Serratus anterior plane

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已实施了增强手术后恢复(ERAS)方案,以减少阿片类药物的使用并减少患者住院时间(LOS,days).锯齿前平面(SAP)阻滞麻醉T2至T9的乳房皮区,可以在手术中应用。这项研究的目的是比较对照组之间的术后阿片类药物(OME)消耗和LOS,一个ERAS组,和ERAS/局部麻醉鸡尾酒组在接受基于植入物的乳房重建的患者中。
    在这项研究中,在2004年至2020年之间进行了基于植入物的乳房重建的142名妇女被分为A组(46名患者),历史队列;B组(73例患者),ERAS/无阻滞对照组;和C组(23例患者),ERAS/麻醉鸡尾酒研究组。感兴趣的主要结果是麻醉后监护病房(PACU),住院和医院OME总消耗量,和PACULOS。
    在PACULOS中,从A组到C组观察到显着降低(103.3与80.2vs.70.5;p=0.011),OME使用(25.1与11.4vs.5.7;p<0.0001),和总医院OME(120.3vs.95.2vs.35.9;p<0.05)。三组之间的住院OME无差异(95.2vs.83.8vs.30.8;p=0.212)。尽管没有达到统计意义,在PACU中,C组每位患者平均消耗的阿片类药物比B组少50-60%,住院,和总医院OME。
    局部麻醉阻滞是ERAS方案的重要组成部分。我们的结果表明,在ERAS方案中,局部阻滞与局部麻醉混合物的组合可以减少基于植入物的乳房重建中的阿片类药物消耗。
    UNASSIGNED: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to decrease opioid use and decrease patient hospital length of stay (LOS, days). Serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks anesthetize the T2 through T9 dermatomes of the breast and can be applied intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid (OME) consumption and LOS between a control group, an ERAS group, and an ERAS/local anesthetic cocktail group in patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, 142 women who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction between 2004 and 2020 were divided into Group A (46 patients), a historical cohort; Group B (73 patients), an ERAS/no-block control group; and Group C (23 patients), an ERAS/anesthetic cocktail study group. Primary outcomes of interest were postanesthesia care unit (PACU), inpatient and total hospital OME consumption, and PACU LOS.
    UNASSIGNED: A significant decrease was observed from Group A to C in PACU LOS (103.3 vs. 80.2 vs. 70.5; p = 0.011), OME use (25.1 vs. 11.4 vs. 5.7; p < 0.0001), and total hospital OME (120.3 vs. 95.2 vs. 35.9; p < 0.05). No difference was observed in inpatient OMEs between the three groups (95.2 vs. 83.8 vs. 30.8; p = 0.212). Despite not reaching statistical significance, Group C consumed an average of 50-60 % less opioids per patient than did Group B in PACU, inpatient, and total hospital OMEs.
    UNASSIGNED: Local anesthetic blocks are important components of ERAS protocols. Our results demonstrate that a combination regional block with a local anesthetic cocktail in an ERAS protocol can decrease opioid consumption in implant-based breast reconstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是一种与术后疼痛相关的广泛接受的外科手术。这项研究是为了比较周围神经刺激器(PNS)引导的前锯肌平面阻滞(SAP)和腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞在LC患者术后镇痛中的作用。
    经伦理委员会批准,将70例LC患者随机分为S组:SAP阻滞和T组:TAP阻滞。这些区块是在PNS指导下进行的,给予0.375%罗哌卡因20ml。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛的严重程度。本研究的主要目的是评估术后VAS评分。术后24h第一剂量的抢救镇痛时间和曲马多的总消耗量是次要目标。所有的统计计算都是使用Windows版本23.0的社会科学统计分析完成的(IBM公司,NY,美国)。
    在休息和6小时运动时TAP阻滞的患者中观察到较低的VAS评分(P=0.001),术后12h(P=0.001)和18h(P=0.001)与SAP比较。与SAP组相比,TAP组首次抢救镇痛时间显着增加(7.97±0.51vs.5.89±1.45,P=0.001)。SAP组的曲马多使用率明显高于TAP组(128.9±36.22vs.72.43±44.80,P=0.001)。
    PNS引导下的TAP阻滞改善了术后疼痛,曲马多的消耗减少,并且在术后期间没有明显的并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a widely accepted surgical procedure associated with postoperative pain. This study was done to compare peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS)-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAP) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing LC.
    UNASSIGNED: Following approval from the ethical committee, 70 patients for LC were randomly assigned to Group S: SAP block and Group T: TAP block. The blocks were performed under PNS guidance, and 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine was administered. The severity of pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The study\'s primary objective was the evaluation of the postoperative VAS score. The time of the first dose of rescue analgesia and total tramadol consumption for 24 h postoperatively were secondary objectives. All the statistical calculation was done using statistical analyses for Social Sciences for Windows version 23.0 (IBM Corp, NY, USA).
    UNASSIGNED: Lower VAS score was seen in patients of TAP block at rest as well as movement at 6 h (P = 0.001), 12 h (P = 0.001) and 18 h (P = 0.001) postoperatively compared with SAP. The TAP group showed a significantly increased time of first rescue analgesic compared to the SAP group (7.97 ± 0.51 vs. 5.89 ± 1.45, P = 0.001). Tramadol usage was significantly higher in the SAP group than in the TAP group (128.9 ± 36.22 vs. 72.43 ± 44.80, P = 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: TAP block guided by the PNS improves postoperative pain with less tramadol consumption and during the postoperative period without significant complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于单次前锯肌平面阻滞(SAP)用于乳腺手术的镇痛效果,存在相互矛盾的证据。这项荟萃分析旨在评估SAP与非阻断治疗(NBC)和其他区域阻断相比的镇痛疗效。即椎旁阻滞(PVB)和改良胸神经阻滞(PECS阻滞)用于乳腺手术。PubMed,Embase,Scopus,搜索了Cochrane中央对照试验和ClinicalTrials.gov。我们纳入了报告在成人乳腺手术中使用SAP阻滞的随机对照试验。主要结果是术后24小时口服吗啡当量(OME)。随机效应模型用于汇集结果和平均差(MD),并计算连续和二分结果的比值比(OR),分别。等级指南被用来评估证据的强度,并进行试验序贯分析(TSA)以提供结论的确定性.纳入了24项纳入1789名患者的试验。中等强度的证据表明,与NBC相比,SAP提供了24小时OME的显着减少[MD-24.9mg(95%CI-41.54,-8.25;P<0.001,I2=99.68%)]。TSA排除了假阳性结果的可能性。SAP的亚组分析表明,浅层平面方法比深层方法更有效地减少了阿片类药物的消耗。与NBC相比,SAP中发生PONV的几率显着降低。与PVB和PECS相比,对于24小时OME和首次抢救镇痛的时间,SAP阻滞没有统计学差异。单次注射SAP减少了阿片类药物的消耗,延长镇痛持续时间,降低疼痛评分,与NBC相比,PONV的发生率降低。SAP之间的研究终点没有统计学上的显着差异,PVB,和PECS块。
    There is conflicting evidence regarding the analgaesic efficacy of single-shot serratus anterior plane block (SAP) for breast surgery. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the analgaesic efficacy of SAP compared with non-block care (NBC) and other regional blocks, i.e. paravertebral block (PVB) and modified pectoral nerve block (PECS block) for breast surgery. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. We included randomized controlled trials reporting the use of the SAP block in adult breast surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption for up to 24 hours. Random-effects models were used to pool results and mean difference (MD), and odds ratio (OR) was calculated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. GRADE guidelines were used to evaluate the strength of evidence, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to provide certainty to the conclusion. Twenty-four trials enrolling 1789 patients were included. Moderate strength evidence suggested that SAP provided a significant reduction in 24-hour OME compared with NBC [MD - 24.9 mg (95% CI - 41.54, -8.25; P < 0.001, I2 = 99.68%)]. TSA ruled out the possibility of false-positive results. Subgroup analysis for the SAP demonstrated that the superficial plane approach was more effective in reducing opioid consumption than the deep approach. The odds of developing PONV were significantly lower in SAP compared to NBC. Compared with PVB and PECS, SAP block was not statistically different for 24-hour OME and time to first rescue analgaesia. Single-shot SAP reduced opioid consumption, prolonged analgaesia duration, lowered pain scores, and decreased the incidence of PONV compared to NBC. There was no statistically significant difference in the studied endpoints between SAP, PVB, and PECS blocks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    区域干预对简单乳腺癌手术的潜在益处尚未得到很好的研究。了解哪些患者不提供区域干预可能与了解哪些患者受益同样重要。尚不清楚筋膜平面是否阻塞,如前锯肌平面(SAP)阻滞,对于不太广泛的乳房手术,应常规进行。因此,在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们的目的是评估在接受单纯肿块切除术(无淋巴结活检)并使用阿片类药物的患者中,将SAP阻滞纳入标准的围手术期多模式镇痛计划的相关性.作为次要结果,我们还分析了术后疼痛评分和麻醉后监护病房(PACU)住院时间.
    这是一项单机构回顾性队列研究(仅手术部位浸润与SAP阻滞队列),评估SAP阻滞与我们感兴趣的结果的关联。在调整后的分析中,我们使用1:1(仅手术部位浸润:SAP阻断)倾向评分匹配,使用最近邻匹配,无需替换,创建匹配队列.为了比较匹配队列中的主要和次要结果,我们用了Wilcoxon符号秩检验.P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    分析中纳入了419例患者,其中116例(27.7%)除了我们的标准围手术期镇痛计划外,还在术前接受了SAP阻滞.在未经调整的分析中,围手术期阿片类药物用量无差异,PACU疼痛评分,和PACU停留时间。在匹配的队列中,与SAP阻滞组相比,仅手术部位浸润组的围手术期阿片类药物消耗中位数[四分位数]分别为10mg[10,13.25mg]和10mg[7,15mg],分别为(P=0.16)。其他结果没有差异。
    在这项研究中,我们评估了SAP阻滞对接受简单肿块切除术的患者的影响,相对较少的乳房手术。我们得出的结论是,常规使用术前区域麻醉对这些特定患者不利。未来的研究应该集中在确定将直接受益于区域干预的患者。
    The potential benefit of regional interventions for simple lumpectomy breast cancer surgeries has not been well investigated. Understanding which patients to not offer a regional intervention to can be just as important as knowing which would benefit. It is unclear whether fascial plane blocks, such as serratus anterior plane (SAP) block, should be routinely performed for less extensive breast surgeries. Therefore, our goal in this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the association of integrating SAP blocks into a standard perioperative multimodal analgesia plan in patients undergoing simple lumpectomies (without node biopsies) with perioperative opioid consumption. As secondary outcomes, we also analyzed postoperative pain scores and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay.
    This was a single institution retrospective cohort study (surgical site infiltration only versus SAP block cohorts) assessing the association of SAP blocks to our outcomes of interest. In the adjusted analysis, we created matched cohorts using 1:1 (surgical site infiltration only: SAP block) propensity-score matching using nearest neighbor-matching without replacement. To compare the primary and secondary outcomes in the matched cohorts, we used the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    There were 419 patients included in the analysis, in which 116 (27.7%) received a SAP block preoperatively in addition to our standard perioperative analgesia plan. In an unadjusted analysis, no differences were seen in perioperative opioid consumption, PACU pain scores, and PACU length of stay. Among the matched cohorts, the median [quartile] perioperative opioid consumption in the surgical site infiltration only versus SAP block cohorts were 10 mg [10, 13.25 mg] and 10 mg [7, 15 mg], respectively (P = 0.16). No differences were seen in the other outcomes.
    In this study, we evaluated the impact of SAP blocks on patients undergoing simple lumpectomies, which are relatively less involved breast surgeries. We concluded that routine use of preoperative regional anesthesia is not beneficial for these specific patients. Future studies should focus on identifying patients that would directly benefit from regional interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:更大体积的局部麻醉剂提供了更广泛的感觉受阻,但具有更大的风险。这项试验的目的是比较不同体积的罗哌卡因在接受乳腺手术的患者中注射到深前锯肌前平面的效果。
    方法:在这项随机双盲试验中,将60例乳腺手术患者随机分为R10、R20和R30组(n=20),并分别用10、20和30mL的0.5%罗哌卡因接受深锯齿肌前平面阻滞。封锁后30分钟,通过冷刺激沿腋下中线在头尾方向上测试皮肤感觉。我们记录了手术后24h内的数字评定量表疼痛评分,并通过数字评定量表疼痛评分估算曲线下面积。记录抢救镇痛的例数和不良事件发生率。
    结果:阻塞的皮组为3[3,4],R10、R20和R30组中的6[5、7]和7[6、8],分别(R10与R20,P<0.001;R10vs.R30,P<0.001;R20vs.R30,P=0.005)。R10组的曲线下面积明显高于R20和R30组(P=0.014,P=0.003,在休息时;在运动时P<0.001,P<0.001)。
    结论:当使用10、20和30mL罗哌卡因用于深锯肌前平面阻滞时,阻滞的皮组随着体积的增加而增加。20和30mL的镇痛效果相似,优于10mL。因此,在乳房手术中,20mL罗哌卡因的体积被认为是适合深前锯肌平面阻滞。
    BACKGROUND: A larger volume of local anesthetic provides a wider range of blocked sensory but carries a greater risk. The purpose of this trial was to compare the effect of different volumes of ropivacaine injected to deep serratus anterior plane in patients undergoing breast surgery.
    METHODS: In this randomized double-blind trial, 60 patients undergoing breast surgery were randomly allocated to R10, R20 and R30 groups (n=20), and received deep serratus anterior plane block with 10, 20 and 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine respectively. 30 minutes after block, the cutaneous sensory was tested by cold stimulus in the craniocaudal direction along the midaxillary line. We recorded the numerical rating scale pain scores over 24 h after surgery and estimated the area under curve by numerical rating scale pain scores. The cases of rescue analgesia and the prevalence of adverse events were also recorded.
    RESULTS: The blocked dermatomes were 3 [3, 4], 6 [5, 7] and 7 [6, 8] in the R10, R20 and R30 groups, respectively (R10 vs. R20, P<0.001; R10 vs. R30, P<0.001; R20 vs. R30, P=0.005). The area under curve of R10 group was significantly higher compared with the R20 and R30 groups (P=0.014, P=0.003, at rest; P<0.001, P<0.001, on movement).
    CONCLUSIONS: The blocked dermatomes increased with increasing volume when 10, 20 and 30 mL ropivacaine was used for deep serratus anterior plane block. The analgesic effects of 20 and 30 mL were similar to each other and better than 10 mL. Therefore, in breast surgery, volume of 20 mL ropivacaine is considered to be appropriate for deep serratus anterior plane block.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近已经描述了在创伤和乳房手术后的围手术期疼痛管理的锯肌前肌平面(SAP)阻滞。它可能被证明是其他区域胸椎旁和中央神经轴阻滞技术的更安全的替代方法。在先前存在的文献中没有描述性尸体研究来描绘这种新技术的解剖平面。我们研究的主要目的是检查Serratus前肌腹部的位置,使用搅动的水作为造影剂的超声成像,评估实现肌肉平面的充分描绘的功效,最后,以观察注射剂在SAP中的头孢尾扩散程度。
    方法:研究了7具尸体。在超声引导下,在4-5(th)肋骨水平的后腋线(PAL)中注入20毫升盐水。然后用空气注入10ml水(8ml水和2ml空气)。在液体扩张的SAP(低回声)区域中存在高回声气泡,证明了水和空气的扩散。
    结果:在36%的尸体中,完全形成的Serratus前肌腹在腋下中线(MAL)被确定,14%的PAL,在PAL和MAL之间保持50%。空气-水传播的下限是在肋下边缘确定的。在2(nd)肋间间隙ICS(7%)中注意到对比物的头颅扩散,3(rd)ICS(71%),和第四(第四)ICS(22%)。
    结论:这项研究描述了前锯肌在PAL附近形成良好,并且可以借助超声搅动的水造影确定注射液的扩散。此外,注射液的头颅传播存在差异。
    BACKGROUND: The Serratus anterior muscle plane (SAP) block has recently been described for the purpose of perioperative pain management following cases of trauma and breast surgery. It might prove a safer alternative to the other regional thoracic paravertebral and central neuraxial blockade techniques. There are no descriptive cadaveric studies in the pre-existing literature to delineate the anatomical plane for this novel technique. The main objectives for our study were to examine the location of the Serratus anterior muscle belly, assess the efficacy of achieving adequate delineation of the muscle plane utilising ultrasound imaging with agitated water as the contrast agent, and finally, to observe the extent of the cepahlo-caudal spread of the injectate in the SAP.
    METHODS: Seven cadavers were studied. 20 mls of saline was injected into posterior axillary line (PAL) at the level of the 4-5(th) rib under ultrasound guidance. This was followed by injection of 10 mls of water with air (8 mls water and 2 mls of air). The presence of hyperechoic air bubbles in the fluid distended SAP (hypoechoic) area demonstrated the spread of water and air.
    RESULTS: In 36% of cadavers, fully formed Serratus Anterior muscle belly was identified at the midaxillary line (MAL), 14% in PAL, and remaining 50% between PAL and MAL. The lower most limit of air-water spread was identified at the subcostal margin. Cephalad spread of contrast was noted in 2(nd) intercostal space ICS (7%), 3(rd) ICS (71%), and 4(th) ICS (22%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study describes that the serratus anterior muscle is well-formed near the PAL and the injectate spread can be determined with the help of agitated water contrast on ultrasound. Furthermore, there was variability in the cephalad spread of the injectate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号