BACKGROUND: Soft coagulation is a hemostatic system of electrosurgical units that automatically regulates its output to avoid carbonization or incision. This system is widely used in invasive procedures, including thoracic surgery. Few reports exist on the harmful effects of these devices. Herein, we encountered a case of an esophagopleural fistula caused by soft coagulation.
METHODS: A 74-year-old man with a history of bladder cancer was diagnosed with a tumor in the right lower lung lobe 2.5 cm in diameter. A thoracoscopic right lower lobectomy with lymph node dissection was performed. During surgery, hemostasis using soft coagulation was performed on the right wall of the lower esophagus. Eight days after surgery, thoracoscopic empyema curettage and drainage were performed. Three days after the second surgery, an esophageal fistula was identified. Suturing for the esophageal fistula and omentoplasty were performed. Suture failure occurred and an esophagobronchial fistula developed after the third surgery, which was reduced by drainage, antibiotics, and enteral nutrition. The fistula was finally addressed by fibrin glue filling in its cavity.
CONCLUSIONS: Soft coagulation helps manage hemostasis and contributes to safe surgery. However, it may cause severe complications owing to the unpredictable spread of heat denaturation. It is suspected that delayed esophageal perforation was caused by an unnoticed heat injury to the deeper layer of the esophageal wall.
CONCLUSIONS: There have been no reports of esophagus injury caused by soft coagulation exept for our experience. Although soft coagulation is a useful device owing to its excellent hemostatic capacity, the spread of heat denaturation may cause unpredictable tissue damage. Extra caution should be observed when using this device for hemostasis.

UNASSIGNED: Among vascular malformations, venous malformations are the most common type. Among these, retroperitoneal venous malformations are extremely rare.
UNASSIGNED: A 60-year-old woman was diagnosed with a retroperitoneal tumor 4.5 cm in diameter by abdominal computed tomographic scan. We had difficulty judging whether the tumor was benign or malignant. We performed laparoscopic surgery in order to remove the tumor and make a precise diagnosis. The pathological diagnosis was a venous malformation.
UNASSIGNED: Venous malformation located in the retroperitoneum is very rare, and there were few cases that could be removed by laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery may be beneficial both for treatment and diagnosis of patients with a small retroperitoneal venous malformation.

BACKGROUND: Soft coagulation is widely used for hemostasis because of its significant advantage in inducing tissue coagulation and denaturation without carbonization. However, a few cases of airway damage have been reported at the site, where soft coagulation was directly applied.
METHODS: We encountered an unusual case of delayed perforation of the intermediate bronchial trunk observed on 24 days after cauterization of the right S6 bulla adjacent to the bronchus. Chest computed tomography revealed a large fistula between the intermediate bronchial trunk and the cauterized bulla in the right S6. Bronchoscopy showed a large fistula at the membranous portion of the intermediate bronchial trunk. We presumed that the bronchial perforation resulted from thermal damage to the intermediate bronchial trunk during bulla cauterization and the bronchial perforation induced infection in the bulla. Resection of the infectious bulla and the intermediate bronchial trunk, followed by end-to-end bronchial anastomosis and a pedicled intercostal muscle flap coverage, was performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The severe airway damage resulting in perforation developed even without direct contact between the electrode tip and the bronchial wall, provoking the need for special attention to the duration of cauterization and location, where it is used.

BACKGROUND: The VIO soft-coagulation system (VIO) with a monopolar electrode is a novel hemostatic device that provides hemostasis by superficial contact at the bleeding site without carbonization. Because heat injury remains a concern, surgical records and postoperative liver dysfunction were retrospectively evaluated in a cohort study.
METHODS: Between September 2010 and March 2016, 322 patients underwent hepatectomy in which hemostatic devices were used at two institutions. Surgical results with use of VIO at one institute (VIO group) were compared with those without use of VIO at a second institute (control group), and propensity analysis was performed.
RESULTS: In limited resection and segmentectomy or sectionectomy performed in the VIO group, the prevalence of liver cirrhosis was significantly higher and the operation time was significantly longer in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). In all hepatectomies, postoperative levels of total bilirubin and aspartate or alanine transaminase tended to be increased and prothrombin activity tended to be lower in the VIO group in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). The prevalence of hepatic failure in the VIO group was significantly higher in comparison with that in the control group (p < 0.05). In cases of segmentectomy or sectionectomy, blood loss was significantly increased in the VIO group in comparison with that in the control group (p < 0.05) Propensity score matching showed that although the surgical records and outcomes were not significantly different between the groups, postoperative liver dysfunction was significant in the VIO group in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Mild postoperative hepatic thermal injury with VIO was confirmed, and therefore, surgeons should take care when using the VIO system to make frequent wide resected cuts on the surface of the liver.