Social risk factors

社会风险因素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    很少有研究研究了多层次的社会因素如何相互作用并影响有性行为风险的中晚期青少年的性风险发展模式。我们研究了青春期中后期男孩和女孩的性危险行为的发展轨迹,以及暴露于三个社会危险因素的影响(父母监测不良,同行风险,和邻里风险)。
    我们从10-12年级每六个月跟踪2,332名巴哈马青少年。我们使用基于组的轨迹建模来识别男孩和女孩的性风险行为的不同轨迹。
    我们确定了男孩和女孩的三个轨迹。同伴风险和邻里风险预测了男孩的高性行为风险轨迹,和同伴风险(单独或与其他风险因素结合)对女孩中高风险轨迹成员的影响最大.父母监测对青少年性危险行为的影响相对较小。
    我们的研究结果强调了早期识别青少年性危险行为和制定有针对性的预防干预措施以改善青少年健康结果的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Few studies have examined how multi-level social factors interact and affect developmental patterns of sexual risk among middle-to-late adolescents who are at risk of experiencing sexual risk behaviors. We examined developmental trajectories of sexual risk behaviors of boys and girls in middle-to-late adolescence and the effects of exposure to three social risk factors (poor parental monitoring, peer risk, and neighborhood risk).
    UNASSIGNED: We followed 2,332 Bahamian adolescents every six months from Grades 10-12. We used group-based trajectory modeling to identify distinct trajectories of sexual risk behaviors for boys and girls.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified three trajectories each for boys and girls. Peer risk and neighborhood risk predicted a high sexual-risk trajectory for boys, and peer risk (alone or combined with other risk factors) had the greatest impact on the membership of moderate-to-high-risk trajectory for girls. Parental monitoring had a relatively small effect on adolescents\' sexual risk behavior.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results underscore the importance of early identification of adolescents with sexual risk behavior and development of targeted prevention interventions to improve adolescent health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究考察了CMS国家创新模型(SIM)对捕获患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的成年人的社会风险因素的影响。使用具有倾向得分权重的差异(DID)方法,本研究比较了使用ICD-9V编码("SDOH编码")在ASCVD住院的成人中作为主要诊断(N=1,485,354)的SDOH/社会因素的二次诊断文献.数据收集自2010年1月1日至2015年9月30日,涵盖2013年10月SIM实施前后的时期。从2010年1月到2015年9月,ASCVD成人中很少使用SDOH代码(0.55%,95%CI:0.43%-0.67%)。在SIM状态(0.56%至0.93%)和比较状态(0.46%至0.56%)中,具有ASCVD的SDOH代码从前期到后期增加。在ASCVD住院期间,SIM的实施与SDOH代码利用率的更大改善相关(校正OR1.30,95CI:1.18-1.43)。ED入院时使用SDOH代码的几率比ASCVD常规入院时高86%(AOR1.86,95CI:1.76-1.97)。将人群限制为参加Medicare的老年人(>=65岁)时的结果相似(AOR1.50,95CI1.31-1.71),而对医疗补助受益人来说并不重要。该研究指出了医疗保健提供者在记录ASCVD成人中的SDOH方面面临的挑战。
    The study examines effects of the CMS State Innovation Models(SIM) on capturing social risk factors in adults hospitalized with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD). Using a difference-in-differences(DID) approach with propensity score weights, the study compared documentation of secondary diagnosis of SDOH/social factors using ICD-9 V codes (\"SDOH codes\") in adults hospitalized with ASCVD as a primary diagnosis (N= 1,485,354). Data were gathered from January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2015, covering the period before and after the SIM implementation in October 2013. From January 2010 to September 2015, SDOH codes were infrequently utilized among adults with ASCVD(0.55%, 95% CI: 0.43%-0.67%). SDOH codes with ASCVD increased from pre- to post-period in SIM states(0.56% to 0.93%) and comparison states (0.46% to 0.56%). SIM implementation was associated with greater improvement in SDOH codes utilization (adjusted OR 1.30, 95%CI: 1.18-1.43) during ASCVD hospitalizations. The odds of SDOH codes utilization were 86% higher in ED admissions(AOR 1.86, 95%CI: 1.76-1.97) than in routine admissions with ASCVD. Findings were similar when limiting population to older adults(>=65 years) enrolled in Medicare(AOR 1.50, 95%CI 1.31-1.71), whereas not significant for Medicaid beneficiaries. The study points to challenges for healthcare providers in documenting SDOH in adults with ASCVD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的护理标准旨在减缓疾病进展并最大化患者功能,然而,急诊科(ED)的再就诊和再入院人数有所增加。社会危险因素在CHF的疾病管理和预后中起作用。使用初始社会风险因素分层,在识别将安全出院的低风险CHF患者方面存在差距。
    目的:为出现急性CHF加重的ED患者提供社会风险概况,并确定可能增加7天和总死亡率风险的变量,30天ED重访,和重新接纳。
    方法:我们在急性CHF加重的ED患者中进行了一项基于前瞻性调查的试点研究。使用自我报告问卷和回顾性图表审查的组合来生成CHF风险概况。
    结果:共有62名患者被纳入试验研究,平均年龄为69.5岁。初步数据表明,在这次ED访问之前,21%的患者不知道以前的CHF诊断;64.5%的患者认为他们的睡眠质量差或非常差;72.6%报告端坐呼吸;43.5%报告最近体重增加。37.1%的患者不遵守饮食建议,有些患者不遵守100%的药物治疗方案。
    结论:这项研究表明,为患有CHF的ED患者建立社会风险状况可以帮助制定针对CHF的护理计划,并优化多学科管理,以减少ED的再就诊和再入院。
    BACKGROUND: The standard of care for congestive heart failure (CHF) aims to slow disease progression and maximize patient function, however there is an increase in emergency department (ED) revisits and readmissions. Social risk factors play a role in the disease management and prognosis of CHF. There is a gap in the identification of low-risk CHF patient who would be safely discharged using an initial social risk factor stratification.
    OBJECTIVE: To generate a social risk profile for patients presenting to the ED with acute CHF exacerbation and identify variables that may increase the risk of 7-day and overall mortality, 30-day ED revisit, and readmission.
    METHODS: We conducted a pilot prospective survey-based study among adult patients presenting to the ED with acute CHF exacerbation. The combination of a self-report questionnaire and retrospective chart review was used to generate a CHF risk profile.
    RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were recruited in the pilot study with a mean age of 69.5 years. The preliminary data indicated that prior to this ED visit, 21% of patients were not aware of a previous CHF diagnosis; 64.5% of patients rated their sleep quality as poor or very poor; 72.6% reported orthopnea; and 43.5% reported recent weight gain. 37.1% of patients did not adhere to dietary recommendations and some patients did not adhere to their medication regime 100%.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests establishing a social risk profile for patients presenting to the ED with CHF can help formulate a CHF-specific care plan and optimize multidisciplinary management to reduce ED revisits and readmissions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:(1)评估住院后社会危险因素与计划外再入院和急诊护理的关系。(2)创建社会风险评分指标。
    方法:我们分析了退伍军人事务部(VA)企业数据仓库的管理数据。设置为参加国家社会工作人员配备计划的VA医疗中心。
    方法:我们将社会相关诊断分组,放映,评估,和程序代码分为九个社会风险领域。我们使用逻辑回归来检查领域在出院后30天内预测计划外再入院和急诊科(ED)使用的程度。协变量是年龄,性别,和医疗再入院风险评分。我们使用模型估计来创建一个百分位得分,表明退伍军人与健康相关的社会风险。
    方法:我们纳入了156,690名退伍军人入院,从10月1日起出院回家,2016年9月30日,2022年。
    结果:30天计划外再入院率为0.074,ED使用率为0.240。调整后,再入院概率最大的社会风险是粮食不安全(调整概率=0.091[95%置信区间:0.082,0.101]),法律需要(0.090[0.079,0.102]),和邻里剥夺(0.081[0.081,0.108]);与无社会风险(0.052)相比。ED使用的最大调整概率是那些经历过粮食不安全的人(调整概率0.28[0.26,0.30]),法律问题(0.28[0.26,0.30]),和暴力(0.27[0.25,0.29]),与无社会风险(0.21)相比。社会风险评分在第95百分位数的退伍军人的计划外护理率高于第95百分位数的退伍军人。VA中使用的临床预测工具。
    结论:有社会风险的退伍军人住院后可能需要专门的干预措施和有针对性的资源。我们提出了一种评分方法来对社会风险进行评分,以用于临床实践和未来的研究。
    OBJECTIVE: (1) To estimate the association of social risk factors with unplanned readmission and emergency care after a hospital stay. (2) To create a social risk scoring index.
    METHODS: We analyzed administrative data from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse. Settings were VA medical centers that participated in a national social work staffing program.
    METHODS: We grouped socially relevant diagnoses, screenings, assessments, and procedure codes into nine social risk domains. We used logistic regression to examine the extent to which domains predicted unplanned hospital readmission and emergency department (ED) use in 30 days after hospital discharge. Covariates were age, sex, and medical readmission risk score. We used model estimates to create a percentile score signaling Veterans\' health-related social risk.
    METHODS: We included 156,690 Veterans\' admissions to a VA hospital with discharged to home from 1 October, 2016 to 30 September, 2022.
    RESULTS: The 30-day rate of unplanned readmission was 0.074 and of ED use was 0.240. After adjustment, the social risks with greatest probability of readmission were food insecurity (adjusted probability = 0.091 [95% confidence interval: 0.082, 0.101]), legal need (0.090 [0.079, 0.102]), and neighborhood deprivation (0.081 [0.081, 0.108]); versus no social risk (0.052). The greatest adjusted probabilities of ED use were among those who had experienced food insecurity (adjusted probability 0.28 [0.26, 0.30]), legal problems (0.28 [0.26, 0.30]), and violence (0.27 [0.25, 0.29]), versus no social risk (0.21). Veterans with social risk scores in the 95th percentile had greater rates of unplanned care than those with 95th percentile Care Assessment Needs score, a clinical prediction tool used in the VA.
    CONCLUSIONS: Veterans with social risks may need specialized interventions and targeted resources after a hospital stay. We propose a scoring method to rate social risk for use in clinical practice and future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用大型电子健康记录(EHR)数据库评估地理编码的社会危险因素数据是否可以预测随访期间青光眼引起的严重视力障碍或失明的发展。
    方法:队列研究。
    方法:在三级护理机构诊断为开角型青光眼(OAG)的患者。所有眼睛在基线时都有青光眼视野缺损。从EHR中提取社会人口统计学和眼部数据,包括年龄,性别,自我报告的种族和种族,保险状况,OAG类型,既往青光眼激光或手术,使用Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish标准的基线疾病严重程度,随访期间的平均眼内压(IOP),和中央角膜厚度。使用地理编码的患者住宅获得了人口普查区级别的社会脆弱性指数(SVIndex)数据。完成了混合效应Cox比例风险模型,以评估随访期间严重视力障碍或失明的发展。定义为最近两次临床就诊时的BCVA≤20/200,或在两次测试中确认的标准自动视野检查(SAP)平均偏差(MD)≤-22dB。
    结果:来自2,826例患者的4,046只眼符合纳入标准,平均随访4.3±2.2年。平均3.4±1.8年后,76例患者(2.7%)的79眼(2.0%)出现严重的视力障碍或失明,导致每年0.5%的严重视力障碍或失明的发病率。年龄较大(调整后的危险比(HR)每十年1.36,p=0.007),居住在SVIndex较高的地区(每增加25%HR1.56,p<0.001),随访期间眼压较高(每增加5mmHgHR3.01,p<0.001),基线时的中度或重度青光眼(HR7.31和26.87,p<0.001)是发生重度视力障碍或失明的危险因素.模型的一致性指数为0.87。社会经济,少数民族地位/语言,住房类型/交通SVIndex主题是导致严重视力障碍或失明的关键因素。
    结论:发生青光眼相关严重视力障碍或失明的危险因素包括年龄较大,随访期间IOP升高,基线时的中度或重度疾病,和居住在与更大的社会脆弱性相关的地区。除了眼部危险因素,有关社会危险因素的经地理编码的EHR数据可以帮助识别发生青光眼相关视力障碍的高危患者.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether geocoded social risk factor data predict the development of severe visual impairment or blindness due to glaucoma during follow-up using a large electronic health record (EHR) database.
    METHODS: Cohort study.
    METHODS: Patients diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) at a tertiary care institution. All eyes had glaucomatous visual field defects at baseline. Sociodemographic and ocular data were extracted from the EHR, including age, gender, self-reported race and ethnicity, insurance status, OAG type, prior glaucoma laser or surgery, baseline disease severity using Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish criteria, mean intraocular pressure (IOP) during follow-up, and central corneal thickness. Social vulnerability index (SVIndex) data at the census tract level were obtained using geocoded patient residences. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard models were completed to assess for the development of severe visual impairment or blindness during follow-up, defined as BCVA ≤ 20/200 at least at the last two clinic visits or standard automated perimetry (SAP) mean deviation (MD) ≤ -22dB confirmed on two tests.
    RESULTS: A total of 4,046 eyes from 2,826 patients met inclusion criteria and were followed for an average of 4.3 ± 2.2 years. Severe visual impairment or blindness developed in 79 eyes (2.0%) from 76 patients (2.7%) after an average of 3.4 ± 1.8 years, leading to an incidence rate of severe visual impairment or blindness of 0.5% per year. Older age (adjusted hazards ratio [HR] 1.36 per decade, P = .007), residence in areas with higher SVIndex (HR 1.56 per 25% increase, P < .001), higher IOP during follow-up (HR 3.01 per 5 mmHg increase, P < .001), and moderate or severe glaucoma at baseline (HR 7.31 and 26.87, P < .001) were risk factors for developing severe visual impairment or blindness. Concordance index of the model was 0.88. Socioeconomic, minority status/language, and housing type/transportation SVIndex themes were key contributors to developing severe visual impairment or blindness.
    CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for developing glaucoma-related severe visual impairment or blindness included older age, elevated IOP during follow-up, moderate or severe disease at baseline, and residence in areas associated with greater social vulnerability. In addition to ocular risk factors, geocoded EHR data regarding social risk factors could help identify patients at high risk of developing glaucoma-related visual impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区卫生中心(CHC)的社会风险数据收集正在扩大。我们探索了临床医生根据他们对患者社会风险因素的认识调整医疗护理的做法-也就是说,他们对护理计划做出改变,以减轻社会风险因素对患者护理和健康结果的潜在影响-在一组德克萨斯州CHC中。
    方法:收敛混合方法。调查/访谈探讨了临床医生根据患者社会风险因素调整医疗护理的观点。调查数据采用描述性统计分析;访谈采用主题分析和归纳编码进行分析。
    结果:在4个CHC中,我们进行了15次临床医生访谈,收集了97项调查.总体上,访谈和调查表明支持调整活动。出现了两个主要主题:1)临床医生报告说,根据他们对患者社会环境的认识,对患者护理计划进行了频繁的调整,同时表达对调整的担忧;2)对患者社会风险因素的认识,和临床医生的时间,培训,并体验所有受影响的临床医生调整。
    结论:参与CHC的临床医生描述了根据患者的社会背景常规调整患者护理计划。这些调整是在没有具体指导方针或培训的情况下进行的。调整的标准化可以通过共享决策来促进患者护理的情境化,以改善结果。
    BACKGROUND: Social risk data collection is expanding in community health centers (CHCs). We explored clinicians\' practices of adjusting medical care based on their awareness of patients\' social risk factors-that is, changes they make to care plans to mitigate the potential impacts of social risk factors on their patients\' care and health outcomes-in a set of Texas CHCs.
    METHODS: Convergent mixed methods. Surveys/interviews explored clinician perspectives on adjusting medical care based on patient social risk factors. Survey data were analyzed with descriptive statistics; interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and inductive coding.
    RESULTS: Across 4 CHCs, we conducted 15 clinician interviews and collected 97 surveys. Interviews and surveys overall indicated support for adjustment activities. Two main themes emerged: 1) clinicians reported making frequent adjustments to patient care plans based on their awareness of patients\' social contexts, while simultaneously expressing concerns about adjustment; and 2) awareness of patients\' social risk factors, and clinician time, training, and experience all influenced clinician adjustments.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians at participating CHCs described routinely adjusting patient care plans based on their patients\' social contexts. These adjustments were being made without specific guidelines or training. Standardization of adjustments may facilitate the contextualization of patient care through shared decision making to improve outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对筛查和干预患者社会风险因素的临床计划的兴趣正在增长,包括住房,食物,和交通。尽管一些研究表明这些项目可以对健康产生积极影响,很少有人研究这些影响的潜在机制。本研究探讨了识别和干预社会风险可以影响家庭健康的途径。
    方法:这项定性研究被嵌入一项随机临床试验中,该试验检查了参与社会服务导航计划对健康的影响。我们对27名参与导航计划的儿科患者的英语或西班牙语护理人员进行了半结构化访谈。访谈采用主题分析法进行分析。
    结果:看护者描述了导航计划影响整体儿童和/或看护者健康的3条途径:1)增加家庭对社会服务的了解和获得;2)帮助家庭与医疗保健服务联系;3)提供情感支持,以减少看护者的孤立和焦虑。参与者建议,即使导航程序不直接影响资源访问,也可以影响健康。
    结论:社会护理计划可能通过多种潜在途径影响健康。计划的影响似乎取决于计划在多大程度上增加了对社会和医疗保健服务的了解和获得,并支持家庭与计划人员之间的积极关系。
    BACKGROUND: Interest is growing in clinic-based programs that screen for and intervene on patients\' social risk factors, including housing, food, and transportation. Though several studies suggest these programs can positively impact health, few examine the mechanisms underlying these effects. This study explores pathways through which identifying and intervening on social risks can impact families\' health.
    METHODS: This qualitative study was embedded in a randomized clinical trial that examined the health impacts of participation in a social services navigation program. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 English or Spanish-speaking caregivers of pediatric patients who had participated in the navigation program. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Caregivers described 3 pathways through which the navigation program affected overall child and/or caregiver health: 1) increasing families\' knowledge of and access to social services; 2) helping families connect with health care services; and 3) providing emotional support that reduced caregiver isolation and anxiety. Participants suggested that navigation programs can influence health even when they do not directly impact resource access.
    CONCLUSIONS: Social care programs may impact health through multiple potential pathways. Program impacts seem to be mediated by the extent to which programs increase knowledge of and access to social and health care services and support positive relationships between families and program personnel.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究回顾了早期推出COVID-19疫苗的资格政策对覆盖率和可能结果的影响,专注于纽约市。我们进行了一项回顾性生态研究,评估年龄65岁以上,地区一级收入,疫苗接种覆盖率,和COVID-19死亡率,使用链接的人口普查局数据和纽约市卫生行政数据,这些数据在修改后的邮政编码制表区(MODZCTA)级别汇总。这项研究的人群是纽约市177个MODZCTA中的所有个体。人口数据来自人口普查局和纽约市卫生行政数据。通过普通最小二乘(OLS)回归模型检查总死亡率,利用地区层面的财富,65岁及以上人口比例,和该年龄组的疫苗接种率作为预测因子。在疫苗推出的前3个月,老年人比例高的低收入地区的覆盖率(平均疫苗接种率为52.8%;最大覆盖率为67.9%)低于较富裕地区(平均疫苗接种率为74.6%;最富有的五分之一人群的最大覆盖率为99%),全年死亡率较高。尽管疫苗短缺,许多年轻人提前接种疫苗,特别是在高收入地区(在最富有的五分之一人群中,45-64岁的平均覆盖率为60%)。优先考虑那些与COVID-19相关的发病率和死亡率风险最高的人群的疫苗计划,将比实施的战略预防更多的死亡。当推出新疫苗时,政策制定者必须考虑当地高危人群的背景和条件。如果纽约将有限的疫苗供应集中在65岁或65岁以上居民比例高的低收入地区,总死亡率可能较低.
    This study reviews the impact of eligibility policies in the early rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine on coverage and probable outcomes, with a focus on New York City. We conducted a retrospective ecological study assessing age  65+, area-level income, vaccination coverage, and COVID-19 mortality rates, using linked Census Bureau data and New York City Health administrative data aggregated at the level of modified zip code tabulation areas (MODZCTA). The population for this study was all individuals in 177 MODZCTA in New York City. Population data were obtained from Census Bureau and New York City Health administrative data. The total mortality rate was examined through an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model, using area-level wealth, the proportion of the population aged 65 and above, and the vaccination rate among this age group as predictors. Low-income areas with high proportions of older people demonstrated lower coverage rates (mean vaccination rate 52.8%; maximum coverage 67.9%) than wealthier areas (mean vaccination rate 74.6%; maximum coverage 99% in the wealthiest quintile) in the first 3 months of vaccine rollout and higher mortality over the year. Despite vaccine shortages, many younger people accessed vaccines ahead of schedule, particularly in high-income areas (mean coverage rate 60% among those 45-64 years in the wealthiest quintile). A vaccine program that prioritized those at greatest risk of COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality would have prevented more deaths than the strategy that was implemented. When rolling out a new vaccine, policymakers must account for local contexts and conditions of high-risk population groups. If New York had focused limited vaccine supply on low-income areas with high proportions of residents 65 or older, overall mortality might have been lower.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行对儿童的心理健康构成了许多障碍。我们进行了一项纵向研究,以评估大流行期间儿童的心理健康和社会风险。
    方法:参与者是172名6-11岁儿童的看护人,他们在美国城市安全网医院大流行前6个月内参加了良好的儿童就诊。大流行前的数据是从电子病历中提取的,调查是在2020年8月至2021年7月的三个时间点进行的。我们用儿科症状清单17、社会风险(例如,食品和住房不安全)与THRIVE问卷,和学校模态(当面,混合动力车,remote).
    结果:与大流行前相比,在所有3次中期大流行浪潮中,儿童的PSC-17总分(总体精神健康症状)和THRIVE总分(社会风险的总负担)均显著较高.使用纵向混合模型考虑时间,社会风险,和学校模式,社会风险(B=0.37,SE=0.14,p<0.01)和学校模式均与PSC-17得分显着相关(B=-1.95,SE=0.63,p<0.01)。参加面对面学校的儿童的心理健康症状少于参加偏远或混合学校的儿童。
    结论:与流行前相比,COVID-19大流行后15个月的精神健康症状和社会风险仍然显著升高。亲自上学似乎可以预防持续升高的心理健康症状。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic posed numerous obstacles to psychosocial wellbeing for children. We conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate child mental health and social risks during the pandemic.
    METHODS: Participants were 172 caregivers of children aged 6-11 years old who attended well child visits within 6 months before pandemic onset at an urban safety net hospital in the US. Prepandemic data was extracted from the electronic medical record, and surveys were administered at three time points between August 2020 and July 2021. We measured mental health symptoms with the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17, social risks (e.g., food and housing insecurity) with the THRIVE questionnaire, and school modality (in-person, hybrid, remote).
    RESULTS: Compared to pre-pandemic, children had significantly higher PSC-17 total scores (overall mental health symptoms) and THRIVE total scores (total burden of social risks) at all three mid-pandemic waves. Using longitudinal mixed models accounting for time, social risks, and school modality, both social risks (B = 0.37, SE = 0.14, p < 0.01) and school modality were significantly associated with PSC-17 scores (B = - 1.95, SE = 0.63, p < 0.01). Children attending in-person school had fewer mental health symptoms than those attending remote or hybrid school.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mental health symptoms and social risks remained significantly higher fifteen months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to prepandemic. In-person attendance at school appeared protective against persistently elevated mental health symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会风险因素是美国支出地域差异的主要驱动因素,但鲜为人知的是社区层面的社会风险因素与医院价格的关系。我们的目标是按价格类型描述区域医院报告价格与社会风险因素之间的关系(chargemaster,cash,商业,Medicare,和医疗补助)。
    方法:本横断面分析使用了2022年急诊综合医院最新提供的医院报告价格。价格为14项共同服务。价格为98%,工资指数调整后,按服务标准化,并汇总到医院服务区(HSA)。对于社会风险,我们在5个社会风险领域(社会经济地位;种族,种族,和文化;性别;社会关系;以及住宅和社区环境)。Spearman的相关性用于估计价格类型的中位数价格和社会风险之间的关联。
    结果:报告了2,386家急性综合医院的价格,占45%(3,436个中的1,502个)HSA。区域价格与其他社会风险因素之间的相关性因价格类型而异(范围:-0.19至0.31)。Chargemaster和现金价格与大多数社区特征(23中的10,43%)显着相关,其次是商业价格(8,35%)。医疗保险和医疗补助价格仅与1项指标显着相关(所有p<0.01)。所有价格类型均与未投保百分比显着相关(均p<0.01)。主管,cash,商业价格与西班牙裔居民的百分比呈正相关,英语水平有限的居民,和非公民(所有p<0.05)。
    结论:虽然价格和社会风险因素之间的区域相关性在所有价格中都很弱,chargemaster,cash,与两个公共付款人(Medicare和Medicaid)相比,商业价格更像是与社区层面的社会风险因素密切相关。主管,cash,在社会弱势社区,商业医院的价格似乎更高。需要进一步研究以阐明价格与社区社会风险因素之间的关系。
    BACKGROUND: Social risk factors are key drivers of the geographic variation in spending in the United States but little is known how community-level social risk factors are associated with hospital prices. Our objective was to describe the relationship between regional hospital-reported prices and social risk factors by price type (chargemaster, cash, commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid).
    METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis used newly available hospital-reported prices from acute general hospitals in 2022. The prices were for 14 common services. Prices were winsorized at 98%, wage index-adjusted, standardized by service, and aggregated to hospital service areas (HSAs). For social risk, we used 23 measures across 5 domains of social risk (socioeconomic position; race, ethnicity, and culture; gender; social relationships; and residential and community context). Spearman\'s correlation was used to estimate associations between median prices and social risk by price type.
    RESULTS: Prices were reported from 2,386 acute general hospitals in 45% (1,502 of 3,436) HSAs. Correlations between regional prices and other social risk factors varied by price type (range: -0.19 to 0.31). Chargemaster and cash prices were significantly correlated with the most community characteristics (10 of 23, 43%) followed by commercial prices (8, 35%). Medicare and Medicaid prices were only significantly correlated with 1 measure (all p < 0.01). All price types were significantly correlated with the percentage of uninsured (all p < 0.01). Chargemaster, cash, and commercial prices were positively correlated with percentage of Hispanic residents, residents with limited English proficiency, and non-citizens (all p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: While regional correlations between prices and social risk factors were weak across all prices, chargemaster, cash, and commercial prices were more like closely aligned with community-level social risk factors than the two public payers (Medicare and Medicaid). Chargemaster, cash, and commercial hospital prices appeared to be higher in socially disadvantaged communities. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between prices and community social risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号