduced. The results of the study confirmed that subtalar arthroereisis contributes to a decreased demand for orthoses in children (9% ± 6%) and for orthopaedic footwear (11% ± 5%) than before surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The employment of subtalars arthroereisis has a positive effect on the quality of life of children with flat feet. The surgery contributes to a reduction in pain and other abnormal symptoms that are associated with flat feet. In addition, physiotherapy performed after the procedure had a positive effect on the healing process and contributed to the improvement of the children\'s quality of life.

BACKGROUND: The use of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is controversial. The aim was to investigate the clinical outcomes and report the implant removal rate of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct for stage 1 PCFD.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 212 consecutive feet undergoing operative management of stage 1 PCFD with adjunctive subtalar arthroereisis between October 2010 and April 2018. The primary outcome was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Secondary outcomes included Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), Euroqol-5D-5L Index and implant removal rate.
RESULTS: Post-operative clinical FAOS outcomes were collected for 153 feet (72.2%). At mean 2.5-year follow-up, the mean ± standard deviation FAOS for each domain was as follows; Pain: 81.5 ± 18.5, Symptoms: 79.5 ± 12.9, Activities of Daily Living: 82.5 ± 15.4 and Quality of Life: 64.2 ± 23.7. EQ-5D-5L Index was 0.884 ± 0.152. Pre-operative scores were available for 20 of these feet demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in all FAOS, FADI and EQ-5D-5L domains (p < 0.05). The implant removal rate for persistent sinus tarsi pain was 48.1% (n = 102).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a subtalar arthroereisis implant as an adjunct to conventional procedures in stage 1 flexible PCFD can result in significant improvement in pain and function. Patients should be counselled as to the relatively frequent rate of subsequent implant removal.
METHODS: IV.

UNASSIGNED: Pes planovalgus is one of the most common pediatric skeletal deformities. There have been no studies to analyze in detail the spatiotemporal variables of gait following arthroereisis.
UNASSIGNED: The purpose of our study was to assess gait parameters in patients with symptomatic flexible flatfoot following treatment with the talus screw.
UNASSIGNED: This was a prospective study assessing the 22 patients treated surgically due to symptomatic flexible flatfoot with the talus screw. Patients underwent gait assessment with a G-Sensor. We analyzed the following gait parameters: gait cycle duration, step length, support phase duration, swing phase duration, double support duration, single support duration, cadence, velocity, step length.
UNASSIGNED: The post-operative gait parameter assessment for the operated and non-operated foot showed a significant difference only in terms of step length. Cadence increased from the pre-operative mean of 82.29 steps/min to a post-operative mean of 102.94 steps/min. Gait velocity increased significantly from 0.81 m/s before to 0.96 m/s after surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Arthroereisis with the talus screw helps improve gait parameters following surgery. Post-operatively, we observed increased gait velocity and cadence and decreased gait cycle duration in the operated limb.
UNASSIGNED: Short-term biomechanical outcomes of pes planovalgus treatment with the talus screw are good.

BACKGROUND: Pes planovalgus, or flexible flatfoot, deformity is a common problem in pediatric orthopedic patients. There is no consensus on using the technique of arthroereisis in the treatment of symptomatic pes planovalgus. The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the functional outcomes following symptomatic pes planovalgus treatment with the use of the Spherus talar screw.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (11 females, 16 males), at a mean age of 10.5 years (7-14 years) were included in the prospective study. We assessed the level of physical activity (including sports) based on the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, a 10-point level-of-activity VAS scale, and the Grimby physical activity scale. Pain was assessed based on a VAS pain scale; foot function was assessed with the revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R); and ankle joint mobility was measured.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 18 months (14-26 months). There was a significant improvement in VAS-measured physical activity scores from 5.47 to 7 at follow-up, p = 0.048. There was a significant improvement in UCLA activity scale scores from 4.78 to 6.05 at follow-up, p = 0.045. Pain levels decreased from a mean VAS score of 4.73 prior to surgery to a mean score of 2.73 at follow-up, p = 0.047. The functional FFI-R scores showed a significant improvement from 140 points prior to surgery to 97.75 points at follow-up, p = 0.017. Comparison of the preoperative and follow-up values of the range of plantar flexion, adduction, and abduction in the operated limb also showed no significant changes in those individual parameters. The mean values of dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, adduction, and abduction at the ankle joint at follow-up, compared individually between the operated and non-operated foot showed no statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a talar screw in the treatment of symptomatic pes planovalgus helps reduce pain and improve functional outcomes after treatment. Foot function assessments showed diminished pain, improved levels of physical and sport activity, and no effect on the range of motion after surgery in comparison with preoperative data. Arthroereisis with a talar screw is a valid surgical technique for the treatment of symptomatic pes planovalgus.

UNASSIGNED: Subtalar arthroereisis (STA) has gained growing acceptance as a viable approach solution for the management of pediatric flexible flatfoot. However, STA still remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of STA using the Talar-Fit implant for treating pediatric flexible flatfoot. Specifically, the aims of the study are as follows: first, to present the mid-term outcomes of STA using the Talar-Fit implant; second, to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes associated with varying sizes of Talar-Fit implant; and third, to analyze the optimal position of the inserted implants.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 57 pediatric patients diagnosed with flexible flatfoot (77 feet) who underwent STA utilizing Talar-Fit between January 2014 and December 2021. The participants were categorized into five groups according to the size of the implant: Group 8, Group 9, Group 10, Group 11, and Group 12. The evaluation included the assessment of clinical function using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind foot score, as well as the assessment of radiographic data such as the calcaneal pitch angle (CPA), lateral Meary angle (LMA), talar declination angle (TDA), and medial longitudinal arch angle (MLAA) were evaluated. Furthermore, the position of the inserted implants was also recorded, including angle, depth, and distance. The comparison of pre- and postoperation was conducted using the paired Student\'s t-test, whereas the analysis of differences among subgroups was performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A P-value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 57 pediatric patients (77 feet) were successfully followed-up for an average period of 26.8 months. The overall AOFAS score significantly improved from 58.6 ± 10.9 to 85.2 ± 8.6 (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the LMA decreased from 20.3° ± 3.6° to 4.5° ± 1.3°, the CPA increased from 14.8° ± 1.6° to 23.6° ± 2.7°(P < 0.05), the TDA decreased from 40.2° ± 2.3° to 25.5° ± 3.2°(P < 0.05), and the MLAA decreased from 140.1° ± 2.8° to 121.4° ± 3.9°(P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed among subgroups regarding the final outcomes. The improvements of CPA, TDA, and MLAA among different groups were significantly different; however, the adjusted P-values were all greater than 0.05. The implant were inserted at a mean angle of 89.5° ± 2.4°, a mean depth of 0.9 mm ± 2.1 mm, and a mean distance of 9.9 mm ± 0.9 mm. Eight patients experienced complications, including six cases of pain occurrence and two cases of implant dislocation.
UNASSIGNED: STA with Talar-Fit has demonstrated satisfactory mid-term outcomes. A Talar-Fit with a larger size may demonstrate a superior effect when compared with that of a smaller size. The implants were inserted in a similar position, indicating that the medial edge of the implant may be possible to transcend the midline of the talus neck.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the effectiveness of subtalar arthroereisis (STA) combined with modified Kidner procedure versus STA alone in the treatment of flexible flatfoot combined with painful accessory navicular bone in children.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 33 children with flexible flatfoot combined with painful accessory navicular bone who were admitted between August 2018 and August 2021 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into a combination group (17 cases, treated by STA combined with modified Kidner procedure) and a control group (16 cases, treated by STA alone) according to the surgical methods. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( P>0.05), such as gender, age, affected side of the foot, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, talus-first metatarsal angle (T1MT), talus-second metatarsal angle (T2MT), talonavicular coverage angle (TCA), talus first plantar angle (Meary angle), calcaneal inclination angle (Pitch angle), and heel valgus angle (HV). The operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, and perioperative complications were recorded in both groups. The anteroposterior, lateral, and calcaneal axial X-ray films for the affected feet were taken regularly, and T1MT, T2MT, TCA, Meary angle, Pitch angle, and HV were measured. The VAS score, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score were used to evaluate pain and functional recovery before and after operation.
UNASSIGNED: Surgeries in both groups were successfully performed without surgical complication such as vascular, nerve, or tendon injuries. Less operation time, shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies were found in the control group than in the combination group ( P<0.05). One case in the combination group had partial necrosis of the skin at the edge of the incision, which healed after the dressing change and infrared light therapy, and the rest of the incisions healed by first intention. All children were followed up 12-36 months, with a mean of 19.6 months. At last follow-up, VAS score and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score significantly improved in both groups when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05), and the differences of these scores between before and after operation improved more significantly in the combination group than in the control group ( P<0.05). Imaging results showed that the T1MT, T2MT, TCA, Meary angle, and HV significantly improved in both groups at last follow-up when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05), and the Pitch angle had no significant difference when compared with preoperative one ( P>0.05). But there was no significant difference in the difference of these indicators between before and after operation between the two groups ( P>0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Both procedures are effective in the treatment of flexible flatfoot children with painful accessory navicular bone. STA has the advantage of minimally invasive, while STA combined with modified Kidner procedure has better effectiveness.
UNASSIGNED: 比较分析距下关节制动术（subtalar arthroereisis，STA）联合改良Kidner术与单纯STA治疗儿童柔韧性平足合并痛性副舟骨的临床疗效。.
UNASSIGNED: 回顾分析2018年8月—2021年8月收治且符合选择标准的33例柔韧性平足合并痛性副舟骨患儿临床资料。根据手术方式分为联合组（17例，行STA联合改良Kidner术）和对照组（16例，单纯行STA）。两组患儿性别、年龄、侧别、病程及术前疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）、美国矫形足踝协会（AOFAS）踝与后足评分、距骨-第1跖骨角（talus-first metatarsal angle，T1MT）、距骨-第2跖骨角（talus-second metatarsal angle，T2MT）、距舟覆盖角（talonavicular coverage angle，TCA）、距骨第1跖骨角（Meary角）、跟骨倾斜角（Pitch角）、跟骨外翻角（heel valgus angle，HV）等基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义（ P>0.05）。记录两组手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术中透视次数及围术期并发症；定期复查患足正侧位及轴位X线片并测量T1MT、T2MT、TCA、Meary角、Pitch角、HV；手术前后采用VAS评分、AOFAS踝与后足评分评价疼痛及功能恢复情况。.
UNASSIGNED: 两组患儿均顺利完成手术，无血管、神经、肌腱损伤等手术并发症发生。对照组手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量及术中透视次数均明显优于联合组（ P<0.05）。联合组1例患儿切口边缘处皮肤出现部分坏死，予以换药、烤灯照射等处理后愈合；其余切口均Ⅰ期愈合。所有患儿均获随访，随访时间12～36个月，平均19.6个月。末次随访时，两组VAS评分、AOFAS踝与后足评分均较术前显著改善（ P<0.05），联合组上述评分手术前后差值优于对照组（ P<0.05）。影像学检测示，末次随访两组T1MT、T2MT、TCA、Meary角、HV均较术前显著改善（ P<0.05），Pitch角与术前比较差异无统计学意义（ P>0.05）；但两组间手术前后差值比较差异均无统计学意义（ P>0.05）。.
UNASSIGNED: 两种术式均能有效治疗儿童柔韧性平足合并痛性副舟骨，单纯STA具有微创优势，而STA联合改良Kidner术临床疗效更佳。.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified kidner procedure combined with subtalar arthroereisis in the treatment of adolescent type II painful accessory navicular with flexible flatfoot.
UNASSIGNED: From January 2018 to January 2022, 25 adolescent patients (40 feet) with painful type II accessory navicular and flexible flatfoot admitted to our hospital were enrolled in the study, including 13 males (23 feet) and 12 females (17 feet). All patients underwent modified kidner procedure combined with subtalar joint arthrodesis. The Meary\'s Angle, the first metatarsal Angle of talus (APTMT), the second metatarsal Angle of talus, Pitch Angle, talus tilt Angle, talonavicular coverage Angle (TCA), talus calcaneal Angle (LTCA), and calcaneal Angle were measured on weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral x-ray films before operation and at last follow-up. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the improvement of foot function and pain.
UNASSIGNED: All patients were followed up for average 17.4 ± 2.6 months (12-24). The incisions of 25 patients healed by first intention. The weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral x-ray films of the foot showed that the suture anchors did not pull out or break, and the foot arch did not collapse further. There was no screw withdrawal or secondary operation to remove the screw in all patients. At the last follow-up, the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the affected foot was significantly lower than that before operation (P < 0.01), and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) foot function score was significantly higher than that before operation (P < 0.01). At the last follow-up, the weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral foot x-ray films showed that: The Meary\'s Angle, the first metatarsal Angle of the talus (APTMT), the second metatarsal Angle of the talus, Pitch Angle, talar tilt Angle, talonavicular overbite Angle (TCA), talocalcaneal Angle (LTCA), and calcaneal Angle significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P < 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: The modified kidner procedure combined with subtalar arthroereisis has a good clinical effect in the treatment of adolescent type II painful accessory navicular with flexible flatfoot, which can effectively improve the pain symptoms, improve the foot function and imaging manifestations, and correct the flatfoot deformity.

BACKGROUND: Kidner procedure is thought to be able to eliminate the medial foot pain and contribute to restoring the medial longitudinal foot arch, making it particularly suitable for surgical treatment of pes planus that combined with symptomatic type 2 accessory navicular (AN). However, controversy remains, and the clinical evidence is still lacking. The aim of the current study is to verify the necessity of Kidner procedure during subtalar arthroereisis (STA) for pediatric flexible flatfoot (PFF) that combined with symptomatic type 2 AN.
METHODS: Forty pediatric patients (72 feet) who had undergone STA for flexible flatfoot and were also diagnosed with symptomatic type 2 AN concomitantly were reviewed retrospectively and divided into two groups (STA + Kidner vs STA alone). The visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, the Oxford ankle foot questionnaire for children (OAFQC), and the radiographic parameters that quantifying pes planus were evaluated as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications.
RESULTS: There were 35 feet in the STA + Kidner group and 37 feet in the STA alone group, with mean follow-up periods of 2.7 years and 2.1 years, respectively. The VAS, AOFAS, OAFQC scores and radiographic parameters presented no significant difference between the two groups both preoperatively and at final follow-up (P > 0.05 for each). The complications of STA surgery occurred equally in both groups, and Kidner procedure could lead to more incision problems (22.9% vs. 2.7%) and a longer time to return to activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Kidner procedure may be unnecessary during surgical treatment of PFF that combined with painful type 2 AN. Correcting the PFF while leaving the AN alone has a high possibility of relieving the pain in the AN region, and tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) rerouting hardly aids in reconstruction of the medial foot arch.
METHODS: III.

OBJECTIVE: Subtalar arthroereisis is a minimally-invasive technique for the treatment of flexible flatfoot. Some issues regarding the procedure are still debated, such as post-operative management. The aim of this study is to offer a review of the pertaining literature to identify current post-operative protocols and describe possible differences among them.
METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for all papers related to subtalar arthroereisis in children specifying the post-operative protocols. After reviewing all studies according to excluding criteria, 50 articles were selected for analysis.
RESULTS: Based on the literature review, different post-operative protocols emerged in the treatment of patients undergoing subtalar arthroereisis, in particular regarding length of hospital stay, type and duration of immobilization, weight-bearing management, adopted rehabilitation scheme, sport resumption and implant removal.
CONCLUSIONS: The most important finding was the existence of a wide variety in post-operative management after subtalar arthroereisis in children, thus confirming that no clear consensus still exists in this field.