OBJECTIVE: The standard treatment for canine and feline meningiomas includes radiotherapy, surgical excision or combined therapy. However, new therapeutic approaches are required due to the possible recurrence or progression of meningiomas despite initial therapy. Adjunctive therapy with synthetic long-acting somatostatin (SST) analogues has been described in humans with SST-expressing tumours. The expression of SST receptors (SSTRs) by feline meningiomas is currently unknown, and there are little data about canine meningiomas. We hypothesized that SSTR is expressed by canine and feline meningiomas (S1).
METHODS: Seven canines and 11 felines with histologically confirmed meningiomas underwent STTR screening. RNA expressions of SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3 and SSTR5 (canine) and SSTR1-SSTR 5 (feline) in fresh frozen and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were investigated using real-time (RT)-qPCR. The expression of SSTR1 and SSTR2 in FFPE samples was evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The specificity of applied antibodies for canine and feline species was confirmed by western blotting.
RESULTS: In canine meningiomas (n = 7), RNA expression of SSTR1, SSTR2 and SSTR5 was detected in all samples; SSTR3 RNA expression was detected in only 33% of samples. In feline meningiomas (n = 12), RNA expression of SSTR1, SSTR4, SSTR5 and SSTR2 was detected in 91%, 46%, 46% and 36% of samples, respectively; SSTR3 was not expressed. Overall, the detection rate was lower in FFPE samples. IHC revealed the expression of SSTR1 and SSTR2 in all samples from both species. However, it is important to exercise caution when interpreting IHC results due to the presence of diffuse background staining.
CONCLUSIONS: SSTRs are widely expressed in canine and feline meningiomas, thereby encouraging further studies investigating SSTR expression to conduct trials about the effect of adjunctive therapy with long-acting SST-analogues.

Myocardial somatostatin PET uptake is observed not only in most patients with acute myocarditis (AM) but also in some oncology patients referred for routine somatostatin PET. This raises concerns about the specificity of somatostatin PET for detecting myocarditis. The current study aims to identify factors associated with the detection of myocardial uptake on somatostatin PET scans recorded for oncology indications and differential PET criteria that characterize myocardial uptake in AM patients. Methods: We analyzed factors associated with the detection of myocardial [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC uptake in 508 [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET scans from 178 patients, performed for confirmed or suspected oncologic disease (Onc-PET) and PET criteria that could differentiate myocardial [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC uptake in 31 patients with MRI-ascertained AM (AM-PET) from that in the Onc-PET group. Results: Significant myocardial uptake was detected in 137 (26.9%) Onc-PET scans and was independently associated with somatostatin analog treatment (exp(β), 0.805; 95% CI, 0.728-0.890; P < 0.001) and age (exp(β), 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001-1.009; P = 0.012). A comparable model was selected for predicting the myocardial-to-blood SUVmax ratio using somatostatin analog treatment (P < 0.001) and history of coronary artery disease (P = 0.022). Myocardial uptake was detected in 12.9% (25/193) of Onc-PET scans from patients treated with somatostatin analogs but in 43.4% (59/136) of untreated patients over the median age of 64 y. Myocardial uptake was apparent in all 31 AM-PET scans, with volume and intensity of uptake dramatically higher than in the 137 Onc-PET scans showing myocardial uptake. A myocardial-to-blood SUVmax ratio threshold of 2.20 provided a sensitivity of 87% (27/31) and a specificity of 88% (44/50) for differentiating myocardial uptake between the AM-PET group and an Onc-PET group restricted to patients with clinical characteristics comparable to those of patients in the AM-PET group (≤64 y of age, no coronary artery disease history, and no somatostatin agonists). A myocardial uptake volume threshold of 18 cm3 provided comparable diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 84% [26/31]; specificity, 94% [47/50]). Conclusion: Myocardial uptake was detected in 26.9% of somatostatin PET scans recorded for oncology indications. This rate was decreased by somatostatin analog treatments and increased in older individuals. However, somatostatin PET scans, analyzed with the quantitative criterion of uptake intensity or volume, are able to identify AM and to differentiate it from myocardial uptake of other origins.

Metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare endocrine malignancies with limited effective treatment options. The association between the tumor microenvironment (TME) with somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) and hypoxia-induced factor-2α (HIF-2α) in PPGLs, critical for optimizing combination therapeutic strategies with immunotherapy, remains largely unexplored. To evaluate the association of SSTR2 and HIF-2α immunoreactivity with the TME in patients with PPGLs, we analyzed the expression of SSTR2A, HIF-2α, and TME components, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD4 and CD8), tumor-associated macrophages (CD68 and CD163), and PD-L1, using immunohistochemistry in patients with PPGLs. The primary outcome was to determine the association of the immune profiles with SSTR2A and HIF-2α expression. Among 45 patients with PPGLs, SSTR2A and HIF2α were positively expressed in 21 (46.7%) and 14 (31.1%) patients, respectively. The median PD-L1 immunohistochemical score (IHS) was 2.0 (interquartile range: 0-30.0). Positive correlations were observed between CD4, CD8, CD68, and CD163 levels. A negative correlation was found between the CD163/CD68 ratio (an indicator of M2 polarization) and SSTR2A expression (r = -0.385, p = 0.006). HIF-2α expression showed a positive correlation with PD-L1 IHS (r = 0.348, p = 0.013). The co-expression of PD-L1 (HIS > 10) and HIF-2α was found in seven patients (15.6%). No associations were observed between SDHB staining results and the CD163/CD68 ratio, PD-L1, or SSTR2A expression. Our data suggest the potential of combination therapy with immunotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy or HIF-2α inhibitors as a treatment option in selected PPGL populations.

OBJECTIVE: To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands.
METHODS: This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO).
RESULTS: Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma.
CONCLUSIONS: These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.

OBJECTIVE: 18F-labelled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) analogs offer several advantages over 68Ga in terms of yield, cost, spatial resolution and detection rate. This study presents an interim analysis of a prospective trial designed to assess the safety, biodistribution and dosimetry of [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3, and compare its diagnostic efficacy and clinical management outcomes with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE or [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-LM3 in patients with well-differentiated NETs.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically confirmed well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G1 and G2) were prospectively recruited. The first eight patients underwent serial PET scans at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 injection to assess biodistribution and dosimetry. The remaining patients underwent whole-body PET/CT scans. [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT were done within a week, with a minimum 24-hour interval between the two scans. Focal uptake above the surrounding background activity and could not be explained by physiologic uptake was considered lesions of NETs. Lesion number, tumor uptake, and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were compared. In patients with discrepant findings, the size of the smallest lesions (measured on coregistered CT) detected on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was compared.
RESULTS: [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was safe and well-tolerated. Physiological uptake of [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 was significantly lower than that of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in abdominal organs and bone marrow, but higher in blood pool and lung. The mean effective dose was 0.024 ± 0.014 mSv/MBq. [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 detected significantly more liver lesions (457 vs. 291, P = 0.006) and lymph node lesions (30 vs. 22, P = 0.011) compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. The tumor uptake was comparable, but TBR was significantly higher with [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 for lesions from all sites except for the duodenum. The size of the minimum liver lesions (0.54 ± 0.15 vs. 1.01 ± 0.49, P<0.001) and lymph node lesions (0.50 ± 0.19 vs. 1.26 ± 0.86, P = 0.024) detected on [18F]ALF-NOTA-LM3 were significantly smaller than those detected on [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE.
CONCLUSIONS: [18F]AlF-NOTA-LM3 shows favorable biodistribution, higher spatial resolution and superior performance than [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE in detecting liver and lymph node metastases, with higher TBR. Notably, it is the first SSTR analog to show superiority in detecting lymph node lesions when compared to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06056362.

[18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide ([18F]AlF-OC) is a promising alternative for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the somatostatin receptor (SSTR). Our aim is to assess changes in TNM staging and differences in patient management between [18F]AlF-OC PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT in the work-up of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients. Patients who underwent both [18F]AlF-OC and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE or [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in our multicenter study (Pauwels et al., J Nucl Med.2023;63:632-638) with a NET were included for analysis. TNM staging was determined and compared for both tracers. For each patient, the blinded [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA or [18F]AlF-OC PET/CT images were presented in random order at a multidisciplinary team board. The images were presented together with clinical information and compared with previous SSTR and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. After a consensus decision for patient management was recorded, the board was presented with the PET/CT images from the other SSTR tracer and a decision was made for the second tracer. Differences in management were classified as major if it entailed an intermodality change and minor if it led to an intramodality change. Compared with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA, the use of [18F]AlF-OC led to a change in 16/75 patients: TNM staging changes in 10/75 patients (13.3%; downstaging in 3/10, upstaging in 7/10) and differences in clinical management were seen in 10/75 patients (13.3%), leading to a major difference in 7/10 cases and a minor change in 3/10 cases. All 10 cases with a difference in patient management between both PET tracers were caused by additional lesion detection by [18F]AlF-OC. The use of [18F]AlF-OC did not impact TNM staging or clinical management in the large majority of the patients (86.7%), further validating the potential for routine clinical use of [18F]AlF-OC PET/CT as an alternative for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT. The trial is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04552847 and EudraCT 2020-000549-15.

Bivalves hold an important role in marine aquaculture and the identification of growth-related genes in bivalves could contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism governing their growth, which may benefit high-yielding bivalve breeding. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) is a conserved negative regulator of growth in vertebrates. Although SSTR genes have been identified in invertebrates, their involvement in growth regulation remains unclear. Here, we identified seven SSTRs (PySSTRs) in the Yesso scallop, Patinopecten yessoensis, which is an economically important bivalve cultured in East Asia. Among the three PySSTRs (PySSTR-1, -2, and -3) expressed in adult tissues, PySSTR-1 showed significantly lower expression in fast-growing scallops than in slow-growing scallops. Then, the function of this gene in growth regulation was evaluated in dwarf surf clams (Mulinia lateralis), a potential model bivalve cultured in the lab, via RNA interference (RNAi) through feeding the clams Escherichia coli containing plasmids expressing double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) targeting MlSSTR-1. Suppressing the expression of MlSSTR-1, the homolog of PySSTR-1 in M. lateralis, resulted in a significant increase in shell length, shell width, shell height, soft tissue weight, and muscle weight by 20%, 22%, 20%, 79%, and 92%, respectively. A transcriptome analysis indicated that the up-regulated genes after MlSSTR-1 expression inhibition were significantly enriched in the fat digestion and absorption pathway and the insulin pathway. In summary, we systemically identified the SSTR genes in P. yessoensis and revealed the growth-inhibitory role of SSTR-1 in bivalves. This study indicates the conserved function of somatostatin signaling in growth regulation, and ingesting dsRNA-expressing bacteria is a useful way to verify gene function in bivalves. SSTR-1 is a candidate target for gene editing in bivalves to promote growth and could be used in the breeding of fast-growing bivalves.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was evaluate the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with histologically proven neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), as well as the correlation of the visualized findings with the tumor grade.
METHODS: We included 50 patients with NETs who underwent both [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/TC. The pooled sensitivity of both scans was compared, as well as [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG for each tumor grade (grade 1/G1, grade 2/G2 and grade 3/G3). Also, the sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG as a function of the continuous variable Ki-67 was investigated. Finally, the number of lesions detected by both PET radiopharmaceuticals for each tumor grade was compared.
RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity of both PET/CT (96%) was higher than [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC (84%) and [18F]FDG (44%) separately, with statistically significant differences. The sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [18F]FDG in both G1 (p = 0.004) and G2 (p < 0.001). In G3 the performance of both scans detected disease in 100% of this subgroup. The sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC and [18F]FDG PET/CT correlated significantly with the Ki-67 proliferative index. In G2 patients the number of lesions detected with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC was higher than [18F]FDG.
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both PET/CT, particularly in G2 and G3, demonstrates the molecular heterogeneity of metastatic NETs and contributes to the selection of a more appropriate treatment, particularly in those high-grade patients who may benefit from radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

BACKGROUND: The rise in thyroid cancer incidence, especially papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), has underscored the need for improved diagnostic methods and management strategies. Herein, we aim to comprehensively review the evolving landscape in thyroid cancer diagnosis and the potential utility of Gallium-68 (Ga-68) based somatostatin receptor imaging.
METHODS: We reviewed the clinical studies involving Ga-68 based radiotracers by looking at the following literature databases -PUBMED, EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE and COCHRANE. We employed a detailed search strategy with the following search terms; PubMed: (\"gallium Ga 68 dotatate\" [Supplementary Concept]) AND (\"Thyroid Gland\"[Mesh] OR \"Thyroid Nodule\"[Mesh] OR \"Thyroid Neoplasms\"[Mesh]), Embase (\"gallium 68\" AND \"Thyroid Disease\"), Web of Science: (\"Gallium 68 and Thyroid\").
RESULTS: A comparison between Ga-68 DOTATATE and Ga-68 DOTANOC showed similar sensitivities but a higher uptake for Ga-68 DOTATATE. Studies comparing Ga-68-based SSTR PET with FDG PET highlighted the potential advantages of both approaches, with Ga-68-based SSTR PET being more specific in certain cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Ga-68-based somatostatin receptor imaging displays clinical utility in RAI-R DTC, offering valuable insight into detecting skeletal lymph node metastases. Notably, it shows potential as a primary imaging tool, potentially augmenting the role of FDG PET. However, SSTR PET imaging\'s efficacy in distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid nodules varies, with a complex interplay of factors influencing its specificity, indicating its value as an adjunct to existing methods, warranting further research for a refined role in thyroid cancer management.
CONCLUSIONS: Although study variations exist, Ga-based somatostatin receptor imaging holds potential as a complementary tool alongside diagnostic methods in thyroid cancer diagnosis, with particular relevance to RAI-R DTC. In carefully selected patients demonstrating the presence of Ga-68 DOTATATE avid lesions, further exploration, and investigation into the potential utilization of Lu177 DOTATATE are warranted.

Radioligand Therapy (RLT) in the form of [177Lu] Lu-DOTA-TATE (Lutathera®) is a promising treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) with cardiac metastasis. We present a patient treated with [177Lu] Lu-DOTA-TATE that showed shrinkage of metastasis after four treatments at 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks.