Serratus anterior plane block

锯齿肌前平面阻滞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目标:椎旁阻滞(PVB)是一项经过充分研究的,乳房手术镇痛的有效方法。涉及肋间神经分支阻塞的替代技术是前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)。然而,迄今为止,尚未发表将两种筋膜块与PVB在乳腺手术中进行比较的研究.我们评估了ESPB和SAPB的有效性与PVB,表示为术中芬太尼的需求,休息和咳嗽时的疼痛强度,和术后第一天的吗啡消耗。其他目的是对所使用的块类型的安全性进行评估。材料和方法:共有77名女性和1名男性患有I期和II期临床乳腺癌,18-85岁,被随机分为三个研究组之一:SAPB,PVB,和ESPB。结果:手术期间芬太尼的消耗量在使用的阻滞类型方面没有统计学上的显着差异(p=0.4246)。ESPB组术后吗啡消耗量最高,平均9.4毫克。从手术当天的下午4点到第二天早上8点,疼痛强度有统计学上的显着差异。术后第一天未观察到与阻滞相关的并发症。结论:前锯肌平面阻滞和竖脊肌平面阻滞均与椎旁阻滞一样有效。前锯齿肌平面阻滞与椎旁阻滞在实现术后镇痛方面同样有效。竖脊肌平面阻滞在实现术后镇痛方面的效果明显低于椎旁阻滞和前锯肌平面阻滞。
    Background/Objectives: The paravertebral block (PVB) is a well-studied, effective method of analgesia for breast surgery. Alternative techniques involving the blockage of intercostal nerve branches are the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). However, no studies comparing both fascial blocks to PVB in breast surgery have been published to date. We evaluated the effectiveness of ESPB and SAPB vs. PVB, expressed as the requirement for intraoperative fentanyl, pain intensity at rest and during coughing, and morphine consumption on the first postoperative day. Additional aims were to perform an evaluation of the safety of the block types used. Materials and Methods: A total of 77 women and 1 man with stage I and II clinical breast cancer, aged 18-85 years, were randomized into one of three study groups: SAPB, PVB, and ESPB. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in fentanyl consumption during surgery with respect to the type of block used (p = 0.4246). Morphine consumption in the postoperative period was highest in the ESPB group, averaging 9.4 mg. There was a statistically significant difference in pain intensity from 4 pm on the day of surgery to 8 am the following morning. No complications related to the blocks were observed on the first postoperative day. Conclusions: Both the serratus anterior plane block and the erector spinae plane block were as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving intraoperative analgesia. The serratus anterior plane block was equally as effective as the paravertebral block in achieving postoperative analgesia. The erector spinae plane block was significantly less effective in achieving postoperative analgesia than both the paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心脏手术后在胸骨和胸管部位发生严重疼痛。尽管以胸骨为目标的镇痛通常是优先考虑的,排水部位的镇痛有时被忽视。这项对接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者进行的研究旨在通过结合胸骨旁阻滞(PSB)和前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)为胸骨和胸管区域提供优化的镇痛。
    方法:伦理委员会批准(E.Kurul-E2-24-6176,07/02/2024)用于研究。然后,该试验已在www上注册。
    结果:gov(https://clinicaltrials.gov/),标识符为17/03/2024NCT05427955。20名年龄在18-80岁之间的患者,ASA身体状况II-III级,胸骨切开术行冠状动脉旁路移植术,包括在内。当患者处于全身麻醉状态时,PSB是通过第二和第四肋间空间进行的,SAPB在第六根肋骨上进行。主要结果是拔管后最初12小时的VAS(视觉模拟量表)。次要结果为术中瑞芬太尼消耗量和阻滞相关副作用。
    结果:患者的平均年龄为64岁。五名患者是女性,15个是男性。对于胸骨区域,只有1例患者静息期VAS评分为4分,其他患者静息期VAS评分低于4分.对于胸管区域,只有两名患者的静息VAS评分为4分或以上,而其他患者的静息VAS评分低于4。患者术中瑞芬太尼平均消耗量为2.05mg。在任何患者中均未观察到与镇痛方案相关的副作用。
    结论:在这项初步研究中,PSB和SAPB联合用于CABG患者,胸骨和胸管区域实现了有效的镇痛。
    BACKGROUND: Severe pain occurs after cardiac surgery in the sternum and chest tubes sites. Although analgesia targeting the sternum is often prioritized, the analgesia of the drain site is sometimes overlooked. This study of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) aimed to provide optimized analgesia for both the sternum and the chest tubes area by combining parasternal block (PSB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB).
    METHODS: Ethics committee approval (E.Kurul-E2-24-6176, 07/02/2024) was received for the study. Then, the trial was registered on www.
    RESULTS: gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ) under the identifier NCT05427955 on 17/03/2024. Twenty patients between the ages of 18-80, with ASA physical status classification II-III, undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting CABG with sternotomy, were included. While the patients were under general anesthesia, PSB was performed through the second and fourth intercostal spaces, and SAPB was performed over the sixth rib. The primary outcome was VAS (Visual Analog Scale) during the first 12 h after extubation. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative remifentanil consumption and block-related side effects.
    RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 64 years. Five patients were female, and 15 were male. For the sternum area, only one patient had resting VAS scores of 4, while the VAS scores for resting for the other patients were below 4. For chest tubes area, only two patients had resting VAS scores of 4 or above, while the resting VAS scores for the other patients were below 4. The patients\' intraoperative remifentanil consumption averaged 2.05 mg. No side effects related to analgesic protocol were observed in any of the patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study where PSB and SAPB were combined in patients undergoing CABG, effective analgesia was achieved for the sternum and chest tubes area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景乳房手术后的疼痛被描述为中度至重度的强度,如果治疗不当,增加术后发病率,医院费用,以及术后持续性疼痛的发生率。锯齿前平面(SAP)阻滞是一种用于胸壁镇痛的筋膜注射技术。关于其在撒哈拉以南非洲的镇痛作用和可能的阿片类药物节省作用,缺乏数据。本研究旨在确定前锯肌平面阻滞用于乳腺手术的围手术期镇痛效果。方法这是一种前瞻性的,随机化,本研究纳入52例患者,随机分为干预组(n=26)和对照组(n=26).对照组的一名患者未接受分配的干预措施,而干预组中的1人失去了随访。50名参与者的完整数据,包括干预(n=25),在分析中使用。患者的人口统计学和健康特征,感应前,术中,记录术后血流动力学参数。麻醉诱导后,一名盲法麻醉师使用0.25%的布比卡因进行超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞,或使用0.9%的生理盐水进行假阻滞(对照).记录术后即刻及术后1、4、8、24小时的数字评定量表(NRS)评分及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率。还评估了患者在术后前24小时内对镇痛管理的满意度。结果接受SAP阻滞的患者在所有测量时间点的NRS评分均较低,但这仅在术后第4小时有统计学意义(p值=0.002).与对照组相比,接受SAP治疗的患者术中较低(11.3±1.5mgvs.11.9±1.5毫克,p值=0.131)和术后(4.6±5.7mgvs.10.5±6毫克,p值=0.001)平均阿片类药物消耗量。然而,仅发现术后阿片类药物消耗量的减少具有统计学意义.这项研究中的大多数参与者(>90%)没有经历PONV,并且对他们的术后疼痛管理非常满意。结论前锯肌平面阻滞可降低术后NRS疼痛评分。它还显着减少了术后阿片类药物的消耗,但并未显着减少术中阿片类药物的消耗。
    Background Pain after breast surgery has been described as moderate to severe in intensity and, if inadequately treated, increases postoperative morbidity, hospital cost, and the incidence of persistent postoperative pain. Serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is an interfascial injection technique for analgesia of the chest wall. There is a lack of data with regard to its analgesic and possible opioid-sparing effects in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to determine the perioperative analgesic effect of serratus anterior plane block administered for breast surgery. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study involving 52 patients and was randomized into the intervention (n = 26) and control (n = 26) groups. One patient in the control group did not receive the allocated intervention, while one in the intervention group lost to follow-up. Complete data of 50 participants, comprising intervention (n=25), was used in the analysis. Patients\' demographic and health characteristics, pre-induction, intra-operative, and postoperative hemodynamic parameters were noted. After induction of anesthesia, a blinded anesthetist performed an ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block with 0.25% plain bupivacaine or a sham block using 0.9% normal saline (control). Numerical rating scale (NRS) score and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were recorded immediately after surgery and at 1, 4, 8, and 24 postoperative hours. Patient satisfaction with analgesic management within the first 24 postoperative hours was also assessed. Results Patients who received SAP block had lower NRS scores at all measured time points, but this was only statistically significant at the fourth postoperative hour (p-value = 0.002). Compared to controls, patients who received SAP had lower intraoperative (11.3±1.5 mg vs. 11.9±1.5 mg, p value = 0.131) and postoperative (4.6±5.7mg vs. 10.5±6 mg, p value=0.001) mean opioid consumption. However, only the reduction in postoperative opioid consumption was found to be statistically significant. Most participants (> 90%) in this study did not experience PONV and were very satisfied with their postoperative pain management. Conclusion Serratus anterior plane block reduces NRS pain scores postoperatively. It also significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption but does not significantly reduce intraoperative opioid consumption.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与传统的开胸手术相比,经心尖经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)手术可减少创伤和加快恢复,促进在心脏手术中采用增强术后恢复(ERAS)协议。尽管取得了这些进步,术后疼痛管理没有得到足够的重视。多模式镇痛的潜在影响,包括超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB),术后疼痛和早期恢复质量尚未得到广泛研究,缺乏全面的前瞻性证据。因此,本研究旨在探讨SAPB联合全身麻醉对经心尖TAVI患者早期苏醒质量及镇痛效果的影响。
    方法:这种前瞻性,随机对照研究将招募70例接受经心尖TAVI的患者,随机分配到SAPB组或对照组。主要结果,使用回收质量-40(QOR-40)量表进行评估,重点关注术后24h和48h的恢复质量。次要结果包括静息时和咳嗽6h时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分,12h,24h,手术后48小时,24h和48h患者自控镇痛(PCA)使用频率,24小时和48小时的阿片类药物消耗,24h和48h抢救镇痛和剧烈疼痛的时间和频率,术后48小时恶心和呕吐的发生率,和止吐药的剂量。
    结论:本研究的目的是评价超声引导下SAPB联合全身麻醉对经心尖TAVI患者术后早期苏醒和镇痛质量的影响。获得的结果可能为在该特定患者人群中实施多模式镇痛和增强ERAS提供有价值的见解。
    背景:中国临床试验注册ChiCTR2300068584。2023年2月24日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Compared to traditional thoracotomy, transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) surgery offers reduced trauma and faster recovery, fostering the adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in cardiac surgery. Despite these advancements, postoperative pain management has received insufficient attention. The potential effects of multi-mode analgesia, including ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), on postoperative pain and early quality of recovery have not been widely studied, lacking comprehensive prospective evidence. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of SAPB combined with general anesthesia on early recovery quality and analgesic efficacy in transapical TAVI patients.
    METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled study will enroll 70 patients undergoing transapical TAVI, randomly allocated to either the SAPB group or the control group. The primary outcome, assessed using Quality of Recovery-40 (QOR-40) scale, focuses on the quality of recovery at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and during coughing at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery, frequency of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) utilization at 24 h and 48 h, opioid consumption at 24 h and 48 h, time and frequency of rescue analgesia and severe pain at 24 h and 48 h, incidence of nausea and vomiting at 48 h after surgery, and dosage of antiemetic drugs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the effects of ultrasound-guided SAPB combined with general anesthesia on postoperative early quality of recovery and analgesia in transapical TAVI patients. The results obtained may provide valuable insight for the implementation of multi-mode analgesia and enhanced ERAS in this specific patient population.
    BACKGROUND: China Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR2300068584. Registered on 24 February 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数接受Nuss手术的患者在手术后报告有中度至重度疼痛。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)联合经胸肌平面阻滞(TTMP)缓解Nuss手术患者急性疼痛的有效性和安全性。
    方法:我们研究的入选患者被分配到接受罗哌卡因联合神经阻滞(NB组)或生理盐水(CON组)。这项研究的主要结果是在休息和运动(咳嗽)期间2、4、8、16、24、36和48h的术后疼痛。次要结果包括术中瑞芬太尼的剂量,拔管时间和在麻醉后监护病房(PACU)的停留时间,对乙酰氨基酚和可待因片的总消费量,第一次排便的时间,时间到了第一次排气,阿片类药物相关的不良事件,以及住院时间的长短。
    结果:与CON组相比,NB组患者的数值评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分明显较低。与CON组相比,NB组术后对乙酰氨基酚的消耗量明显减少,围手术期舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼的剂量也较低。与NE组相比,CON组的PACU停留时间和拔管时间显着增加。NB组首次排便时间和首次排气时间较早。但是在住院时间和可待因片的消耗量方面,两组之间没有显着差异。
    结论:超声引导下SAPB和TTMP阻滞在Nuss手术患者中可以提供有效的镇痛效果。
    背景:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2000038506)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Most patients undergoing the Nuss procedure reported moderate to severe pain after surgery. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) combined with transversus thoracic muscle plane (TTMP) block for relieving acute pain in patients undergoing the Nuss procedure.
    METHODS: The enrolled patients in our study were allocated to either receive combined nerve blocks with ropivacaine (NB group) or saline (CON group). The primary outcome of this study was postoperative pain at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, and 48 h during rest and movement (coughing). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative dosage of remifentanil, the time to extubation and the length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), the total acetaminophen and codeine tablet consumption, time to first bowel movement, time to first flatus, opioid-related adverse events, and the length of hospital stay.
    RESULTS: Patients in the NB group had significantly lower Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores compared with the CON group. The NB group required significantly less postoperative acetaminophen consumption and lower dosages of perioperative sufentanyl and remifentanil compared with the CON group. The length of stay in the PACU and time to extubation were significantly increased in the CON group compared with the NE group. Time to first bowel movement and time to first flatus were earlier in the NB group. But there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the length of hospital stay and codeine tablet consumption.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided SAPB and TTMP blocks in patients undergoing the Nuss procedure could provide effective analgesia.
    BACKGROUND: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000038506).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    改良根治术(MRM)是乳腺癌的主要手术治疗方法,但它会导致严重的术后疼痛。
    这项随机对照试验评估了竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)与锯齿肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)对MRM后疼痛管理和减轻应激反应的影响。
    计划于2021年10月至2022年10月在全身麻醉下进行单侧MRM的60名个体分为三组。A组包括20例接受超声引导的ESPB(20mL0.25%布比卡因)的患者。B组包括20例接受超声引导下SAPB(20mL0.25%布比卡因)的患者。C组根据疼痛评分静脉注射吗啡。使用2μg/kg的芬太尼和2-3mg/kg的丙泊酚诱导麻醉。该研究使用数字评定量表比较了三组的疼痛评分,血清皮质醇水平,总芬太尼,吗啡的消耗,手术期间平均动脉血压(MAP)和心率(HR)的变化,以及术后并发症的发生。
    与B组和C组相比,A组的疼痛评分在统计学上显著降低。A组显示术后吗啡消耗量显着减少,术后1小时血清皮质醇水平(P=0.021),MAP,与B组相比,术后呕吐和恶心与C组相比,A组和B组的所有参数均有统计学上的显着改善。
    该研究表明,与接受MRM的患者相比,ESPB提供了优于SAPB的镇痛效果。减少吗啡使用和降低术后皮质醇水平。两种方法都比单独静脉注射吗啡提供更有效的疼痛控制。
    UNASSIGNED: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is the primary surgical treatment for breast cancer, yet it leads to significant postoperative pain.
    UNASSIGNED: This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effects of an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on post-MRM pain management and stress response reduction.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty individuals scheduled for unilateral MRM under general anesthesia from October 2021 to October 2022 were divided into three groups. Group A comprised 20 patients who received ultrasound-guided ESPB (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine). Group B included 20 patients who received ultrasound-guided SAPB (20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine). Group C was treated with intravenous morphine based on pain scores. Anesthesia was induced using 2 μg/kg of fentanyl and 2 - 3 mg/kg of propofol. The study compared the three groups regarding pain scores using a numerical rating scale, serum cortisol levels, total fentanyl, and morphine consumption, changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) during surgery, and the occurrence of postoperative complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Statistically significant reductions in pain scores were observed in group A compared to groups B and C. Moreover, group A exhibited a significant decrease in postoperative morphine consumption, serum cortisol levels 1 hour post-surgery (P = 0.021), MAP, and postoperative vomiting and nausea compared to group B. Furthermore, groups A and B showed statistically significant improvements in all parameters compared to group C.
    UNASSIGNED: The study demonstrates that ESPB provides superior analgesic effects compared to SAPB in patients undergoing MRM, with reduced morphine use and lower postoperative cortisol levels. Both blocks offer more effective pain control than intravenous morphine alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开胸术后疼痛控制非常重要,如果不受控制,它会导致严重的并发症。
    本研究旨在比较右美托咪定和氯胺酮在锯肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)开胸术后疼痛控制中的应用。
    这项随机临床试验是对74名年龄在18至60岁的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I级或II级患者进行的,这些患者被转诊到阿瓦兹的伊玛目霍梅尼医院,伊朗,行开胸手术并随机分为两组。手术后,在超声引导下进行SAPB。在罗哌卡因-氯胺酮(RK)组中,氯胺酮0.5mg/kg和0.4cc/kg罗哌卡因溶液0.25%和罗哌卡因-右美托咪定(RD)组,除了0.4cc/kg罗哌卡因0.25%,添加右美托咪定0.5µg/kg.言语数字标度(VNS),收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP),呼吸频率(RR),心率(HR),记录平均动脉压(MAP)。
    两组在人口统计信息方面没有显着差异(P<0.05)。氯胺酮组的平均VNS低于右美托咪定组;然而,仅在术后1、12和24小时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组在SBP和DBP方面无统计学差异。HR,地图。术后12、24h两组RR差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    右美托咪定和氯胺酮,在接受选择性开胸手术的患者中用作罗哌卡因SAPB的补充剂,降低了开胸手术后的疼痛强度;然而,在接受氯胺酮的组中,疼痛减轻的强度越来越有效。
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative pain control after thoracotomy is very important, and if not controlled, it can cause severe complications.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare dexmedetomidine and ketamine in serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in pain control after thoracotomy.
    UNASSIGNED: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 74 patients aged 18 to 60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II who were referred to Imam Khomeini hospital in Ahvaz, Iran, for thoracotomy and randomly divided into two groups. After surgery, the SAPB with ultrasound-guided was performed. In the ropivacaine-ketamine (RK) group, ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and 0.4 cc/kg ropivacaine solution 0.25% and in the ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine (RD) group, in addition to 0.4 cc/kg ropivacaine 0.25%, dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg was added. Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference in both groups in terms of demographic information (P < 0.05). The average VNS was lower in the ketamine group than in the dexmedetomidine group; however, there was a significant difference only at 1, 12, and 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of SBP and DBP, HR, and MAP. There was a significant difference in the RR in the two groups at 12 and 24 hours after the operation (P < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Dexmedetomidine and ketamine, which were used as supplements to ropivacaine for SAPB in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy, reduced the pain intensity after thoracotomy; nevertheless, the intensity of pain reduction was more and more effective in the group receiving ketamine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:众所周知,前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)和椎旁阻滞(PVB)可以减轻电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)后的疼痛程度。然而,每个区块的相对功效和两者的组合尚未得到充分表征。本研究的目的是评估单独使用PVB的疗效,只有SAPB,以及PVB和SAPB的组合对VATS后疼痛的发生和强度的影响。
    方法:我们进行了THORACOSOPIC单中心,双盲,因接受择期VATS肺切除术的成年患者的随机试验。参与者仅被随机分配到PVB,仅SAPB和PVB+SAPB组。主要终点是入院后咳嗽疼痛。次要终点是在其他时间点休息和咳嗽时的术后疼痛以及累积阿片类药物消耗。以视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行评分。
    结果:纳入156例患者(每组52例)。进入PACU后,三组在咳嗽疼痛方面没有显着差异:VAS评分为3[0;6],PVB中的4[0;8]和2[0;6],SAPB和PVB+SAPB组,分别为(P=0.204)。在术后护理期间,SABP+PVP组休息时和咳嗽时的总体疼痛评分显著降低.
    结论:与单独使用SABP或PVB相比,SABP+PVB的组合可能对VATS的疼痛管理有益。
    OBJECTIVE: Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) are well known to reduce pain levels after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, the relative efficacies of each block and a combination of the 2 have not been fully characterized. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of PVB alone, SAPB alone and the combination of PVB and SAPB with regard to the occurrence and intensity of pain after VATS.
    METHODS: We conducted the THORACOSOPIC single-centre, double-blind, randomized trial in adult patients due to undergo elective VATS lung resection. The participants were randomized to PVB only, SAPB only and PVB + SAPB groups. The primary end-point was pain on coughing on admission to the postanaesthesia care unit. The secondary end-points were postoperative pain at rest and on coughing at other time points and the cumulative opioid consumption. Pain was scored on a visual analogue scale.
    RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty-six patients (52 in each group) were included. On admission to the postanaesthesia care unit, the 3 groups did not differ significantly with regard to the pain on coughing: the visual analogue scale score was 3 (0-6), 4 (0-8) and 2 (0-6) in the PVB, SAPB and PVB + SAPB groups, respectively (P = 0.204). During postoperative care, the overall pain score was significantly lower in the SABP + PVP group at rest and on cough.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SABP + PVB could be beneficial for pain management in VATS in comparison to SABP or PVB alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于严重的术后疼痛,漏斗胸微创修复(MIRPE)后的术后疼痛管理仍然是一个关键问题。据报道,MIRPE后冷冻镇痛有希望的结果;然而,它的侵入性,单肺通气,和额外的仪器要求仍然是障碍。锯齿前平面阻滞(SAPB)是一种区域性阻滞技术,能够覆盖T2-9水平的前胸壁,受到MIRPE的影响。我们假设SAPB将是一种更好的替代疼痛控制方式,比传统方法更有效地减轻术后疼痛。
    我们对2022年3月至2023年8月期间接受MIRPE的患者进行了回顾性研究。在N组之间比较疼痛控制的疗效(常规疼痛管理,n=24)和S组(SAPB,n=26)。N组接受静脉患者自控镇痛(IV-PCA)和皮下局部麻醉药输注。S组在基线IV-PCA双侧推注30mL0.25%罗哌卡因后,接受双侧连续SAPB和0.3%罗哌卡因。术后1、3、6、12、24、48和72小时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛水平,并通过吗啡毫克当量(MME)进行总静脉内抢救镇痛剂消耗。
    在术后72小时内,S组的平均VAS评分明显低于N组(p<0.01)。S组在术后72小时显示出显著较低的MME(N组:108.53,S组:16.61;p<0.01)。
    与常规管理相比,SAPB改善了静息和动态状态下的术后疼痛控制,并减少了阿片类药物的消耗。
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative pain management following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) remains a critical concern due to severe post-procedural pain. Promising results have been reported for cryoanalgesia following MIRPE; however, its invasiveness, single-lung ventilation, and additional instrumentation requirements remain obstacles. Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a regional block technique capable of covering the anterior chest wall at the T2-9 levels, which are affected by MIRPE. We hypothesized that SAPB would be a superior alternative pain control modality that reduces postoperative pain more effectively than conventional methods.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent MIRPE between March 2022 and August 2023. The efficacy of pain control was compared between group N (conventional pain management, n=24) and group S (SAPB, n=26). Group N received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and subcutaneous local anesthetic infusion. Group S received bilateral continuous SAPB with 0.3% ropivacaine after a bilateral bolus injection of 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine with baseline IV-PCA. Pain levels were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively and total intravenous rescue analgesic consumption by morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
    UNASSIGNED: Mean VAS scores were significantly lower in group S than in group N throughout the 72-hour postoperative period (p<0.01). Group S showed significantly lower MME at postoperative 72 hours (group N: 108.53, group S: 16.61; p<0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: SAPB improved immediate postoperative pain control in both the resting and dynamic states and reduced opioid consumption compared to conventional management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号