Sigmoid colon cancer

乙状结肠癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:远端乙状结肠癌的外科治疗方法之一是保留左结肠动脉(LCA)血管的结肠节段切除术。D3淋巴结清扫术可能根据不同的血管解剖结构而在技术上有所不同。本研究旨在根据肠系膜下动脉(IMA)分支的不同模式,为远端乙状结肠癌提供保留LCA的D3淋巴结清扫方法。
    方法:常规进行带有三维重建的CT血管造影以确定IMA分支模式。所有病例均进行腹腔镜乙状结肠远端切除术,D3淋巴结清扫,并以标准化方式保留左绞痛动脉。数据,包括临床,术中,和短期手术结果,表示为中位数(Me)和四分位数间距(IQR)。
    结果:26例远端乙状结肠癌患者接受腹腔镜远端乙状结肠切除术治疗。D3淋巴结清扫的方法根据不同的解剖变化而变化。高BMI患者有1例转换(3.8%)和1例吻合口漏(3.8%)。同时,有一个高根尖淋巴结计数(我3(IQR2-5),最小值-最大值0-10)由于IMA的骨架化。
    结论:在不同类型的LCA和乙状结肠动脉分支模式下,保留左结肠动脉的D3淋巴结清扫术的技术方面可能有所不同,而与标准化的解剖标志无关。进行保留血管的淋巴结清扫时,应考虑解剖特征。
    BACKGROUND: One of the approaches to distal sigmoid colon cancer surgical treatment is segmental colonic resection with vascular preservation of left colic artery (LCA). D3 lymph node dissection may technically vary according to different vascular anatomy. This study aims to show the approaches to D3 lymph node dissection with LCA preservation for distal sigmoid colon cancer according to different patterns of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) branching.
    METHODS: CT angiography with 3D reconstruction was routinely performed to identify the IMA branching pattern. Laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection with D3 lymph node dissection and left colic artery preservation in standardized fashion was performed in all cases. Data, including clinical, intraoperative, and short-term surgical outcomes, is presented as median numbers (Me) and interquartile range (IQR).
    RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with distal sigmoid colon cancer were treated with laparoscopic distal sigmoid colon resection. The approach to D3 lymph node dissection varied according to different anatomical variations. There was one conversion (3.8%) and one anastomotic leakage (3.8%) in patients with high BMI. At the same time, there was a high apical lymph node count (Me 3 (IQR 2-5), min-max 0-10) due to the skeletonization of the IMA.
    CONCLUSIONS: The technical aspects of D3 lymph node dissection with left colic artery preservation may vary in different types of LCA and sigmoid artery branching patterns regardless of the standardized anatomical landmarks. The anatomical features should be considered when performing vascular-sparing lymph node dissection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    结肠癌表现为伴有脓肿和破裂的大腹部肿块是罕见的,并且容易被误诊和延迟。此外,合并腹壁转移时治疗方案不明确。
    一名79岁的妇女,表现为腹部大肿块,伴有脓肿和破裂。在当地医院误诊为软组织感染,经过全面检查,诊断为乙状结肠癌,腹壁转移,脓肿形成。病人接受了一期手术,包括肿瘤整块切除和侵犯腹壁,以及自体组织腹壁重建,具有良好的临床预后。
    对于腹部大肿块的诊断,腹部CT,脓液培养比超声波更有价值。对于有腹壁转移的结肠癌,一期手术完全切除肿瘤和腹壁全层,采用自体组织腹壁重建技术修复缺损是可行的。
    该病例突出了将结肠癌作为鉴别诊断之一对老年患者腹部大肿块伴脓肿和破裂的重要性,以及当存在腹壁转移时,一期手术切除肿瘤和侵入腹壁和用自体组织重建腹壁的可能性。
    UNASSIGNED: Colon cancer presenting as a large abdominal mass accompanied by abscess and rupture is rare and prone to be misdiagnosed and delayed. In addition, the treatment plan is not clear when combined with abdominal wall metastasis.
    UNASSIGNED: A 79-year-old woman presented with a large abdominal mass accompanied by abscess and rupture. It was misdiagnosed as a soft tissue infection in a local hospital, and after a comprehensive examination, it was diagnosed as sigmoid colon cancer with abdominal wall metastasis and abscess formation. The patient underwent a one-stage surgery, including en bloc resection of the tumor and invaded abdominal wall, as well as autologous tissue abdominal wall reconstruction, with a good clinical prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: For the diagnosis of large abdominal masses, abdominal CT, and pus culture are more valuable than ultrasound. For colon cancer with abdominal wall metastasis, one-stage surgery to completely remove the tumor and full-thickness of the abdominal wall, and the use of autologous tissue abdominal wall reconstruction technology to repair defects is feasible.
    UNASSIGNED: This case highlights the importance of using colon cancer as one of the differential diagnoses for the diagnosis for large abdominal mass accompanied by abscess and rupture in elderly patients, as well as the possibility of one-stage surgical resection of the tumor and invasion of the abdominal wall and reconstruction of the abdominal wall with autologous tissue when there is abdominal wall metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    机器人辅助腹腔镜前切除术是一项新技术。然而,文献中关于机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RLS)优势的证据不足.这项研究的目的是比较RLS与传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)治疗乙状结肠癌的结果。我们在苏北人民医院进行了一项回顾性研究。2019年1月至2023年9月期间诊断为乙状结肠癌并接受前切除术的患者被纳入研究。我们比较了两组患者的基本特征以及患者的短期和长期预后。共纳入452例患者。基于倾向得分匹配,212名患者(RLS,n=106;CLS,包括n=106)。RLS组的基线数据与CLS组相当。与CLS组相比,RLS组显示出更少的估计失血(P=0.015),更多的收集淋巴结(P=0.005),手术时间更长(P<0.001),总住院费用更高(P<0.001)。同时,两组在其他围手术期或病理结局方面无显著差异.对于3年预后,RLS组的总生存率为92.5%,CLS组为90.6%(HR0.700,95%CI0.276-1.774,P=0.452);RLS组的无病生存率为91.5%,CLS组为87.7%(HR0.613,95%CI0.262-1.435,P=0.259).与CLS相比,发现乙状结肠癌的RLS与更多的淋巴结收集有关,相似的围手术期结局和长期生存结局.RLS的高总住院费用并没有转化为更好的长期肿瘤学结果。
    Robot-assisted laparoscopic anterior resection is a novel technique. However, evidence in the literature regarding the advantages of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) is insufficient. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RLS versus conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer. We performed a retrospective study at the Northern Jiangsu People\'s Hospital. Patients diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer and underwent anterior resection between January 2019 to September 2023 were included in the study. We compared the basic characteristics of the patients and the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients in the two groups. A total of 452 patients were included. Based on propensity score matching, 212 patients (RLS, n = 106; CLS, n = 106) were included. The baseline data in RLS group was comparable to that in CLS group. Compared with CLS group, RLS group exhibited less estimated blood loss (P = 0.015), more harvested lymph nodes (P = 0.005), longer operation time (P < 0.001) and higher total hospitalization costs (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in other perioperative or pathologic outcomes between the two groups. For 3-year prognosis, overall survival rates were 92.5% in the RLS group and 90.6% in the CLS group (HR 0.700, 95% CI 0.276-1.774, P = 0.452); disease-free survival rates were 91.5% in the RLS group and 87.7% in the CLS group (HR 0.613, 95% CI 0.262-1.435, P = 0.259). Compared with CLS, RLS for sigmoid colon cancer was found to be associated with a higher number of lymph nodes harvested, similar perioperative outcomes and long-term survival outcomes. High total hospitalization costs of RLS did not translate into better long-term oncology outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    结肠膀胱瘘(CVF)通常由结肠憩室炎引起,其次是肿瘤。传统手术通常在一个或多个阶段中完成。对于复杂的癌症CVF,根治性切除比较困难。我们报告了一名62岁的男性患者,被诊断为乙状结肠癌合并乙状结肠膀胱瘘。在治疗过程中,除了常规手术,创新使用新辅助化疗(NAC)。乙状结肠肿瘤和瘘管明显缩小。根治性手术获得阴性切缘。
    Colovesical fistula (CVF) is usually developed from colonic diverticulitis, followed by tumor. Traditional surgery is usually completed in one or more stages. For complex cancerous CVF, radical resection is more difficult. We report a 62-year-old male patient diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer combined with sigmoid vesical fistula. In the course of treatment, in addition to conventional surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was innovatively used. The sigmoid tumor and fistula were significantly shrunken. Radical surgery achieved negative margins.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在确定影响乙状结肠癌合并膀胱受累患者长期预后的危险因素。
    方法:对2002年6月至2017年5月期间因乙状结肠癌合并膀胱受累而接受多脏器切除术的118例患者的回顾性队列进行了综合分析。采用单变量和多变量分析来确定与长期结果相关的危险因素。
    结果:在纳入的患者中,10(8.5%)根据Clavien-Dindo分类经历了III-IV级并发症,其中4例(3.4%)出现吻合口漏。术后死亡率为0.8%。108例(91.6%)患者实现了R0切除。仅对31例患者进行了辅助化疗(26.3%)。8例(6.8%)局部复发。无局部复发生存率和无疾病生存率的危险因素是CCI>3,根据Clavien-Dindo分类,术后并发症为III-IV级,切缘阳性,疾病的第三阶段,额外切除的器官(不包括结肠和膀胱)和没有辅助化疗。同样的风险因素,除CCI外,与总生存期相关.
    结论:这项研究强调了阴性切缘,术后无III-IV级并发症,辅助化疗的实施是促进整体改善的关键因素,乙状结肠癌伴膀胱受累患者的无病和无局部复发生存期。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the risk factors impacting long-term outcomes in patients diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder involvement.
    METHODS: A comprehensive analysis was conducted on a retrospective cohort of 118 patients who underwent multivisceral resection for sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder involvement between June 2002 and May 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify risk factors associated with long-term outcomes.
    RESULTS: Among the included patients, 10 (8.5%) experienced grade III-IV complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, with 4 (3.4%) presenting anastomotic leaks. The postoperative mortality was 0.8%. R0 resection was achieved in 108 (91.6%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administrated to only 31 patient (26.3%). Local recurrence was observed in 8 (6.8%) cases. Risk factors for local recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival were CCI>3, grade III-IV postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, positive resection margins, stage III of the disease, additional resected organs (excluding colon and bladder) and the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. The same risk factors, with the exception of CCI, were associated with overall survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that negative resection margins, a postoperative period without grade III-IV complications, and the implementation of adjuvant chemotherapy are crucial factors contributing to improve overall, disease-free and local recurrence-free survival in patients with sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder involvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    结肠癌是全球第三大常见癌症。大约五分之一的结肠癌会由于梗阻或穿孔而出现。坏死性软组织感染是穿孔结肠癌的罕见表现,并且由于高死亡率而代表手术急症。一名80多岁的男子出现了几天的阴囊疼痛和虚弱。在体格检查中发现他有阴囊水肿和红斑以及双侧腹股沟疝。影像学检查显示阴囊大脓肿,并担心坏死性软组织感染。他被带到手术室进行手术清创和探查,并被发现在嵌顿的腹股沟疝中结肠穿孔。他接受了剖腹探查术,乙状结肠切除术和结肠造口术。病理学返回显示浸润性乙状结肠腺癌。Fournier的坏疽需要高度怀疑。这是一种与高死亡率相关的快速发展的感染。早期开始抗生素和手术清创是治疗的主要手段。当与结肠恶性肿瘤穿孔相关时,检查必须包括胸部成像,腹部,和骨盆以及癌胚抗原(CEA)水平来完成分期。穿孔乙状结肠腺癌继发的Fournier坏疽是一种独特的表现。治疗首先涉及抗生素和积极的手术清创。一旦病人稳定下来,应完成进一步的肿瘤检查以确定治疗过程。
    Colon cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. Approximately one-fifth of colon cancers will present emergently due to obstruction or perforation. Necrotizing soft tissue infection is a rare presentation of perforated colon cancer and represents a surgical emergency due to high mortality rate.  A man in his 80s presented with several days of scrotal pain and weakness. On physical exam he was found to have scrotal edema and erythema and bilateral inguinal hernias. Imaging revealed a large scrotal abscess and concern for necrotizing soft tissue infection. He was taken to the operating room for surgical debridement and exploration and was discovered to have perforated colon within an incarcerated inguinal hernia. He underwent exploratory laparotomy with sigmoid resection and end colostomy creation. Pathology returned demonstrating invasive sigmoid adenocarcinoma. Fournier\'s gangrene requires a high index of suspicion. It is a rapidly progressing infection associated with high mortality. Early initiation of antibiotics and surgical debridement are mainstays of treatment. When associated with perforated colonic malignancy, workup must include imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level to complete staging. Fournier\'s gangrene secondary to perforated sigmoid adenocarcinoma is a unique presentation. Treatment first involves antibiotics and aggressive surgical debridement. Once the patient is stabilized, further oncologic workup should be completed to determine treatment course.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在微创外科领域,两孔腹腔镜手术正在上升。这项研究调查了与传统腹腔镜手术(CLS)相比,两孔腹腔镜手术(TLS)切除乙状结肠和上直肠癌的安全性和有效性。
    回顾性收集2019年7月至2022年1月在赣南医学院第一附属医院普外科行腹腔镜乙状结肠癌和上段直肠癌切除术患者的临床资料。根据腹腔镜手术的不同进行分组。根据纳入和排除标准,共纳入81例患者,在TLS组的25名患者中,和来自CLS组的56名患者。主要比较两组在手术时间上是否有统计学差异,术中出血,切口长度,到了第一次行走的时间,时间到了第一次排气,第一次排便的时间,术后并发症发生率,和其他手术结果。
    两组在基线临床特征方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。就手术结果而言,总切口长度有统计学差异(TLS:6.21±0.67cm,CLS:8.64±1.08cm,P<0.001)),首次步行时间(TLS:2.0±0.7d,CLS:3.1±0.9d,P<0.001),至首次肛门排气的时间(TLS:2.5±0.8d,CLS:3.0±0.8d,P=0.028),首次排便时间(TLS:3.8±1.3d,CLS:5.1±2.1d,P=0.010),和流质饮食的时间(TLS:4.3±1.4d,CLS:5.3±1.9d,P=0.021)。两组在病理方面无统计学差别(P>0.05)。
    在安全方面,TLS在乙状结肠和上段直肠癌切除术中的应用与CLS相当。然而,它的切口更小,更美观,它造成的创伤比CLS小。此外,在术后恢复方面也优于CLS。
    UNASSIGNED: In the field of minimally invasive surgery, the two-port laparoscopic surgery is on the rise. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of two-port laparoscopic surgery (TLS) for resecting sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancers compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer resection at the Department of General Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College between July 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively collected. Grouped according to different laparoscopic surgery. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria,A total of 81 patients were enrolled, of the 25 patients from the TLS group,and of the 56 patients from the CLS group. We mainly compared whether there were statistical differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, incision length, time to first ambulation, time to first flatus, time to first defecation, postoperative complication rate, and other surgical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of baseline clinical characteristics (P > 0.05). In terms of the surgical outcomes, there were statistical differences in the total incision length (TLS: 6.21 ± 0.67 cm, CLS: 8.64 ± 1.08 cm, P < 0.001)), time to first ambulation (TLS: 2.0 ± 0.7 d, CLS:3.1 ± 0.9 d, P < 0.001), time to first flatus (TLS: 2.5 ± 0.8 d, CLS: 3.0 ± 0.8 d, P = 0.028), time to first defecation (TLS: 3.8 ± 1.3 d, CLS: 5.1 ± 2.1 d, P = 0.010), and time for liquid diet (TLS: 4.3 ± 1.4 d, CLS: 5.3 ± 1.9 d, P = 0.021). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the pathology (P > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: In terms of safety, TLS in sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer resection is comparable to CLS. However, its incision is smaller and more aesthetic, and it causes lesser trauma than CLS. Additionally, it is also superior to CLS in postoperative recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨腹腔镜左结肠切除术(LLC)和腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术(LSD)对乙状结肠癌(SCC)患者近期疗效和预后的影响。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,2011年1月至2019年12月,接受LLC或LSD手术的SCC患者从一个临床中心收集.比较接受LSD手术和LLC手术的患者的短期预后和预后。
    结果:本研究共纳入356例患者。1:1PSM分析后,在本研究中,有50例患者接受了LLC手术,50例患者接受了LSD手术.PSM后基线特征无显著差异(P>.05)。与LLC手术组相比,LSD手术组PSM后手术时间较短(P=.003)。此外,手术操作不是总生存期(OS)(P=.918,95%CI=.333-2.688)和无病生存期DFS(P=.730,95%CI=.335-2.150)的独立预测因子,但是年龄(OS:P=.009,95%CI=1.010-1.075;DFS:P=.014,95%CI=1.007-1.061)和肿瘤分期(OS:P=.004,95%CI=1.302-3.844;DFS:P<.01,95%CI=1.572-4.171)是SCC患者OS和DFS的独立危险因素。
    结论:两种手术方式对SCC患者的预后无显著差异。然而,改变手术方式的可能原因应由外科医生谨慎。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of laparoscopic left colectomy (LLC) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LSD) on short-term outcomes and prognosis of sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) patients using propensity score matching (PSM).
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, the SCC patients who underwent LLC or LSD surgery were collected from a single clinical center from Jan 2011 to Dec 2019. Short-term outcomes and prognosis were compared between patients who received LSD surgery and LLC surgery.
    RESULTS: A total of 356 patients were included in this study. After 1:1 PSM analysis, there were 50 patients who underwent LLC surgery and 50 patients who underwent LSD surgery left in this study. No significant difference was found in baseline characteristics after PSM (P > .05). In comparison with the LLC surgery group, the LSD surgery group had shorter operation time (P = .003) after PSM. Moreover, the surgical procedure was not an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) (P = .918, 95% CI = .333-2.688) and disease-free survival DFS (P = .730, 95% CI = .335-2.150), but age (OS: P = .009, 95% CI = 1.010-1.075; DFS: P = .014, 95% CI = 1.007-1.061) and tumor stage (OS: P = .004, 95% CI = 1.302-3.844; DFS: P < .01, 95% CI = 1.572-4.171) were the independent risk factors for OS and DFS in SCC patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the two surgical procedures for prognosis of SCC patients. However, the possible reasons for changing the surgical procedures should be cautious by surgeons.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号