Serological tests

血清学试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    布鲁氏菌病是一种人畜共患疾病,在全球范围内给畜牧业生产造成巨大损失,并对公共卫生产生重大影响。由于旅游业的增加和移民的扩大,目前没有一个无布鲁氏菌病的国家能够保证其防止引入病原体的能力。及时识别感染动物是预防布鲁氏菌病、降低流行病学风险的有效手段。试管凝集试验,玫瑰孟加拉板测试,补体固定试验,和酶联免疫吸附测定,通常用于鉴定血清反应阳性的生产性动物,有局限性和结果并不总是相关的。间接血凝试验(IHA)在非传统方法中脱颖而出,因为它是负担得起的,有一个简单的协议,比经典的血清学测试更可靠,特别是在可疑和/或假阴性结果的情况下。IHA的诊断价值早已被几个国家的实验室研究,但主要是后苏联研究小组;因此,结果继续发表在俄语期刊上,确保当地科学界能够获得结果。此外,该试验对布鲁氏菌病和其他传染病的诊断效果尚未审查。本综述的目的是总结IHA用于布鲁氏菌病诊断的研究结果,并确定进一步改进的前景。
    Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that causes enormous losses in livestock production worldwide and has a significant public health impact. None of the brucellosis-free countries is currently able to guarantee their ability to prevent the introduction of the pathogen due to the increase in tourism and the expansion of migration. The timely identification of infected animals is an effective means of preventing brucellosis and minimizing the epidemiological risk. The tube agglutination test, Rose Bengal plate test, complement fixation test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which are routinely used to identify seropositive productive animals, have limitations and results that do not always correlate. The indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) stands out among non-traditional methods because it is affordable, has a simple protocol, and is more reliable than classical serological tests, especially in cases of questionable and/or false-negative results. The diagnostic value of the IHA has long been studied by laboratories in several countries, but mostly by post-soviet research teams; therefore, the results continue to be published in Russian-language journals, ensuring that the local scientific community can access the results. In addition, the efficacy of this test for the diagnosis of brucellosis and other infectious diseases has not yet been reviewed. The purpose of this review was to summarize the results of studies on the development and use of IHA for the diagnosis of brucellosis and to determine the prospects for further improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨秘鲁妊娠梅毒的相关因素和结局。
    方法:流产的妇女,阴道分娩,利马一家大型妇产医院的剖腹产病房,纳入或未诊断为梅毒患者,并比较其妊娠结局.通过快速血浆反应蛋白(RPR)和快速梅毒试验(RST)确定使用母体血液的母亲梅毒状况和使用脐带血的儿童血清状况。新生儿临床记录用于确定先天性梅毒。
    结果:在340名女性样本中,RPR/RST阳性197例,阴性143例。脐带血和母血血清中的抗体滴度与RPR滴度高度相关(rho:0·82,p<0·001)。年龄小(p=0·009)和出生体重低(p=0·029)与妊娠梅毒有关。在患有妊娠梅毒的女性中,76%的人接受过适当的治疗。所有患有先天性梅毒的新生儿的母亲也接受了适当的治疗。没有记录对其性伴侣的治疗。
    结论:妊娠期间的梅毒仍然是胎儿丢失和新生儿先天性梅毒破坏性影响的主要原因。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the factors and outcomes associated with gestational syphilis in Peru.
    METHODS: Women from the miscarriage, vaginal delivery, and C-section wards from a large maternity hospital in Lima with or without syphilis diagnosis were enrolled and their pregnancy outcomes compared. Maternal syphilis status using maternal blood and child serostatus using cord blood were determined by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and rapid syphilis tests. The newborns\' clinical records were used to determine congenital syphilis.
    RESULTS: A total of 340 women were enrolled, 197 were positive and 143 were negative for RPR/rapid syphilis tests. Antibody titers in sera from cord and maternal blood were comparable with RPR titers and were highly correlated (rho = 0.82, P <0.001). Young age (P = 0.009) and lower birth weight (P = 0.029) were associated with gestational syphilis. Of the women with gestational syphilis, 76% had received proper treatment. Mothers of all newborns with congenital syphilis also received appropriate treatment. Treatment of their sexual partners was not documented.
    CONCLUSIONS: Syphilis during pregnancy remains a major cause of the fetal loss and devastating effects of congenital syphilis in newborns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    吞噬体,平顶虫和犬埃里希菌,负责狗的疾病,是tick传播的病原体,具有已证明或潜在的人畜共患作用,在全球范围内已显示出越来越多的患病率。这项回顾性研究的目的是评估无性体的频率。和埃里希亚。在意大利一家兽医教学医院测试了9年的狗的暴露,为了比较所使用的诊断测试的性能,为了评估与临床数据的相关性,并对鉴定的细菌进行基因分析。在学习期间,通过至少一种快速免疫酶促试验测试了1322只狗,包括间接免疫荧光抗体检测或终点PCR检测。测试狗是否有临床体征或临床病理改变或与感染有关的危险因素,如果它们是潜在的献血者动物。1322只(7.1%)的狗中有94只对至少一种病原体进行了阳性测试:吞噬细胞菌为53只(4.3%),A.platys为一个(0.1%),E.canis为63(4.6%)。多年来,测试的狗数量增加,阳性率逐渐下降。测试的比较表明,血清学测试之间的一致性接近完美,而PCR和间接测定之间的一致性较差。已经强调了狩猎品种狗的吞噬细胞感染和混合品种狗的E.canis感染的品种易感性。系统发育证实了吞噬细胞的潜在人畜共患病意义,并且已鉴定的细菌与地理起源没有相关性。我们的研究为狗可能的危险因素提供了新的见解,并证明了不同测试之间的不一致结果,这表明血清学和分子检测相结合是正确诊断的首选方法。
    Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis, responsible of diseases in dogs, are tick-borne pathogens with a proven or potential zoonotic role that have shown increasing prevalence worldwide. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess the frequency of Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. exposure in dogs tested in a veterinary teaching hospital in Italy over a 9-year period, to compare the performance of the diagnostic tests used, to evaluate correlations with clinical data, and to genetically analyse the identified bacteria. During the study period, 1322 dogs tested by at least one of the rapid immunoenzymatic test, indirect immunofluorescent antibody test or end-point PCR assay for Anaplasmataceae detection were included. Dogs were tested if they had clinical signs or clinicopathological alteration or risk factors related to infection, and if they were potential blood-donor animals. Ninety-four of 1322 (7.1%) dogs tested positive for at least one pathogen: 53 (4.3%) for A. phagocytophilum, one (0.1%) for A. platys and 63 (4.6%) for E. canis. The number of dogs tested increased and the positivity rate progressively declined over the years. Comparison of tests showed a near-perfect agreement between serological tests and a poor agreement between PCR and indirect assays. A breed predisposition has been highlighted for A. phagocytophilum infection in hunting breed dogs and for E. canis infection in mixed breed dogs. Phylogeny confirmed potential zoonotic implications for A. phagocytophilum and showed no correlation of the identified bacteria with the geographical origin. Our study provides new insights into possible risk factors in dogs and evidenced discordant results between different tests, suggesting that a combination of serological and molecular assays is preferable for a correct diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新的冠状病毒病,COVID-19提出了复杂的挑战,这些挑战由几个因素加剧,其中呼吸道组织病变明显。因此,迫切需要鉴定可以指示疾病严重程度的信息生物学标记。一些研究强调了蛋白质的参与,如APOA1,XPNPEP2,ORP150,CUBN,HCII,和CREB3L3在这些呼吸道组织病变中。然而,缺乏有关人体中这些蛋白质抗体的信息,这可能是COVID-19的有价值的诊断标志物。同时,选择无需侵入性程序即可获得的生物流体是相关的。尿液就是这样一种液体,但是由于缺乏对其成分的研究,其对临床实验室分析的影响尚未完全了解。
    本研究使用的方法如下:血清总蛋白分析;中重度COVID-19患者血清和尿液的ELISA;生物信息学方法:ROC分析,PCA,SVM。
    抗APOA1,抗XPNPEP2,抗ORP150,抗CUBN的水平,AntiHCII,和抗CREB3L3在COVID-19患者的血清和尿液中表现出从中度到重度的逐渐波动。然而,个体抗蛋白抗体的诊断价值较低,在血清和尿液中。相反,主成分分析(PCA)和支持向量机(SVM)的结果表明,在患者血清中联合检测这些抗体可显著提高诊断价值.非线性回归模型的精度为0.833。此外,PCA有助于鉴定对患者群体歧视影响最大的血清蛋白标志物。该研究表明,血清是描述蛋白质定量的优良分析物,由于其一致的组成和缺乏有机盐和药物残留,否则会影响蛋白质的稳定性。
    UNASSIGNED: The new coronavirus disease, COVID-19, poses complex challenges exacerbated by several factors, with respiratory tissue lesions being notably significant among them. Consequently, there is a pressing need to identify informative biological markers that can indicate the severity of the disease. Several studies have highlighted the involvement of proteins such as APOA1, XPNPEP2, ORP150, CUBN, HCII, and CREB3L3 in these respiratory tissue lesions. However, there is a lack of information regarding antibodies to these proteins in the human body, which could potentially serve as valuable diagnostic markers for COVID-19. Simultaneously, it is relevant to select biological fluids that can be obtained without invasive procedures. Urine is one such fluid, but its effect on clinical laboratory analysis is not yet fully understood due to lack of study on its composition.
    UNASSIGNED: Methods used in this study are as follows: total serum protein analysis; ELISA on moderate and severe COVID-19 patients\' serum and urine; bioinformatic methods: ROC analysis, PCA, SVM.
    UNASSIGNED: The levels of antiAPOA1, antiXPNPEP2, antiORP150, antiCUBN, antiHCII, and antiCREB3L3 exhibit gradual fluctuations ranging from moderate to severe in both the serum and urine of COVID-19 patients. However, the diagnostic value of individual anti-protein antibodies is low, in both blood serum and urine. On the contrary, joint detection of these antibodies in patients\' serum significantly increases the diagnostic value as demonstrated by the results of principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machine (SVM). The non-linear regression model achieved an accuracy of 0.833. Furthermore, PCA aided in identifying serum protein markers that have the greatest impact on patient group discrimination. The study revealed that serum serves as a superior analyte for describing protein quantification due to its consistent composition and lack of organic salts and drug residues, which can otherwise affect protein stability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近在美洲爆发的与Mayaro病毒(MAYV)感染有关的疫情使这种被忽视的病毒成为全球公共卫生的潜在威胁。考虑到与MAYV感染相关的症状范围,根据临床症状来诊断个体可能是具有挑战性的,特别是在其他蚊子传播病毒同时传播的国家,如登革热病毒(DENV)和基孔肯雅病毒(CHIKV)。考虑到这个挑战,基于实验室的诊断在采取有助于防止病毒传播和充分治疗患者的措施方面发挥着关键作用.在这次审查中,我们概述了感染患者的临床特征以及目前可用的用于MAYV诊断的实验室工具,讨论他们的进步,优势,以及在该领域应用的限制。此外,我们探索了新型的定点照护(PoC)诊断平台,该平台可为实验室基础设施有限的地区提供非集中式诊断。
    The recent outbreaks related to Mayaro virus (MAYV) infection in the Americas have brought this neglected virus as a potential threat to global public health. Given the range of symptoms that can be associated with MAYV infection, it can be challenging to diagnose individuals based on clinical signs, especially in countries with simultaneous circulation of other mosquito-borne viruses, such as dengue virus (DENV) and chikungunya virus (CHIKV). With this challenge in mind, laboratory-based diagnosis assumes a critical role in the introduction of measures to help prevent virus dissemination and to adequately treat patients. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical features reported in infected patients and currently available laboratory tools that are used for MAYV diagnosis, discussing their advances, advantages, and limitations to apply in the field. Moreover, we explore novel point-of-care (PoC) diagnostic platforms that can provide de-centralised diagnostics for use in areas with limited laboratory infrastructure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)是一种新型人类冠状病毒,于2019年被发现。SARS-CoV-2感染导致急性,严重的呼吸道疾病,称为2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。SARS-CoV-2的出现和迅速蔓延导致了全球公共卫生危机,继续影响着全球人口。实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)是COVID-19诊断的参考标准测试。血清学测试是用于血清监测计划和建立预防疾病的相关性的有价值的工具。这项研究评估了一种内部酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的性能,利用融合前稳定的SARS-CoV-2尖峰(S)的胞外域,两种市售化学发光测定法OrthoVITROS免疫诊断产品抗SARS-CoV-2总试剂包和雅培SARS-CoV-2IgG测定法以及一种市售替代病毒中和试验(sVNT),GenScriptUSAInc.,cPassSARS-CoV-2中和抗体检测试剂盒,用于检测SARS-CoV-2特异性抗体。使用一组rRT-PCR确认的COVID-19患者血清和阴性对照组作为参考标准,所有三种免疫测定均显示出较高的可比阳性率和较低的不一致率.所有三种免疫测定均高度敏感,估计灵敏度为95.4-96.6%。ROC曲线分析表明,所有三种免疫测定均具有高诊断准确性,曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.9698至0.9807的范围内。在常规的微中和测试(MNT)滴度和sVNT抑制百分比值之间证明了高度正相关。我们的研究表明,独立评估对于优化整体效用和血清学测试结果的解释是必要的。总的来说,我们证明本研究中评估的所有血清学测试均适用于SARS-CoV-2抗体的检测。
    Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel human coronavirus that was identified in 2019. SARS-CoV-2 infection results in an acute, severe respiratory disease called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The emergence and rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global public health crisis, which continues to affect populations across the globe. Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) is the reference standard test for COVID-19 diagnosis. Serological tests are valuable tools for serosurveillance programs and establishing correlates of protection from disease. This study evaluated the performance of one in-house enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) utilizing the pre-fusion stabilized ectodomain of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S), two commercially available chemiluminescence assays Ortho VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total Reagent Pack and Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and one commercially available Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT), GenScript USA Inc., cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies. Using a panel of rRT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients\' sera and a negative control group as a reference standard, all three immunoassays demonstrated high comparable positivity rates and low discordant rates. All three immunoassays were highly sensitive with estimated sensitivities ranging from 95.4-96.6 %. ROC curve analysis indicated that all three immunoassays had high diagnostic accuracies with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.9698 to 0.9807. High positive correlation was demonstrated among the conventional microneutralization test (MNT) titers and the sVNT inhibition percent values. Our study indicates that independent evaluations are necessary to optimize the overall utility and the interpretation of the results of serological tests. Overall, we demonstrate that all serological tests evaluated in this study are suitable for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:由于缺乏黄金标准,评估SARS-CoV-2血清学检测的准确性具有挑战性。这项研究旨在使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型(BLCM)评估SARS-CoV-2特异性血清学测试的准确性,并比较有无金标准的方法。
    方法:在本研究中,我们分析了356个样本-254个阳性,即,从先前诊断为SARS-CoV-2感染的个体中,和102个底片,即,大流行前样本-使用六种不同的快速血清学检测和一种实验室检测。使用BLCM同时评估SARS-CoV-2特异性IgM和IgG抗体的所有血清学测试的敏感性和特异性。使用非信息先验。考虑三种方法进行了敏感性分析:1)RT-PCR作为金标准,2)以RT-PCR为不完善金标准的BLCM,3)频率潜类模型(LCM)。所有分析均使用软件R4.3.0版,并且使用软件JAGS使用包装runjags拟合BLCM。
    结果:BLCM对IgM的敏感性从10.7%[95%可信区间(95%CrI):1.9-24.6]到96.9%(95%CrI:91.0-100.0),特异性范围从48.3%(95%CrI:39.0-57.6)到98.9%(95%CrI:96.2-100.0)。IgG的敏感性在76.9%(95%CrI:68.2-84.7)和99.1%(95%CrI:96.1-100.0)之间变化,特异性范围从49.9%(95%CrI:19.4-95.8)到99.3%(95%CrI:97.2-100.0)。LCM结果与BLCM相当。认为RT-PCR作为黄金标准低估了检测的灵敏度,特别是IgM。
    结论:BLCM得出的结果与使用金标准的结果不同,低估了测试的特点,特别是敏感性。尽管贝叶斯和频率论LCM方法产生了可比的结果,BLCM具有即使在样本功率有限的情况下也能够进行可信度区间计算的优点。
    OBJECTIVE: Assessing the accuracy of serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 was challenging due to the lack of a gold standard. This study aimed to estimate the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2-specific serological tests using Bayesian latent class models (BLCM) and compare methods with and without a gold standard.
    METHODS: In this study, we analyzed 356 samples-254 positives, ie, from individuals with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis, and 102 negatives, ie, prepandemic samples-using six different rapid serological tests and one laboratory assay. A BLCM was employed to concurrently estimate the sensitivity and specificity of all serological tests for the immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG antibodies specific for SARS-CoV-2. Noninformative priors were used. A sensitivity analysis was conducted considering three methods: 1) reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test (RT-PCR) as the gold standard, 2) BLCM with RT-PCR as an imperfect gold standard, and 3) frequentist latent class model (LCM). All analyses used software R version 4.3.0, and BLCM were fitted using package runjags using the software JAGS (Just Another Gibbs Sampler).
    RESULTS: The BLCM-derived sensitivity for IgM varied from 10.7% [95% credibility interval (CrI):1.9-24.6] to 96.9% (95% CrI: 91.0-100.0), with specificities ranging from 48.3% (95% CrI: 39.0-57.6) to 98.9% (95% CrI: 96.2-100.0). Sensitivity for IgG varied between 76.9% (95% CrI: 68.2-84.7) and 99.1% (95% CrI: 96.1-100.0), and specificity ranged from 49.9% (95% CrI: 19.4-95.8) to 99.3% (95% CrI: 97.2-100.0). LCM results were comparable to BLCM. Considering the RT-PCR as a gold standard underestimated the tests\' sensitivity, particularly for IgM.
    CONCLUSIONS: BLCM-derived results deviated from those using a gold standard, which underestimated the tests\' characteristics, particularly sensitivity. Although Bayesian and frequentist LCM approaches yielded comparable results, BLCM had the benefit of enabling credibility interval computation even when sample power is limited.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们的研究旨在分析疾病严重程度不同的COVID-19患者的病毒特异性体液免疫反应。
    方法:87例患者共109份血清样本,使用检测不同类型免疫球蛋白的抗SARS-CoV-2免疫测定法研究了COVID-19的症状.
    结果:临床样本分为两组-在症状发作(PoS)后2周及以上收集。在第一组中,IgA类病毒特异性抗体阳性样本百分比最高(78.1%),其次是IgM(71.9%/59.4%)和IgG(56.3%/53.1%)。在第二组中,病毒特异性IgA类抗体阳性的样本也最多(97.7%),IgG阳性的样本也最多。总共72个IgA和/或IgM和/或IgG阳性样品进一步测试了SARS-CoV-2中和抗体(NAb)-在2周PoS之前和之后获得的样品的89.1%和100%,分别为阳性。血清学检测结果也根据疾病的严重程度进行了分析-轻度形式的COVID-19的SARS-CoV-2阳性样本少于中度和重度形式,但这种差异没有统计学意义。
    结论:SARS-CoV-2特异性抗体和这些抗体的高病毒中和能力出现早期PoS;IgA类免疫球蛋白对SARS-CoV-2感染的检测具有最重要的诊断价值;检测时机是阳性率的最重要因素。
    Our study aimed to analyze virus-specific humoral immune responses in COVID-19 patients with varying disease severity.
    A total of 109 serum samples from 87 patients, symptomatic for COVID-19 were studied using anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays detecting different classes of immunoglobulins.
    Clinical samples were divided into 2 groups - collected up to and more than 2 weeks post-onset of symptoms (PoS). In the first group, the highest percentage of positive samples was found for IgA class virus-specific antibodies (78.1%), followed by IgM (71.9%/59.4%) and IgG (56.3%/53.1%). In the second group, samples positive for virus-specific IgA class antibodies were also the most (97.7%) along with those positive for IgG. A total of 72 IgA and/or IgM and/or IgG positive samples were further tested for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) - 89.1% and 100% of samples obtained up to and after 2 weeks PoS, respectively were positive. Serological test results were also analyzed depending on the severity of the disease - SARS-CoV-2 positive samples in mild forms of COVID-19 were fewer than in moderate and severe forms but this difference was not statistically significant.
    SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies and a high virus neutralization capacity of these antibodies appear early PoS; Immunoglobulins of IgA class are of most significant diagnostic value for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection; Timing of testing is the most important factor for positivity rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行强调了对快速和具有成本效益的诊断工具的需求。血清学试验,特别是那些测量靶向病毒受体结合域(RBD)的抗体,在追踪感染动态和疫苗有效性方面发挥着关键作用。在这项研究中,我们旨在开发一种简单的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),用于测量RBD特异性抗体,比较两个基于工厂的诊断试剂生产平台。我们选择将RBD保留在内质网(ER)中以防止与植物特异性聚糖相关的潜在免疫反应性问题。我们在两个植物系统中产生了ER保留的RBD:BY-2植物细胞培养物的稳定转化(BY2-RBD)和使用MagnICON系统(NB-RBD)在本氏烟草中的瞬时转化。两种系统都证明了它们的适用性,产量和生产时间表各不相同。植物制造的蛋白质揭示了N-聚糖谱的意外差异,BY2-RBD显示寡甘露糖苷N-聚糖,NB-RBD显示更复杂的聚糖谱。这种差异可能归因于N.benthamiana系统中更高的重组蛋白合成,可能使ER保持信号过载,导致一些蛋白质流入高尔基体.当用作ELISA的诊断试剂时,BY2-RBD在灵敏度方面优于NB-RBD,特异性,以及与商业套件的相关性。这种差异可能是由于不同的聚糖谱,因为NB-RBD上的复合聚糖可能影响免疫反应性。总之,我们的研究强调了基于工厂的系统在紧急情况下快速诊断试剂生产的潜力。然而,瞬时表达系统,在提供更短的时间表的同时,在重组蛋白形式中引入更高的异质性,在血清学测试开发中需要仔细考虑。
    The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the need for rapid and cost-effective diagnostic tools. Serological tests, particularly those measuring antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the virus, play a pivotal role in tracking infection dynamics and vaccine effectiveness. In this study, we aimed to develop a simple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measuring RBD-specific antibodies, comparing two plant-based platforms for diagnostic reagent production. We chose to retain RBD in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to prevent potential immunoreactivity issues associated with plant-specific glycans. We produced ER-retained RBD in two plant systems: a stable transformation of BY-2 plant cell culture (BY2-RBD) and a transient transformation in Nicotiana benthamiana using the MagnICON system (NB-RBD). Both systems demonstrated their suitability, with varying yields and production timelines. The plant-made proteins revealed unexpected differences in N-glycan profiles, with BY2-RBD displaying oligo-mannosidic N-glycans and NB-RBD exhibiting a more complex glycan profile. This difference may be attributed to higher recombinant protein synthesis in the N. benthamiana system, potentially overloading the ER retention signal, causing some proteins to traffic to the Golgi apparatus. When used as diagnostic reagents in ELISA, BY2-RBD outperformed NB-RBD in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and correlation with a commercial kit. This discrepancy may be due to the distinct glycan profiles, as complex glycans on NB-RBD may impact immunoreactivity. In conclusion, our study highlights the potential of plant-based systems for rapid diagnostic reagent production during emergencies. However, transient expression systems, while offering shorter timelines, introduce higher heterogeneity in recombinant protein forms, necessitating careful consideration in serological test development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    牛布鲁氏菌病,主要由流产布鲁氏菌引起,严重影响动物健康和人类福祉。准确的诊断对于设计知情的控制和预防措施至关重要。缺乏黄金标准测试使得确定最佳截止值和评估测试的诊断性能具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种新颖的贝叶斯潜类模型,该模型集成了二进制和连续测试结果,结合额外的固定(平价)和随机(农场)效应,通过最大化Youden指数来校准最佳临界值。我们检测了河南省两个地区6个奶牛场的651份血清样本,中国有四项血清学试验:玫瑰红试验,血清凝集试验,荧光偏振测定,和竞争性酶联免疫吸附测定。我们的分析表明,FPA和C-ELISA的最佳临界值为94.2mP和0.403PI,分别。四项测试的敏感度估计为69.7%至89.9%,而特异性估计值在97.1%和99.6%之间变化。河南省两个研究区域的真实患病率分别为4.7%和30.3%。与初产母牛相比,不同胎次组的阳性血清学状态的亲缘比在1.2至2.2之间。这种方法提供了一个强大的框架,用于在没有黄金标准测试的情况下验证连续和离散测试的诊断测试。我们的研究结果可以提高我们设计有针对性的疾病检测策略和实施有效控制中国奶牛场布鲁氏菌病的能力。
    Bovine brucellosis, primarily caused by Brucella abortus, severely affects both animal health and human well-being. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for designing informed control and prevention measures. Lacking a gold standard test makes it challenging to determine optimal cut-off values and evaluate the diagnostic performance of tests. In this study, we developed a novel Bayesian Latent Class Model that integrates both binary and continuous testing outcomes, incorporating additional fixed (parity) and random (farm) effects, to calibrate optimal cut-off values by maximizing Youden Index. We tested 651 serum samples collected from six dairy farms in two regions of Henan Province, China with four serological tests: Rose Bengal Test, Serum Agglutination Test, Fluorescence Polarization Assay, and Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Our analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off values for FPA and C-ELISA were 94.2 mP and 0.403 PI, respectively. Sensitivity estimates for the four tests ranged from 69.7% to 89.9%, while specificity estimates varied between 97.1% and 99.6%. The true prevalences in the two study regions in Henan province were 4.7% and 30.3%. Parity-specific odds ratios for positive serological status ranged from 1.2 to 2.2 for different parity groups compared to primiparous cows. This approach provides a robust framework for validating diagnostic tests for both continuous and discrete tests in the absence of a gold standard test. Our findings can enhance our ability to design targeted disease detection strategies and implement effective control measures for brucellosis in Chinese dairy farms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号