Clinician distress is common in serious illness care. Palliative specialists are often consulted for cases involving significant distress among primary teams. Consults involving clinician distress can be challenging to navigate when it feels like 1) palliative specialists do not have the right skills to be helpful or 2) palliative specialists are being asked to \'fix\' difficult situations that would require changing other people\'s attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors, or healthcare systems writ large. This article uses three composite cases to illustrate types of clinician distress and examine the benefits and risks of palliative specialist involvement. We conclude with a discussion of potential impacts of palliative care consults for clinician distress on the field of palliative care and consider next steps in critically important efforts to support and sustain the entire workforce-both palliative specialists and nonspecialists alike-when caring for patients with serious illness and their family caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Though patients undergoing treatment for upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers frequently experience a range of sequelae and disease recurrence, patients often do not receive specialty palliative care soon after diagnosis and it is unknown in what ways they may benefit.
OBJECTIVE: To understand patient experiences of specialty palliative care in the perioperative period for patients seeking curative intent upper GI oncologic surgery.
METHODS: As part of a randomized controlled trial, we conducted in-depth interviews between November 2019 and July 2021 with 23 patients in the intervention arm who were undergoing curative intent treatment for upper GI cancers and who were also followed by the specialty palliative care team.
RESULTS: We found five themes that characterized patient experiences and perceptions of specialty palliative care. Patients typically had limited prior awareness of palliative care (theme 1), but during the study, came to understand it as a \"talking\" intervention (theme 2). Patients whose concerns aligned with palliative care described it as being impactful on their care (theme 3). However, most patients expressed a focus on cure from their cancer and less perceived relevance for integration of palliative care (theme 4). Integrating specialist palliative care practitioners with surgical teams made it difficult for some patients to identify how palliative care practitioners differed from other members of their care team (theme 5).
CONCLUSIONS: While receipt of specialty palliative care in the perioperative period was generally perceived positively and patients appreciated palliative care visits, they did not describe many needs typically met by palliative care practitioners.
BACKGROUND: clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03611309.

Palliative care improves outcomes, yet rural residents often lack adequate and equitable access. This study provides practical tips to address palliative care (PC)-related challenges in rural communities. Strategies include engaging trusted community partners, addressing cultural factors, improving pediatric care, utilizing telehealth, networking with rural teams including caregivers, and expanding roles for nurses and advanced practice providers. Despite complex barriers to access, providers can tailor PC to be patient-centered, respect local values, and bridge gaps. The \"Top 10\" format emphasizes the relevant issues to enable clinicians to provide optimal care for people from rural areas.

Palliative care is no longer synonymous with end-of-life care, and because supply has been well outstripped by demand, much of the practice of palliative care early in a patient\'s illness journey will take place in the primary care clinic-referred to as primary palliative care. Referral to specialty palliative care for complex symptom management or clarification on decision-making is appropriate, and can facilitate hospice referral, if indicated and in line with patient/family goals.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care for patients with advanced cancer improves suffering symptoms, and quality of life (QoL). However, routine implementation of palliative care by specialty palliative care consultation is still an unmet need among in-patients with advanced cancer. Our study aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based approach on QoLs and readmission rate when compared to routine practice by among medical oncologists.
METHODS: This study was a prospective, Quasi-Experimental design. In-patients with advanced cancer were non-randomly assigned to receive palliative care service by team-based approach or medical oncologists only. The primary endpoint was QoL. The secondary endpoint was the readmission rate at 7 and 30 days of hospital discharge.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two in-patients were enrolled. In-patients who were assessed by a team-based approach had significantly improved change scores of subjective well-being (SWB) when compared to another group (∆ SWB: -1 [-19 - 11] vs 0 [-9 - 15], p-value = 0.043). Furthermore, patients who were assessed under a team-based approach had significantly decreased in terms of readmission rate at 7 days of hospital discharge (4.92% in the team-based approach group vs. 19.67% in the medical oncologist group, p-value = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary collaboration is the key to success in establishing goals of care, which are supporting the best possible QoL and relieving suffering symptoms for those in-patients with advanced cancer. Furthermore, the readmission rate at 7 days of hospital discharge was significantly reduced by a team-based approach. Therefore, comprehensive palliative care assessment by interprofessional collaborative practice is required.
BACKGROUND: Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR): number 20200312001. Date of first registration on 09/03/2020.

Objective: Surgeons comprise 2% of HPM-trained physicians. Little is known about the perceived value of HPM training to the surgeon or medical community. We aim to demonstrate the value of HPM fellowship training to surgeons and surgical practice from the point of view of HPM fellowship trained surgeons. Design: A qualitative analysis was performed using semi-structured zoom interviews that elicited the lived experiences of HPM trained surgeons. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Setting: Researchers were from the University of Kansas School of Medicine and the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Participants were trained and worked across the United States in a variety of settings. Participants: Eligibility included training in general surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, or affiliated subspecialties and completion of a 1-year HPM fellowship. Results: 17 interviews were performed. Several themes emerged regarding the transformative value of HPM training to their medical and surgical practice: (1) Learning to apply shared decision making and goal-concordant care to surgical decision making, and (2) Decreasing personal bias in medical decision making, and (3) Enabling wellness in surgeons. Two themes emerged regarding the perceived value to both the surgical community and the HPM community: (1) Value of the HPM Fellowship Trained Surgeon to the Surgical Community, and (2) Value of the HPM Fellowship Trained Surgeon to the HPM Community. All study participants valued their HPM training and felt highly valued by the healthcare team. Conclusion: HPM trained surgeons are highly valued on the healthcare team and improve patient-centered surgical care.

Pediatric palliative advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) leaders are essential in advancing the field of pediatric palliative care. With expertise in pediatrics and strong advocacy skills for children, APRNs are well suited to lead interprofessional clinical teams, educational programs, community hospice and palliative organizations, policy changes, and research initiatives. Despite the prominence of their positions, there is a paucity of literature on pediatric palliative APRNs. This paper explores the leadership roles of the pediatric palliative APRN, offers resources to support leadership development, and showcases the importance of this role in various domains of pediatric palliative care.

The issue of generalist versus specialist palliative care is on the minds of healthcare leaders everywhere. We are amid changing demographics of physicians. The industrialization of medicine is well underway in the US and around the developing world. Is it important to identify patients who benefit the most from specialist palliative care, given that it is currently a limited resource? Should we step out of standard practice and redesign palliative care using principles of population management? The COVID pandemic rapidly introduced virtual palliative care consults. Is it a better way to promote wide access to specialty palliative care? Looking forward, should we promote ways to advance primary palliative care and reserve specialty palliative care to patients who will benefit most from this level of care? These questions, and others, are considered in this transcribed discussion between leading physicians in the field.

The practice of surgical palliative care is not new. Dr Balfour M. M. Mount, a retired urologic surgeon is considered the father of North American Palliative Care and coined the term Palliative Care in 1975. Dr Geoffrey P. Dunn, a retired general surgeon and hospice and palliative medicine specialist along with other like minded surgical colleagues were instrumental in developing the field of surgical palliative care. Dr Olga Jonasson, championed the American Board of Surgery becoming one of the sponsoring boards of the Hospice and Palliative Medicine certifying exam. Dr Anne Mosenthal advocated for palliative care to be integrated as parallel clinical aims so espoused in the Trauma Quality and Improvement Program Palliative Care Best Practice Guidelines. Dr Mosenthal currently chairs the American College of Surgeons Committee on Surgical Palliative Care. This introductory article is a brief history about the origins of surgical palliative care and sheds light on the current landscape of surgeons integrating primary and specialty palliative care into surgical practice. The aim of this surgical palliative care symposium is to take everyday surgical problems and highlight the application and benefit of palliative care when treating surgical patients with serious illness. Integrating palliative care principles into standard clinical management is evidenced based patient-centered practice.

Kidney palliative care is a growing subspecialty of clinical practice, education, and research in nephrology. It is an essential aspect of care for patients across the continuum of advanced kidney disease who have high symptom burden, multidimensional communication needs, and limited life expectancy. Training in kidney palliative care can occur in a variety of ways, from didactic curricula and clinical experiences embedded in nephrology fellowship training to the pursuit of additional dedicated fellowship training in palliative care. At this time, a minority of nephrologists pursue formal fellowship training in specialty palliative care. This article will discuss opportunities and challenges in building a skilled workforce that will address the palliative needs of patients living with advanced kidney disease.