Shockwave lithotripsy

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:钙化性二尖瓣狭窄(钙化性MS)对手术治疗提出了挑战,并且是大多数现代经导管二尖瓣置换术(TMVR)的禁忌症,使患者的治疗选择非常有限。
    目的:本研究旨在评估二尖瓣碎石术(MVL)后的临床和血流动力学随访。
    方法:所有在圣迈克尔医院接受MVL治疗症状性钙化MS的连续患者,多伦多,加拿大,包括在内。心脏团队评估后,患者被认为不适合进行二尖瓣手术或TMVR。排除风湿性MS或≥中度二尖瓣反流(MR)的患者。主要终点是有创二尖瓣梯度降低≥50%,无显著(≥中度)MR。
    结果:在2021年至2023年期间,有15例患者接受了MVL,平均年龄为74±9岁;53%为女性,平均STS评分为10%±0.1%。在MVL之后,与基线相比,侵入性测量的平均跨二尖瓣梯度降低(14mmHg与6mmHg;p<0.05)。8例患者(53%)达到主要终点,无主要手术并发症。随访时(中位数90天,IQR58-115天),14例(93%)患者报告从纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III-IV级到NYHAI-II级(p<0.01)的症状改善,回声平均梯度稳定(7.7mmHg±2mmHgvs.8.4mmHg±2.9mmHg(p=0.7)。
    结论:在有症状的不能手术的钙化型MS患者中,MVL是安全的并且与显著的短期临床和血流动力学改善相关。对于这个具有挑战性的队列,MVL可能代表一种新的同情疗法。需要进一步的研究来确定长期结果,并帮助确定IVL技术在治疗钙化性瓣膜疾病中的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Calcific mitral stenosis (calcific MS) presents a challenge for surgical treatment and is a contraindication for most contemporary transcatheter mitral valve replacement devices (TMVR), rendering patients with very limited therapeutic options.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the clinical and hemodynamic follow-up after mitral valve lithotripsy (MVL).
    METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent MVL to treat symptomatic calcific MS at St Michael\'s Hospital, Toronto, Canada, were included. Patients were deemed unsuitable for mitral surgery or TMVR after heart team assessment. Patients with rheumatic MS or ≥moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) were excluded. The primary endpoint was a reduction in the invasive mitral gradient by ≥50% without significant (≥moderate) MR.
    RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent MVL between 2021 and 2023 with a mean age of 74 ± 9 years; 53% were female, with a mean STS score of 10% ± 0.1%. Following MVL, there was a reduction in the invasively measured mean trans-mitral gradient compared to baseline (14 mmHg vs. 6 mmHg; p < 0.05). The primary endpoint was achieved in 8 patients (53%) with no major procedural complications. At follow-up (median 90 days, IQR 58-115 days), 14 (93%) patients reported improved symptoms from New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV to NYHA Class I-II (p < 0.01) with stable echo-derived mean gradient (7.7 mmHg ± 2 mmHg vs. 8.4 mmHg ± 2.9 mmHg (p = 0.7).
    CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with symptomatic inoperable calcific MS, MVL was safe and associated with significant short-term clinical and hemodynamic improvement. MVL may represent a new compassionate therapy for this challenging cohort. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term outcomes and help define the role of IVL technology in treating calcific valvular conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是在社交媒体平台TikTok上评估患者对肾结石手术的体验和看法。越来越多的公众使用社交媒体(SoMe)作为平台来分享他们对手术治疗经验的看法。
    使用#kidneystonesurgery标签,包含了截至01.01.2024在TikTok上的100个最新视频帖子。以及性别和地理位置等人口统计数据,还收集了主题内容。为了实现这一点,使用了以前发布的框架,并将其应用于肾结石手术。在修订和建立最终框架之前,对20个样本视频进行了试点,以评估其可行性。这包括以下关键领域:疼痛,并发症,焦虑,Recovery,回到工作,Finances,治疗延误,饮食与预防和支架投诉。
    大多数职位(95%)来自北美,女性占80%,平均视频观看次数为92,826(范围:261-2,000,000)。76%的视频讨论了输尿管镜检查(URS)。49%是在医院拍摄的,在9%的视频中被命名。讨论的三大主题是:恢复(65%),疼痛(62%)和支架(55%)。其次是焦虑(39%)和并发症(24%)。这些由非专业人士上传的视频中有12%包含完全不正确的基本医疗信息。超过一半的帖子(51%)的语气是负面的。治疗延迟(5%)和缺乏足够的术前信息(4%)也被提出,这似乎有助于负面报道。然而,负面情绪的主要原因是80%的患者(n=44)讨论了将视频集中在术后支架疼痛上的支架。
    关于肾结石手术的主题,TikTok的用户和参与度很高。负面视频的比例很高,其中大部分与令人讨厌的支架症状和并发症有关。这很容易导致潜在患者对此类不良事件的真正负担的误解。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to perform an evaluation of patient experiences and perceptions regarding kidney stone surgery on the social media platform TikTok. An increasing number of the public use social media (SoMe) as a platform to share their views regarding their experiences related to surgical treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the hashtag #kidneystonesurgery, the 100 most recent video posts as of 01.01.2024 on TikTok were included. As well as demographic data such as gender and location, thematic content was also collected. To achieve this, a previously published framework was used and adapted for application in the setting of kidney stone surgery. This was piloted on 20 sample videos to assess its feasibility before revision and establishment of the final framework. This included the following key areas: Pain, Complications, Anxiety, Recovery, Return to work, Finances, Treatment delays, Diet and Prevention and stent complaints.
    UNASSIGNED: The majority of posts (95%) were from North America, 80% by females and the mean number of video views was 92,826 (range: 261-2,000,000). 76% of the videos discussed ureteroscopy (URS). 49% were filmed at the hospital, which was named in 9% of the videos. Top three topics discussed were: Recovery (65%), pain (62%) and stents (55%). This was followed by anxiety (39%) and complications (24%). 12% of these videos uploaded by lay people included basic medical information that was wholly incorrect. More than half of the posts (51%) were negative in tone. Treatment delays (5%) and a lack of sufficient preoperative information (4%) were also raised, that appeared to contribute to the negative reports. However, the main cause for negative tone owed to the 80% of the patients (n = 44) who discussed stents that focused their video on the pain suffered from the post operative stent.
    UNASSIGNED: There is a high level of usership and engagement on TikTok on the subject of kidney stone surgery. The proportion of negative videos is high and much of this is related to the bothersome stent symptoms and complications. This could easily lead to misperceptions among potential patients about the true burden of such adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在预测肾结石冲击波碎石(SWL)治疗成功率中的应用。
    方法:在本研究中,在2022年5月至2023年8月期间,对100例肾结石患者进行了SWL。将患者分为SWL应答者和非应答者2组。该研究比较了两组患者的基线参数,如年龄,性别,体重指数(BMI),石头尺寸,石头位置,石材密度(HU),皮肤到石头的距离(SSD),肾积水程度和结石弹性成像值。
    结果:无结石率与梗阻程度无统计学意义(p=0.628),结石大小(p=0.390)上花柱位置(p=0.17),中柱位置(p=0.66),和肾盂位置(p=1.0)。然而,关于较低的花坛位置,发现了统计学上显著的关系,石材密度(HU),和使用多变量分析的石头弹性成像值。
    结论:通过剪切波弹性成像(SWE)测量结石密度可作为SWL前决策中HU的替代方法。SWL的成功主要取决于石材场地,HU,和SWE值。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usage of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the prediction of the success rate of shock‑wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment of renal stones.
    METHODS: In the present study, SWL was performed for 100 patients presented with renal stones in the duration from May 2022 to August 2023. The patients were divided into 2 groups SWL responders and non-responders. The study compared between the 2 groups in terms of baseline parameters of the patients as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), stone size, stone location, stone density (HU), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), the degree of hydronephrosis and the stone elastography values.
    RESULTS: There was no statistically significant relation between stone-free rate and degree of obstruction (p = 0.628), stone size (p = 0.390) upper calyceal location (p = 0.17), middle calyceal location (p = 0.66), and renal pelvis location (p = 1.0). Nevertheless, a statistically significant relation was found as regards lower calyceal location, stone density (HU), and stone Elastography values using multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of stone density by shear wave elastography (SWE) can be used as an alternative to HU in decision-making before SWL. SWL success depends mainly on stone site, HU, and SWE values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现代碎石机的焦区(FZ)较窄被认为是导致体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗效果欠佳的因素之一。因此,我们研究了SWL中标准狭窄或扩展(FZ)尺寸对肾结石患者的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:在2018年4月至2022年10月进行的这项前瞻性研究中,肾结石患者随机接受标准或延长FZ的SWL。使用模块SLX-F2碎石机进行治疗,在1.5Hz下进行最大3000次电击。主要结果是单次SWL治疗12周后治疗成功,定义为在计算机断层扫描中没有结石或结石碎片<4mm。次要结果包括肾周血肿的发生率,无石率(SFR),以及尿液中急性肾损伤标志物水平的变化。结果:共招募320例患者,276例患者被随机分为两组.两组基线参数相似。标准FZ组的治疗成功率(74.3%)明显优于扩展FZ组(59.3%)(p=0.009)。标准FZ的SFR也明显更好(A级,36.8%vs23.0%,p=0.013),治疗后疼痛减轻。两组肾周血肿形成率相似,计划外住院率,和尿急性肾损伤标志物的变化。结论:标准窄FZ在肾结石的SWL治疗中与延长FZ相比具有更好的治疗效果和相似的安全性。该临床试验已在公共领域(CCRBCTR)注册,试验编号CUHK_CCRB00510。
    Background: The narrower focal zone (FZ) size of modern lithotripter was considered as one of the factors that resulted in suboptimal treatment result of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Therefore, we investigate the efficacy and safety of standard narrow or extended (FZ) sizes in SWL for patients with renal stones. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study conducted between April 2018 and October 2022, patients with renal stones were randomized to receive SWL with either standard or extended FZ. Treatment was delivered using a Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter with a maximum of 3000 shocks at 1.5 Hz. The primary outcome was treatment success 12 weeks after a single SWL session, defined as the absence of a stone or stone fragment <4 mm on computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of perinephric hematoma, stone-free rate (SFR), and changes in the urinary levels of acute renal injury markers. Results: A total of 320 patients were recruited, and 276 patients were randomized into the two groups. The two groups had similar baseline parameters. The treatment success rate was significantly better for standard FZ (74.3%) than the extended FZ group (59.3%) (p = 0.009). Standard FZ also had a significantly better SFR (Grade-A, 36.8% vs 23.0%, p = 0.013) and less pain after treatment. Both groups had similar perinephric hematoma formation rates, unplanned hospital admission rates, and changes in urinary acute renal injury markers. Conclusions: The standard narrow FZ has better treatment efficacy and similar safety compared with the extended FZ during SWL for renal stones. This clinical trial has been registered in the public domain (CCRBCTR) under trial number CUHK_CCRB00510.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名72岁女性在核压力测试中出现进行性心绞痛和前部缺血。
    A 72-year-old woman presented with progressive angina and anterior ischemia on a nuclear stress test.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了研究不同剂量的体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)对疼痛的有效性,股骨头坏死(ONFH)患者的功能和影像学结果。
    遵循PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行本综述。通过使用六个不同的电子数据库进行系统的文献检索,包括MEDLINE(由Pubmed评估)CENTRAL(Cochrane图书馆中央对照试验登记册),WebofScience,PEDro(物理治疗证据数据库),Scopus和科学直接。回顾性和前瞻性队列研究;病例对照研究,纳入随机临床试验.由两名独立作者进行的筛选以及纳入研究的纳入和排除标准。采用结构化有效性质量评价量表(SEQES)和Newcastle-Ottawa量表进行病例对照研究,对队列研究和随机临床试验进行方法学质量评价。
    从各种数据库中找到了1410篇文章。重复删除后,剩下450篇文章。其次是标题和摘要筛选53篇符合全文阅读条件的文章,其中13篇文章符合纳入标准,并纳入本综述。
    在缓解疼痛方面,ESWT的高能量通量密度在疾病的早期阶段更有效,其次是低和中等能量通量密度,功能改善和疾病进展。由于研究设计之间的高度可变性,ESWT剂量,患者特征,并考虑到缺乏良好的研究,目前的研究不能得出结论。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effectiveness of different dosages of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain, function and radiographic outcomes in patients with osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH).
    UNASSIGNED: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis) guidelines were followed to conduct this review. The systematic literature search was done by using six different electronic databases include MEDLINE (assessed by Pubmed) CENTRAL (Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database), Scopus and Science Direct. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies; case control study, randomized clinical trials were included. Screening conducted by two independent authors along with inclusion and exclusion criteria of included studies. The methodological quality assessment for cohort studies and randomized clinical trials was done by using Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case control study.
    UNASSIGNED: Total 1410 articles were found from various databases. After duplicates removed 450 articles remained. Followed by title and abstract screening 53 articles eligible for full text reading, out of them 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and included in this review.
    UNASSIGNED: High energy flux densities of ESWT found to be more effective followed by low and moderate energy flux densities in earlier course of the disease compared to later stages in terms of pain relief, functional improvement and disease progression. Due to high variability among study design, ESWT dosages, patient characteristics and considering the paucity of well conducted studies, the present study cannot be conclusive.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)是一种在荧光镜和/或超声引导下使用冲击波破碎尿路结石的微创技术。ESWL结果取决于适应症(结石大小/成分,临床背景)以及它是如何进行的。石头结构,性质和密度(Hounsfield单位;通过无造影剂的CT评估)影响ESWL获得的碎片。由于尺寸较大的Steinstrasse的风险增加以及麻醉和输尿管支架置入的潜在需求,肾结石的尺寸上限已降低至15mm(1.68cm3)。相反,内生技术的发展允许更精细的石头碎片和/或更好的消除,从而降低Steinstrasse的风险,并减少潜在的会议或额外干预措施的数量。方法:这些建议是使用两种方法制定的:临床实践建议方法(CPR)和适应方法,取决于欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)建议(https://uroweb.org/guidelines/尿石症[EAU2022])是否考虑了该问题,以及它们对法国环境的适应性。
    Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a minimally invasive technique for the fragmentation of urinary tract stones using shock waves under fluoroscopic and/or ultrasound guidance. ESWL results depend on the indication (stone size/composition, clinical context) and also on how it is performed. The stone structure, nature and density (Hounsfield units; evaluated by CT without contrast agent) influence the fragmentation achieved by ESWL. The upper size limit of kidney stones has been lowered to 15mm (1.68cm3) due to the increased risk of steinstrasse with larger sizes and the potential need of anesthesia and ureteral stenting. Conversely, the development of endourological technologies allows a finer stone fragmentation and/or better elimination, thus reducing the risk of steinstrasse and decreasing the potential number of sessions or additional interventions. METHODOLOGY: These recommendations were developed using two methods: the Clinical Practice Recommendations method (CPR) and the ADAPTE method, depending on whether the question was considered in the European Association of Urology (EAU) recommendations (https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis [EAU 2022]) and their adaptability to the French context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析“人工智能(AI)及其子集(机器学习-ML,虚拟现实-VR,在过去的30年里,影像组学)在尿石症中。我们研究了与人工智能和结石疾病相关的出版物趋势,包括临床和外科应用,和腔内泌尿外科的培训。
    方法:尽管对PubMed进行了细目研究,我们从1994-2023年对所有发表的关于“人工智能”的论文进行了全面审查,ML,VR和Radiomics\"。然后将论文分为三类:A-临床(非手术),B-临床(外科)和C-培训论文,然后将文章分配给3个时期:1期(1994-2003年),Period-2(2004-2013),第3期(2014-2023年)。
    结果:发现343篇论文(A-129、B-163和C-51组),趋势从第1期增加到第2期,为123%(p=0.009),到第3期,为453%(p=0.003)。A组从第2期增加到第3期,B和C为476%(p=0.019),分别为616%(0.001)和185%(p<0.001)。A组论文包括关于“石头特征”的论文中的上升(+2100%;p=0.011),“肾功能”(p=0.002),“结石诊断”(+192%),“石头通道预测”(+400%)和“生活质量”(+1000%)。B组论文包括“URS”论文中的上升(+2650%,p=0.008),“PCNL”(+600%,p=0.001)和“SWL”(+650%,p=0.018)。关于“目标”的论文(+453%,p<0.001),“结果”(+850%,p=0.013)和“技术创新”(p=0.0311)呈上升趋势。C组论文包括“PCNL”论文中的上升(+300%,p=0.039),和“URS”(+188%,p=0.003)。
    结论:在过去十年中,有关AI及其尿石症子集领域的出版物呈指数增长,随着手术和非手术临床领域以及培训的增加。未来在腔内泌尿外科和尿石症领域与AI相关的增长可能会改善培训,以患者为中心的决策和临床结果。
    Purpose: To analyze the bibliometric publication trend on the application of \"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its subsets (Machine Learning-ML, Virtual reality-VR, Radiomics) in Urolithiasis\" over 3 decades. We looked at the publication trends associated with AI and stone disease, including both clinical and surgical applications, and training in endourology. Methods: Through a MeshTerms research on PubMed, we performed a comprehensive review from 1994-2023 for all published articles on \"AI, ML, VR, and Radiomics.\" Articles were then divided into three categories as follows: A-Clinical (Nonsurgical), B-Clinical (Surgical), and C-Training articles, and articles were then assigned to following three periods: Period-1 (1994-2003), Period-2 (2004-2013), and Period-3 (2014-2023). Results: A total of 343 articles were noted (Groups A-129, B-163, and C-51), and trends increased from Period-1 to Period-2 at 123% (p = 0.009) and to period-3 at 453% (p = 0.003). This increase from Period-2 to Period-3 for groups A, B, and C was 476% (p = 0.019), 616% (0.001), and 185% (p < 0.001), respectively. Group A articles included rise in articles on \"stone characteristics\" (+2100%; p = 0.011), \"renal function\" (p = 0.002), \"stone diagnosis\" (+192%), \"prediction of stone passage\" (+400%), and \"quality of life\" (+1000%). Group B articles included rise in articles on \"URS\" (+2650%, p = 0.008), \"PCNL\"(+600%, p = 0.001), and \"SWL\" (+650%, p = 0.018). Articles on \"Targeting\" (+453%, p < 0.001), \"Outcomes\" (+850%, p = 0.013), and \"Technological Innovation\" (p = 0.0311) had rising trends. Group C articles included rise in articles on \"PCNL\" (+300%, p = 0.039) and \"URS\" (+188%, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Publications on AI and its subset areas for urolithiasis have seen an exponential increase over the last decade, with an increase in surgical and nonsurgical clinical areas, as well as in training. Future AI related growth in the field of endourology and urolithiasis is likely to improve training, patient centered decision-making, and clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管肾结石治疗指南不断更新,预测体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)成功反应的能力仍然是一个研究主题.这是由于需要在技术进步和当前大流行的背景下完善决策。本研究旨在确定单颗肾结石直径为10至20mm的成年患者单次SWL治疗后的无石率(SFR)的预测因子。
    于2019年12月至2021年2月在一家私人SWL中心对直径为10至20mm的单个肾结石患者的记录进行了回顾性审查。对石和患者相关因素进行了单变量和多变量分析,对定量变量使用Studentt和Mann-WhitneyU检验,对定性变量使用Fisher精确和Pearson相关检验。
    共有138名患者符合这项研究的条件,包括92名男性和46名女性。平均年龄38.6±12.4岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为25.9±3.4kg/m2。SWL后四周,120例患者(87%)无结石,18(13%)需要进一步治疗。单因素分析显示SFR与BMI升高呈负相关(p=0.0001),最大石材长度(p=0.0001),石头的横向直径(p=0.0001),每个疗程的电击次数(p=0.052),和亨氏单位(HU)(p=0.0001)。多变量分析显示,HU(p=0.009),最大结石长度(p=0.01),BMI(p=0.000),双J支架(p=0.034)的存在是单节SWL治疗10至20mm直径的肾结石失败的独立危险因素。估计每宗案件的平均费用为450.5美元。
    增加了HU,最大石材长度,BMI,双J支架的存在是肾结石直径10~20mm单次SWL后SFR低的独立危险因素。SWL的成本仍然是私营部门的优势。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the continuous update of guidelines for the management of kidney stones, the ability to predict a successful response to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) remains a topic of research. This is due to the need to refine the decision making in the context of technological advancements and current pandemics. This study aimed to determine the predictors of stone-free rate (SFR) after single-session SWL in adult patients with a single kidney stone 10 to 20 mm in diameter.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of the records of patients with a single kidney stone 10 to 20 mm in diameter was performed at a private SWL center from December 2019 to February 2021. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for stone- and patient-related factors, using the Student t and Mann-Whitney U tests for the quantitative variables and the Fisher exact and Pearson correlation tests for the qualitative variables.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 138 patients were eligible for this study, including 92 men and 46 women. The mean age was 38.6 ± 12.4 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.9 ± 3.4 kg/m2. Four weeks after SWL, 120 patients (87%) were free of stones, and 18 (13%) needed further treatment. Univariate analyses showed that SFR was negatively correlated with increased BMI (p = 0.0001), maximum stone length (p = 0.0001), transverse diameter of the stone (p = 0.0001), number of shocks per session (p = 0.052), and Hounsfield unit (HU) (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that HU (p = 0.009), maximum stone length (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.000), and presence of double-J stent (p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for failure of single-session SWL in the treatment of kidney stones 10 to 20 mm in diameter. The estimated average cost per case was USD 450.5.
    UNASSIGNED: Increased HU, maximum stone length, BMI, and presence of double-J stents were independent risk factors for low SFR after single-session SWL for a kidney stone 10 to 20 mm in diameter. The cost of SWL remains an advantage in the private sector.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于存在导管撕裂和环状扩张欠佳的风险,严重的右心室流出道钙化的存在可能会妨碍同种异体肺动脉狭窄患者安全有效的经导管肺动脉瓣置换术。在右心室流出道内使用血管内碎石术使钙膨胀可以减轻这种风险并改善瓣膜血流动力学。(难度等级:高级。).
    The presence of severe right ventricular outflow tract calcification may preclude safe and effective transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in patients with pulmonary allograft stenosis owing to the risk of conduit tear and suboptimal annular expansion. Debulking calcium using intravascular lithotripsy within the right ventricular outflow tract may mitigate this risk and improve valve hemodynamics. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号