Spinal Cord Independence Measure

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究设计:这是一项回顾性病例系列研究。目的:本研究的目的是调查虚弱是否有助于脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的功能恢复。方法:研究了过去三年来从我中心出院的121例SCI患者(颈部SCI106例,胸部SCI15例)。此外,11因素修正的虚弱指数(mFI)得分,住院时间的长短,回家的速度,并对脊髓独立性测量(SCIM)评分的改善情况进行回顾性评估.结果:121例患者受伤时的平均年龄为59.6岁。根据损伤前的评估,24例被归类为脆弱组,97例被归类为Robust组。脆弱组的SCIM改善率为16.7%,家庭出院率为45.8%。相比之下,Robust组的SCIM改善率为33.5%,家庭出院率为68.0%,两组间差异具有统计学意义。mFI评分与SCIM改善率呈显著负相关(R=-0.231,p=0.014)。结论:这项研究表明,在SCI之前存在虚弱的个体的SCIM改善率较差,并且在返回家园时面临挑战。
    Study Design: This is a retrospective case series study. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether frailty contributes to functional recovery in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A total of 121 patients with SCI (106 cervical SCI, 15 thoracic SCI) discharged from our center over the past three years were studied. Moreover, 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI) scores, the length of hospital stays, the rate of returning home, and improvement in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) scores were assessed retrospectively. Results: The average age at the time of injury for all 121 cases was 59.6 years. Based on pre-injury assessments, 24 cases were categorized as the Frail group, and 97 cases were categorized as the Robust group. The Frail group had SCIM improvement rates of 16.7% and a home discharge rate of 45.8%. In contrast, the Robust group had SCIM improvement rates of 33.5% and a home discharge rate of 68.0%, with statistically significant differences between the two groups. A significant negative correlation was observed between mFI scores and SCIM improvement rates (R = -0.231, p = 0.014). Conclusions: This study suggests that individuals with pre-existing frailty before SCI experience poorer SCIM improvement rates and face challenges in returning home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脊髓独立性测量(SCIM)是一种专门为脊髓损伤(SCI)患者设计的重要功能结果测量,自报告版本的SCIM(SCIM-SR)于2013年发布。本研究旨在将SCIM-SR翻译成中文,并探讨中国人SCIM-SR在SCI患者中的效度。SCIM-SR的中文版以标准化的方式翻译成中文,然后在入院后3天内填写SCI患者样本(n=205)。然后使用Rasch分析和主成分分析对中文SCIM-SR的有效性进行分析。子量表自我护理和子量表移动性显示出与Rasch模型的良好拟合,在项目-性状相互作用的卡方检验结果中没有发现显著性,采用Bonferroni校正为显著性水平(χ2=18.125,P=0.111;χ2=33.629,P=0.006)。每个子量表的项目和人员的平均拟合残差在±2.5以内。即使在删除一个项目并合并具有局部依赖性的两个项目之后,呼吸和括约肌管理子量表的模型拟合也不令人满意。然而,Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin检验的总分和中国SCIM-SR的所有分量表均>0.50,Bartlett检验P<0.05。没有性别差异项目的功能,受伤后的时间,年龄,和病因在三个分量表中的任何一个。还开发了中国SCIM-SR的在线版本。结论是,中文SCIM-SR适用于SCI患者。从SCI个人的角度来看,SCIM-SR被认为是自我报告功能状态的重要工具。
    Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) was an important functional outcome measure specifically designed for spinal cord injury (SCI) patients, with the self-reported version of SCIM (SCIM-SR) published in 2013. This study aims to translate the SCIM-SR into Chinese, and to investigate the validity of Chinese SCIM-SR among SCI patients. This Chinese version of SCIM-SR was translated into Chinese in a standardized approach, and then filled out by a sample of patients with SCI (n = 205) within 3 days after admission. Validity of Chinese SCIM-SR was then analyzed using Rasch analysis and principal component analysis. The subscale Selfcare and subscale Mobility showed good fit to the Rasch model, with no significance found in Chi-square test results for item-trait interaction, using Bonferroni adjustment for the significant level (χ2 =18.125, P = 0.111; χ2 =33.629, P = 0.006). Mean fit residual for items and persons of each subscale were within ± 2.5. The model fit of the subscale of Respiration and Sphincter Management was not satisfactory even after deleting one item and merging two items with local dependence. However, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test was > 0.50 in total score and all the subscales of Chinese SCIM-SR, and P < 0.05 in the Bartlett\'s test. There was no differential item functioning for gender, time post injury, age, and etiology in any of the three subscales. An online version of Chinese SCIM-SR was also developed. It is concluded that the SCIM-SR in Chinese is valid for application in individuals with SCI. SCIM-SR is considered as an important tool for self-reporting functional status from SCI individuals\' perspective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Study
    目的:我们旨在通过极端梯度增强(XGBoost)构建非线性回归模型来预测急性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者手术减压后1年的功能结局,并探讨预测因子在预测功能结局中的重要性。
    方法:我们从2016年6月1日至2020年6月1日从5个主要骨科中心前瞻性招募了249例急性SCI患者。我们从三个方面确定了6个预测因子:(1)临床特征,包括年龄,美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)入院时损害量表(AIS),损伤程度和基线ASIA运动评分(AMS);(2)MR成像,主要包括脑脊髓损伤中心(BASIC)评分;(3)手术时机,特别比较是否在24小时内接受手术减压。我们评估了手术后1年的SCIM评分作为功能结局指标。利用XGBoost通过Boost集成学习的方法建立非线性回归预测模型。
    结果:我们通过XGBoost成功构建了非线性回归预测模型,并验证了可信度。实际SCIM与非线性预测模型之间无显著差异(t=0.86,P=0.394;平均值±SD:3.31±2.8)。非线性模子优于传统的线性模子(t=6.57,P<0.001)。AMS和年龄在构建预测模型中起着最重要的作用。AIS之间存在明显的相关性,AMS和BASIC得分。
    结论:我们验证了使用XGBoost构建急性SCI患者功能预后的非线性回归预测模型的可行性,证明了非线性模型的预测性能优于传统的线性回归预测模型。年龄和基线AMS在预测功能结局中起着最重要的作用。我们还发现入院时AIS之间存在显著相关性,基线AMS和BASIC评分。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03103516。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to construct a nonlinear regression model through Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost) to predict functional outcome 1 year after surgical decompression for patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) and explored the importance of predictors in predicting the functional outcome.
    METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 249 patients with acute SCI from 5 primary orthopedic centers from June 1, 2016, to June 1, 2020. We identified a total of 6 predictors with three aspects: (1) clinical characteristics, including age, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) at admission, level of injury and baseline ASIA motor score (AMS); (2) MR imaging, mainly including Brain and Spinal Injury Center (BASIC) score; (3) surgical timing, specifically comparing whether surgical decompression was received within 24 h or not. We assessed the SCIM score at 1 year after the operation as the functional outcome index. XGBoost was used to build a nonlinear regression prediction model through the method of boosting integrated learning.
    RESULTS: We successfully constructed a nonlinear regression prediction model through XGBoost and verified the credibility. There is no significant difference between actual SCIM and nonlinear prediction model (t = 0.86, P = 0.394; Mean ± SD: 3.31 ± 2.8). The nonlinear model is superior to the traditional linear model (t = 6.57, P < 0.001). AMS and age played the most important roles in constructing predictive models. There is an obvious correlation between AIS, AMS and BASIC score.
    CONCLUSIONS: We verified the feasibility of using XGBoost to construct a nonlinear regression prediction model for the functional outcome of patients with acute SCI, and proved that the predictive performance of the nonlinear model is better than the traditional linear regression prediction model. Age and baseline AMS play the most important role in predicting the functional outcome. We also found a significant correlation between AIS at admission, baseline AMS and BASIC score.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03103516.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Lack of clarity about the neurological consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI) in children causes speculation about diagnoses, recovery potential, and treatment effectiveness. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has shown promising results as a biomarker to evaluate spinal cord integrity at a microstructural level.
    UNASSIGNED: To look at the difference between pediatric participants with and without SCI to determine which DTI metrics best categorize spinal cord tissue damage and to correlate DTI metrics with two clinical measures: Capabilities of the Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM-III).
    UNASSIGNED: This single-site, prospective study included pediatric participants with SCI (n = 26) and typically developed (TD) control subjects (n = 36). All participants underwent two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans on a 3T MR scanner. Participants with SCI also completed the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), CUE-T, and SCIM-III outcomes measures.
    UNASSIGNED: This study found significant strength of association between fractional anisotropy (FA) and upper extremity muscle strength (UEMS) in participants with SCI. Most DTI parameters showed a significant difference between participants with SCI and TD participants and a moderate correlation with the CUE-T total score. Regional effects on group differences were found to be significant.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates the strength of association between DTI parameters and clinical measures in the pedantic SCI population. It illustrates DTI as a potential biomarker of SCI location and severity in the pediatric SCI population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在调查住院康复后功能独立性的改善情况,并比较脊髓损伤(SCI)不同程度和严重程度之间的改善情况。还研究了影响患者预后的预后因素。
    联合国:罗菲德康复医院。
    未经评估:脊髓独立性测量版本III(SCIMIII),和功能独立性度量(FIM)。
    未经评估:在这项回顾性队列研究中,纳入180例SCI患者,记录其入院和出院时的功能独立性,并使用非参数检验比较不同程度和严重程度的损伤之间的变化。通过广义估计方程(GEE)分析研究预后因素。
    UNASSIGNED:除上颈椎AISA和B患者外,所有严重程度(美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS))和损伤程度的独立性变化均显着(P<0.05)。伤害程度,AIS,逗留长度(LOS)压疮对患者预后具有显著的预测价值。此外,相同AIS等级的不同损伤程度在功能改善方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而损伤程度相同的AIS组之间仅在上、中宫颈病变有显著性差异(P<0.05)。
    UNASSIGNED:记录SCI患者康复前后的功能独立性值可以帮助临床医生大致预期未来患者的预后。此外,对预后因素的深入研究可以为康复结局提供更合乎逻辑的期望.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the improvements of functional independence following inpatient rehabilitation and compare those improvements between different levels and severities of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Prognostic factors affecting the patient\'s outcomes were also studied.
    UNASSIGNED: Rofeideh Rehabilitation Hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective cohort study, 180 patients with SCI were enrolled to record their functional independence upon admission and discharge, and the changes were compared between different levels and severities of injury using non-parametric tests. The prognostic factors of outcomes were studied by generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The independence changes were significant for all the severities (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS)) and levels of injury except for the patients with AIS A and B at upper cervical levels (P < 0.05). The level of injury, AIS, Length of Stay (LOS), and pressure ulcer had a significant prognostic value on patient\'s outcomes. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between different levels of injury with the same AIS grade in functional improvement (P < 0.05), while there was a significant difference between AIS groups with the same level of injury only at upper and middle cervical lesions (P < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Recording the values of functional independence before and after rehabilitation in individuals with SCI can help clinicians approximately expect the outcomes of future patients. Moreover, a deeper study of the prognostic factors can provide a more logical expectation of rehabilitation outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:本研究的目的是评估不同磁共振(MR)成像方法之间的相互关系及其在评估急性创伤性脊髓损伤(tSCI)严重程度和预测神经系统预后方面的有效性。
    方法:我们对89例急性tSCI患者进行了术前多中心队列研究,并在损伤后24小时内进行了术前MR成像。我们评估了几种MR损伤成像测量,包括轴向等级(脑和脊髓损伤中心[BASIC]评分),矢状坡度,受伤的长度,最大运河妥协(MCC),和最大脊髓压迫(MSCC)。主成分分析(PCA)用于评估不同MR成像措施之间的相互关系。Spearman相关和回归分析用于评估损伤严重程度和预测神经功能缺损。入院时通过美国脊髓损伤协会损害量表(AIS)评估严重程度,虽然神经学结果是通过6周时的AIS等级变化来定义的,术后1年AIS分级和SCIM评分。
    结果:PCA确定了与1)固有索信号异常(BASIC评分,矢状等级和损伤长度)和2)外在脊髓压迫(MCC和MSCC)的措施。神经系统的结果和损伤的严重程度最好通过磁共振成像测量的内在信号异常,BASIC评分代表短期和长期神经系统结局的最准确预测指标。
    结论:我们确定BASIC评分在评估损伤严重程度方面具有优越的意义,预测早期AIS改善,与其他MR成像测量相比,1年时的AIS等级和SCIM评分。
    OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the interrelationship between different magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measures and their validity in assessing the severity of acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) and predicting neurological outcomes.
    METHODS: We performed a preoperative multicenter cohort study of 89 patients with acute tSCI and preoperative MR imaging within 24 h after injury. We assessed several MR imaging measures of injury, including axial grade (Brain and Spinal Injury Center [BASIC] score), sagittal grade, length of injury, maximum canal compromise (MCC), and maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to evaluate the interrelationship between different MR imaging measures. Spearman correlation and regression analyses were applied to assess injury severity and predict neurological impairment. The severity was assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) at admission, while neurological outcome was defined by AIS grade change at 6 weeks, AIS grade and SCIM score at 1 year after surgery.
    RESULTS: The PCA identified 2 clusters of MR imaging variables related to 1) measures of intrinsic cord signal abnormality (BASIC score, sagittal grade and length of injury) and 2) measures of extrinsic cord compression (MCC and MSCC). Neurological outcome and injury severity were best accounted for by MR imaging measures of intrinsic cord signal abnormalities, with the BASIC score representing the most accurate predictor of short-term and long-term neurological outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: We determined the superior significance of the BASIC score in assessing injury severity, predicting early AIS improvement, AIS grade and SCIM score at 1 year compared with other MR imaging measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景。在脊髓损伤中,有多个数据库包含有关功能恢复的信息,但由于函数测量方式的差异,数据无法汇集或比较。需要人行横道来链接或转换乐器之间的分数。Objectives.在脊髓损伤的功能独立性措施(FIM®)和脊髓独立性措施III(SCIMIII)中的自愿性肌肉骨骼运动项目之间建立人行横道。方法。使用FIM®和SCIMIII对同一人的回顾性数据集进行开发(瑞士数据集,n=662)并验证(美国,n=119,加拿大数据集,n=133)人行横道。三种不同的人行横道方法(专家小组,等百分位,和Rasch分析)。我们使用FIM®和SCIMIII的观察分数与横道分数之间的相关性作为评估横道强度的主要标准。次要标准,如分数分布,科恩的效果大小,点差异,还评估了子群不变性。结果。这三种方法都产生了很强的相关系数,超过主要标准值r=.866(.897-.972)。次要标准的评估表明,等百分位数和Rasch方法产生了最强的人行横道。Conclusions.推荐使用RaschFIM®/SCIMIII人行横道,因为它基于线性化测量的共同校准,允许更复杂的参数分析。人行横道将允许使用不同的功能措施对国际数据库中的自愿肌肉骨骼功能恢复进行比较,以及不同的护理和康复方法。
    Background. In spinal cord injury, there are multiple databases containing information on functional recovery, but data cannot be pooled or compared due to differences in how function is measured. A crosswalk is needed to link or convert scores between instruments. Objectives. To create a crosswalk between the voluntary musculoskeletal movement items in the Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) for spinal cord injury. Methods. Retrospective datasets with FIM® and SCIM III on the same people were used to develop (Swiss dataset, n = 662) and validate (US, n = 119, and Canadian datasets, n = 133) the crosswalks. Three different crosswalk methods (expert panel, equipercentile, and Rasch analysis) were employed. We used the correlation between observed scores on FIM® and SCIM III to crosswalked scores as the primary criterion to assess the strength of the crosswalk. Secondary criteria such as score distributions, Cohen\'s effect size, point differences, and subgroup invariance were also evaluated. Results. All three methods resulted in strong correlation coefficients, exceeding the primary criterion value of r = .866 (.897-.972). Assessment of secondary criteria suggests the equipercentile and Rasch methods produced the strongest crosswalks. Conclusions. The Rasch FIM®/SCIM III crosswalk is recommended because it is based on co-calibration of linearized measures, allowing for more sophisticated parametric analyses. The crosswalk will allow comparisons of voluntary musculoskeletal functional recovery across international databases using different functional measures, as well as different systems of care and rehabilitation approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    UNASSIGNED: Study on psychometric properties.
    UNASSIGNED: An inpatient rehabilitation facility in China.
    UNASSIGNED: 102 participants with spinal cord injury. Mean (SD) age was 48.8 (15.6) years; tetraplegia/paraplegia ratio was 50/52; median time post injury was 2 months.
    UNASSIGNED: SCIM III was translated into Chinese. Chinese versions of Barthel Index and SCIM III were filled out for each participant by Rater 1. SCIM III was then administered by Rater 2 after 24 hours (n = 67) and 7 days (n = 65).
    UNASSIGNED: Validity, inter-rater/test-retest reliability, and internal consistency of the Chinese version of SCIM III.
    UNASSIGNED: The total scores between the two raters were similar (mean ± SD: 33.8 ± 25.8 vs 33.8 ± 25.5, P = 0.95). Total agreement between the raters in each item was >80%, with both Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients >0.97 (P < 0.01) for each subscale and total score. The Pearson correlation coefficients of the two independent assessments performed by Rater 2 were also >0.97 (P < 0.01) for each subscale and the total score. Cronbach α was >0.7 for each subscale and the total score for both raters. High consistency was found between Barthel Index and SCIM III total scores (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.88, P < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: The Chinese version of SCIM III is valid and reliable for the functional assessment of patients with SCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:健康偏好值与一个人的幸福状态有关,并且是锚定在0(死亡)和1(完美健康)的单个度量。健康偏好在卫生经济学和卫生政策中起着关键作用。特别是在解释成本效益研究的结果时,并支持医疗资源的分配。当前的研究使用了国际功能分类的要素,残疾与健康(ICF)框架,用于预测脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的健康偏好。
    方法:数据是通过电话调查收集的(1)人口统计学,(2)损害(病因学,神经损伤程度,和ASIA减值量表),(3)二级健康状况(SHCs)使用SCI-二级健康状况量表修改,(4)使用脊髓独立性测量(SCIM)的功能能力,(5)在患有慢性SCI的成年人中使用健康效用指数-MarkIII(HUI-MarkIII)的健康偏好。根据ICF标题对变量进行分类,并使用分层回归分析来预测HUI-MarkIII评分。
    结果:患有慢性创伤性或非创伤性SCI的成年人(N=357)报告的平均健康偏好评分为0.27(±0.27)。在预测健康偏好时,我们的模型占“身体功能和结构”方差的55.1%,和“活动和参与”,对模型有显著贡献(P<0.0001)。特别是,年龄较大,被雇用,SCIM评分较高与健康偏好呈正相关.相反,较高的SHC影响评分与较差的健康偏好相关.
    结论:代表“活动和参与”的变量在很大程度上影响慢性SCI患者的健康偏好,这可能适合干预。这些发现可用于倡导健康促进和就业支持计划,以最大程度地提高社区慢性SCI患者的幸福感。
    OBJECTIVE: Health preference values relate to a person\'s state of well-being, and is a single metric anchored at 0 (death) and 1 (perfect health). Health preference plays a key role in health economics and health policy, particularly in interpreting the results of cost-effectiveness studies, and supports the allocation of healthcare resources. The current study used elements of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework to predict health preference in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI).
    METHODS: Data were collected by telephone survey on (1) demographics, (2) impairment (etiology, neurological level of injury, and ASIA impairment scale), (3) secondary health conditions (SHCs) using the SCI-Secondary Conditions Scale-Modified, (4) functional abilities using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), and (5) health preference using the Health Utilities Index-Mark III (HUI-Mark III) among adults with chronic SCI. Variables were categorized according to ICF headings and hierarchical regression analyses were used to predict HUI-Mark III scores.
    RESULTS: Adults with chronic traumatic or non-traumatic SCI (N = 357) reported a mean health preference score of 0.27 (±0.27). In predicting health preference, our model accounted for 55.1% of the variance with \"body functions and structure\", and \"activity and participation\", significantly contributing to the model (P < 0.0001). In particular, older age, being employed, and having higher SCIM scores were positively associated with health preference. Conversely, a higher SHC impact score was associated with poorer health preference.
    CONCLUSIONS: Variables representative of \"activity and participation\" largely influence health preference among persons with chronic SCI, which may be amenable to intervention. These findings could be applied to advocate for health promotion and employment support programs to maximize well-being in persons aging with chronic SCI in the community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号