Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

钠 - 葡萄糖转运蛋白 2 抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究揭示了钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)对心力衰竭患者的益处。然而,它们对急性心肌梗死(AMI)的影响仍不确定.因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估SGLT2i在有或无糖尿病的AMI患者中的有效性.我们对PubMed进行了全面搜索,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆包含从成立到2023年11月30日的数据。纳入了在AMI患者中比较SGLT2i与安慰剂或非SGLT2i的相关研究。当异质性统计量(I2)小于50%时,使用固定效应模型汇总具有95%置信区间的平均差和/或比值比(OR);否则,采用随机效应模型。该荟萃分析包括4项随机对照试验和4项观察性研究,涉及9397例AMI患者。与安慰剂或非SGLT2i治疗的患者相比,SGLT2i治疗的心力衰竭住院率(OR=0.50,95%CI:0.32-0.80)和全因死亡(OR=0.65,95%CI:0.44-0.95)明显降低。此外,SGLT2i的使用与左心室射血分数的显著增加(平均差=1.90,95%CI:1.62~2.17)和脑钠肽N末端激素原的降低(OR=0.88,95%CI0.82~0.94)相关.亚组分析显示,在糖尿病患者中,SGLT2i表现出类似的效果。本荟萃分析提供的证据表明SGLT2i在AMI患者中的有效性;SGLT2i可以作为AMI患者的额外治疗选择。无论是否存在糖尿病。
    UNASSIGNED: Recent studies have revealed the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in heart failure patients. However, their effects on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of SGLT2i in patients with AMI with or without diabetes. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library encompassing data from inception until November 30, 2023. Relevant studies comparing SGLT2i with placebo or non-SGLT2i in patients with AMI were included. The mean difference and/or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using a fixed-effects model when the heterogeneity statistic (I2) was less than 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was employed. Four randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies involving 9397 patients with AMI were included in this meta-analysis. Patients treated with SGLT2i exhibited a significantly lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.80) and all-cause death (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.95) compared with those treated with placebo or non-SGLT2i. Furthermore, the use of SGLT2i was associated with a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.62-2.17) and a greater reduction of N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94). Subgroup analysis revealed that in patients with diabetes, SGLT2i exhibited similar effects. The present meta-analysis provided evidence indicating the effectiveness of SGLT2i in patients with AMI; SGLT2i may serve as an additional therapeutic option for patients with AMI, regardless of the presence or absence of diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆固醇酯转移蛋白(CETP)抑制剂,最初开发用于治疗高脂血症,在临床试验中显示出减少新发糖尿病风险的希望。这将CETP抑制剂定位为在代谢疾病治疗中重新利用的潜在候选物。鉴于他们的口服,它们可以补充现有的口服药物,如钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂,可能会延迟对胰岛素等注射疗法的需求。
    我们进行了2x2阶乘孟德尔随机化分析,涉及来自英国生物库的233,765名参与者。本研究旨在评估CETP和SGLT2的同时遗传抑制与分别抑制两者相比是否能增强血糖控制。
    我们的发现表明,与对照和单剂抑制相比,CETP和SGLT2的双重遗传抑制显着降低了糖化血红蛋白水平。此外,与对照组和单独的SGLT2抑制相比,联合抑制与较低的糖尿病发病率相关.
    这些结果表明,CETP和SGLT2抑制剂联合治疗可能提供优于单独SGLT2抑制剂的血糖控制。未来的临床试验应该研究重新利用CETP抑制剂治疗代谢性疾病的潜力。提供了一种口服治疗选择,可以使高风险患者在需要胰岛素或胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂等注射疗法之前受益。
    UNASSIGNED: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, initially developed for treating hyperlipidemia, have shown promise in reducing the risk of new-onset diabetes during clinical trials. This positions CETP inhibitors as potential candidates for repurposing in metabolic disease treatment. Given their oral administration, they could complement existing oral medications like sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, potentially delaying the need for injectable therapies such as insulin.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a 2x2 factorial Mendelian Randomization analysis involving 233,765 participants from the UK Biobank. This study aimed to evaluate whether simultaneous genetic inhibition of CETP and SGLT2 enhances glycemic control compared to inhibiting each separately.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings indicate that dual genetic inhibition of CETP and SGLT2 significantly reduces glycated hemoglobin levels compared to controls and single-agent inhibition. Additionally, the combined inhibition is linked to a lower incidence of diabetes compared to both the control group and SGLT2 inhibition alone.
    UNASSIGNED: These results suggest that combining CETP and SGLT2 inhibitor therapies may offer superior glycemic control over SGLT2 inhibitors alone. Future clinical trials should investigate the potential of repurposing CETP inhibitors for metabolic disease treatment, providing an oral therapeutic option that could benefit high-risk patients before they require injectable therapies like insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2型糖尿病患者接受钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2is)或胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP1RA)治疗后的肾脏结局尚未直接比较。这项研究比较了SGLT2i和GLP1RA治疗对肾功能和代谢参数的影响。
    方法:纳入2009年1月至2023年8月在三级医院开始SGLT2i或GLP1RA治疗的2型糖尿病患者,以评估综合肾脏结局。例如估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降40%,终末期肾病的发作,肾死亡,或新发的大量白蛋白尿。血压的改变,葡萄糖调节参数,血脂谱,和人体测量参数,包括身体脂肪和肌肉,被检查了4年。
    结果:使用1-3倾向评分匹配方法共纳入2,112名患者(GLP1RAs的528名患者,1,584名SGLT2i患者)。SGLT2i治疗优于GLP1RA治疗,虽然不重要,对于复合肾脏结局(风险比[HR],0.63;p=0.097)。SGLT2i治疗比GLP1RAs有效地保护了肾功能(eGFR降低,≥40%;HR,0.46;p=0.023),随着蛋白尿消退的改善(HR,1.72;p=0.036)。SGLT2i疗法较年夜程度降低血压和体重。然而,与SGLT2is组相比,GLP1RAs组HbA1c水平<7.0%的患者更多(40.6%vs31.4%;p<0.001).GLP1RA治疗增强β细胞功能并降低LDL-胆固醇水平低于基线值。
    结论:SGLT2is在保护肾功能和减轻体重方面具有优势,而GLP1RAs更好地管理血糖失调和血脂异常。
    BACKGROUND: Renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes following treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) have not been directly compared. This study compared the impact of SGLT2i and GLP1RA therapy on renal function and metabolic parameters.
    METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated SGLT2i or GLP1RA therapy in a tertiary hospital between January 2009 and August 2023 were included to assess composite renal outcomes, such as a 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), onset of end-stage renal disease, renal death, or new-onset macroalbuminuria. Alterations in blood pressure, glucose regulation parameters, lipid profile, and anthropometric parameters, including body fat and muscle masses, were examined over 4-years.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,112 patients were enrolled using a one-to-three propensity-score matching approach (528 patients for GLP1RAs, 1,584 patients for SGLT2i). SGLT2i treatment was favoured over GLP1RA treatment, though not significantly, for composite renal outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; p = 0.097). SGLT2i therapy preserved renal function effectively than GLP1RAs (decrease in eGFR, ≥ 40%; HR, 0.46; p = 0.023), with improving albuminuria regression (HR, 1.72; p = 0.036). SGLT2i therapy decreased blood pressure and body weight to a greater extent. However, more patients attained HbA1c levels < 7.0% with GLP1RAs than with SGLT2is (40.6% vs 31.4%; p < 0.001). GLP1RA therapy enhanced β-cell function and decreased LDL-cholesterol levels below baseline values.
    CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2is were superior for preserving renal function and reducing body weight, whereas GLP1RAs were better for managing glucose dysregulation and dyslipidaemia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    EMMY的试验是多中心的,调查员发起的,安慰剂对照,双盲审判,该研究纳入了476名AMI后立即患者,第一项研究表明,与依帕列净相比,急性心肌梗死后患者的NT-proBNP水平显着降低,心脏结构和功能显着改善。安慰剂。然而,几乎没有任何数据可用于研究基线心电图指标在SGLT2抑制剂治疗患者中的预后作用.该事后分析调查了在试验的一个中心(181名患者)中收集的基线ECG指标与对Empagliflozin治疗的响应的结构和功能心脏参数以及心脏生物标志物的变化的关联。共纳入181名患者(146名男性;平均年龄58±14岁)。中间PQ间隔为156(IQR144-174)毫秒(ms),QRS宽度92(84-98)ms,QTc间隔453(428-478)ms,Q波持续时间45(40-60)ms,Q波振幅0.40(0.30-0.70)毫伏(mV),心率为71(64-85)bpm。对于整个队列的功能心脏参数(LVEF和E/e'),在较短的QRS宽度(P=0.005)中,E/e从基线到第26周下降更大。仅发现结构性心脏终点在LVEDD和Q波持续时间之间具有显著正相关(P=0.037)。较高的心率与较好的LVEF反应显著相关(P=0.001)。E/E(P=0.021),NT-proBNP(P=0.005)。Empagliflozin治疗与结果没有相互作用。AMI后的基线心电图特征不能预测Empagliflozin在AMI后的有益NTproBNP效应。也不是AMI后26周内的功能或结构变化。
    The EMMY trial was a multicentre, investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, which enrolled 476 patients immediately following AMI and the first study demonstrating a significant reduction in NT-proBNP-levels as well as significant improvements in cardiac structure and function in patients after acute myocardial infarction treated with empagliflozin vs. placebo. However, hardly any data are available investigating the prognostic role of baseline electrocardiogram metrics in SGLT2-inhibitor-treated patients. This post-hoc analysis investigated the association of baseline ECG metrics collected in one centre of the trial (181 patients) with changes in structural and functional cardiac parameters as well as cardiac biomarkers in response to Empagliflozin treatment. A total of 181 patients (146 men; mean age 58 ± 14 years) were included. Median PQ-interval was 156 (IQR 144-174) milliseconds (ms), QRS width 92 (84-98) ms, QTc interval 453 (428-478) ms, Q-wave duration 45 (40-60) ms, Q-wave amplitude 0.40 (0.30-0.70) millivolt (mV), and heart rate was 71 (64-85) bpm. For functional cardiac parameters (LVEF and E/e\') of the entire cohort, a greater decrease of E/e\' from baseline to week 26 was observed in shorter QRS width (P = 0.005).Structural cardiac endpoints were only found to have a significant positive correlation between LVEDD and Q wave duration (P = 0.037). Higher heart rate was significantly correlated with better response in LVEF (P = 0.001), E/e\' (P = 0.021), and NT-proBNP (P = 0.005). Empagliflozin-treatment showed no interaction with the results. Baseline ECG characteristics post AMI are neither predictive for beneficial NTproBNP effects of Empagliflozin post AMI, nor for functional or structural changes within 26 weeks post AMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:具有心血管或肾脏益处的新型抗糖尿病药物,如钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA),已被推向市场。这项研究探讨了2型糖尿病(T2D)住院患者抗糖尿病药物使用的4年趋势。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    方法:瑞士三级护理医院。
    方法:4695名成人因T2D住院并普遍或偶然使用以下抗糖尿病药物之一(二甲双胍,二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i),磺酰脲类,GLP-1RA,SGLT-2i,短效胰岛素或长效胰岛素),使用电子健康记录数据识别。总体绘制了抗糖尿病药物使用的季度趋势,并按心血管疾病(CVD)和慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)进行了分层。
    结果:我们观察到接受任何抗糖尿病药物的T2D住院比例呈稳定趋势(从2019年的77.6%到2022年的78%;趋势p=0.97)。在流行用户中,SGLT-2i使用量增幅最大(从2019年的7.4%增至2022年的21.8%;趋势<0.01),磺酰脲类下降幅度最大(从2019年的11.4%降至2022年的7.2%;趋势<0.01)。在事件用户中,SGLT-2i是最常见的新处方抗糖尿病药物,从2019年的26%增加到2022年的56.1%(趋势<0.01)。在入院和出院之间,SGLT-2i也占处方的最大增长(+5.1%;p<0.01)。
    结论:这些2019年至2022年的真实数据表明,在医院环境中,抗糖尿病药物发生了重大变化。随着磺酰脲类的使用减少和SGLT-2i处方的增加,尤其是在因CVD或CKD住院的患者中。这一趋势符合国际准则,表明医疗保健提供者迅速适应,标志着朝着更有效的糖尿病管理迈进。
    OBJECTIVE: Novel antidiabetes medications with proven cardiovascular or renal benefit, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), have been introduced to the market. This study explored the 4-year trends of antidiabetes medication use among medical hospitalisations with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: Tertiary care hospital in Switzerland.
    METHODS: 4695 adult hospitalisations with T2D and prevalent or incident use of one of the following antidiabetes medications (metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), sulfonylureas, GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2i, short-acting insulin or long-acting insulin), identified using electronic health record data. Quarterly trends in use of antidiabetes medications were plotted overall and stratified by cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD).
    RESULTS: We observed a stable trend in the proportion of hospitalisations with T2D who received any antidiabetes medication (from 77.6% during 2019 to 78% in 2022; p for trend=0.97). In prevalent users, the largest increase in use was found for SGLT-2i (from 7.4% in 2019 to 21.8% in 2022; p for trend <0.01), the strongest decrease was observed for sulfonylureas (from 11.4% in 2019 to 7.2% in 2022; p for trend <0.01). Among incident users, SGLT-2i were the most frequently newly prescribed antidiabetes medication with an increase from 26% in 2019 to 56.1% in 2022 (p for trend <0.01). Between hospital admission and discharge, SGLT-2i also accounted for the largest increase in prescriptions (+5.1%; p<0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data from 2019 to 2022 demonstrate a significant shift in antidiabetes medications within the in-hospital setting, with decreased use of sulfonylureas and increased prescriptions of SGLT-2i, especially in hospitalisations with CVD or CKD. This trend aligns with international guidelines and indicates swift adaptation by healthcare providers, signalling a move towards more effective diabetes management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管目前的治疗方法,心力衰竭和慢性肾脏病仍然是发病和死亡的主要原因.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂最近已成为这些疾病的标准治疗方法。这篇综述总结了SGLT-2抑制剂的重要随机对照试验以及在临床和医院环境中在心力衰竭和慢性肾脏疾病患者中使用这些药物的指南。
    Despite current therapies, heart failure and chronic kidney disease continue to be major causes of morbidity and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have recently become standard-of-care therapy for these conditions. This review summarizes important randomized controlled trials of SGLT-2 inhibitors and guidelines for using these agents in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease in both clinic and hospital settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号