Stroke

Stroke
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:与平日干预相比,周末手术干预的结果与更高的死亡率和并发症发生率相关。虽然先前的研究报告了颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的“周末效应”,经颈动脉血运重建术(TCAR)和经股颈动脉支架术(TFCAS)的这种关联尚不清楚.我们调查了所有三种颈动脉血运重建方法的周末效果。
    方法:我们查询了接受CEA的患者的血管质量倡议(VQI),TCAR,和TFCAS在2016-2022年之间。卡方和逻辑回归模型分析了结果,包括院内卒中,死亡,MI,和周末30天的死亡率与工作日干预。利用后向逐步回归来识别显著的混杂变量,并最终包括在每个最终的逻辑回归模型中。结果的Logistic回归以症状状态为基础。次要多变量分析比较了周末与周末三种血运重建方法之间的结果。工作日干预。
    结果:分析了155,962个程序,包括103,790个CEA,31,666TCAR和20,506TFCAS。其中,1988年CEA,246TCAR和820TFCAS接受了周末干预。Logistic回归显示TCAR无显著差异,CEA[OR:1.31,(1.04-1.65)]和TFCAS[OR:1.46,(1.09-1.96)]周末手术发生院内卒中/死亡/MI的几率增加。无症状TCAR患者30天死亡率的几率几乎是其三倍[OR:2.85,(1.06-7.68),P=0.038]。同样,无症状CEA的住院死亡几率几乎增加了两倍[OR:2.89,(1.30-6.43),P=0.009]和无症状TFCAS[OR:2.78,(1.34-5.76),P=0.006]名患者。次要分析表明,CEA和TCAR在所有结果中没有显着差异。与CEA和TCAR相比,TFCAS与卒中和死亡几率增加相关。
    结论:在这项观察性队列研究中,我们发现周末颈动脉血运重建与并发症和死亡率增加相关.此外,在CEA和TFCAS手术组中,周末无症状患者的表现更差.在三种血运重建方法中,TFCAS与围手术期中风和死亡率的最高几率相关。因此,我们的研究结果表明,周末应该避免使用TFCAS程序,赞成CEA或TCAR。在CEA不良候选患者中,TCAR为周末手术提供最低的发病率和死亡率。
    OBJECTIVE: Outcomes for weekend surgical interventions are associated with higher rates of mortality and complications compared to weekday interventions. While prior investigations have reported the \'weekend effect\' for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), this association remains unclear for Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) and Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting (TFCAS). We investigated the weekend effect for all three carotid revascularization methods.
    METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) for patients undergoing CEA, TCAR, and TFCAS between 2016-2022. Chi-square and logistic regression modeling analyzed outcomes including in-hospital stroke, death, MI, and 30-day mortality by weekend vs. weekday intervention. Backward stepwise regression was utilized to identify significant confounding variables and were ultimately included in each final logistic regression model. Logistic regression of outcomes was substratified by symptomatic status. Secondary multivariable analysis compared outcomes between the three revascularization methods by weekend vs. weekday interventions.
    RESULTS: 155,962 procedures were analyzed including 103,790 CEA, 31,666 TCAR and 20,506 TFCAS. Of these, 1988 CEA, 246 TCAR and 820 TFCAS received weekend interventions. Logistic regression demonstrated no significant differences for TCAR, and increased odds of in-hospital stroke/death/MI for CEA [OR:1.31,(1.04-1.65)] and TFCAS [OR:1.46,(1.09-1.96)] weekend procedures. Asymptomatic TCAR patients had nearly triple the odds of 30-day mortality [OR:2.85,(1.06-7.68), P=0.038]. Similarly, odds of in-hospital death were nearly tripled for asymptomatic CEA [OR:2.89,(1.30-6.43), P=0.009] and asymptomatic TFCAS [OR:2.78,(1.34-5.76), P=0.006] patients. Secondary analysis demonstrated that CEA and TCAR had no significant differences for all outcomes. TFCAS was associated with increased odds of stroke and death compared to CEA and TCAR.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this observational cohort study, we found that weekend carotid revascularization is associated with increased odds of complications and mortality. Furthermore, asymptomatic weekend patients perform worse in the CEA and TFCAS procedural groups. Among the three revascularization methods, TFCAS is associated with the highest odds of perioperative stroke and mortality. As such, our findings suggest that TFCAS procedures should be avoided over the weekend, in favor of CEA or TCAR. In patients who are poor candidates for CEA, TCAR offers the lowest morbidity and mortality for weekend procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺血性卒中(IS)后,继发性损伤与内质网(ER)应激和体脑串扰密切相关。尽管如此,在人类IS中,全身性免疫疾病介导的ER应激的潜在机制仍然未知.在这项研究中,通过重叠MSigDBER应激途径基因和DEGs鉴定了32个候选ER应激相关基因(ERSRGs)。使用LASSO确定了三个关键的ERSRG(ATF6,DDIT3和ERP29),随机森林,和SVM-RFE。使用共识聚类将具有不同ERSRGs特征的IS患者分为两组,并通过GSVA进一步探索两组之间的差异。通过免疫细胞浸润去卷积分析,和大脑中动脉闭塞(MCAO)小鼠scRNA分析,我们发现,3个关键ERSRGs的表达与周围巨噬细胞的ER应激密切相关,这在RT-qPCR实验中得到了进一步证实。这些ERS基因可能有助于通过ER应激进一步准确调节中枢神经系统和全身免疫反应,在IS的临床实践中具有潜在的应用价值。
    After ischemic stroke (IS), secondary injury is intimately linked to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and body-brain crosstalk. Nonetheless, the underlying mechanism systemic immune disorder mediated ER stress in human IS remains unknown. In this study, 32 candidate ER stress-related genes (ERSRGs) were identified by overlapping MSigDB ER stress pathway genes and DEGs. Three Key ERSRGs (ATF6, DDIT3 and ERP29) were identified using LASSO, random forest, and SVM-RFE. IS patients with different ERSRGs profile were clustered into two groups using consensus clustering and the difference between 2 group was further explored by GSVA. Through immune cell infiltration deconvolution analysis, and middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) mouse scRNA analysis, we found that the expression of 3 key ERSRGs were closely related with peripheral macrophage cell ER stress in IS and this was further confirmed by RT-qPCR experiment. These ERS genes might be helpful to further accurately regulate the central nervous system and systemic immune response through ER stress and have potential application value in clinical practice in IS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估总督血管针刺(GVAc)治疗中风后认知障碍(PSCI)的有效性。
    方法:共检查了7个数据库。四个英语数据库(科克伦图书馆,PubMed,Embase,和Medline)和三个中文数据库(中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),中国科技期刊数据库(VIP),和万方数据库)包含所有随机对照试验(RCT),将总督血管针灸与其他治疗或无针灸治疗PSCI进行比较。搜索期的确切日期是从2000年1月1日到2023年1月1日。两名研究人员独立回顾了文献,收集的RCT数据,并进行统计分析。使用ReviewManager软件(RevMan)5.3分析所有数据。
    结果:本荟萃分析共包括39项试验,共2044例患者。每个测试组和对照组都有1022名参与者。经过12-120天的针灸治疗,一项荟萃分析显示,治疗组(GVAc与常规治疗组)显着提高了其治疗比率(OR=3.00,95CI=2.37-3.79,P=0.98,I²=0%),蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)(MD=1.82,95CI=1.60-2.03,P=0.11,I²=25%),简易精神状态检查(MMSE)(MD=2.18,95CI=1.64-2.72,P<0.005,I²=92%),和日常生活活动能力(ADL)(MD=5.99,95CI=5.33-6.64,P=0.19,I²=26%)。
    结论:结果表明,针刺总督血管穴位可增强中风幸存者的认知功能。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Governor vessel acupuncture (GV Ac) in treating post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI).
    METHODS: There was a total of seven databases examined. Four English databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Medline) and three Chinese databases (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Databases (VIP), and Wan Fang Database) contain all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Governor vessel acupuncture to other treatments or none acupuncture for PSCI. The exact dates for the search period are from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2023.Two researchers independently reviewed the literature, gathered RCT data, and performed statistical analysis. All data were analyzed using Review Manager software (Rev Man) 5.3.
    RESULTS: This meta-analysis includes a total of 39 trials with 2044 patients. There were 1022 participants in each of the test and control groups. Following 12-120 days of acupuncture treatment, a meta-analysis revealed that the treatment groups (GV Ac combined with conventional treatment groups) significantly increased their scores on the Curative ratio (OR=3.00, 95%CI=2.37-3.79, P=0.98, I²=0%), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)(MD=1.82, 95%CI=1.60-2.03, P=0.11, I²=25%), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)(MD=2.18, 95%CI=1.64-2.72, P<0.005, I²=92%), and Activity of Daily Living (ADL)(MD=5.99, 95%CI=5.33-6.64, P=0.19, I²=26%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that acupuncture on points of the Governor vessel enhanced cognitive function in stroke survivors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抗凝治疗可以预防房颤(AF)患者的卒中,延长患者的生命;抗凝房颤患者仍有死亡风险.这项研究的目的是调查XANTUS人群的死亡原因以及与全因和心血管死亡相关的因素。
    结果:XANTUS项目研究中患者开始使用利伐沙班后一年内死亡的原因由中央裁决委员会裁决,并根据国际指导进行分类。确定了与全因死亡或心血管死亡相关的基线特征。在11,040名患者中,187人(1.7%)死亡。这些死亡中几乎一半是由于出血以外的心血管原因(n=82,43.9%)。尤其是心力衰竭(n=38,20.3%)和猝死或目击死亡(n=24,12.8%)。致命中风(n=8,4.3%),这被归类为一种心血管死亡,致死性出血(n=17,9.1%)是较不常见的死亡原因。与全因死亡或心血管死亡相关的独立因素包括年龄,AF类型,身体质量指数,左心室射血分数,基线时住院,利伐沙班剂量,和贫血.
    结论:XANTUS患者卒中或出血导致的总体死亡风险较低。房颤抗凝患者仍有因心力衰竭和猝死而死亡的风险。降低房颤抗凝患者心血管死亡的潜在干预措施,需要进一步调查,如早期节律控制治疗和房颤消融术。
    OBJECTIVE: Anticoagulation can prevent stroke and prolong lives in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); However, anticoagulated patients with AF remain at risk of death. The aim of this study was to investigate the causes of death and factors associated with all-cause and cardiovascular death in the XANTUS population.
    RESULTS: Causes of death occurring within a year after rivaroxaban initiation in patients in the XANTUS program studies were adjudicated by a central adjudication committee and classified following international guidance.Baseline characteristics associated with all-cause or cardiovascular death were identified. Of 11,040 patients, 187 (1.7%) died. Almost half of these deaths were due to cardiovascular causes other than bleeding (n = 82, 43.9%), particularly heart failure (n = 38, 20.3%) and sudden or unwitnessed death (n = 24, 12.8%). Fatal stroke (n = 8, 4.3%), which was classified as a type of cardiovascular death, and fatal bleeding (n = 17, 9.1%) were less common causes of death. Independent factors associated with all-cause or cardiovascular death included age, AF type, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, hospitalization at baseline, rivaroxaban dose, and anaemia.
    CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of death due to stroke or bleeding was low in XANTUS. Anticoagulated patients with AF remain at risk of death due to heart failure and sudden death. Potential interventions to reduce cardiovascular deaths in anticoagulated patients with AF, require further investigation, e.g. early rhythm control therapy and AF ablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:年轻的中风幸存者可能比年长的幸存者更快地从急性医院护理中出院而没有康复,但不清楚为什么。该队列缺乏捕获现实世界临床实践的文件审核研究。我们旨在比较年轻和老年幸存者的特征和护理途径,并描述年轻幸存者(≤45岁)的卒中表现和护理途径的预测因素。包括对“隐形”(认知,心理)困难。方法回顾性审核847份病历(67例年轻卒中幸存者,平均年龄=36岁;780名老年患者,平均年龄=70岁),完成了在澳大利亚三级医院住院的卒中幸存者。使用卒中特征和认知困难的存在(通过临床医生意见或认知筛查确定)来预测年轻卒中幸存者的住院时间和出院目的地。结果年轻和老年幸存者的住院时间没有差异,然而,年轻的卒中幸存者更有可能在没有康复的情况下出院回家(尽管这可能是由于在年轻的卒中幸存者中观察到的轻度卒中).对于年轻的中风幸存者来说,中风严重程度和年龄预测出院目的地,而认知困难预示着更长的停留时间。虽然几乎所有年轻幸存者都接受了职业治疗和物理治疗,没有人接受心理输入(临床,健康或神经心理学)。结论为老年人设计的服务模式可能在很大程度上无法满足年轻卒中幸存者的认知和心理需求。调查结果可以为服务发展或护理模式提供信息,例如新的澳大利亚青年中风服务,旨在更好地满足年轻幸存者的需求。
    Background Young stroke survivors are likely to be discharged home from acute hospital care without rehabilitation more quickly than older survivors, but it is not clear why. File-audit studies capturing real-world clinical practice are lacking for this cohort. We aimed to compare characteristics and care pathways of young and older survivors and describe stroke presentations and predictors of pathways of care in young survivors (≤45years), including a focus on care received for \'invisible\' (cognitive, psychological) difficulties. Methods A retrospective audit of 847 medical records (67 young stroke survivors, mean age=36years; 780 older patients, mean age=70years) was completed for stroke survivors admitted to an Australian tertiary hospital. Stroke characteristics and presence of cognitive difficulties (identified through clinician opinion or cognitive screening) were used to predict length of stay and discharge destination in young stroke survivors. Results There were no differences in length of stay between young and older survivors, however, young stroke survivors were more likely to be discharged home without rehabilitation (though this may be due to milder strokes observed in young stroke survivors). For young stroke survivors, stroke severity and age predicted discharge destination, while cognitive difficulties predicted longer length of stay. While almost all young survivors were offered occupational therapy and physiotherapy, none received psychological input (clinical, health or neuropsychology). Conclusions Cognitive and psychological needs of young stroke survivors may remain largely unmet by a service model designed for older people. Findings can inform service development or models of care, such as the new Australian Young Stroke Service designed to better meet the needs of young survivors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中风后第一年抑郁和失眠的患病率约为30%,显着影响复苏的前景,康复,和生活质量。此外,在中风后亚急性期,失眠和抑郁症成为慢性的风险很高.这项横断面观察研究调查了卒中后亚急性期失眠和抑郁是否相关。使用经过验证的仪器。66名门诊卒中幸存者参加。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS-D)的抑郁分量表和失眠严重程度指数(ISI)测量抑郁。采用多元线性回归分析检验因变量卒中后抑郁与自变量失眠和卒中前抑郁治疗之间的关联。结果显示,失眠(β=0.48,t=4.40,p<0.001)和卒中前抑郁治疗(β=0.24,t=2.28,p=0.026)都是抑郁症的重要预测因子。有更多失眠主诉的参与者和接受中风前抑郁治疗的参与者在中风后有更多的抑郁症状。因此,重要的是要在中风后的亚急性期保持警惕,失眠和抑郁症的抱怨。
    Prevalence rates for both depression and insomnia the first year after stroke are around 30%, significantly impacting the prospects of recovery, rehabilitation, and quality of life. Furthermore, the risk of insomnia and depression becoming chronic is high in the subacute phase post-stroke. This cross-sectional observational study investigated whether insomnia and depression are related in the subacute phase post-stroke, using validated instruments. Sixty-six outpatient stroke survivors participated. Depression was measured using the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and insomnia severity with the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). A multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between the dependent variable post-stroke depression and the independent variables insomnia and pre-stroke depression treatment. Results showed that insomnia (β = 0.48, t = 4.40, p < 0.001) and pre-stroke depression treatment (β = 0.24, t = 2.28, p = 0.026) were both significant predictors of depression. Participants with more insomnia complaints and participants with pre-stroke depression treatment had more depression symptoms post-stroke. Therefore, it is important to be alert in the subacute phase post-stroke of both, insomnia and depression complaints.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:后备箱控制是姿势控制的基本组成部分,实现躯干控制是一个复杂的过程,可以通过动态构建和维持神经肌肉功能来实现。横向撕脱,这也被定义为身体落在一侧,被认为是中风后经常遇到的重要疾病,并影响躯干控制。众所周知,根据半球定位,姿势控制和躯干控制的调节存在差异。我们有一组非常特殊的患者,并试图在这项研究中前瞻性地找出结果。
    方法:将患者分为右半球病变组(第1组)和左半球病变组(第2组)。使用Charlson合并症指数(CMI)和标准化迷你精神状态测验(SMMSE)评估合并症和认知功能。使用土耳其语版本的改良Barthel指数(MBI)评估了日常生活活动。中风康复运动器械评估(STREAM)测试用于评估躯干控制,而Brunnstrom(BS)测试用于评估运动功能。
    结果:第1组和第2组的下肢STREAM评分有显著差异,第2组的STREAM评分较高(P<0.05)。在第1组和第2组中,BS下肢IV-VI期的患者数量较高(P<0.05)。确定上肢,第2组患者的下肢和TotalSTREAM评分及BSHand分期均明显高于第1组(P<0.05)。
    结论:确定右半球病变患者的躯干控制受影响更大。此外,完全MCA病变患者的躯干控制受到显着影响。
    BACKGROUND: Trunk control is the basic component of postural control, and achieving trunk control is a complex process that can be achieved by dynamically building and maintaining neuromuscular function. Lateropulsion, which is also defined as the body falling to one side, is considered an important condition that is frequently encountered after stroke and affects trunk control. It is known that there are differences in the regulation of postural control and trunk control according to hemispheric localization. We had a very specific group of patients and tried to find out the outcomes prospectively in this study.
    METHODS: The patients were divided into 2 groups those with right hemisphere lesions (Group 1) and those with left hemisphere lesions (Group 2). Comorbidity and cognitive function were evaluated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CMI) and Standardized Mini-Mental State Test (SMMSE). Activities of daily living were evaluated using the Turkish version of the Modified Barthel Index (MBI). The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement Instrument (STREAM) test was used to assess trunk control and the Brunnstrom (BS) test was used to assess motor functions.
    RESULTS: There was a significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of STREAM in lower extremity scores were higher in Group 2 (P < .05). The number of patients in BS lower extremity Stages IV-VI was higher in Group 1 and Group 2 (P < .05). It was determined that upper extremity, lower extremity and Total STREAM scores and BS Hand stage in Group 2 were significantly higher than Group 1 in patients with total middle cerebral artery (MCA) affected(P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: It was determined that trunk control was more affected in patients with right hemispheric lesions. Additionally, trunk control is significantly affected in patients with total MCA lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:运动障碍是中风最常见的并发症之一。针刺疗法(AT)和镜像疗法(MT)是治疗中风后运动障碍的有希望的康复措施。尽管一些研究表明AT和MT对运动障碍是有效和安全的,的影响,由于缺乏强有力的证据,安全性仍然不确定。目的探讨AT联合MT治疗脑卒中后运动障碍的疗效和安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了以下数据库:PubMed,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,EMBASE,Medline,中国知网,万方,和中国生物医学文献数据库,从开始到2023年1月1日,以确定符合条件的研究。总有效率,Fugl-Meyer评估量表(FMA)上肢和下肢评分,修改后的Barthel指数得分,伯格平衡量表,改良的Ashworth秤,并以不良反应作为结局指标。2名独立评审员使用建议评估开发和评估系统来评估研究中包含的结果指标的证据质量。采用RevManV.5.4软件进行统计分析。
    结果:共纳入24项随机对照研究,包括2133例脑卒中后运动障碍患者。AT联合MT治疗脑卒中后运动障碍的总有效率更有优势(相对危险度=1.31,95%置信区间[CI][1.22-1.42],Z=6.96,P<.0001)。AT联合MT对FMA上肢评分更有利(平均差[MD]=6.67,95%CI[5.21-8.13],Z=8.97,P<.00001)和FMA下肢评分(MD=3.72,95%CI[2.81-4.63],Z=7.98,P<.00001)。Meta分析显示,AT联合MT治疗脑卒中后运动障碍的改良Barthel指数评分更有优势(MD=9.51,95%CI[7.44-11.58],Z=9.01,P<.00001)。
    结论:AT联合MT可有效改善患者的运动功能和日常生活能力。尤其是改善肌肉痉挛.然而,鉴于评估结果的证据质量较低,因此应谨慎对待这些结果。
    BACKGROUND: Dyskinesia is one of the most common complications of stroke. Acupuncture therapy (AT) and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for the treatment of post-stroke dyskinesia. Although some studies suggested that AT and MT are effective and safe for dyskinesia, the effects, and safety remain uncertain due to lacking strong evidence. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of AT combined with MT in the treatment of post-stroke dyskinesia.
    METHODS: We searched the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, China Knowledge Network, WANFANG, and China Biomedical Literature Database, from inception to 1 January 2023 to identify eligible studies. Total effective rate, the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale (FMA) upper and lower limb scores, modified Barthel index scores, Berg balance scale, modified Ashworth scale, and adverse reactions were adopted as outcome indicators. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system was used by 2 independent reviewers to assess the quality of evidence for the outcome indicators included in the study. The statistical analysis was conducted by RevMan V.5.4 software.
    RESULTS: A total of 24 randomized controlled studies included 2133 patients with post-stroke dyskinesia were included. The total effective rate of AT combined with MT was more advantageous in the treatment of post-stroke dyskinesia (relative risk = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.22-1.42], Z = 6.96, P < .0001). AT combined with MT was more advantageous for FMA upper limb score (mean difference [MD] = 6.67, 95% CI [5.21-8.13], Z = 8.97, P < .00001) and FMA lower limb score (MD = 3.72, 95% CI [2.81-4.63], Z = 7.98, P < .00001). Meta-analysis showed that AT combined with MT for post-stroke dyskinesia had a more advantageous modified Barthel index score (MD = 9.51, 95% CI [7.44-11.58], Z = 9.01, P < .00001).
    CONCLUSIONS: AT combined with MT is effective in improving motor function and daily living ability of patients, especially in improving muscle spasms. However, these results should be regarded with caution given the low quality of evidence for the evaluation results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:上肢功能障碍是中风最常见的后遗症之一,机器人治疗被认为是上肢康复的有希望的方法之一。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨使用康复机器人设备(Rebless®)对中风患者进行上肢训练的临床有效性。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,未失明,随机对照试验,患者被随机分配接受机器人训练(实验组,n=15)或常规治疗(对照组,n=15)。两组均接受持续30分钟的上肢训练,4周内共进行10次训练。电机功能,功能评估,和痉挛在训练前后进行临床评估。在第1次和第10次训练中使用功能性近红外光谱法测量皮质活化。
    结果:实验组在Fugl-Meyer评估-上肢评分和改良的Ashworth量表评分方面显示出显着改善。与对照组相比,实验组在10次训练后,未受影响的半球的皮质活动显着降低。
    结论:实验组在Fugl-Meyer评估-上肢评分和肘屈肌痉挛方面有显著改善,未受累半球的皮质活动显著降低。使用Rebless®进行训练可以帮助慢性中风患者恢复上肢功能并恢复对侧运动功能激活的优势。
    BACKGROUND: Upper limb dysfunction is one of the most common sequelae of stroke and robotic therapy is considered one of the promising methods for upper limb rehabilitation.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the clinical effectiveness of upper limb training using a rehabilitation robotic device (Rebless®) for patients with stroke.
    METHODS: In this prospective, unblinded, randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive robotic training (experimental group, n = 15) or conventional therapy (control group, n = 15). Both groups received upper limb training lasting for 30 minutes per session with a total of 10 training sessions within 4 weeks. Motor function, functional evaluation, and spasticity were clinically assessed before and after the training. Cortical activation was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy at the 1st and 10th training sessions.
    RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in the Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity score and the modified Ashworth scale grade in elbow flexors. The cortical activity of the unaffected hemisphere significantly decreased after 10 training sessions in the experimental group compared with the control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The experimental group showed significant improvement in the Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity score and spasticity of elbow flexors and had significantly decreased cortical activity of the unaffected hemisphere. Training with Rebless® may help patients with chronic stroke in restoring upper limb function and recovering the contralateral predominance of activation in motor function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于β受体阻滞剂在预防中风方面的疗效较差,因此一些指南不推荐β受体阻滞剂作为高血压的一线治疗方法。β受体阻滞剂的联合治疗通常用于血压控制。我们比较了使用氨氯地平加比索洛尔(AB)治疗的患者的临床结果,Aβ1选择性β受体阻滞剂和氨氯地平加缬沙坦(A+V)。方法:使用台湾国民健康保险研究数据库的数据进行基于人群的队列研究。2012年至2019年,新诊断的成人高血压患者接受氨氯地平单药治疗,然后改用A+V或A+B。疗效结果包括全因死亡,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)事件(心血管死亡,心肌梗塞,缺血性卒中,和冠状动脉血运重建),出血性中风,和心力衰竭。多变量Cox比例风险模型用于评估结局与不同治疗之间的关系。结果:总体而言,A+B组4311例,A+V组10980例。经过4.34±1.79年的平均随访,在全因死亡方面,A+V组和A+B组的疗效结果相似(调整后的风险比[aHR]0.99,95%置信区间[CI]0.83-1.18),ASCVD事件(AHR0.97,95%CI0.84-1.12),和心力衰竭(aHR1.06,95%CI0.87-1.30)。A+B组出血性卒中风险较低(aHR0.70,95%CI0.52-0.94)。在竞争风险分析中考虑死亡时,结果相似。两组的安全性结果相似。结论:全因死亡无差异,ASCVD事件,A+B与心力衰竭A+V用户。但A+B使用者出血性中风的风险较低。
    Objective: Several guidelines do not recommend beta-blocker as the first-line treatment for hypertension because of its inferior efficacy in stroke prevention. Combination therapy with beta-blocker is commonly used for blood pressure control. We compared the clinical outcomes in patients treated with amlodipine plus bisoprolol (A + B), a ß1-selective beta-blocker and amlodipine plus valsartan (A + V).Methods: A population-based cohort study was performed using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. From 2012 to 2019, newly diagnosed adult hypertensive patients who received initial amlodipine monotherapy and then switched to A + V or A + B were included. The efficacy outcomes included all-cause death, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and coronary revascularization), hemorrhagic stroke, and heart failure. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between outcomes and different treatments.Results: Overall, 4311 patients in A + B group and 10980 patients in A + V group were included. After a mean follow-up of 4.34 ± 1.79 years, the efficacy outcomes were similar between the A + V and A + B groups regarding all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.18), ASCVD event (aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12), and heart failure (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.87-1.30). The risk of hemorrhagic stroke was lower in A + B group (aHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.94). The result was similar when taking death into consideration in competing risk analysis. The safety outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.Conclusions: There was no difference of all-cause death, ASCVD event, and heart failure in A + B vs. A + V users. But A + B users had a lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号