背景:本研究的目的是验证AIDA(注意,利息,欲望,andAction)Model-basedantismokingCampaignQuestionnairetobeusedinMalaysiapopulation.
方法:本研究主要包括翻译,验证,和试点测试。翻译阶段使用正向和反向翻译,涉及三个小组和三个翻译。验证是2023年5月至7月采用目的抽样技术进行的横断面研究。数据是通过八名专家的电子邮件收集的。这些专家回答了一个在线问卷,使用四种选择的李克特量表,基于相关性的四个概念,清晰度,全面性,和代表性。内容效度指数(CVI)是在内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)和通用协议(UA)的量表上进行测量的。对于试点测试,最终版本在25名非吸烟者和6名吸烟者中进行了测试,以使用Cronbach的alpha来确定其可靠性。
结果:相关性的内容效度研究,清晰度,理解,代表性S-CVI/Ave分别为0.85、0.79、0.79和0.84。高于0.83的CVI评分表明所有项目都是相关的和有代表性的。中试测试表明,两个样本的内部一致性很高,超过0.85。
结论:总之,改编后的翻译版本的内容有效性指标令人满意,可以在其他目标人群中进行进一步的试点测试。
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, and Action) Model-Based Antismoking Campaign Questionnaire to be used in Malaysian population.
METHODS: This study consists of mainly translation, validation, and pilot testing. The translation phase using forward and backward translation, involved three panels and three translators. The validation was a cross-sectional study conducted from May to July 2023 with a purposive sampling technique. The data was collected through e-mails among eight experts. These experts answered an online questionnaire on a four-option Likert scale, based on the four concepts of relevancy, clarity, comprehensiveness, and representativeness. The content validity index (CVI) was measured on the scale of the content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) and Universal Agreement (UA). For pilot testing, the final version was tested among 25 non-smokers and six smokers to determine its reliability using the Cronbach\'s alpha.
RESULTS: The content validity study for relevancy, clarity, comprehension, and representative S-CVI/Ave is 0.85, 0.79, 0.79, and 0.84, respectively. The CVI score of above 0.83 indicates all items are relevant and representable. The pilot testing shows high internal consistency for both samples, more than 0.85.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the adapted translated version\'s content validity index was satisfactory, and it can be further pilot tested among the other target population.