UNASSIGNED: To describe the clinical characteristics and identifiable risk factors for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in a real-world clinical setting.
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study among patients with COPD.
UNASSIGNED: The Respiratory clinic of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital.
UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients with spirometry confirmed COPD on follow-up for ≥3 months. There were 79 participants.
UNASSIGNED: None.
UNASSIGNED: COPD risk factors, disease severity, comorbidities, and the severity of airflow limitation.
UNASSIGNED: The mean age of the participants was 63.3± 12.4 years, and 47 (59.5) were male. There was a high symptom burden (73.4% had COPD assessment test (CAT) score >10), 33 (41.8%) and 4 (5.1%) had GOLD 3 and GOLD 4 airflow limitation, respectively. Risk factors were identified for 96.2% of the participants: history of asthma in 37 (46.8%), tobacco smoking 22 (27.8%), occupational exposure 15 (19%), biomass exposure 5 (6.6%), post-tuberculosis 3 (3.8%), old age (3.8%), and prematurity 1 (1.3%). Fifty-nine (74.7%) had Asthma COPD Overlap (ACO). There were no significant associations between the risk factors and disease severity. Participants with ACO had lower lung function and a high frequency of allergic rhinitis.
UNASSIGNED: Asthma was the most commonly identifiable risk factor for COPD, underscoring asthma risk reduction and management optimisation as priorities toward COPD burden mitigation. Future studies need to validate these findings and identify the predominant COPD phenotypes in our setting.
UNASSIGNED: None declared.

BACKGROUND: Several techniques can be used to assess bronchodilator response (BDR) in preschool-aged children, including spirometry, respiratory oscillometry, the interrupter technique, and specific airway resistance. However, there has not been a systematic comparison of BDR thresholds across studies yet.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed on all studies up to May 2023 measuring a bronchodilator effect in children 2-6 years old using one of these techniques (PROSPERO CRD42021264659). Studies were identified using MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, CINAHL via EBSCO, Web of Science databases, and reference lists of relevant manuscripts.
RESULTS: Of 1224 screened studies, 43 were included. Over 85% were from predominantly European ancestry populations, and only 22 studies (51.2%) calculated a BDR cutoff based on a healthy control group. Five studies included triplicate testing with a placebo to account for the within-subject intrasession repeatability. A relative BDR was most consistently reported by the included studies (95%) but varied widely across all techniques. Various statistical methods were used to define a BDR, with six studies using receiver operating characteristic analyses to measure the discriminative power to distinguish healthy from wheezy and asthmatic children.
CONCLUSIONS: A BDR in 2- to 6-year-olds cannot be universally defined based on the reviewed literature due to inconsistent methodology and cutoff calculations. Further studies incorporating robust methods using either distribution-based or clinical anchor-based approaches to define BDR are required.

BACKGROUND: Spirometry is a point-of-care lung function test that helps support the diagnosis and monitoring of chronic lung disease. The quality and interpretation accuracy of spirometry is variable in primary care. This study aims to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) decision support software improves the performance of primary care clinicians in the interpretation of spirometry, against reference standard (expert interpretation).
METHODS: A parallel, two-group, statistician-blinded, randomised controlled trial of primary care clinicians in the UK, who refer for, or interpret, spirometry. People with specialist training in respiratory medicine to consultant level were excluded. A minimum target of 228 primary care clinician participants will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation to assess fifty de-identified, real-world patient spirometry sessions through an online platform either with (intervention group) or without (control group) AI decision support software report. Outcomes will cover primary care clinicians\' spirometry interpretation performance including measures of technical quality assessment, spirometry pattern recognition and diagnostic prediction, compared with reference standard. Clinicians\' self-rated confidence in spirometry interpretation will also be evaluated. The primary outcome is the proportion of the 50 spirometry sessions where the participant\'s preferred diagnosis matches the reference diagnosis. Unpaired t-tests and analysis of covariance will be used to estimate the difference in primary outcome between intervention and control groups.
BACKGROUND: This study has been reviewed and given favourable opinion by Health Research Authority Wales (reference: 22/HRA/5023). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at relevant national and international conferences, disseminated through social media, patient and public routes and directly shared with stakeholders.
BACKGROUND: NCT05933694.

Construction work is common all over the world. Construction workers are exposed to various physical, chemical, biological and ergonomic hazards that may directly affect respiratory health. Aim of the study was to assess construction workers\' pulmonary function and compare pulmonary function with healthy volunteers. This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Physiology ARMCH & RC, Solapur, India from March 2022 to March 2023 on construction workers (n=25) and healthy subjects (n=25). Pulmonary function assessment in both groups was done using a Spiro Excel machine spirometer. The comparison was made between both groups for frequency of respiratory symptoms, spirometry pattern, and spirometry values. Statistical software used unpaired t-test and chi-square test. A normal pattern was observed in 40.0% of healthy subjects compared to 72.0% of construction workers (p<0.05). Restrictive and mixed patterns were evident in 4.0% and 1.0%, respectively, in healthy volunteers compared to 11.0% and 3.0% in construction workers (p<0.05). Statistical difference was seen in all lung function parameters, i.e. FVC, FEV₁, FEV₁/FVC%, FEF 25.0-75.0%, PEFR except MVV between both groups. In conclusion the construction workers are at risk of respiratory function derangement. This derangement is in the form of increased frequency of respiratory symptoms, restrictive & mixed patterns and decreased spirometry values of various parameters.

BACKGROUND: Today, nanomaterials are broadly used in a wide range of industrial applications. Such large utilization and the limited knowledge on to the possible health effects have raised concerns about potential consequences on human health and safety, beyond the environmental burden. Given that inhalation is the main exposure route, workers exposed to nanomaterials might be at risk of occurrence of respiratory morbidity and/or reduced pulmonary function. However, epidemiological evidence regarding the association between cumulative exposure to nanomaterials and respiratory health is still scarce. This study focused on the association between cumulative exposure to nanomaterials and pulmonary function among 136 workers enrolled in the framework of the European multicentric NanoExplore project.
RESULTS: Our findings suggest that, independently of lifelong tobacco smoking, ethnicity, age, sex, body mass index and physical activity habits, 10-year cumulative exposure to nanomaterials is associated to worse FEV1 and FEF25 - 75%, which might be consistent with the involvement of both large and small airway components and early signs of airflow obstruction. We further explored the hypothesis of a mediating effect via airway inflammation, assessed by interleukin (IL-)10, IL-1β and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α), all quantified in the Exhaled Breath Condensate of workers. The mediation analysis results suggest that IL-10, TNF-α and their ratio (i.e., anti-pro inflammatory ratio) may fully mediate the negative association between cumulative exposure to nanomaterials and the FEV1/FVC ratio. This pattern was not observed for other pulmonary function parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Safeguarding the respiratory health of workers exposed to nanomaterials should be of primary importance. The observed association between cumulative exposure to nanomaterials and worse pulmonary function parameters underscores the importance of implementing adequate protective measures in the nanocomposite sector. The mitigation of harmful exposures may ensure that workers can continue to contribute productively to their workplaces while preserving their respiratory health over time.

Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the lives of thousands of patients worldwide with many patients having residual symptoms months after the acute infection. The severity of lung involvement ranges from mild asymptomatic to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which may lead to pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary fibrosis increases the long-term morbidity of post-COVID-19 patients in the form of restrictive lung disease. The six-minute walk test (6MWT), Borg scale, and spirometry are simple and low-cost tests used to evaluate a patient\'s exercise capacity and functional status. This study was conducted to assess the residual symptoms and functional status using spirometry and 6MWT in COVID-19 patients of moderate to severe category after three months of discharge. Methods This was an observational, prospective, and cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care center in North India, aiming to enroll a minimum of 50 patients who recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia. These patients were previously hospitalized with moderate to severe disease severity as defined by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) criteria, and the assessment occurred at least three months after their discharge. Individuals who were under 18 years of age or pregnant or had any respiratory or cardiac illness in the past were excluded from the study. Results A total of 50 patients were included in the study for final analysis. After a three-month follow-up, 40 (80%) patients were still symptomatic. The most commonly reported symptom was exertional dyspnea in 21 (42%), dyspnea at rest in 16 (32%), and fatigue in three (6%) patients. Of the total patients, 37 (74%) covered a distance less than expected in the six-minute walk test. The mean distance covered by patients was 426.1 ± 115.01 m, in contrast to the expected mean distance of 537.22 ± 37.61 m according to standard equations for Indian males and females. A fall in oxygen saturation by more than or equal to 3% was observed in approximately 24 (48%) patients after the six-minute walk test. The mean value of fatigue and dyspnea score was 3.2 ± 1.7 (moderate score). Among patients with moderate disease during their hospital stay, a higher proportion exhibited a normal pattern on pulmonary function tests (PFT) compared to those severely affected, 23 (69.70%) versus two (11.76%), respectively. Conclusion The persistence of symptoms and functional limitation of activities should be anticipated in patients with COVID-19. Spirometry and 6MWT can be a valuable tool in determining the prevalence of functional limitation in recovered patients of COVID-19. It can potentially help in determining and further planning the rehabilitative measures in the management of COVID-19 survivors. It can also be concluded that it is important to have a long-term follow-up in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

This work introduces Spiromni, a single device incorporating three different pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) accessories: a pMDI spacer, an electronic monitoring device (EMD), and a spirometer. While there are devices made to individually address the issues of technique, adherence and monitoring, respectively, for asthma patients as laid out in the Global Initiative for Asthma\'s (GINA) global strategy for asthma management and prevention, Spiromni was designed to address all three issues using a single, combination device. Spiromni addresses the key challenge of measuring both inhalation and exhalation profiles, which are different by an order of magnitude. Moreover, the innovative design prevents exhalation from entering the spacer chamber and prevents medication loss during inhalation using umbrella valves without a loss in flow velocity. Apart from recording the peak exhalation flow rate, data from the sensors allow us to extract other key lung volume and capacities measures similar to a medical pulmonary function test. We believe this low-cost portable multi-functional device will benefit both asthma patients and clinicians in the management of the disease.

Diagnosis of asthma can be confirmed based on variability in peak expiratory flow (PEF) or changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) measured with spirometry. Our aim was to use methacholine challenge as a model of induced airway obstruction to assess how well relative changes in PEF reflect airway obstruction in comparison to relative changes in FEV1. We retrospectively studied 878 patients who completed a methacholine challenge test. To assess congruency along with differences between relative changes in FEV1 and PEF during airway obstruction, a regression analysis was performed, and a Bland & Altman plot was constructed. ROC analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and κ-coefficient were used to analyze how decrease in PEF predicts decrease of 10% or 15% in FEV1. The relative change in PEF was on average less than the relative change in FEV1. In the ROC analysis areas under the curve were 0.844 and 0.893 for PEF decrease to predict a 10% and 15% decrease in FEV1, respectively. The agreement between changes in PEF and FEV1 varied from fair to moderate. Airway obstruction detected by change in PEF was false in about 40% of cases when compared to change in FEV1. Change in PEF is not a very accurate measure of airway obstruction when compared to change in FEV1. Replacing peak flow metre with a handheld spirometer might improve diagnostic accuracy of home monitoring in asthma.

The aim of the present study was to determine the gender respiratory differences of bilateral diaphragm thickness, respiratory pressures, and pulmonary function in patients with low back pain (LBP). A sample of 90 participants with nonspecific LBP was recruited and matched paired by sex (45 women and 45 men). Respiratory outcomes included bilateral diaphragm thickness by ultrasonography, respiratory muscle strength by maximum inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressures, and pulmonary function by forced expiratory volume during 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC spirometry parameters. The comparison of respiratory outcomes presented significant differences (p < 0.001), with a large effect size (d = 1.26-1.58) showing means differences (95% CI) for MIP of -32.26 (-42.99, -21.53) cm H2O, MEP of -50.66 (-64.08, -37.25) cm H2O, FEV1 of -0.92 (-1.18, -0.65) L, and FVC of -1.00 (-1.32, -0.69) L, with lower values for females versus males. Gender-based respiratory differences were presented for maximum respiratory pressures and pulmonary function in patients with nonspecific LBP. Women presented greater inspiratory and expiratory muscle weakness as well as worse lung function, although these differences were not linked to diaphragm thickness during normal breathing.

UNASSIGNED: Asthma guidelines have advocated for the use of quality-of-care indicators (QCIs) in asthma management. To improve asthma care, it is important to identify effective QCIs that are actionable. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the presence of 3 QCIs: asthma education, Asthma Control Test (ACT) and spirometry testing on the time to severe exacerbation (TTSE).
UNASSIGNED: Data collected from the SingHealth COPD and Asthma Data Mart (SCDM), including asthma patients managed in 9 SingHealth polyclinics and Singapore General Hospital from January 2015 to December 2020, were analysed. Patients receiving Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Steps 3-5 treatment, with at least 1 QCI recorded, and at least 1 severe exacerbation within 1 year before the first QCI record, were included. Data were analysed using multivariate Cox regression and quasi-Poisson regression models.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 3849 patients in the registry fulfilled the criteria. Patients with records of asthma education or ACT assessment have a lower adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for TTSE (adjusted HR=0.88, P=0.023; adjusted HR=0.83, P<0.001). Adjusted HR associated with spirometry is higher (adjusted HR=1.22, P=0.026). No QCI was significantly associated with emergency department (ED)/inpatient visits. Only asthma education and ACT showed a decrease in the number of exacerbations for multivariate analysis (asthma education estimate: -0.181, P<0.001; ACT estimate: -0.169, P<0.001). No QCI was significant for the number of exacerbations associated with ED/inpatient visits.
UNASSIGNED: Our study suggests that the perfor-mance of asthma education and ACT was associated with increased TTSE and decreased number of exacerbations, underscoring the importance of ensuring quality care in clinical practice.