Sleeve lobectomy

袖状肺叶切除术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:新辅助治疗已被广泛接受为局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方式。然而,新辅助治疗后袖状肺叶切除术(SL)或全肺切除术(PN)的临床获益仍存在争议.
    方法:回顾性收集2019年12月至2023年3月在高容量单中心接受新辅助治疗后接受SL或PN的NSCLC患者的临床和病理特征。通过倾向评分匹配(PSM),SL组与PN组进行4:1匹配。系统收集并分析手术结果。
    结果:在为期5年的研究期间,大多数患者(215人中的175人,81.4%)接受了SL手术,40例(18.6%)患者接受PN。在PSM之后,SL组术后心律失常较低(4.8%vs26.9%,P<0.001),30天死亡率较低(1.0%对7.7%,P=0.046)和术后住院时间较短(6.0天vs10.0天,P<0.001),与PN组相比。此外,两组的无病生存期或总生存期无显著差异(分别为P=0.977和P=0.913).
    结论:SL对于接受新辅助治疗的中央非小细胞肺癌患者来说是一种安全可行的选择。与PN相比。这一发现表明,在广泛使用新辅助疗法的背景下,SL仍然是可行的首选。
    OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant therapy has gained widespread acceptance as the standard modality for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, the clinical benefit of sleeve lobectomy (SL) or pneumonectomy (PN) following neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial.
    METHODS: The clinical and pathological characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent SL or PN after neoadjuvant therapy at a high-volume single centre between December 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively collected. The SL group was matched 4:1 with the PN group by propensity score matching. The surgical outcomes were systematically collected and analysed.
    RESULTS: During a 5-year study period, the majority of patients (175 of 215, 81.4%) underwent the SL procedure, while 40 patients (18.6%) underwent PN. Following propensity score matching, the SL group exhibited lower postoperative arrythmia (4.8% vs 26.9%, P < 0.001), lower 30-day mortality (1.0% vs 7.7%, P = 0.046) and a shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (6.0 days vs 10.0 days, P < 0.001), compared with the PN group. In addition, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of disease-free survival or overall survival (P = 0.977 and P = 0.913, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: SL stands as a safe and feasible option for patients with centrally located non-small-cell lung cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy, in comparison to PN. This finding suggests that SL remains the preferable choice when feasible in the context of the widespread utilization of neoadjuvant therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究的目的是研究外周血指标在预测接受袖状肺叶切除术(SL)的中央型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的生存和复发中的价值。
    方法:我们收集了2014年1月至2023年5月在我们的机构接受SL治疗的146例NSCLC患者的临床信息。外周血中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率(NLR),单核细胞淋巴细胞比率(MLR),通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定血小板淋巴细胞比率(PLR)水平,以建立阈值点。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估不同分组的预后价值。并进行单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型(简称COX).
    结果:通过ROC分析进行无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)截止值。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示NLR的OS存在显着差异(≥2.196vs.<2.196,p=0.0009),MLR(≥0.2763vs.<0.2763,p=0.0018),和PLR(≥126.11vs.<126.11,p=0.0354)。同样,NLR的DFS存在显着差异(≥3.010vs.<3.010,p=0.0005),MLR(≥0.2708vs.<0.2708,p=0.0046),和PLR(≥126.11vs.<126.11,p=0.0028)。单变量Cox分析显示,NLR(风险比[HR]:2.469;95%置信区间[CI]:1.416-4.306,p<0.001),MLR(HR:2.192,95%CI:1.319-3.643,p=0.002)和PLR(HR:1.696,95%CI:1.029-2.795,p=0.038)与OS相关。多因素Cox分析显示NLR(HR:2.036,95%CI:1.072-3.864,p=0.030)是一个独立的OS风险变量。此外,pN阶段(HR:3.163,95%CI:1.660-6.027,p<0.001),NLR(HR:2.530,95%CI:1.468-4.360,p<0.001),MLR(HR:2.229,95%CI:1.260-3.944,p=0.006)和PLR(HR:2.249,95%CI:1.300-3.889,p=0.004)与DFS相关。多因素Cox分析显示,pN分期(HR:3.098,95%CI:1.619-5.928,p<0.001)是一个单独的DFS风险变量。
    结论:研究表明,NLR,MLR,PLR在预测患有SL的中央型NSCLC的个体的生存和复发方面发挥着方便且具有成本效益的作用。
    BACKGROUND: The goal of the research was to examine the value of peripheral blood indicators in forecasting survival and recurrence among people suffering central-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing sleeve lobectomy (SL).
    METHODS: Clinical information was gathered from 146 individuals suffering from NSCLC who had SL at our facility between January 2014 and May 2023. Peripheral blood neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) levels were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to establish the threshold points. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate the prognostic value of different groupings, and both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (referred to as COX) were performed.
    RESULTS: The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) cutoff values were carried out via ROC analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed notable differences in OS for NLR (≥2.196 vs. <2.196, p = 0.0009), MLR (≥0.2763 vs. <0.2763, p = 0.0018), and PLR (≥126.11 vs. <126.11, p = 0.0354). Similarly, significant differences in DFS were observed for NLR (≥3.010 vs. <3.010, p = 0.0005), MLR (≥0.2708 vs. <0.2708, p = 0.0046), and PLR (≥126.11 vs. <126.11, p = 0.0028). Univariate Cox analysis showed that NLR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.469; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.416-4.306, p < 0.001), MLR (HR: 2.192, 95% CI: 1.319-3.643, p = 0.002) and PLR (HR: 1.696, 95% CI: 1.029-2.795, p = 0.038) were correlated alongside OS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that NLR (HR: 2.036, 95% CI: 1.072-3.864, p = 0.030) was a separate OS risk variable. Additionally, the pN stage (HR: 3.163, 95% CI: 1.660-6.027, p < 0.001), NLR (HR: 2.530, 95% CI: 1.468-4.360, p < 0.001), MLR (HR: 2.229, 95% CI: 1.260-3.944, p = 0.006) and PLR (HR: 2.249, 95% CI: 1.300-3.889, p = 0.004) were connected to DFS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pN stage (HR: 3.098, 95% CI: 1.619-5.928, p < 0.001) was a separate DFS risk variable.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that NLR, MLR, and PLR play a convenient and cost-effective role in predicting survival and recurrence among individuals alongside central-type NSCLC having SL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:下胆叶切除术(LBL)留下残留的胸膜间隙,可能与术后不良结局相关。在选定的患者中,右袖下肺叶切除术(RSLL)在中叶支气管和中间支气管之间吻合是可行的。RSLL和LBL的结果没有比较。这项研究的目的是比较肺癌患者RSLL和LBL的术后和长期结局。
    方法:我们回顾性纳入了2001年至2019年在我们的转诊胸外科机构接受RSLL或LBL治疗的患者。比较术后并发症和死亡率。绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线以比较总体和无病生存率。
    结果:我们确定了23例RSLL患者和96例LBL患者。RSLL术后死亡率为9%,LBL术后死亡率为5%(p=0.41)。3例(13%)RSLL患者和6例(6%)LBL患者发生支气管瘘(p=0.23)。RSLL术后胸膜间隙并发症明显较少(4/23[17%]vs.45/96[47%],p=0.03)。RSLL组的长期肺活量明显更高(91%vs.64%,p<0.01)。两组之间的五年生存率没有显着差异(84%vs.72%,p=0.09)。
    结论:与LBL相比,RSLL具有相似的术后死亡率和长期生存率。然而,RSLL术后胸膜间隙并发症较少,肺功能优于LBL。在可行的情况下,在经验丰富的中心管理的肺癌患者中,RSLL可能比LBL更可取。
    OBJECTIVE: Lower bilobectomy (LBL) leaves a residual pleural space potentially associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. In selected patients, right sleeve lower lobectomy (RSLL) with anastomosis between the middle lobe bronchus and intermediate bronchus is feasible. The outcomes of RSLL and LBL have not been compared. The aim of this study was to compare post-operative and long-term outcomes of RSLL and LBL in patients with lung cancer.
    METHODS: We retrospectively included patients managed by RSLL or LBL at our referral chest-surgery institution between 2001 and 2019. Post-operative complications and mortality were compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare overall and disease-free survival rates.
    RESULTS: We identified 23 patients with RSLL and 96 with LBL. Postoperative mortality was 9 % after RSLL and 5 % after LBL (p = 0.41). Bronchial fistula developed in 3 (13 %) RSLL patients and 6 (6 %) LBL patients (p = 0.23). Pleural space complications were significantly less common after RSLL (4/23 [17 %] vs. 45/96 [47 %], p = 0.03). Long-term vital capacity was significantly higher in the RSLL group (91 % vs. 64 %, p < 0.01). Five-year survival did not differ significantly between groups (84 % vs. 72 %, p = 0.09).
    CONCLUSIONS: RSLL was associated with similar postoperative mortality and long-term survival compared to LBL. However, pleural space complications were less common and lung function was better after RSLL than after LBL. When feasible, RSLL may deserve preference over LBL in patients with lung cancer managed at highly experienced centres.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    We demonstrated successful treatment of patients with complicated central lung cancer, who underwent right upper sleeve lobectomy with carinal resection. We have used the following options for carinal reconstruction: anastomosis of trachea with the left main bronchus and anastomosis of intermediate bronchus with the left main bronchus (clinical case No. 1) or with trachea (clinical case No. 2). Cervicothoracotomy provided correct N-staging and mobilization of trachea with left main bronchus. This approach provided compliance with oncological principles of surgical treatment of lung cancer and significantly reduced tension of anastomosis. These aspects are important for satisfactory immediate functional and oncological results after right upper sleeve lobectomy with carinal resection.
    В представленных клинических случаях мы продемонстрировали успешный опыт лечения больных осложненным центральным немелкоклеточным раком легкого, прооперированных в объеме бронхопластической верхней лобэктомии справа с резекцией бифуркации трахеи. При выборе варианта реконструкции бифуркации трахеи мы остановились на следующих вариантах формирования анастомоза: трахеи с левым главным бронхом и промежуточного бронха с левым главным бронхом (клинический случай №1) или с трахеей (клинический случай №2). Выбор в пользу комбинированного цервико-торакотомного доступа позволил одновременно выполнить как максимально корректное N-стадирование, так и мобилизацию трахеи и левого главного бронха на всем их протяжении. Такой подход обеспечил не только соблюдение онкологических принципов хирургического вмешательства, но и существенное уменьшение натяжения на зону анастомозов, что принципиально важно для достижения удовлетворительных ближайших, функциональных и онкологических результатов при выполнении лобэктомии с резекцией бифуркации трахеи.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    袖状肺叶切除术是一项具有挑战性的手术,术后并发症的风险很高。为了便于手术决策和优化围手术期治疗,我们建立了风险分层模型来量化袖状肺叶切除术后并发症的发生概率.
    我们回顾性分析了2016年7月至2019年12月接受袖状肺叶切除术的691例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的临床特征。在队列中对Logistic回归模型进行训练和验证,以预测总体并发症,主要并发症,和特定的轻微并发症。通过Kaplan-Meier方法探讨了特定并发症在预后分层中的影响。
    在691名患者中,232(33.5%)出现并发症,包括35例(5.1%)和197例(28.5%)有主要和次要并发症的患者,分别。模型显示出强大的辨别能力,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为0.853[95%置信区间(CI):0.705~0.885],用于预测术后总体并发症风险,尤其是0.751(95%CI:0.727~0.762).预测轻微并发症的模型也取得了良好的性能,AUC范围从0.78到0.89。生存分析显示,术后并发症与不良预后之间存在显着关联。
    风险分层模型可以准确预测袖状肺叶切除术后NSCLC患者并发症的发生概率和严重程度,这可能为未来患者的临床决策提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Sleeve lobectomy is a challenging procedure with a high risk of postoperative complications. To facilitate surgical decision-making and optimize perioperative treatment, we developed risk stratification models to quantify the probability of postoperative complications after sleeve lobectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 691 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent sleeve lobectomy between July 2016 and December 2019. Logistic regression models were trained and validated in the cohort to predict overall complications, major complications, and specific minor complications. The impact of specific complications in prognostic stratification was explored via the Kaplan-Meier method.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 691 included patients, 232 (33.5%) developed complications, including 35 (5.1%) and 197 (28.5%) patients with major and minor complications, respectively. The models showed robust discrimination, yielding an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.853 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.705-0.885] for predicting overall postoperative complication risk and 0.751 (95% CI: 0.727-0.762) specifically for major complication risks. Models predicting minor complications also achieved good performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.78 to 0.89. Survival analyses revealed a significant association between postoperative complications and poor prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Risk stratification models could accurately predict the probability and severity of complications in NSCLC patients following sleeve lobectomy, which may inform clinical decision-making for future patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:肺粘液表皮样癌(PMEC)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,起源于气管支气管树内的小唾液腺。PMEC的透明细胞变体异常罕见,并提出了显着的诊断挑战。主要归因于其与含有透明细胞的其他肿瘤的形态相似性。
    方法:一名22岁男性,以前身体健康,持续咳嗽和痰液产生两个月。随后的影像学和支气管镜检查显示左主支气管远端有一个2厘米的肿瘤,导致左肺完全不张。通过正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描和内窥镜活检进一步评估证实了肿瘤的原发性恶性。大多数肿瘤细胞的细胞形态清晰。患者接受了左下叶袖状切除术,并伴有系统的纵隔淋巴结清扫。分子病理学分析随后显示CRTC3-MAML2基因融合,导致PMEC透明细胞变异的明确病理诊断,分期为T2N0M0。手术后,在1年半的随访期间,患者恢复顺利,未出现复发迹象.
    结论:本文描述了一个不寻常的PMEC透明细胞变体,其特征是在22岁男性中存在CRTC3-MAML2基因融合。患者接受了成功的左下叶袖状切除术。该病例强调了诊断和治疗这种罕见恶性肿瘤的独特挑战,强调精确诊断和个性化治疗策略的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (PMEC) is a rare malignancy that arises from minor salivary glands within the tracheobronchial tree. The clear cell variant of PMEC is exceptionally uncommon and presents notable diagnostic challenges, primarily attributable to its morphological similarity to other tumors containing clear cells.
    METHODS: A 22-year-old male, formerly in good health, came in with a two-month duration of persistent cough and production of sputum. Subsequent imaging and bronchoscopy examinations revealed a 2 cm tumor in the distal left main bronchus, which resulted in complete atelectasis of the left lung. Further assessment via positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans and endoscopic biopsy confirmed the primary malignant nature of the tumor, characterized by clear cell morphology in most of the tumor cells. The patient underwent a left lower lobe sleeve resection accompanied by systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection. Molecular pathology analysis subsequently revealed a CRTC3-MAML2 gene fusion, leading to a definitive pathological diagnosis of the clear cell variant of PMEC, staged as T2N0M0. After surgery, the patient experienced a smooth recovery and exhibited no signs of recurrence during the one-and-a-half-year follow-up period.
    CONCLUSIONS: This article describes an unusual case of a clear cell variant of PMEC characterized by the presence of a CRTC3-MAML2 gene fusion in a 22-year-old male. The patient underwent successful left lower lobe sleeve resection. This case underscores the distinctive challenges associated with diagnosing and treating this uncommon malignancy, underscoring the importance of precise diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肺癌的发病率和死亡率一直在恶性肿瘤(MTs)中排名第一。既往研究表明,新辅助化疗可提高非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的5年生存率,但好处是有限的。研究证明,新辅助免疫疗法联合化疗在延长患者生存期方面具有独特的优势,减少远处复发,并诱导抗肿瘤免疫。然而,其影响仍有待更全面的调查。
    一名59岁的男性,因反复咳嗽和咳痰6个月而入院。术前评估提示右上肺鳞癌伴肺门及纵隔多发淋巴结转移,临床分期为cT2aN2M0期(IIIA)。在给予三个周期的帕博利珠单抗+卡铂+紫杉醇治疗后,肿瘤的重新检查被评估为部分反应(PR),在单孔胸腔镜下进行了右上肺袖状肺叶切除术。手术进展顺利,没有转换为开胸手术,成功实现R0切除。术后病理分期为ypT1bN0M0IA期,术后病理缓解被评估为主要病理反应(MPR)。手术后,完成三个周期的免疫治疗联合化疗,随后是pembrolizumab单药维持治疗1年,到目前为止,随访中未发现肿瘤复发和转移的迹象。
    通过这种情况,我们认为新辅助治疗后局部晚期NSCLC袖状肺叶切除术可能是一种安全可行的治疗选择,可以避免肺切除术,保护患者的肺功能,仍保证R0切除率。此外,它可能不会显着增加外科手术的难度或降低安全性。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实我们的结论。然后,围手术期的新辅助治疗可能会引起一系列的副作用或不良反应,因此,应更加重视其及时管理。
    UNASSIGNED: The morbidity and mortality of lung cancer have always ranked first among malignant tumors (MTs). Previous studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve the 5-year survival rate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the benefit is limited. Studies have proven that neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has unique advantages in prolonging patient survival, reducing distant recurrence, and inducing antitumor immunity. However, its impact remains to be more comprehensively investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: A 59-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital with a primary complaint of repeated cough and expectoration for 6 months. Preoperative assessment showed right upper lung squamous cell carcinoma with multiple hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and the clinical stage was cT2aN2M0 stage (IIIA). After three cycles of pembrolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel therapy were administered, the reexamination of the tumor was evaluated as partial response (PR), and a sleeve lobectomy of the right upper lung was performed under single-port thoracoscopic surgery. The operation proceeded smoothly without conversion to thoracotomy, and R0 resection was successfully achieved. Postoperative pathological stage was ypT1bN0M0 stage IA, and postoperative pathological remission was evaluated as major pathological response (MPR). After the operation, three cycles of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy were completed, which was followed by maintenance therapy with pembrolizumab monotherapy for 1 year, and no signs of tumor recurrence and metastasis have been found in follow-up thus far.
    UNASSIGNED: Through this case, we believe that for locally advanced NSCLC sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant therapy may be a safe and feasible treatment option, can avoid pneumonectomy, protect the lung function of patients, and still ensure the R0 resection rate. Moreover, it may does not significantly increase the difficulty of surgical operation or reduce safety. However, further research is needed to confirm our conclusion. And then, neoadjuvant therapy in the perioperative period may induce a series of side effects or adverse reactions, and thus greater attention should be paid to its timely management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺袖状切除术是一种复杂的肺切除和重建手术,主要用于患有中央位置的局部浸润性肺癌的患者,这些肺癌通常会渗透到中央气道和脉管系统中。这种方法最初用于无法耐受肺切除术的患者,而目前在肿瘤在解剖学上适合的患者中也是首选。今天,胸袖切除术包括范围广泛的手术,从支气管和气管袖切除术到隆突袖式肺切除术。在这次审查中,根据目前的文献,我们讨论了各种类型的袖状切除术的适应症。
    Pulmonary sleeve resection is a complex lung resection and reconstruction surgery mostly performed in patients with centrally located locally invasive lung cancers which often penetrate into central airways and vasculature. This approach was initially used for patients unable to tolerate pneumonectomies, while it is currently also being preferred in patients whose tumors are anatomically suited. Today, thoracic sleeve resections include a wide range of procedures ranging from bronchial and tracheal sleeve resections to carinal sleeve pneumonectomies. In this review, we discuss indications for various types of sleeve resection in the light of current literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号