Serological markers

血清学标记
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脊髓损伤(SCI)是一种罕见的疾病,具有异质性表现,使复苏的预测具有挑战性。然而,血清学标志物已被证明与SCI后的严重程度和长期恢复相关.因此,我们的调查旨在评估使用常规血清学标志物将这种关联转化为SCI患者慢性期(初次损伤后52周)下肢运动评分(LEMS)预测的可行性.血清学标记,在Murnau创伤医院的观察性队列研究中,在受伤后的最初7天内进行了评估,接受了多种特征工程方法.这些涉及算术测量,如平均值,中位数,minimum,最大值,和范围,以及对标记物测试频率和值是否在正常范围内的考虑。为了预测慢性阶段的LEMS评分,八种不同的回归模型(包括线性,基于树,和集成模型)用于量化血清学标志物相对于仅依赖于非常急性LEMS评分和患者年龄的基线模型的预测值。包含血清学标记物并不能改善预测模型的性能。表现最好的方法,包括血清学标记,平均绝对误差(MAE)为6.59(2.14),这相当于基准模型的性能。作为一种替代方法,我们根据损伤后非常急性期观察到的LEMS分别训练了模型.具体来说,我们分别考虑LEMS为0或LEMS超过0的个体.这一策略导致了所有队列和模型的MAE平均改善,1.20(2.13)。我们的结论是,在我们的研究中,常规血清学标志物对LEMS的预测能力有限。然而,通过非常急性的LEMS实施模型分层显着增强了预测性能。这一观察结果支持将临床知识纳入SCI恢复的预测任务建模中。此外,它为未来研究在调查潜在生物标志物的预测能力时考虑分层分析奠定了基础.
    Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare condition with a heterogeneous presentation, making the prediction of recovery challenging. However, serological markers have been shown to be associated with severity and long-term recovery following SCI. Therefore, our investigation aimed to assess the feasibility of translating this association into a prediction of the lower extremity motor scores (LEMS) at chronic stage (52 weeks after initial injury) in patients with SCI using routine serological markers. Serological markers, assessed within the initial seven days post-injury in the observational cohort study from the Trauma Hospital Murnau underwent diverse feature engineering approaches. These involved arithmetic measurements such as mean, median, minimum, maximum, and range, as well as considerations of the frequency of marker testing and whether values fell within the normal range. To predict LEMS scores at the chronic stage, eight different regression models (including linear, tree-based, and ensemble models) were used to quantify the predictive value of serological markers relative to a baseline model that relied on the very acute LEMS score and patient age alone. The inclusion of serological markers did not improve the performance of the prediction model. The best-performing approach including serological markers achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.59 (2.14), which was equivalent to the performance of the baseline model. As an alternative approach, we trained separate models based on the LEMS observed at the very acute stage after injury. Specifically, we considered individuals with an LEMS of 0 or an LEMS exceeding zero separately. This strategy led to a mean improvement in MAE across all cohorts and models, of 1.20 (2.13). We conclude that, in our study, routine serological markers hold limited power for prediction of LEMS. However, the implementation of model stratification by the very acute LEMS markedly enhanced prediction performance. This observation supports the inclusion of clinical knowledge in the modeling of prediction tasks for SCI recovery. Additionally, it lays the path for future research to consider stratified analyses when investigating the predictive power of potential biomarkers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:子宫内膜癌与血细胞计数的变化和高水平的炎症标志物有关。因此反映了肿瘤对各种生物过程的影响,并表明它们作为子宫内膜癌诊断的生物标志物的潜力,预后,和治疗反应。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,血小板与淋巴细胞比率,据报道,患者术前外周血中的单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值与不同类型恶性肿瘤的预后独立相关.目的:本研究旨在比较几种血液标志物——红细胞,白细胞,血小板参数,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,血小板与淋巴细胞比率,单核细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,C反应蛋白,和纤维蛋白原-良性或恶性子宫内膜肿瘤患者。材料和方法:我们的回顾性研究包括670例患者(192例诊断为子宫内膜癌和478例子宫内膜增生)。我们将上述血清学参数与手术前一天的样本进行了比较。结果:全血细胞计数指标分析显示,子宫内膜癌组和子宫内膜增生组之间的红细胞或总白细胞参数没有显着差异。然而,在白细胞差异中出现了一种独特的模式。与子宫内膜增生组相比,子宫内膜癌组淋巴细胞计数有统计学意义的下降。相比之下,子宫内膜癌组的平均血小板计数和平均血小板体积均明显高于对照组.此外,子宫内膜癌组表现出明显的炎症反应,C反应蛋白水平显著升高,纤维蛋白原,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,血小板与淋巴细胞比率,与子宫内膜增生组相比,单核细胞与淋巴细胞的比率。结论:目前的研究揭示了两组之间多种血清学生物标志物的统计学差异。这些发现支持关于这些生物标志物在子宫内膜癌诊断中的潜在效用的最初假设。预后,和治疗反应,强调在任何卫生系统下都可以负担得起的生物标志物的存在,无论国家的发展水平如何。
    Background: Endometrial cancer is associated with changes in blood cell counts and with high levels of inflammatory markers, thus reflecting the tumor\'s impact on various biological processes and suggesting their potential as biomarkers for endometrial cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood sampled preoperatively from patients have been reported to be independently associated with the prognosis of different types of malignancies. Objectives: This study aimed to compare several blood markers-red blood cells, white blood cells, platelet parameters, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen-in patients with benign or malignant endometrial tumors. Material and methods: Our retrospective study included 670 patients (192 diagnosed with endometrial cancer and 478 with endometrial hyperplasia), and we compared the serological parameters discussed above with those sampled the day before surgery. Results: Analysis of complete blood count indices revealed no significant differences in red blood cell or total white blood cell parameters between the endometrial cancer group and the endometrial hyperplasia group. However, a distinct pattern emerged in the white blood cell differential. The endometrial cancer group showed a statistically significant decrease in lymphocyte count compared with the endometrial hyperplasia group. In contrast, the endometrial cancer group showed significantly higher mean platelet counts and increased mean platelet volume compared with controls. Furthermore, the endometrial cancer group demonstrated a marked inflammatory response, as evidenced by significantly elevated levels of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio compared with the endometrial hyperplasia group. Conclusions: The current research revealed statistically significant differences in multiple serological biomarkers between the two groups. These findings support the initial hypothesis regarding the potential utility of these biomarkers in endometrial cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response, highlighting the existence of biomarkers affordable for analysis under any health system, regardless of the country\'s level of development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:2型糖尿病(T2DM)的持续时间和血糖水平对T2DM并发症的发展有重大影响。然而,目前已知的危险因素不能很好地预测糖尿病性视网膜病变(DR)的发病或进展.因此,我们的目的是研究2型糖尿病患者血脂成分的差异,没有和有DR,并寻找与DR发展相关的潜在血清学指标。
    方法:选择在西安交通大学第一附属医院内分泌科住院的622例T2DM患者作为发现集。根据DR的传统危险因素进行一对一的病例对照匹配(即年龄,糖尿病的持续时间,HbA1c水平,和高血压)。排除所有合并慢性肾脏病的病例,以消除混杂因素。共有42对成功配对。T2DM合并DR患者(DR组)为病例组,无DR的T2DM患者(NDR组)作为对照组。超高效液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS/MS)用于血清脂质组学分析,建立了偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)模型,根据投影中变量重要性(VIP)>1筛选差异脂质分子。选择另外531名T2DM患者作为验证组。接下来,对DR的传统危险因素进行1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM),NDR和DR组的95对配对成功.通过基于质谱的多反应监测(MRM)定量来验证筛选的差异脂质分子。
    结果:发现集显示与DR发展相关的传统风险因素没有差异(即,年龄,疾病持续时间,HbA1c,血压,和肾小球滤过率)。在DR组与NDR组相比,三种神经酰胺(Cer)和七种鞘磷脂(SM)的水平显着降低,和一种磷脂酰胆碱(PC),两种溶血磷脂酰胆碱(LPC),和两个SM显著较高。此外,对验证样品组中这15种差异脂质分子的评估显示,DR组中有3种Cer和SM(d18:1/24:1)分子显著较低.排除其他混杂因素后(例如,性别,BMI,降脂药物治疗,和脂质水平),多因素Logistic回归分析显示,两种神经酰胺的丰度较低,即,Cer(d18:0/22:0)和Cer(d18:0/24:0),是T2DM患者发生DR的独立危险因素。
    结论:脂质代谢紊乱与T2DM患者DR的发生密切相关。尤其是神经酰胺。我们的研究首次揭示Cer(d18:0/22:0)和Cer(d18:0/24:0)可能是诊断T2DM患者DR发生的潜在血清学标志物。为DR的早期诊断提供新思路。
    OBJECTIVE: The duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and blood glucose levels have a significant impact on the development of T2DM complications. However, currently known risk factors are not good predictors of the onset or progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the differences in the serum lipid composition in patients with T2DM, without and with DR, and search for potential serological indicators associated with the development of DR.
    METHODS: A total of 622 patients with T2DM hospitalized in the Department of Endocrinology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi\'an JiaoTong University were selected as the discovery set. One-to-one case-control matching was performed according to the traditional risk factors for DR (i.e., age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c level, and hypertension). All cases with comorbid chronic kidney disease were excluded to eliminate confounding factors. A total of 42 pairs were successfully matched. T2DM patients with DR (DR group) were the case group, and T2DM patients without DR (NDR group) served as control subjects. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for untargeted lipidomics analysis on serum, and a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model was established to screen differential lipid molecules based on variable importance in the projection (VIP) > 1. An additional 531 T2DM patients were selected as the validation set. Next, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for the traditional risk factors for DR, and a combined 95 pairings in the NDR and DR groups were successfully matched. The screened differential lipid molecules were validated by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) quantification based on mass spectrometry.
    RESULTS: The discovery set showed no differences in traditional risk factors associated with the development of DR (i.e., age, disease duration, HbA1c, blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate). In the DR group compared with the NDR group, the levels of three ceramides (Cer) and seven sphingomyelins (SM) were significantly lower, and one phosphatidylcholine (PC), two lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC), and two SMs were significantly higher. Furthermore, evaluation of these 15 differential lipid molecules in the validation sample set showed that three Cer and SM(d18:1/24:1) molecules were substantially lower in the DR group. After excluding other confounding factors (e.g., sex, BMI, lipid-lowering drug therapy, and lipid levels), multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that a lower abundance of two ceramides, i.e., Cer(d18:0/22:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:0), was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of DR in T2DM patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Disturbances in lipid metabolism are closely associated with the occurrence of DR in patients with T2DM, especially in ceramides. Our study revealed for the first time that Cer(d18:0/22:0) and Cer(d18:0/24:0) might be potential serological markers for the diagnosis of DR occurrence in T2DM patients, providing new ideas for the early diagnosis of DR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的:探讨术前白蛋白与碱性磷酸酶比值(AAPR)在阴茎癌(PC)腹股沟淋巴结清扫(ILND)患者中预测病理淋巴结阳性(pN)疾病的作用。材料与方法:收集2016年至2021年在单个高容量机构接受的鳞状细胞癌(SCC)PCILND患者的临床资料,并进行回顾性分析。AAPR是从他们计划的手术后30天内进行的术前血液分析中获得的。ROC曲线分析用于评估AAPR截止值,除了Youden指数。Logistic回归分析用于比值比(OR),95%置信区间(CI)计算,和pN+疾病的估计。P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。结果:总体而言,42名PC患者被纳入研究,平均年龄63.6±12.9岁。AAPR截止点值确定为0.53。ROC曲线分析报告AUC为0.698。在多变量logistic回归分析中,淋巴血管侵犯(OR=5.38;95%CI:1.47-9.93,p=0.022),临床淋巴结阳性疾病(OR=13.68;95%CI:4.37-43.90,p<0.009),白蛋白与碱性磷酸酶比值≤0.53(OR=3.61;95%CI:1.23-12.71,p=0.032)是pN+受累的预测因子.结论:术前AAPR可能是接受PC手术的患者pN疾病的潜在有价值的预后指标。
    Background and Objectives: To investigate the role of preoperative albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) in predicting pathologic node-positive (pN+) disease in penile cancer (PC) patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). Materials and Methods: Clinical data of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) PC + ILND at a single high-volume institution between 2016 and 2021 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. An AAPR was obtained from preoperative blood analyses performed within 30 days from their scheduled surgery. A ROC curve analysis was used to assess AAPR cutoff, in addition to the Youden Index. Logistic regression analysis was utilized for an odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) calculations, and an estimate of pN+ disease. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be as statistically significant. Results: Overall, 42 PC patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 63.6 ± 12.9 years. The AAPR cut-off point value was determined to be 0.53. The ROC curve analysis reported an AUC of 0.698. On multivariable logistic regression analysis lymphovascular invasion (OR = 5.38; 95% CI: 1.47-9.93, p = 0.022), clinical node-positive disease (OR = 13.68; 95% CI: 4.37-43.90, p < 0.009), and albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio ≤ 0.53 (OR = 3.61; 95% CI: 1.23-12.71, p = 0.032) were predictors of pN+ involvement. Conclusions: Preoperative AAPR may be a potentially valuable prognostic marker of pN+ disease in patients who underwent surgery for PC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is a chronic liver condition associated with metabolic abnormalities characterized by hepatic steatosis that can progress to metabolic-related steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, a liver biopsy is still the gold standard for diagnosis but due to its invasiveness and risk of complications, the development of serological diagnostic indicators to achieve non-invasive diagnosis has been a hot research topic in recent years. Herein, well-researched serological non-invasive diagnostic indicators present now for fatty livers are reviewed.
    代谢相关脂肪性肝病是以代谢异常相关的肝脂肪变性为特征的慢性肝病,可进展至代谢相关脂肪性肝炎、肝纤维化和肝硬化,甚至肝细胞癌。目前,肝活组织检查仍是诊断的金标准,但由于肝活组织检查的有创性和并发症风险,开发血清学诊断指标以实现无创性诊断是近年来研究的热点。现对目前研究较充分的脂肪肝无创性血清学诊断指标进行综述。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非产褥期乳腺炎(NPM)约占所有良性乳腺病变的4-5%。超声是筛查乳腺疾病的首选方法;然而,成像结果的相似性使得区分NPM和浸润性导管癌(IDC)具有挑战性.我们的目标是确定方便和客观的血液学标志物,以区分NPM和IDC。
    我们招募了89名NPM患者,88与IDC,86患有纤维腺瘤(FA),并比较了他们入院时的实验室数据。LASSO回归,单变量逻辑回归,和多变量逻辑回归用于筛选用于构建诊断模型的参数。接收机工作特性曲线,校正曲线,并构建决策曲线以评估该模型的准确性。
    我们发现NPM和IDC患者的常规实验室数据存在显着差异,这些指标是区分这两种疾病的候选生物标志物。此外,我们评估了以前研究中报道的一些经典血液学标志物区分NPM和IDC的能力,结果表明,这些指标并不是理想的生物标志物。此外,通过严格的LASSO和逻辑回归,我们选择了年龄,白细胞计数,和凝血酶时间来构建一个表现出高水平辨别力的鉴别诊断模型,训练集中曲线下面积为0.912,验证集中为0.851。此外,使用相同的选择方法,我们构建了NPM和FA的差分诊断模型,这也证明了良好的性能,在训练集中曲线下的面积为0.862,在验证集中为0.854。这两个模型的AUC都高于使用随机森林等机器学习方法构建的模型的AUC,决策树,和SVM在训练集和验证集中。
    入院时的某些实验室参数在NPM组和IDC组之间存在显着差异,构建的模型被指定为鉴别诊断标志物。我们的分析表明,它在区分NPM和IDC方面具有可接受的效率,可以用作辅助诊断工具。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-puerperal mastitis (NPM) accounts for approximately 4-5% of all benign breast lesions. Ultrasound is the preferred method for screening breast diseases; however, similarities in imaging results can make it challenging to distinguish NPM from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Our objective was to identify convenient and objective hematological markers to distinguish NPM from IDC.
    UNASSIGNED: We recruited 89 patients with NPM, 88 with IDC, and 86 with fibroadenoma (FA), and compared their laboratory data at the time of admission. LASSO regression, univariate logistic regression, and multivariate logistic regression were used to screen the parameters for construction of diagnostic models. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were constructed to evaluate the accuracy of this model.
    UNASSIGNED: We found significant differences in routine laboratory data between patients with NPM and IDC, and these indicators were candidate biomarkers for distinguishing between the two diseases. Additionally, we evaluated the ability of some classic hematological markers reported in previous studies to differentiate between NPM and IDC, and the results showed that these indicators are not ideal biomarkers. Furthermore, through rigorous LASSO and logistic regression, we selected age, white blood cell count, and thrombin time to construct a differential diagnostic model that exhibited a high level of discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.912 in the training set and with 0.851 in the validation set. Furthermore, using the same selection method, we constructed a differential diagnostic model for NPM and FA, which also demonstrated good performance with an area under the curve of 0.862 in the training set and with 0.854 in the validation set. Both of these two models achieved AUCs higher than the AUCs of models built using machine learning methods such as random forest, decision tree, and SVM in both the training and validation sets.
    UNASSIGNED: Certain laboratory parameters on admission differed significantly between the NPM and IDC groups, and the constructed model was designated as a differential diagnostic marker. Our analysis showed that it has acceptable efficiency in distinguishing NPM from IDC and may be employed as an auxiliary diagnostic tool.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common gastrointestinal tract disease and can be divided into two major groups: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn\'s disease (CD). These two entities can be diagnosed from a combination of invasive and non-invasive tests as well as a thorough history and physical examination. However, invasive tests are preferred for a definitive diagnosis since the two entities have characteristic features of colonoscopy and biopsy. In this review, the following will be discussed: how non-invasive tests could help detect the presence of IBD, how markers help monitor disease progression, and how the disease responds to treatment. Some of the common markers that are discussed in detail include perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmatic antibodies (p-ANCA), anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), calprotectin, lactoferrin, lipocalin-2 (LCN2), and several other novel markers that are based on bacterial antigens. The best non-invasive tests available for detecting the presence of IBD are serological and fecal markers. Detecting these markers has helped doctors significantly by bringing to their attention the possibility of the presence of IBD. The serological testing can also help distinguish the two forms of IBD since a different combination of markers is elevated in UC and CD. In addition, the symptoms of IBD are non-specific and usually overlap with other gastrointestinal tract disorders, so by finding these serological markers, doctors can proceed with further invasive testing that would give them a definitive diagnosis. That way, invasive testing, such as colonoscopy with biopsy, can be avoided in patients with no suspicion of IBD. The common markers used in the clinical setting to point out the presence of IBD are discussed in detail in this review. Recently, more specific markers derived from bacterial antigens are also used, and their role is discussed, too.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Congress
    在医疗保健系统薄弱的发展中国家,HBV和HCV感染是一个重要的公共卫生问题。贫困率高,文盲,低HBV免疫覆盖率,和低公共卫生教育。一项研究评估HBV抗原的血清流行病学,抗HCV标志物,在肝炎日期间,Dambam地方政府的559名参与者的生化和血液学指标。采用结构化问卷评估人口统计信息和危险因素。快速乳胶免疫染色试剂盒用于HBV,HCV,和HBV组合血清学标志物,每批分析中包括阳性和阴性对照。对数据进行描述性统计分析。
    559名研究参与者,平均年龄为35.5+10.9岁,年龄群体中的大多数,18-39年279(49.04%),女性占291(52.1%),男性占268(47.9),教育背景,第三产业244(43.6%),已婚,356人(68.7%),学生254人(45.4%)。HBsAg的血清阳性率为10.7%,血清学标记如下,HbsAb1.7%,HbeAg13.3%,HbeAb60.0%HbcAb95.0%和抗HCV3.4%。HBV(13.4%vs8.2%)和HCV(3.0%vs3.8%)的性别分类(MvsF)。在HBV和HCV与年龄组的血清阳性率中观察到显着关联,性别,婚姻状况和职业(<0.05)。HBV和HCV的危险因素差异无统计学意义。生化和卫生学指标显示血清阳性和阴性研究参与者之间存在显着差异(<0.05)。
    研究结果肯定了包奇州HBV感染的地方性和HCV感染的增加趋势,造成严重的公共卫生问题。HBV血清学标志物表明HBV免疫覆盖率低,参与者在社区中暴露于病毒病因。加强免疫覆盖率和基于人群的监测是预防和控制包奇州病毒性肝炎的战略。
    UNASSIGNED: HBV and HCV infections are a significant public health issue in developing countries with weak healthcare systems, high poverty rates, illiteracy, low HBV immunization coverage, and low public health education. A study assessed the sero epidemiology of HBV antigen, anti- HCV markers, biochemical and heamatological indices of 559 participants in Dambam local government during hepatitis day. A structured questionnaire was administered to assess demographic information and risk factors. Rapid latex immunochromtographic kits were used for HBV, HCV, and HBV Combo serological markers, with positive and negative control included in each batch analysis. Descriptive statistics analysis was conducted on the data.
    UNASSIGNED: The 559 study participants, had a mean age of 35.5+10.9years, majority within the age- group, 18-39years 279(49.04%), female accounted for 291(52.1%) compared to male 268(47.9), educational background, tertiary 244(43.6%), married, 356(68.7%) and student were 254(45.4%). Seroprevalence of HBsAg was 10.7%, serological markers as follows, HbsAb 1.7%, HbeAg 13.3%, HbeAb 60.0% HbcAb 95.0% and Anti-HCV of 3.4%. Gender breakdown(M vs F) of HBV(13.4% vs 8.2%) and HCV(3.0% vs 3.8%). Significant association was observed in the seroprevalence of HBV and HCV with age-group, gender, marital status and occupation(<0.05). No significant difference was observed with the risk factors of HBV and HCV. Biochemical and heamatological indices showed a significant difference between seropositive and negative study participants(<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The study\'s findings affirmed the endemicity of HBV infection and the increasing trend of HCV infection in Bauchi state, posing serious public health concerns. HBV serological markers suggest a low HBV immunization coverage rate and exposure of participants to the viral etiology in the community. Strengthening immunization coverage and population-based surveillance is strategic in the prevention and control of viral hepatitis in Bauchi state.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)目前是全球最常见的肝病之一。早期诊断和疾病分期至关重要,因为它主要是无症状的,但可进展为非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)或肝硬化甚至导致肝细胞癌的发展。随着时间的推移,为了取代肝活检的使用,人们已经努力开发无创诊断和分期方法。使用的非侵入性方法包括测量肝脏硬度和生物标志物的成像技术,重点是血清生物标志物。由于NAFLD的病理生理学令人印象深刻的复杂性,生物标志物能够检测所涉及的不同过程,如细胞凋亡,纤维发生,和炎症,甚至解决遗传背景和“组学”技术。本文不仅回顾了目前验证的非侵入性方法来研究NAFLD,而且还回顾了关于最近发现的生物标志物的有希望的结果。包括生物标志物小组以及目前验证的评估方法和血清标志物的组合。
    Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) currently represents one of the most common liver diseases worldwide. Early diagnosis and disease staging is crucial, since it is mainly asymptomatic, but can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or cirrhosis or even lead to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Over time, efforts have been put into developing noninvasive diagnostic and staging methods in order to replace the use of a liver biopsy. The noninvasive methods used include imaging techniques that measure liver stiffness and biological markers, with a focus on serum biomarkers. Due to the impressive complexity of the NAFLD\'s pathophysiology, biomarkers are able to assay different processes involved, such as apoptosis, fibrogenesis, and inflammation, or even address the genetic background and \"omics\" technologies. This article reviews not only the currently validated noninvasive methods to investigate NAFLD but also the promising results regarding recently discovered biomarkers, including biomarker panels and the combination of the currently validated evaluation methods and serum markers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨使用血清学标志物的机器学习模型是否可以预测溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的复发。
    这项临床队列研究包括292名UC患者,和患者出院时获得的血清学标志物。随后,四个机器学习模型,包括随机森林(RF)模型,Logistic回归模型,决策树,与神经网络进行比较,预测UC的复发。构造了一个列线图,这些模型的性能是通过准确性来评估的,灵敏度,特异性,和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。
    根据患者的特征和血清学标志物,我们选择了与复发相关的相关变量,并建立了LR模型.包括性别在内的新颖模型,白细胞计数,白细胞的百分比,单核细胞的百分比,嗜中性粒细胞的绝对值,建立红细胞沉降率来预测复发。此外,4种机器学习模型的平均AUC为0.828,其中RF模型最好.试验组的AUC为0.889,准确率为76.4%,灵敏度为78.5%,特异性为76.4%。RF模型中有45个变量,并确定了这些变量的相对权重系数。年龄对分类结果影响最大,其次是血红蛋白浓度,白细胞计数,和血小板分布宽度。
    基于血清学标志物的机器学习模型在预测UC复发方面具有很高的准确性。该模型可以用于非侵入性地预测患者结果,并且可以是用于确定个性化治疗计划的有效工具。
    UNASSIGNED: To explore whether machine learning models using serological markers can predict the relapse of Ulcerative colitis (UC).
    UNASSIGNED: This clinical cohort study included 292 UC patients, and serological markers were obtained when patients were discharged from the hospital. Subsequently, four machine learning models including the random forest (RF) model, the logistic regression model, the decision tree, and the neural network were compared to predict the relapse of UC. A nomogram was constructed, and the performance of these models was evaluated by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the patients\' characteristics and serological markers, we selected the relevant variables associated with relapse and developed a LR model. The novel model including gender, white blood cell count, percentage of leukomonocyte, percentage of monocyte, absolute value of neutrophilic granulocyte, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate was established for predicting the relapse. In addition, the average AUC of the four machine learning models was 0.828, of which the RF model was the best. The AUC of the test group was 0.889, the accuracy was 76.4%, the sensitivity was 78.5%, and the specificity was 76.4%. There were 45 variables in the RF models, and the relative weight coefficients of these variables were determined. Age has the greatest impact on classification results, followed by hemoglobin concentration, white blood cell count, and platelet distribution width.
    UNASSIGNED: Machine learning models based on serological markers had high accuracy in predicting the relapse of UC. The model can be used to noninvasively predict patient outcomes and can be an effective tool for determining personalized treatment plans.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号