During COVID-19 in the US, social determinants of health (SDH) have driven health disparities. However, the use of SDH in COVID-19 vaccine modeling is unclear. This review aimed to summarize the current landscape of incorporating SDH into COVID-19 vaccine transmission modeling in the US. Medline and Embase were searched up to October 2022. We included studies that used transmission modeling to assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccine strategies in the US. Studies\' characteristics, factors incorporated into models, and approaches to incorporate these factors were extracted. Ninety-two studies were included. Of these, 11 studies incorporated SDH factors (alone or combined with demographic factors). Various sets of SDH factors were integrated, with occupation being the most common (8 studies), followed by geographical location (5 studies). The results show that few studies incorporate SDHs into their models, highlighting the need for research on SDH impact and approaches to incorporating SDH into modeling.
UNASSIGNED: This research was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

BACKGROUND: The impact of social determinants of health in allogeneic transplant recipients in low- and middle-income countries is poorly described. This observational study analyzes the impact of place of residence, referring institution, and transplant cost coverage (out-of-pocket vs government-funded vs private insurance) on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in two of Mexico\'s largest public and private institutions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of social determinants of health and their relationship with outcomes among allogeneic transplant recipients in Mexico.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we included adolescents and adults ≥ 16 years who received a matched sibling or haploidentical transplant from 2015-2022. Participants were selected without regard to their diagnosis and were sourced from both a private clinic and a public University Hospital in Mexico. Three payment groups were compared: Out-of-pocket (OOP), private insurance, and a federal Universal healthcare program \"Seguro Popular\". Outcomes were compared between referred and institution-diagnosed patients, and between residents of Nuevo Leon and out-of-state. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), categorized by residence, referral, and payment source. Secondary outcomes encompassed early mortality, event-free-survival, graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival, and non-relapse-mortality (NRM). Statistical analyses employed appropriate tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. Statistical software included SPSS and R with tidycmprsk library.
RESULTS: Our primary outcome was overall survival. We included 287 patients, n = 164 who lived out of state (57.1%), and n = 129 referred from another institution (44.9%). The most frequent payment source was OOP (n = 139, 48.4%), followed by private insurance (n = 75, 26.1%) and universal coverage (n = 73, 25.4%). No differences in OS, event-free-survival, NRM, or graft-versus-host-relapse-free survival were observed for patients diagnosed locally vs in another institution, nor patients who lived in-state vs out-of-state. Patients who covered transplant costs through private insurance had the best outcomes with improved OS (median not reached) and 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM of 14% than patients who covered costs OOP (Median OS and 2-year NRM of 32%) or through a universal healthcare program active during the study period (OS and 2-year NRM of 19%) (P = 0.024 and P = 0.002, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, payment source and disease risk index were the only factors associated with overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: In this Latin-American multicenter study, the site of residence or referral for alloHSCT did not impact outcomes. However, access to healthcare coverage for alloHSCT was associated with improved OS and reduced NRM.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the Cultural, Social and Emotional Wellbeing Program for reducing psychological distress and enhancing the social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal women preparing for release from prison.
METHODS: Mixed methods; qualitative study (adapted reflexive thematic analysis of stories of most significant change) and assessment of psychological distress.
METHODS: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women at the Boronia Pre-release Centre for Women, Perth, Western Australia, May and July 2021.
METHODS: Cultural, Social and Emotional Wellbeing Program (two days per week for six weeks). The Program involves presentations, workshops, activities, group discussions, and self-reflections designed to enhance social and emotional wellbeing.
METHODS: Themes and subthemes identified from reflexive thematic analysis of participants\' stories of most significant change; change in mean psychological distress, as assessed with the 5-item Kessler Scale (K-5) before and after the Program.
RESULTS: Fourteen of 16 invited women completed the Program; ten participated in its evaluation. They reported improved social and emotional wellbeing, reflected as enhanced connections to culture, family, and community. Mean psychological distress was lower after the Program (mean K-5 score, 11.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-13.6) than before the Program (9.0; 95% CI, 6.5-11.5; P = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: The women who participated in the Program reported personal growth, including acceptance of self and acceptance and pride in culture, reflecting enhanced social and emotional wellbeing through connections to culture and kinship. Our preliminary findings suggest that the Program could improve the resilience of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander in contact with the justice system.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This study used a self-authorship framework to explore if diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and social determinants of health (SDoH)-focused labs and learning activities increase student confidence in understanding aspects of implicit bias (IB) and SDoH and how these activities impact student comfort discussing and confidence initiating conversations on DEI/SDoH topics with colleagues, faculty, supervisors, and patients.
METHODS: First year (P1) PharmD students engaged in three learning activities across two courses. Students were challenged to evaluate their biases and incorporate DEI/SDoH into their professional identity formation (PIF). This study utilized a mixed-method, embedded approach to analyze assessment data collected via a questionnaire and assignments administered at three points during the fall semester. Quantitative analysis used a quasi-experimental, between-subjects, pretest-posttest design. The qualitative component used open-ended questions to gain additional insight into participant experiences, gathered detail on perceptions, and provided context.
RESULTS: A one-way ANOVA showed statistically significant increases between assessment points for all items related to confidence understanding IB and SDoH. Comfort discussing DEI/SDoH topics with supervisors/faculty and patients increased over time. Comfort discussing DEI/SDoH topics with colleagues did not increase. Three salient themes emerged from qualitative analyses (bias and privilege awareness, education, and professionalism).
CONCLUSIONS: This study found students started evaluating their own knowledge, beliefs, and claims in social and professional settings as defined by the self-authorship framework. Student comfort and confidence discussing DEI/SDoH topics increased over time. Findings support engaging students in multimodal programming may support incorporation of DEI/SDoH into PIF.

OBJECTIVE: To assess recent temporal trends in guideline-compliant pediatric lipid testing, and to examine the influence of social determinants of health (SDoH) and provider characteristics on the likelihood of testing in youth.
METHODS: In this observational, multi-year cross-sectional study, we calculated lipid testing prevalence by year among 268,627 12-year-olds from 2015 through 2019 who were enrolled in Florida Medicaid and eligible for universal lipid screening during age 9 to 11, and 11,437 22-year-olds (2017-2019) who were eligible for screening during age 17-21. We compared trends in testing prevalence by SDoH and health risk factors at two recommended ages and modeled the associations between patient characteristics and provider type on lipid testing using generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: Testing among 12-year-olds remained low between 2015 through 2019 with the highest prevalence in 2015 (8.0%) and lowest in 2017 (6.7%). Screening compliance among 22-year-olds was highest in 2017 (21.1%) and fell to 17.8% in 2019. Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks in both age groups had about 2-3% lower testing prevalence than non-Hispanic Whites. Testing in 12-year-olds was 12.3% versus 7.7% with and without obesity, and 14.4% versus 7.6% with and without antipsychotic use. Participants who saw providers who were more likely to prescribe lipid testing were more likely to receive testing (odds ratio=2.3, 95% CI 2.0-2.8, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although lipid testing prevalence was greatest among high-risk children, overall prevalence of lipid testing in youth remains very low. Provider specialty and choices by individual providers play important roles in improving guideline-compliant pediatric lipid testing.

BACKGROUND: Predisposing factors for traumatic injuries are complex and variable. Neighborhood environments may influence injury mechanism or outcomes. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) identifies areas at risk for emergencies; Area Deprivation Index (ADI) measures socioeconomic disadvantage. The objective was to assess the impact of SVI or ADI on hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality for injured patients to determine whether SVI or ADI indicated areas where injury prevention may be most impactful.
METHODS: Adult patients who resided in Milwaukee County and were treated for injuries from 2015 to 2022 at a level I trauma center were included. Patients\' addresses were geocoded and merged with 2020 state-level SVI and ADI measures. SVI ranks census tracts 0-100 from least to most vulnerable. ADI ranks census block groups 1-10 from least to most disadvantaged. ADI and SVI rankings were converted to deciles. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and regression models for LOS and in-hospital mortality, adjusted for either SVI or ADI within separate models, age, sex, race or ethnicity, mechanism of injury (MOI), injury severity score (ISS).
RESULTS: 14,542 patients were included; 63 % were male. Mean total hospital LOS was 6.4 ± 9.8 days, and in-hospital mortalities occurred in 5.2 % of patients. Based on SVI and ADI, 5,280 (36 %) patients resided in high vulnerability areas and 5,576 (39 %) lived in highly disadvantaged areas, respectively. After adjusting for patient factors, SVI deciles #6, 9, 10 were associated with increased hospital LOS, and SVI decile #5 was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.22, 95 %CI:1.06-4.63; p = 0.034). When adjusted for ADI, the 7th-10th deciles were associated with increased hospital LOS. Greater age and ISS were associated with increased hospital LOS and mortality when adjusted for SVI and ADI.
CONCLUSIONS: SVI and ADI identified a similar proportion of patients in high vulnerability or disadvantaged areas. Higher SVI and ADI deciles were associated with longer hospital LOS, and only the 5th SVI decile was associated with in-hospital mortality. Highly disadvantaged or vulnerable areas may have a longer LOS, but SVI and ADI have limited influence on trauma mortality. Continued research on neighborhood and community factors and trauma outcomes is needed.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth technologies offer efficient ways to deliver health-related social needs (HRSN) screening in cancer care, but these methods may not reach all populations. The authors examined patient characteristics associated with using an online patient portal (OPP) to complete HRSN screening as part of gynecologic cancer care.
METHODS: From June 2021 to June 2023, patients in a gynecologic oncology clinic completed validated HRSN screening questions either (1) using the OPP (independently before the visit) or (2) in person (verbally administered by clinic staff). The authors examined the prevalence of HRSN according to activated OPP status and, in a restricted subgroup, used stepwise multivariate Poisson regression to identify associations between patient and visit characteristics and using the OPP.
RESULTS: Of 1616 patients, 87.4% (n = 1413) had an activated OPP. Patients with inactive OPPs (vs. activated OPPs) more frequently reported two or more needs (10% vs 5%; p < .01). Of 986 patients in the restricted cohort, 52% used the OPP to complete screening. The final multivariable model indicated that patients were less likely to use the OPP if they were Black (vs. White; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.83); not employed (vs. employed; aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.97), or had low measures of OPP engagement (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92). New versus established patients were 21% more likely to use the OPP (aRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.38).
CONCLUSIONS: Differential use of the OPP suggested that over-reliance on digital technologies could limit the ability to reach those populations that have social factors already associated with cancer outcome disparities. Cancer centers should consider using multiple delivery methods for HRSN screening to maximize reach to all populations.

Organized cervical screening programmes are commonplace in high-income countries. To provide an equitable cervical screening service, it is important to understand who is and is not attending screening and why. Promotion of screening and service improvement is not possible without recognition and identification of the barriers and needs of communities that are less engaged with screening. This study explored stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening attendance and accessibility in Ireland. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare professionals, policymakers and academics. Interviews were conducted online in 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis was used inductively to generate themes, supported by NVivo. Three themes were developed: (i) getting the right information out the right way, (ii) acceptability and accessibility of screening and (iii) trying to identify and reach the non-attenders. Participants felt public knowledge of cervical screening and human papilloma virus was low and communication strategies were not adequate. Individual, cultural, structural and service-level factors influenced the accessibility and acceptability of screening. Identifying and reaching non-attenders was considered challenging and community outreach could support those less likely to attend screening. Stakeholder perspectives were valuable in understanding the complexities of screening accessibility and attendance from individual to service-level factors. Cultural competency training, inclusive language and visual cues in waiting rooms would support engagement with some populations who may be hesitant to attend screening. Collaboration with community organizations has opportunities to promote screening and understand the needs of those less likely to attend screening.

BACKGROUND: Personal characteristics may be associated with believing misinformation and not believing in best practices to protect oneself from COVID-19.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations of a person\'s age, race/ethnicity, education, residence, health literacy, medical mistrust level, and sources of health-related information with their COVID-19 health and conspiracy myth beliefs.
METHODS: We surveyed adults with hypertension in Maryland and Pennsylvania between August 2020 and March 2021. Incorrect responses were summed for eight health (mean = 0.68; range 0-5) and two conspiracy (mean = 0.92; range 0-2) COVID-19 questions. Higher scores indicated more incorrect responses. Statistical analyses included two-sample t-tests, Spearman\'s correlation, and log binomial regression.
METHODS: In total, 561 primary care patients (mean age = 62.3 years, 60.2% female, 46.0% Black, 10.2% Hispanic, 28.2% with a Bachelor\'s degree or higher, 42.8% with annual household income less than $60,000) with a diagnosis of hypertension and at least one of five commonly associated conditions.
METHODS: Sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy, medical mistrust level, source of health-related information, and COVID-19 conspiracy and health myth beliefs.
RESULTS: In multivariable analyses, participants who did not get information from medical professional sources (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.06-1.55), had less than a bachelor\'s degree (PR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.12-1.99), were less confident filling out medical forms (PR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.02-1.50), and had higher medical mistrust (PR = 1.34; 95% CI = 1.05-1.69) were more likely to believe any health myths. Participants who had less than a bachelor\'s degree (PR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.02-1.45), were less confident filling out medical forms (PR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.09-1.34), and had higher medical mistrust (PR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.43-2.06) were more likely to believe any conspiracy myths.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower educational attainment and health literacy, greater medical mistrust, and certain sources of health information are associated with misinformed COVID-19 beliefs. Programs addressing misinformation should focus on groups affected by these social determinants of health by encouraging reliance on scientific sources.