Stones

石头
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与研究目的胆道括约肌切开术是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的关键步骤,已知有5%到10%的并发症风险。纯切的关系,Endocut,ERCP术后胰腺炎(PEP)和出血尚不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了这两种当前类型及其与不良事件的关系。患者和方法本系统评价涉及直到2023年8月在多个数据库中搜索文章,比较胆道括约肌切开术中的纯切割与Endocut。荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目。结果共纳入4项随机对照试验987例患者。整体胰腺炎:与Purecut组相比,Endocout组发生胰腺炎的风险更高(P=0.001,RD=0.04[范围,0.01至0.06];I2=29%)。总体即时出血:发现统计学意义有利于Endocout,(P=0.05;RD=-0.15[范围,-0.29至-0.00];I2=93%)。在没有内镜干预的即时出血中,当前模式之间无统计学意义(P=0.10;RD=-0.13[范围,-0.29至0.02];I2=88%),内镜介入后立即出血(P=0.06;RD=-0.07[范围,-0.14至0.00];I2=76%),延迟出血(P=0.40;RD=0.01[范围,-0.02至0.05];I2=72%),拉链剪裁(P=0.58;RD=-0.03[范围,-0.16至0.09];I2=97%),穿孔(P=1.00;RD=0.00[范围,-0.01至0.01];I2=0%)和胆管炎(P=0.77;RD=0.00[范围,-0.01至0.02];I2=29%)。结论文献中的现有数据表明,Endocot具有增加的PEP风险,并且不能预防延迟或临床上明显的出血。尽管它可以防止术中出血。基于这些发现,单纯切开应是胆道括约肌切开术的首选电流模式。
    Background and study aims Biliary sphincterotomy is a crucial step in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a procedure known to carry a 5% to 10% risk of complications. The relationship between Pure cut, Endocut, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and bleeding is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared these two current types and their relationships with adverse events. Patients and methods This systematic review involved searching articles in multiple databases until August 2023 comparing pure cut versus Endocut in biliary sphincterotomy. The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Results A total of 987 patients from four randomized controlled trials were included. Overall pancreatitis: A higher risk of pancreatitis was found in the Endocut group than in the Pure cut group ( P =0.001, RD=0.04 [range, 0.01 to 0.06]; I 2 =29%). Overall immediate bleeding: Statistical significance was found to favor Endocut, ( P =0.05; RD=-0.15 [range, -0.29 to -0.00]; I 2 =93%). No statistical significance between current modes was found in immediate bleeding without endoscopic intervention ( P =0.10; RD=-0.13 [range, -0.29 to 0.02]; I 2 =88%), immediate bleeding with endoscopic intervention ( P =0.06; RD=-0.07 [range, -0.14 to 0.00]; I 2 =76%), delayed bleeding (P=0.40; RD=0.01 [range, -0.02 to 0.05]; I 2 =72%), zipper cut ( P =0.58; RD=-0.03 [range, -0.16 to 0.09]; I 2 =97%), perforation ( P =1.00; RD=0.00 [range, -0.01 to 0.01]; I 2 =0%) and cholangitis ( P =0.77; RD=0.00 [range, -0.01 to 0.02]; I 2 =29%). Conclusions The available data in the literature show that Endocut carries an increased risk for PEP and does not prevent delayed or clinically significant bleeding, although it prevents intraprocedural bleeding. Based on such findings, Pure cut should be the preferred electric current mode for biliary sphincterotomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    野火被认为是对南欧地中海国家森林生态系统的重大干扰。尽管地面居住的大型无脊椎动物对许多土壤功能至关重要,对于野火在近期如何影响这个社区以及石头在他们生存中的作用,根本缺乏了解。因此,在本研究中,我们通过比较燃烧和未燃烧的地中海橡树林中的群落,评估了在石头下发现的地面居住的大型无脊椎动物群落中野火的直接影响。我们的结果表明,石头允许许多类群在烧毁地区生存。然而,丰度,丰富,多样性,烧焦地点的每块石头的公平性明显低于未烧焦地点。此外,结果还表明,随着石头深度和面积的增加,丰富度和丰度显着增加,在烧焦和未烧焦的地方。与未燃烧区域相比,在燃烧区域观察到营养水平的显着变化,特别是捕食者的减少。在分类群之间的栖息地关联方面没有发现显着差异。总的来说,这项研究强调了石头作为野火期间地面居住的大型无脊椎动物群落的微栖息地和避难所的作用。
    Wildfires are considered a major disturbance to forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean countries of Southern Europe. Although ground-dwelling macroinvertebrates are crucial to many soil functions, there is a fundamental lack of understanding of how wildfires impact this community in the immediate term and of the role of stones in their survival. Hence, in the present study we assessed the immediate effects of wildfires in the ground-dwelling macroinvertebrate community found under stones by comparing communities in burnt and non-burnt Mediterranean oak forests. Our results revealed that stones allowed the survival of many taxa in the burnt area. However, abundance, richness, diversity, and equitability per stone were significantly lower at the burnt than unburnt sites. Furthermore, the results also showed that richness and abundance increased significantly with increasing stone depth and area, both at the burnt and unburnt sites. Significant changes at the trophic level were observed in the burnt area comparing to the unburnt, particularly a decline in predators. No significant differences were identified concerning habitat associations among taxa. Overall, this study stressed the role of stones as microhabitats and refuge for the ground-dwelling macroinvertebrate community during wildfires.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    为了证明我们在输尿管镜检查和钬激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石的初步经验的结果。
    在Awka一家私人泌尿科中心接受输尿管镜检查和激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石的32名患者的数据,对尼日利亚阿南布拉州从2020年9月至2022年6月(20个月)进行了回顾性研究。他们的社会人口统计数据,临床症状,石头的位置和大小,术前和术后使用支架,住院,并发症,分析结石清除率。
    共对32例患者进行了32次手术。患者的平均年龄为44.7±12.2岁。平均结石大小为15.4±6.7mm,范围为8.0-39mm,和Hounsfield单位从233-906。石头在正确的地方,左道,双边占46.9%,43.7%,和9.4%的病例。患者的平均住院时间为3.31±1.45天。结石清除率为90.3%。53.1%的患者有术后并发症,其中40.6%是术后发热,并用抗生素解决。一名患者因输尿管狭窄而无法检查输尿管,导致治疗失败。
    输尿管镜和激光碎石术是治疗上消化道结石的安全有效的选择,具有通过自然孔口进行的优点,不那么痛苦,降低严重出血的风险,肾实质的不可逆损失,以及短暂的住院时间。
    UNASSIGNED: To demonstrate the outcome of our initial experience in the management of upper tract stones with ureteroscopy and Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy.
    UNASSIGNED: The data of thirty-two patients who had ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones at a private urology centre in Awka, Anambra State Nigeria from September 2020 to June 2022 (20months) were retrospectively studied. Their sociodemographic data, clinical symptoms, the location and size of the stones, preoperative and postoperative stent use, hospital stay, complications, and stone-clearance rates were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 32 procedures were performed on 32 patients. The mean age of the patients was 44.7 ± 12.2 years. The mean stone size was 15.4 ± 6.7mm with a range of 8.0-39mm, and Hounsfield unit ranging from 233-906. The stones were on the right tract, left tract, and bilateral in 46.9%, 43.7%, and 9.4% of the cases respectively. The patients had a mean length of hospital stay of 3.31 ± 1.45 days. The stone clearance rate was 90.3%. 53.1% of the patients had postoperative complications with 40.6% of these being post-operative fever which resolved with antibiotics. There was treatment failure in one patient due to the inability to scope the ureter on account of ureteral stricture.
    UNASSIGNED: Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy are safe and effective options in the management of upper tract stones with the advantages of being performed via a natural orifice, being less painful, with reduced risk of severe bleeding, irreversible loss of renal parenchyma, as well as a short hospital stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了确定接受输尿管软镜(FURS)治疗肾结石和输尿管上段结石的患者三足神经缺失的预测因素。
    回顾性分析了从2021年6月至2022年12月接受FURS的成人肾结石或输尿管上段结石患者的数据。3个月后,用非造影CT评估无结石状态(无>3mm残留结石)。使用改良的Clavien分类对并发症进行分级。一次FURS干预后无结石状态无并发症被定义为三联症。患者分为两组(三联和非三联)。使用单因素和多因素分析比较了两组之间三联缺失的危险因素。
    共23例患者,平均年龄48.9±13岁,平均结石长16±5.9mm。Trifecta标准适用于250例患者(71%)。在多变量分析中,三甲缺失的危险因素是结石多重性(OR:3.326,95CI:1.933-5.725)和无经验的外科医生(OR:1.819,95CI:1.027-3.220).
    多发性结石和无经验的外科医生对FURS的表现是FURS三连性缺失的独立危险因素。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine predictors for missing trifecta in patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for treatment of renal and upper ureteric calculi.
    UNASSIGNED: The data of adult patients with renal or upper ureteral stones who underwent FURS from June 2021 through December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Stone-free status (no residual stones > 3 mm) was evaluated after 3 months with non-contrast CT. Modified Clavien classification was used to grade complications. A stone-free status after a single intervention of FURS without complications was defined as trifecta. Patients were divided into two groups (trifecta and non-trifecta). Risk factors for missing trifecta were compared between both groups using univariate and multivariate analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Three hundred twenty-three patients with mean age 48.9 ± 13 years and mean stone length 16 ± 5.9 mm were included. The trifecta criteria were applicable for 250 patients (71%). On multivariate analysis, risk factors for missing trifecta were stone multiplicity (OR: 3.326, 95%CI: 1.933-5.725) and non-experienced surgeons (OR: 1.819, 95%CI: 1.027-3.220).
    UNASSIGNED: Multiple stones and performance of FURS by non-experienced surgeons are the independent risk factors for missing trifecta of FURS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估超微型PCNL(SMP,14Fr)与标准PCNL(sPCNL,24-30Fr)用于治疗1.5至3cm大小的肾结石。
    方法:从2021年2月至2022年1月,使用计算机生成的简单随机化,以1:1的比例将100例患者随机分为SMP组和sPCNL组(每组50例)。人口统计数据,石材特性,手术时间,围手术期并发症,输血,术后血红蛋白下降,术后疼痛,比较两组的住院时间和结石清除率.
    结果:平均结石体积(2.41cm2vs2.61cm2)和无结石率(98%vs94%,p=0.14)在SMP和sPCNL组中相似,分别。SMP组的平均手术时间明显更长(51.62±10.17分钟vs35.6±6.8分钟,p=0.03)。SMP组术中肾小管损伤(1/50vs7/50,p=0.42)和术后血红蛋白平均下降(0.8±0.7g/dlvs1.2±0.81,p=0.21)较低,但没有统计学意义。SMP组的平均术后疼痛VAS评分(5.4±0.7vs5.9±0.9,p=0.03)和平均住院时间(28.38±3.6hvs39.84±3.7h,p=0.0001)。达到Clavien2级的并发症具有可比性,标准组并发症≥3级较高,但没有统计学意义。
    结论:Super-miniPCNL与标准PCNL在治疗3厘米肾结石方面同样有效,术后疼痛和住院时间显著减少,Clavien≥3级并发症的风险较低,尽管手术时间更长。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of super-mini PCNL (SMP, 14 Fr) when compared to standard PCNL (sPCNL, 24-30 Fr) in the management of renal calculi of size ranging from 1.5 to 3 cm.
    METHODS: From February 2021 to January 2022, a total of 100 patients were randomized to either SMP group or sPCNL group in a 1:1 ratio (50 in each group) using computer-generated simple randomization. Demographic data, stone characteristics, operative times, perioperative complications, blood transfusions, postoperative drop in haemoglobin, postoperative pain, duration of hospital stay and stone-free rates were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Mean stone volume (2.41 cm2 vs 2.61 cm2) and stone-free rates (98% vs 94%, p = 0.14) were similar in both the SMP and sPCNL groups, respectively. The SMP group had significantly longer mean operative times (51.62 ± 10.17 min vs 35.6 ± 6.8 min, p = 0.03). Intraoperative calyceal injury (1/50 vs 7/50, p = 0.42) and mean postoperative drop in haemoglobin (0.8 ± 0.7 g/dl vs 1.2 ± 0.81, p = 0.21) were lower in the SMP group, but not statistically significant. SMP group showed significantly lower mean postoperative pain VAS scores (5.4 ± 0.7 vs 5.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.03) and mean duration of hospital stay (28.38 ± 3.6 h vs 39.84 ± 3.7 h, p = 0.0001). Complications up to Clavien grade 2 were comparable, with grade ≥ 3 complications higher in the standard group, but not statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Super-mini PCNL is equally effective as standard PCNL in treating renal calculi up to 3 cm, with significantly reduced postoperative pain and duration of hospital stay and lower risk of Clavien grade ≥ 3 complications, although with higher operative times.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与研究目的内窥镜超声引导的经胃介入(EDGI)是一种技术,可在Roux-en-Y胃旁路(RYGB)解剖结构中在胃囊或空肠与排除的胃之间建立吻合,以允许进入胰胆管系统。到目前为止,在取腔贴壁金属支架(LAMS)时,吻合口闭合的处理方法差异很大.本研究旨在评估使用透镜式(TTS)基于钉钉的缝合系统去除LAMS时初次闭合的功效。患者和方法这是一项对RYGB患者的两中心回顾性研究,这些患者使用20mmLAMS进行了单阶段EDGI,并在支架移除时用X-tack系统进行了一次吻合闭合。患者人口统计学,程序详细信息,临床结果,和影像学发现报告。结果19例患者(中位年龄63岁,84%的女性)接受了单阶段EDGI,中位随访时间为31.5个月。2例腹痛需要住院治疗的患者(11%)发生了不良事件。LAMS的中位停留时间为32天(范围16-86)。所有在LAMS切除后接受随访研究的患者(100%)均已确认吻合口闭合(n=18)。大多数患者在去除LAMS时和最后一次随访时都有体重减轻(68%,n=13)。结论单期EDGI是治疗RYGB胰胆管病变的有效方法。到目前为止,内镜下TTS钉缝合在LAMS切除后吻合口闭合中的成功率较高,应被视为预防慢性瘘的主要方法.
    Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI) is a technique that creates an anastomosis between the gastric pouch or jejunum to the excluded stomach in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) anatomy to allow access to the pancreaticobiliary system. Thus far, management of anastomosis closure at the time of lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) removal has varied widely. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of primary closure at the time of LAMS removal using a through-the-scope (TTS) tack-based suture system.  Patients and methods This was a two-center retrospective study of RYGB patients who underwent single-stage EDGI using a 20-mm LAMS and subsequent primary anastomosis closure with the X-tack system at the time of stent removal. Patient demographics, procedure details, clinical outcomes, and imaging findings are reported. Results Nineteen patients (median age 63 years, 84% female) underwent single-stage EDGI with a median follow-up of 31.5 months. Adverse events occurred in two patients (11%) who had abdominal pain requiring hospitalization. The median LAMS dwell time was 32 days (range 16-86). All patients (100%) who underwent follow-up studies after LAMS removal had confirmed anastomosis closure (n = 18). Most patients had documented weight loss at the time of LAMS removal and at last follow-up (68%, n = 13). Conclusions Single-stage EDGI is an effective approach to managing RYGB patients with pancreaticobiliary pathology. Thus far, endoscopic TTS tack-based suturing appears to have a high success rate in anastomosis closure after LAMS removal and should be considered as a primary method for preventing chronic fistulae.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和研究目的数字单操作员胆道镜检查(DSOC)可以诊断胆管疾病和治疗复杂的结石。然而,这些技术有局限性,如探头和工作通道的大小,成本过高,图像分辨率低。最近,一种新颖的DSOC系统(eyeMAX,Micro-Tech,南京,中国)的发展是为了解决这些限制。我们旨在基于视觉检查评估新型9F和11FDSOC系统在肿瘤诊断准确性方面的有用性和安全性。评估肿瘤扩展和实现胆管结石完全清除的能力,和与程序相关的不良事件(AE)。患者和方法对2021年7月至2022年4月接受DSOC的≥18岁患者的数据进行回顾性恢复,并分为诊断和治疗队列。结果共纳入80例患者。在诊断队列中(n=49/80),49例患者中有26例(46.9%)发现新生血管.在65.3%的患者中进行了活检,在96.8%的病例中获得了足够的组织样本。32例中有23例活检证实为肿瘤。DSOC视觉印象在诊断肿瘤方面达到91.6%的敏感性和87.5%的特异性。在治疗队列中(n=43/80),43例患者中有26例需要单独碎石术。在第一届会议中,71%的患者实现了全部结石清除。在诊断或治疗队列中均未记录早期或晚期AE。结论新型DSOC装置在区分胆道肿瘤病变方面具有出色的诊断准确性,并且在完全取石的情况下具有治疗益处。没有记录的AE。
    Background and study aims Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) allows the diagnosis of biliary duct disorders and treatment for complicated stones. However, these technologies have limitations such as the size of the probe and working channel, excessive cost, and low image resolution. Recently, a novel DSOC system (eyeMAX, Micro-Tech, Nanjing, China) was developed to address these limitations. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness and safety of a novel 9F and 11F DSOC system in terms of neoplastic diagnostic accuracy based on visual examination, ability to evaluate tumor extension and to achieve complete biliary stone clearance, and procedure-related adverse events (AEs). Patients and methods Data from ≥ 18-year-old patients who underwent DSOC from July 2021 to April 2022 were retrospectively recovered and divided into a diagnostic and a therapeutic cohort. Results A total of 80 patients were included. In the diagnostic cohort (n = 49/80), neovascularity was identified in 26 of 49 patients (46.9%). Biopsy was performed in 65.3% patients with adequate tissue sample obtained in 96.8% of cases. Biopsy confirmed neoplasia in 23 of 32 cases. DSOC visual impression achieved 91.6% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity in diagnosing neoplasms. In the therapeutic cohort (n = 43/80), 26 of 43 patients required lithotripsy alone. Total stone removal was achieved in 71% patients in the first session. Neither early nor late AEs were documented in either the diagnostic or therapeutic cohort. Conclusions The novel DSOC device has excellent diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing neoplastic biliary lesions as well as therapeutic benefits in the context of total stone removal, with no documented AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:本文对α-受体阻滞剂的作用进行了不同且更严格的研究,有时被昵称为“神奇药丸”,特别是对于结石病和药物治疗(MET)。
    方法:进行非系统叙述性综述,从选定的文章中综合相关信息,批判性地评估他们的结论。有时对α受体阻滞剂有不同的看法,包括适合本主题的好奇心或其他有趣的细微差别,但始终保持敏锐的客观性和最重要的科学严谨性。
    结论:α受体阻滞剂似乎是灵丹妙药,用于治疗各种非泌尿系统疾病和病症。泌尿外科应用包括良性前列腺增生的勃起功能障碍,从尿失禁到尿潴留,甚至促进尿路结石沿尿路通过。由于其多功能性,α-受体阻滞剂似乎是泌尿科药物的瑞士军刀。然而,α受体阻滞剂对MET的疗效,疼痛管理,或促进上呼吸道通道非常令人失望,带来不,或者在某些情况下,只有边际效益。他们的治疗结果远非重要或令人印象深刻,更不用说神奇了。定期性交是α受体阻滞剂的有效替代品,提供更快的输尿管结石排出率和减少对止痛药的需要。大多数支持α受体阻滞剂的研究都是基于单中心,动力不足,低质量的研究。这些低质量的研究对随后的几项荟萃分析产生了偏见,用低质量的数据污染他们,加强和延长这种错觉。这些结果强调了对大型,多中心,没有偏见,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照试验,以防止未来一年可能困扰任何医学领域的妄想。
    OBJECTIVE: The present paper takes a different and more critical look at the role of alpha-blockers, sometimes nicknamed as \"magical pills\", in particular for stone disease and medical expulsive therapy (MET).
    METHODS: A non-systematic narrative review was performed, synthesizing pertinent information from selected articles, and critically evaluating their conclusions. Sometimes different views on alpha-blockers were laid bare, including curiosities or other entertaining nuances suitable to the present topic, but always maintaining sharp objectivity and the foremost scientific rigor.
    CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-blockers seem to be a panacea, being used to treat a wide variety of non-urological diseases and conditions. Urological applications include erectile dysfunction to benign prostatic hyperplasia, from incontinence to urinary retention, or even to facilitate urinary stone passage along the urinary tract. Due to its versatility, alpha-blockers appear to be the Swiss army knife of urological medications. However, the efficacy of alpha-blockers for MET, pain management, or facilitating upper tract access is very disappointing, bringing no, or in some instances, only marginal benefits. Their treatment results are far from being significant or impressive let alone magical. Regular sexual intercourse is an effective alternative to alpha-blockers, providing faster ureteral stone expulsion rates and reducing the need for pain medication. Most of the research supporting alpha-blockers has been based on single-center, underpowered, low-quality studies. These low-quality studies biased several subsequent meta-analyses, contaminating them with their low-quality data, enhancing and prolonging this delusion. These results emphasize the need for large, multi-centric, unbiased, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials to prevent future year-long delusions that may afflict any medical field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和研究目的虽然耐药细菌的数量随着抗菌治疗的延长而增加,没有研究对急性胆管炎中抗菌治疗持续时间与耐药细菌数量增加之间的关系进行了研究.我们假设在急性胆管炎中短期使用抗菌药物会抑制细菌耐药性。患者和方法这是一个单中心,回顾性,2018年1月至2020年6月收治的符合以下标准的急性胆管炎患者的观察性研究:成功的胆道引流,血或胆汁培养阳性,从对抗生素敏感的培养物中鉴定出的细菌,和随后的胆管炎复发到2022年1月。将患者分为两组:复发时的病原体对初次入院时使用的抗菌药物产生耐药性的患者(耐药组)和仍然易感的患者(易感组)。多因素分析用于检查与耐药病原体发展相关的危险因素。多变量分析调查了内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后3天或更短的抗生素使用时间,以及先前报道的细菌耐药性发展的危险因素。结果总计,89名符合条件的患者纳入本研究。两组之间的患者背景或ERCP发现没有显着差异。使用抗生素,在ERCP后3天内完成,与较低的细菌耐药性风险相关(优势比,0.17;95%置信区间,0.04-0.65;P=0.01)。结论在急性胆管炎中,在ERCP治疗3天内服用抗菌药物可能会抑制耐药细菌的产生.
    Background and study aims Although the number of resistant bacteria tends to increase with prolonged antimicrobial therapy, no studies have examined the relationship between the duration of antimicrobial therapy and increase in the number of resistant bacteria in acute cholangitis. We hypothesized that the short-term administration of antimicrobial agents in acute cholangitis would suppress bacterial resistance. Patients and methods This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study of patients with acute cholangitis admitted between January 2018 and June 2020 who met the following criteria: successful biliary drainage, positive blood or bile cultures, bacteria identified from cultures sensitive to antimicrobials, and subsequent cholangitis recurrence by January 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: those whose causative organisms at the time of recurrence became resistant to the antimicrobial agents used at the time of initial admission (resistant group) and those who remained susceptible (susceptible group). Multivariate analysis was used to examine risk factors associated with the development of resistant pathogens. Multivariate analysis investigated antibiotics used with the length of 3 days or shorter after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and previously reported risk factors for the development of bacterial resistance. Results In total, 89 eligible patients were included in this study. There were no significant differences in patient background or ERCP findings between the groups. The use of antibiotics, completed within 3 days after ERCP, was associated with a lower risk of developing bacterial resistance (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.65; P =0.01). Conclusions In acute cholangitis, the administration of antimicrobials within 3 days of ERCP may suppress the development of resistant bacteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和研究目的在非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)中使用结石密度来预测体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)在慢性钙化性胰腺炎(CCP)中的有效性相对尚未探索。患者和方法这是CCP患者的前瞻性观察性研究。在预处理NCCT期间,确定了最大的胰腺导管结石的Hounsfield单位(HU)。所有患者均接受ESWL直至最大结石碎裂至<3mm,然后进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)取石。研究了ESWL成功提取结石的预测因素,接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线确定了HU最佳切点。结果82例患者中位(四分位距)年龄36岁(范围,29-55);大多数男性45(54.9%),包括在内。78例患者(95.1%)发现特发性CCP。结石密度中位数(SD)为1095HU(范围,860.7-1260.7),ESWL会话数量为2(范围,2-3).55例患者(67.1%)在索引ERCP时完成了结石清除。部分清除者(n=27)需要重复ERCP,26例(96.3%)成功;1例(3.7%)患者接受了手术。有一个重要的,ESWL次数与SD呈正相关(r=0.797;P<0.001)。在双变量分析中,SD和ESWL会话的数量显示与完全导管清除存在显着关联。通过ROC曲线完全取石的最佳切点为1106.5HU(Youden指数0.726),灵敏度为93%,特异性为80%。结论SD是ESWL成功的重要预测因子,其次是ERCP的导管清除。和<1106.5HU是ESWL治疗的良好候选人的预测指标。
    Background and study aims The utility of stone density at non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) for predicting the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in chronic calcific pancreatitis (CCP) is relatively unexplored. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational study of patients with CCP. Hounsfield units (HU) were determined for the largest pancreatic ductal stone during pretreatment NCCT. All patients underwent ESWL until the largest stone was fragmented to <3mm, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for stone extraction. The predictive factors following ESWL for successful stone extraction were studied and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined the HU optimal cut-point. Results Eighty-two patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 36 years (range, 29-55); majority male 45 (54.9%), were included. Idiopathic CCP was noted in 78 patients (95.1%). The median stone density (SD) was 1095 HU (range, 860.7-1260.7) and the number of ESWL sessions was 2 (range, 2-3). Complete stone removal at index ERCP was achieved in 55 patients (67.1%). Those with partial clearance (n=27) needed a repeat ERCP, which was successful in 26 (96.3%); one patient (3.7%) underwent surgery. There was a significant, positive correlation between number of ESWL sessions and SD (r=0.797; P <0.001). On bivariate analysis, SD and the number of ESWL sessions revealed a significant association with complete ductal clearance. The optimal cut-point for complete stone removal by the ROC curve was 1106.5 HU (Youden index 0.726), with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 80%. Conclusions The SD is a significant predictor of ESWL success followed by ductal clearance at ERCP, and <1106.5 HU is a predictor of good candidates for ESWL therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号