Strictures

狭窄
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在表征临床结果,安全,腔内金属支架(LAMS)治疗良性胃肠狭窄的疗效。
    对2017年6月至2023年7月因良性狭窄而接受LAMS放置的所有患者进行单中心回顾性审查。主要结果是技术上的成功,早期临床成功,晚期临床成功(LCS),和持续的后LAMS临床成功(SPLCS)。次要结果包括支架停留时间,狭窄改变,不良事件,再干预率,和症状学评估。
    35例患者接受了42例LAMS的放置(74%为女性,平均年龄:54.2±11.7岁)。吻合口狭窄占病例的64%(N=27,胃空肠吻合术占45%)。性病中位数为91.0天(四分位距[IQR]:55.0-132.0)。在所有情况下都获得了技术成功。80%的病例获得了早期临床成功和LCS。在45%(n=15)的病例中实现了SPLCS。总体再干预率为63%,再次干预的中位时间为50.5天(IQR:24-105)。不良事件总体发生率为28%(n=12),具有24%的迁移率(n=10)。83%的病例完成了随访,中位持续时间为629天(范围:192.0-1297.0)。在留置LAMS期间,症状总体改善为79%(n=27),而在取出后30天和60天时为58%和56%,分别。
    良性胃肠狭窄的LAMS与较高的技术和早期临床成功率/LCS率相关,积极的生活质量指标,和可耐受的不良事件发生率。总的来说,LAMS摘除后症状复发和高再干预率增加了治疗良性胃肠道狭窄的难度,但在部分病例中也主张LAMS是一种确定的治疗方法.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to characterize the clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in treating benign gastrointestinal strictures.
    UNASSIGNED: A single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent LAMS placement for benign strictures from June 2017 to July 2023. Primary outcomes were technical success, early clinical success, late clinical success (LCS), and sustained post-LAMS clinical success (SPLCS). Secondary outcomes included stent dwell time, stenosis changes, adverse events, reintervention rates, and symptomatology evaluation.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-five patients underwent placement of 42 LAMS (74% female, mean age: 54.2 ± 11.7 years). Anastomotic strictures accounted for 64% of cases (N = 27, 45% at the gastrojejunal anastomosis). The median STD was 91.0 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 55.0-132.0). Technical success was obtained in all cases. Early clinical successand LCS were achieved in 80% of cases overall. SPLCS was achieved in 45% (n = 15) of cases. The overall reintervention rate was 63%, with a median time to reintervention being 50.5 days (IQR: 24-105). adverse events occurred in 28% (n = 12) overall, with a 24% migration rate (n = 10). Follow-up was completed in 83% of cases with a median duration of 629 days (range: 192.0-1297.0). Overall symptom improvement occurred in 79% (n = 27) during indwelling LAMS versus 58% and 56% at 30- and 60-days post-removal, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: LAMS for benign gastrointestinal strictures are associated with high technical and early clinical success/LCS rates, positive quality-of-life metrics, and a tolerable adverse event rate. Overall, recurrence of symptoms and high reintervention rates post-LAMS removal reinforce the difficulty in managing benign gastrointestinal strictures but also argue for LAMS as a definitive therapy in select cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    成功的克罗恩病(CD)治疗依赖于及时和精确的管理策略。内窥镜球囊扩张术(EBD)由于其微创性和保留肠道长度的可能性,已被用作有症状的CD相关狭窄的一线治疗方法。
    本研究的目的是确定技术上成功的EBD后,与CD相关的回肠狭窄手术需要相关的患者相关预测因素。
    所有在2023年12月之前发表的原始研究报告了EBD治疗CD继发回肠狭窄的患者的结局,并描述了至少1年的随访。针对8种不同的患者特征(性别,吸烟习惯,以前的手术,生物治疗,类固醇,免疫抑制剂,狭窄的性质,和内镜疾病活动)。
    接受手术的患者和没有手术史的患者在EBD后需要手术的风险存在显着差异(RD:-0.20[-0.31,-0.08]),内镜粘膜活动患者和EBD缓解患者(RD:0.19[0.04,0.34]),在EBD时使用生物制剂的患者和未使用生物制剂的患者(RD:-0.09[-0.16,-0.03]),使用类固醇的患者和在EBD时不使用类固醇的患者(RD:0.16[0.07,0.26])。
    在EBD时使用生物制剂和内镜疾病缓解是避免手术需要的保护因素。以前没有手术或在EBD时使用类固醇与随访期间需要手术有关。
    UNASSIGNED: Successful Crohn\'s disease (CD) therapy relies on timely and precise management strategies. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) has been applied as a first-line treatment for symptomatic CD-associated strictures due to its minimally invasive nature and the possibility of preserving intestinal length.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the present study was to determine patient-related predictive factors associated with the need for surgery for CD-associated ileocolic strictures after technically successful EBD.
    UNASSIGNED: All original studies published before December 2023 that reported the outcomes of patients treated with EBD for ileocolic strictures secondary to CD and described follow-up for at least 1 year were included. The difference in risk of needing surgery was calculated for 8 different patient characteristics (Sex, smoking habit, previous surgery, biologic therapy, steroids, immunosuppressors, nature of the stricture, and endoscopic disease activity).
    UNASSIGNED: There were significant differences in the risk of needing surgery after EBD among patients who underwent surgery and patients without a history of surgery (RD: -0.20 [-0.31, -0.08]), patients with endoscopic mucosal activity and patients in remission at the time of EBD (RD: 0.19 [0.04, 0.34]), patients using biologics at the time of EBD and patients not using biologics (RD: -0.09 [-0.16, -0.03]), and patients using steroids and those not using steroids at the time of EBD (RD: 0.16 [0.07, 0.26]).
    UNASSIGNED: The use of biologics and endoscopic disease remission at the time of EBD were protective factors against the need for surgery. No previous surgery or use of steroids at the time of EBD was associated with the need for surgery during follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与研究目的内镜超声引导下的肝胃造口术与左右胆管之间的桥接是内镜经乳头引流治疗恶性肺门胆道梗阻的替代方法。我们旨在分析内窥镜超声引导下的肝胃造口术与桥接的长期支架通畅性。患者与方法回顾性分析2018年4月至2023年7月期间行超声内镜引导下肝胃造口术伴桥接的患者。我们回顾性地比较了这些患者的支架通畅性与使用不匹配(完整)和倾向评分匹配的队列进行内窥镜经乳头引流-多支架置入术的患者的支架通畅性。结果超声内镜引导下肝胃造口术加桥的技术成功率为90%(18/20)。不良事件很少。内窥镜超声引导下的肝胃造口术的临床成功病例数为17和82,其中使用金属支架和内窥镜经乳头引流-多支架置入术桥接,分别。内镜超声引导肝胃造瘘术伴桥接和内镜经乳头引流-多支架置入术的胆道梗阻复发率分别为17.6%和58.5%,分别;内镜超声引导肝胃造口术与桥接术的胆道梗阻复发的中位时间(天数)明显更长(未达到vs.104,P=0.03)和倾向得分匹配(183vs.79,P=0.05)队列。内镜超声引导下的肝胃造口术在3个月和6个月时的非复发性胆道梗阻率为91.6%,在12个月时为57%。多变量分析显示,内镜超声引导下的肝胃造口术与桥接有助于较低的复发性胆道梗阻发生率(风险比,0.31,P=0.05)无明显性差别。结论内镜超声引导下肝胃造口术支架通畅性明显优于桥接术。然而,未来的前瞻性研究是必要的。
    Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. Patients and methods Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. Results Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, P =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, P =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, P =0.05) without significant difference. Conclusions Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:管腔狭窄,常见于炎症性肠病(IBD),尤其是克罗恩病(CD),通常用内窥镜球囊扩张术(EBD)治疗。较新的内镜狭窄切开术(ESt)方法显示出希望,但数据有限。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了ESt在IBD相关狭窄中的有效性和安全性。
    方法:对评估ESt在IBD中的疗效和安全性的研究进行了全面的文献检索,直至2023年11月。主要结果是临床和技术成功,次要终点涵盖不良事件,随后的狭窄手术,额外的内窥镜治疗(ESt或EBD),药物升级,与疾病相关的急诊科就诊,和住院后ESt。技术成功被定义为通过狭窄的范围,临床成功定义为症状改善。单组荟萃分析(CMA版本3)以95%的置信区间(CI)计算每位患者的事件率。使用I2评估异质性。
    结果:纳入了9项研究,涉及对287例IBD患者进行640例ESt手术(169CD,118溃疡性结肠炎)。其中,53.3%是男性,平均年龄为43.3±14.3岁,平均狭窄长度为1.68±0.84厘米。技术成功率为96.4%(95%CI92.5-98.3,p值<0.0001),临床成功率为62%(95%CI52.2-70.9,p值=0.017,I2=34.670)。每位患者的出血率为10.5%,穿孔率为3.5%。平均随访0.95±1.1年,16.4%的人需要手术治疗ESt术后狭窄,而44.2%需要额外的内镜治疗.ESt后用药增加率为14.7%。与疾病相关的急诊科就诊率为14.7%,术后疾病相关住院率为21.3%。
    结论:我们的分析表明,ESt对于治疗IBD相关狭窄是安全有效的,使其成为内窥镜医师的武器库的宝贵补充。正式培训工作应侧重于确保其广泛采用。
    OBJECTIVE: Luminal strictures, common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially Crohn\'s disease (CD), are typically treated with endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD). The newer endoscopic stricturotomy (ESt) approach shows promise, but data is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness and safety of ESt in IBD-related strictures.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted until November 2023 for studies assessing ESt efficacy and safety in IBD. Primary outcomes were clinical and technical success, with secondary endpoints covering adverse events, subsequent stricture surgery, additional endoscopic treatments (ESt or EBD), medication escalation, disease-related emergency department visits, and hospitalization post-ESt. Technical success was defined as passing the scope through the stricture, and clinical success was defined as symptom improvement. Single-arm meta-analysis (CMA version 3) calculated the event rate per patient with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2.
    RESULTS: Nine studies were included, involving 640 ESt procedures on 287 IBD patients (169 CD, 118 ulcerative colitis). Of these, 53.3% were men, with a mean age of 43.3 ± 14.3 years and a mean stricture length of 1.68 ± 0.84 cm. The technical success rate was 96.4% (95% CI 92.5-98.3, p-value < 0.0001), and the clinical success rate was 62% (95% CI 52.2-70.9, p-value = 0.017, I2 = 34.670). The bleeding rate was 10.5% per patient, and the perforation rate was 3.5%. After an average follow-up of 0.95 ± 1.1 years, 16.4% required surgery for strictures post-ESt, while 44.2% needed additional endoscopic treatment. The medication escalation rate after ESt was 14.7%. The disease-related emergency department visit rate was 14.7%, and the disease-related hospitalization rate post-procedure was 21.3%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis shows that ESt is safe and effective for managing IBD-related strictures, making it a valuable addition to the armamentarium of endoscopists. Formal training efforts should focus on ensuring its widespread adoption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和研究目的胰腺炎是经内镜下放置自膨式金属支架(SEMS)治疗恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)的潜在致命不良事件。在这种情况下,基于深度学习的图像识别在预测胰腺炎方面尚未得到研究。患者和方法我们包括70例接受内镜下放置SEMS治疗不可切除的远端MBO的患者。我们使用一系列覆盖整个胰腺的术前计算机断层扫描图像(总共≥120,960张增强图像)构建了用于胰腺炎预测的卷积神经网络(CNN)模型。我们检查了基于CNN的概率对以下基于临床参数的机器学习模型的额外影响:逻辑回归,具有线性或RBF核的支持向量机,随机森林分类器,和梯度增强分类器。模型性能基于接收器工作特性分析中的曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估,阳性预测值(PPV),准确度,和特异性。结果CNN模型与中等水平的性能指标相关:AUC,0.67;PPV,0.45;精度,0.66;和特异性,0.63.当添加到机器学习模型时,基于CNN的概率提高了性能指标。具有基于CNN的概率的逻辑回归模型的AUC为0.74,PPV为0.85,准确性为0.83,特异性为0.96,而分别为0.72、0.78、0.77和0.96。没有概率。结论基于CNN的模型可以提高内镜下放置胆道SEMS后胰腺炎的可预测性。我们的研究结果支持深度学习技术在胰胆管内镜治疗中改善预后模型的潜力。
    Background and study aims Pancreatitis is a potentially lethal adverse event of endoscopic transpapillary placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). Deep learning-based image recognition has not been investigated in predicting pancreatitis in this setting. Patients and methods We included 70 patients who underwent endoscopic placement of a SEMS for nonresectable distal MBO. We constructed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for pancreatitis prediction using a series of pre-procedure computed tomography images covering the whole pancreas (≥ 120,960 augmented images in total). We examined the additional effects of the CNN-based probabilities on the following machine learning models based on clinical parameters: logistic regression, support vector machine with a linear or RBF kernel, random forest classifier, and gradient boosting classifier. Model performance was assessed based on the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic analysis, positive predictive value (PPV), accuracy, and specificity. Results The CNN model was associated with moderate levels of performance metrics: AUC, 0.67; PPV, 0.45; accuracy, 0.66; and specificity, 0.63. When added to the machine learning models, the CNN-based probabilities increased the performance metrics. The logistic regression model with the CNN-based probabilities had an AUC of 0.74, PPV of 0.85, accuracy of 0.83, and specificity of 0.96, compared with 0.72, 0.78, 0.77, and 0.96, respectively, without the probabilities. Conclusions The CNN-based model may increase predictability for pancreatitis following endoscopic placement of a biliary SEMS. Our findings support the potential of deep learning technology to improve prognostic models in pancreatobiliary therapeutic endoscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目的是调查围手术期结局的差异,尤其是输尿管肠系膜狭窄,在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)和回肠导管时接受了输尿管肠管支架吻合术的患者与未接受的患者之间。
    对我们的RARC数据库进行了回顾性审查(2009-2023年)。患者分为接受输尿管肠管支架吻合术的患者和未接受支架吻合术的患者。在年龄方面,以3(支架输尿管肠吻合)与1(无支架)的比例进行倾向评分匹配,性别,BMI,种族,美国麻醉医师协会评分,新辅助化疗,Charlson合并症指数,先前的放射治疗,既往腹部手术史,临床T3/临床T4分期,术前转移,术前肾积水.使用累积发生率曲线来描绘输尿管肠系膜狭窄,并使用Cox回归模型来识别与输尿管肠系膜狭窄相关的变量。
    488名患者接受了RARC,366人接受了输尿管肠管支架吻合术,122例患者接受了无支架入路。90天总体并发症没有显着差异,严重并发症,再入院,UTI,泄漏,肠梗阻(P>0.05)。在1年和2年,输尿管肠系膜狭窄的发生率分别为13%和18%。分别在支架组中,无支架组分别为7%和10%(P=0.05)。支架放置与输尿管肠系膜狭窄显着相关。
    无支架输尿管肠吻合与RARC和回肠导管后狭窄较少相关。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to investigate the differences in perioperative outcomes, especially ureteroenteric strictures, between patients who underwent a stented ureteroenteric anastomosis at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and ileal conduit vs those who did not.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of our RARC database was performed (2009-2023). Patients were divided into those who received stented ureteroenteric anastomosis vs those who did not. Propensity score matching was performed in the ratio of 3 (stented ureteroenteric anastomosis) to 1 (stent-free) in terms of age, gender, BMI, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Charlson Comorbidity Index, prior radiation therapy, previous abdominal surgery history, clinical T3/clinical T4 stage, preoperative metastasis, and preoperative hydronephrosis. A cumulative incidence curve was used to depict ureteroenteric strictures and a Cox regression model was used to identify variables associated with ureteroenteric strictures.
    UNASSIGNED: Four hundred eighty-eight patients underwent RARC, 366 individuals underwent a stented ureteroenteric anastomosis, and 122 patients underwent a stent-free approach. There was no significant difference in 90-day overall complications, high-grade complications, readmissions, UTIs, leakage, and ileus (P > .05). Ureteroenteric strictures occurred at a rate of 13% and 18% at 1 and 2 years, respectively in the stented group, vs 7% and 10% in the stent-free group (P = .05). Stent placement was significantly associated with ureteroenteric strictures.
    UNASSIGNED: Stent-free ureteroenteric anastomosis was associated with fewer strictures following RARC and ileal conduit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小肠梗阻是发病率和死亡率的主要来源,具有显著的经济负担。复发性小肠梗阻可继发于环状狭窄(小肠膈肌疾病),长期使用NSAID的次要实体。我们旨在描述经手术治疗的小肠diaphragm肌疾病患者术前CT小肠造影的敏感性。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2010-2023年间由一名微创外科医生进行的择期小肠切除术治疗小肠梗阻的成年患者。患者病史,射线照相,内窥镜,Operative,和病理学报告进行审查,以参考NSAID的使用,小肠狭窄,隔膜,和肠病。排除标准是先前的辐射,炎症性肠病,恶性肿瘤,粘连性疾病,吻合口狭窄.
    结果:共确定了225例患者;其中,22例患者(10%)符合纳入标准。平均年龄为60.7岁(范围29-78),15名女性(68%)。所有患者均接受微创小肠切除术治疗梗阻,组织病理学证据为狭窄,无透壁性炎症的证据。肉芽肿,或异型增生,并确认使用NSAID(n=22;100%)。36%(n=8)存在贫血。18例(82%)进行了术前CT或MR小肠造影,13例(72%)报告了狭窄。术中,触诊发现所有患者均有狭窄。
    结论:NSAID诱导的小肠损伤是一种公认的条件,在严重的情况下,可表现为小肠梗阻。外科医生应考虑在患有梗阻和使用NSAID的患者中出现隔膜疾病,术前CT或MR小肠造影可能有用,但不能排除疾病。
    BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction is a major source of morbidity and mortality that carries a significant economic burden. Recurrent small bowel obstruction may be secondary to circumferential strictures (small bowel diaphragm disease), an under-recognized entity secondary to long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. We aimed to describe the sensitivity of preoperative computed tomography (CT) enterography in patients with surgically treated small bowel diaphragm disease.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent elective small bowel resection for small bowel obstruction performed by a single minimally invasive surgeon between 2010 and 2023. Patient history, radiographic, endoscopic, operative, and pathology reports were reviewed for reference to NSAID use, small bowel strictures, diaphragms, and enteropathy. Exclusion criteria were prior radiation, inflammatory bowel disease, malignancy, adhesive disease, and anastomotic strictures.
    RESULTS: A total of 225 patients were identified, 22 (10%) of whom met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 60.7 years (range 29-78), with 15 women (68%). All patients underwent minimally invasive small bowel resection for obstruction with histopathologic evidence of stricture without evidence of transmural inflammation, granuloma, or dysplasia and confirmed NSAID use (n = 22, 100%). Anemia was present in 36% (n = 8). Preoperative CT or magnetic resonance (MR) enterography was performed in 18 patients (82%), of which stricturing was reported in 13 (72%). Intraoperatively, palpation identified strictures in all patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: NSAID-induced small bowel injury is an under-recognized condition that, in severe cases, can present as small bowel obstruction. Surgeons should consider diaphragm disease in patients with obstruction and NSAID use, in which preoperative CT or MR enterography may be useful but cannot rule out disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与研究目的内镜超声引导胰管引流(EUS-PD)正在成为内镜逆行胰管造影(ERP)失败后阻塞性胰腺炎的有效替代治疗方法。然而,与EUS-PD相关的不良事件的高发生率(约20%)仍然是一个问题.最近,我们为EUS-PD开发了一种新型塑料支架,其中,不透射线的标记物定位在距支架的远端的长度的大约三分之一处,并且侧孔专门定位在标记物的远侧。本研究旨在评估在EUS-PD中使用该支架的可行性和安全性。患者和方法我们回顾性分析了2021年3月至2023年10月在国家癌症中心医院接受新型塑料支架EUS-PD的10例患者的数据。技术和临床成功,程序次数,不良事件(AE),复发性胰管梗阻(RPO),并评估了RPO的时间。结果10例患者中,5例术后发生良性胰肠吻合口狭窄,5例发生恶性胰管梗阻。技术和临床成功率均为100%(10/10)。一名患者(10.0%)发生了AE(自限性腹痛)。2例患者(20.0%)在随访期间因原发病死亡(中位数,44天;范围,25-272天)。RPO发生率为10.0%(1/10),3个月非RPO率为83.3%。结论新型塑料支架显示出作为EUS-PD有用且安全的工具的潜力。
    Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) is emerging as an effective alternative treatment for obstructive pancreatitis after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). However, the high incidence of adverse events associated with EUS-PD (approximately 20%) remains an issue. Recently, we developed a novel plastic stent for EUS-PD, with a radiopaque marker positioned at approximately one-third of the length from the distal end of the stent and side holes positioned exclusively distal to the marker. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using this stent in EUS-PD. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed data from 10 patients who underwent EUS-PD with the novel plastic stent at the National Cancer Center Hospital between March 2021 and October 2023. Technical and clinical success, procedure times, adverse events (AEs), recurrent pancreatic duct obstruction (RPO), and time to RPO were assessed. Results Of the 10 patients, five had postoperative benign pancreaticojejunal anastomotic strictures and five had malignant pancreatic duct obstruction. The technical and clinical success rates were both 100% (10/10). An AE (self-limited abdominal pain) occurred in one patient (10.0%). Two patients (20.0%) died of their primary disease during the follow-up period (median, 44 days; range, 25-272 days). The incidence of RPO was 10.0% (1/10), and the 3-month non-RPO rate was 83.3%. Conclusions The novel plastic stent shows potential as a useful and safe tool in EUS-PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和研究目的胆道内射频消融术(RFA)是一种有效的姑息性治疗方法,但是很少有研究评估其对肝门部胆管恶性梗阻的结果,它具有薄壁和复杂的导管-血管接触。我们评估了温控胆管内射频消融的疗效和安全性,这可以通过维持消融段的温度来降低意外热损伤的风险,用于治疗无法手术的肝门部胆管癌(CCA)。患者和方法倾向评分匹配后,64例无法手术的肺门CCA患者分为RFA支架组(胆管内RFA支架;n=32)或仅支架组(仅支架;n=32)。评估的结果是复发性胆道梗阻(RBO)的中位时间,总生存期(OS),和不良事件(AE)。结果所有患者均取得技术成功。RFA+支架组的临床成功率为93.8%,仅支架组为87.5%(P=0.672)。RFA+支架组的中位RBO时间为242天,仅支架组为168天(P=0.031)。在RFA+支架组中,中位OS显示出较高的趋势(337天对296天;P=0.260)。两组总体不良事件发生率相当(12.5%vs9.4%,P=1.000)。结论温度控制的胆管内RFA可在不增加AEs发生率的情况下获得良好的支架通畅性,但并未显着增加无法手术的肺门CCA患者的OS(临床试验登记号:KCT0008576)。
    Background and study aims Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be an effective palliative treatment, but few studies have evaluated its outcomes for malignant obstruction in the hilar bile duct, which has a thin wall and complex duct-vascular contacts. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA, which can reduce the risk of unintentional thermal injury by maintaining the temperature of the ablation segment, in the treatment of inoperable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Patients and methods After propensity score matching, 64 patients with inoperable hilar CCA were categorized to the RFA + stent group (endobiliary RFA with stenting; n=32) or stent-only group (stenting only; n=32). The evaluated outcomes were the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Results Technical success was achieved in all patients. The clinical success rate was 93.8% in the RFA + stent group and 87.5% in the stent-only group ( P =0.672). The median time to RBO was 242 days in the RFA + stent group and 168 days in the stent-only group ( P =0.031). The median OS showed a non-significant tendency to be higher in the RFA + stent group (337 versus 296 days; P =0.260). Overall AE rates were comparable between the two groups (12.5% vs 9.4%, P =1.000). Conclusions Temperature-controlled endobiliary RFA resulted in favorable stent patency without increasing the rate of AEs but it did not significantly increase OS in patients with inoperable hilar CCA (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0008576).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号