Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided vascular interventions were first reported in 2000 in a study that evaluated the utility of EUS in sclerotherapy of esophageal varices. Currently, gastric variceal therapy and portosystemic pressure gradient (PPG) measurements are the most widely utilized applications. Ectopic variceal obliteration, splenic artery embolization, aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm treatment, portal venous sampling, and portosystemic shunt creation using EUS are some of the other emerging interventions. Since the release of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA)\'s commentary in 2023, which primarily endorses EUS-guided gastric variceal therapy and EUS-PPG measurement, several new studies have been published supporting the use of EUS for various vascular conditions. In this review, we present the recent advances in this field, critically appraising new studies and trials.

OBJECTIVE: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI) is well accepted in appropriate patients. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) in higher-grade injuries likely plays an important role in increasing the success of NOM. We previously implemented a protocol requiring referral of all BSI grades III-V undergoing NOM for SAE. It is unknown the risk of complications as well as longitudinal outcomes. We aimed to examine the splenic salvage rate and safety profile of the protocol. We hypothesized the splenic salvage rate would be high and complications would be low.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at our Level 1 trauma center over a 9-year period. Injury characteristics and outcomes in patients sustaining BSI grades III-V were collected. Outcomes were compared for NOM on protocol (SAE) and off protocol (no angiography or angiography but no embolization). Complications for angiographies were examined.
RESULTS: Between January 2010 and February 2019, 570 patients had grade III-V BSI. NOM was attempted in 359 (63 %) with overall salvage rate of 91 % (328). Of these, 305 were on protocol while 54 were off protocol (41 no angiography and 13 angiography but no SAE). During the study period, for every grade of injury a pattern was seen of a higher salvage rate in the on-protocol group when compared to the off-protocol group (Grade III, 97 %(181/187) vs. 89 %(32/36), Grade IV, 91 %(98/108) vs. 69 %(9/13) and Grade V, 80 %(8/10 vs. 0 %(0/5). The overall salvage rate was 94 %(287) on protocol vs. 76 %(41) off protocol (p < 0.001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). Complications occurred in only 8 of the 318 who underwent angiography (2 %). These included 5 access complications and 3 abscesses.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of a protocol requiring routine splenic artery embolization for all high-grade spleen injuries slated for non-operative management is safe with a very low complication rate. NOM with splenic angioembolization failure rate is improved as compared to non-SAE patients\' at all higher grades of injury. Thus, SAE for all hemodynamically stable patients of all high-grade types should be considered as a primary form of therapy for such injuries.

A Dieulafoy lesion is an abnormal artery located in the gastric submucosa that represents a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. These lesions typically present as massive hemorrhages in older patients, with multiple medical comorbidities. The lesions are diagnosed with endoscopy and treated with hemostasis by clip placement or coagulation. This case report is that of a rare presentation of this rare condition in a younger 18-year-old patient with no medical comorbidities. He presented with hematemesis, melena, and syncope in the setting of ibuprofen self-treatment for a recent upper viral illness. This medication use is a proposed inciting factor for the bleeding lesion, though he had a history of a splenic artery embolization following a remote motor vehicle accident, which could represent a mechanism for a rare acquired lesion. A gastroenterologist was consulted and assisted in the diagnosis and management of this patient. His lesion was identified and treated within 24 hours of his presentation.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) versus splenectomy in adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) compared SAE versus splenectomy in adults with blunt high-grade splenic injuries (grade ≥ IV). Patients were stratified first by hemodynamic status then splenic injury grade. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and transfusion requirements at four and 24 h from arrival.
RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred nine hemodynamically stable patients were analyzed, with 2975 (95.7%) undergoing splenectomy and 134 (4.3%) with SAE. One thousand eight hundred sixty five patients had grade IV splenic injuries, and 1244 had grade V. Patients managed with SAE had 72% lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; P = 0.002), significantly shorter ICU-LOS (7 versus 9 d, 95%, P = 0.028), and received a mean of 1606 mL less packed red blood cells at four h compared to those undergoing splenectomy. Patients with grade IV or V injuries both had significantly lower odds of mortality (IV: OR 0.153, P < 0.001; V: OR 0.365, P = 0.041) and were given less packed red blood cells within four h when treated with SAE (2056 mL versus 405 mL, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: SAE may be a safer and more effective management approach for hemodynamically stable adult trauma patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries, as demonstrated by its association with significantly lower rates of in-hospital mortality, shorter ICU-LOS, and lower transfusion requirements compared to splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Splenic sequestration crisis is a potentially fatal complication of sickle cell disease, mainly seen in young children. Only a few case series describe the acute splenic sequestration crisis in adults and its management, which primarily consists of supportive care and, in some cases, splenectomy. Splenic artery embolization has seldom been described in sickle cell disease. This is probably the first case in which an adult with sickle cell disease presented with an acute splenic sequestration crisis was managed successfully through splenic artery embolization.
RESULTS: This 22-year-old female, a known case of sickle cell disease, presented with severe pain in the abdomen and low-grade intermittent fever for two days, secondary to an acute splenic sequestration crisis. The diagnosis of acute splenic sequestration was made based on clinical and blood parameters, ultrasonography, and computed tomography. Even with adequate supportive care and blood transfusions, the patient\'s condition worsened with a rapid fall in the hemoglobin and total platelet count. Considering splenectomy to be a high-risk procedure for this patient, a decision of rescue splenic artery embolization was taken, which was successful.
CONCLUSIONS: Splenic artery embolization may be considered a lifesaving procedure in patients with acute splenic sequestration, where the risk of splenectomy can be high. Adequate post-procedure supportive care is vital for preventing complications.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to elucidate the diagnostic capabilities of imaging techniques in identifying Non-Occlusive Hepatic Artery Hypoperfusion Syndrome (NOHAH) and to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE), including the choice and placement of embolic agents.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Fifteen studies encompassing 240 patients treated with embolization (using coils or Amplatzer Vascular Plugs (AVP)) were analyzed. Key metrics assessed included patient demographics, embolization techniques, embolic agents, technical success, radiologic findings pre- and post-embolization, and complication rates.
RESULTS: Among the 240 patients studied, 177 (73.8%) were reported by gender, with a majority being male (127/177, 71.7%). Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) emerged as the primary initial screening tool in 80% of studies. The hepatic arterial resistive index (RI) was a critical parameter, with mean values significantly decreasing from 0.84 pre-embolization to 0.70 post-embolization (p < 0.001). All cases confirmed technical success via digital subtraction angiography, revealing delayed hepatic arterial filling without stenosis or thrombosis. Coils were the predominant embolic agent, used in 80.8% of patients, followed by AVP in 16.3%. The overall mortality rate was 4.58%, with 29 major and 3 minor complications noted. Notably, proximal placement of coils in the splenic artery was associated with lower mortality rates compared to distal placement and showed comparable complication rates to AVPs.
CONCLUSIONS: DUS is a reliable screening modality for NOHAH, with post-SAE assessments showing significant improvements. The choice and location of embolization significantly impact patient outcomes, with proximal placement of coils emerging as a preferable strategy due to lower mortality rates and comparable complication profiles to alternative methods.

BACKGROUND: Splenic rupture associated with Behçet\'s syndrome (BS) is extremely rare, and there is no consensus on its management. In this case report, a patient with BS-associated splenic rupture was successfully treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE) and had a good prognosis after the intervention.
METHODS: The patient was admitted for pain in the left upper abdominal quadrant. He was diagnosed with splenic rupture. Multiple oral and genital aphthous ulcers were observed, and acne scars were found on his back. He had a 2-year history of BS diagnosis, with symptoms of oral and genital ulcers. At that time, he was treated with oral corticosteroids for 1 month, but the symptoms did not alleviate. He underwent SAE to treat the rupture. On the first day after SAE, the patient reported a complete resolution of abdominal pain and was discharged 5 d later. Three months after the intervention, a computed tomography examination showed that the splenic hematoma had formed a stable cystic effusion, suggesting a good prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: SAE might be a good choice for BS-associated splenic rupture based on good surgical practice and material selection.

Splenectomy is a common procedure for managing splenic injury in patients with unstable vital signs. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has emerged as a limited alternative to splenectomy, although the role of TAE can be expanded upon the stabilization of vital signs. The current case report discusses a man in his 50s, in shock after a motor vehicle accident, who was successfully stabilized using resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), followed by splenic artery embolization (SAE) instead of splenectomy, with early involvement of diagnostic and interventional radiologists from the initial stage of care. We also discuss the difficulties of SAE under REBOA and the significance of the early involvement of radiologists in trauma care.

Sinistral portal hypertension (SPH), also known as segmental portal hypertension, is a complication of pancreatic disorders and an extremely rare cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. SPH is observed in patients without cirrhosis and arises from splenic vein thrombosis. Unmitigated backflow of blood may cause gastric venous congestion and ultimately GI hemorrhage. Herein, we report a rare case of massive hematemesis due to SPH in a male patient with a history of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocyst. Our patient was successfully treated with endoscopic necrosectomy followed by open splenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and partial gastric resection.

BACKGROUND: Sinistral, or left-sided, portal hypertension (SPH) is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage resulting from obstruction of the splenic vein. Venous drainage from the spleen via collaterals can result in venous hemorrhage into both the retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal spaces due to increased venous blood pressure in peripancreatic and gastroduodenal vasculature. SPH can occur secondary to pancreatitis with thrombosis of the splenic vein. Another possible cause is the surgical ligation of the splenic vein as part of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Although splenectomy has been traditionally considered as the treatment of choice to relieve venous hypertension, individual concepts for each patient have to be developed. Considering the venous collateral drainage pathways, a comprehensive approach involving surgical, endoscopic, and interventional radiology interventions may be necessary to address the underlying cause of variceal bleeding. Among these approaches, splenic artery embolization (SAE) has demonstrated efficacy in mitigating the adverse effects associated with elevated venous outflow pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes key imaging findings in SPH patients after PD and highlights the potential of minimally invasive embolization for curative treatment of variceal hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: (i) SPH is a potential consequence after major pancreas surgery. (ii) Collateral flow can lead to life-threatening abdominal bleeding. (iii) Depending on the origin and localization of the bleeding, a dedicated management is required, frequently involving interventional radiology techniques.