[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1351864.].

Background and Objectives: Traditional methods of fidelity monitoring are not possible in pragmatic trials in real-world clinical settings. We describe our approach to monitoring and reinforcing the fidelity to ACP conversations for a hard-to-reach subpopulation by using standardized patients in a pragmatic trial. Research Design and Methods: We developed standardized patient scenarios grounded in the Respecting Choices First Steps™ Advance Care Planning curriculum to provide an opportunity to reinforce and assess ACP facilitator competency. Scenarios represented one-on-one encounters. The first case was a standardized patient with cognitive impairment and the second case involved a standardized patient with dementia and their care partner. A previously validated fidelity checklist was used to score skills and behaviors observed during simulations including encounter set-up, ACP topics, and general communication. Simulations involved voice teleconferencing to align primary modality of ACP in the pragmatic trial. Results: Six facilitators completed two standardized patient cases each. Overall fidelity scores were moderately high (78.8% ± 11.7; 63.4 - 95.6) for the case with cognitive impairment and for the case with the patient with dementia and care partner (76.2% ± 13.0; 54.4 - 91.5). Discussion and Implications: Simulation using standardized patients supported fidelity monitoring and provided coachable feedback to support facilitator competency. Our study can help inform future research and training related to advance care planning in older adults living with Alzheimer\'s disease and related disorders.

BACKGROUND: Medical mistrust among Black patients has been used to explain the existence of well-documented racial inequities at the end of life that negatively impact this group. However, there are few studies that describe patient perspectives around the impact of racism and discriminatory experiences on mistrust within the context of serious illness.
OBJECTIVE: To better characterize experiences of racism and discrimination among patients with serious illness and its association with medical mistrust.
METHODS: Seventy-two Black participants with serious illness hospitalized at an academic county hospital.
METHODS: This is a convergent mixed methods study using data from participant-completed surveys and existing semi-structured interviews eliciting participants\' perspectives around their experiences with medical racism, communication, and decision-making.
METHODS: The experience of medical racism and its association with Group-Based Medical Mistrust (GBMM) scale scores, a validated measure of medical mistrust.
RESULTS: Of the 72 Black participants, 35% participated in interviews. Participants were mostly men who had significant socioeconomic disadvantage, including low levels of wealth, income, and educational attainment. There were reported high levels of race-based mistrust in the overall GBMM scale score (mean [SD], 36.6 [9.9]), as well as high scores within the suspicion (14.2 [5.0]), group disparities in healthcare (9.9 [2.8]), and lack of support (9.1 [2.7]) subscales. Three qualitative themes aligned with the GBMM subscales. Participants expressed skepticism of healthcare workers (HCWs) and modern medicine, recounted personal experiences of discrimination in the medical setting, and were frustrated with poor communication from HCWs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found high levels of mistrust among Black patients with serious illness. Suspicion of HCWs, disparities in healthcare by race, and a lack of support from HCWs were overarching themes that influenced medical mistrust. Critical, race-conscious approaches are needed to create strategies and frameworks to improve the trustworthiness of healthcare institutions and workers.

OBJECTIVE: To understand multidisciplinary healthcare clinicians\' meaningful and challenging experiences providing spiritual care to patients with cancer and their care partners.
METHODS: Multidisciplinary clinicians who participated in a communication training program supported by the National Cancer Institute or a palliative care training for nurses (N = 257) responded to two, open-ended questions about meaningful and challenging experiences of providing spiritual care. A thematic analysis of responses using an iterative, inductive approach was conducted until saturation was reached.
RESULTS: Participants from nursing (68%), social work (22%), and chaplaincy (10%) responded to open-ended survey questions. Three themes related to meaningful experiences of providing spiritual care emerged: building authentic interpersonal connection with patients and care partners; creating intentional space for patients and care partners to inform spiritual care; and actively supporting patients and care partners in their processes with spirituality. Three themes related to challenging experiences of providing spiritual care emerged: contextual factors and clinical circumstances complicate provision of spiritual care; facing barriers to providing high-quality, patient-centered care; and navigating ethical and logistical issues that affect spiritual and other care.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians derive meaning from a range of experiences throughout their provision of spiritual care to patients with cancer. However, they also face many challenges in delivering person-centered spiritual care in cancer settings, with some challenges reflecting significant gaps in spiritual care knowledge and training. Findings can guide future training and educational endeavors for multidisciplinary clinicians in the domain of spiritual care.

People with a substance use disorder (SUD) have shortened lifespans due to complications from their substance use and challenges engaging with traditional health care settings and institutions. This impact on life expectancy is especially prominent in patients with co-occurring SUDs and cancer, and often has a much worse prognosis from the cancer than a similar patient without a SUD. Palliative care teams are experts in serious illness communication and symptom management and have become increasingly embedded in the routine care of patients with cancer. We argue that the skill set of palliative care teams is uniquely suited for addressing the needs of this oft marginalized group. We provide a comprehensive review of tools for addressing these needs, including medications that can both treat pain and opioid use disorder (OUD), and highlight psychosocial approaches to treating patients with OUD and cancer in a way that is respectful and effective. Using a trauma informed framework, we focus on the application of harm reduction principles from addiction medicine and the principles of clear communication, accompaniment, and emotional presence from palliative care to maximize support. We also focus on ways to reduce stigma in the delivery of care, by providing language that reduces barriers and increases patient engagement. Finally, we describe a clinic embedded within our institution\'s cancer center which aims to serve patients with cancer and SUDs, built on the framework of harm reduction, accompaniment and trauma informed care (TIC). Overall, we aim to provide context for addressing the common challenges that arise with patients with cancer and OUD, including the direct impact of psychosocial stress on substance use and cancer treatment, delays in disease directed treatment that can potentially impact further treatment options and outcomes, challenging pain management due to greater opioid debt, and potential loss of primary coping mechanism through substance use in the face of potential terminal diagnosis.

Background: For patients with serious illnesses, one aim of palliative care services is to reduce the frequency and severity of hospital-based episodes of care. Since hospital-alternative palliative care may consume costly resources, providers need to efficiently target high-intensity services toward those most at risk for such adverse episodes of care. Objective: Our objective was to investigate progressively more restrictive diagnosis-based indications of serious illness as used to prospectively identify patients with higher average rates of hospitalization. Design/Setting: We designed an observational cohort quality improvement study using historical Medicare claims records to evaluate diagnostic inclusion criteria for targeting palliative and serious illness care resources. We first isolated a Seriously Ill Population (SIP) and then defined More SIP and Most SIP subgroups. Measurements: Our primary outcome measure was the 2019 acute-care count of hospitalizations for patients in the SIP, More SIP, and Most SIP subgroups, respectively. Results: The More SIP and Most SIP subgroups exhibited higher hospitalization rates. However, they also excluded progressively more seriously ill patients who did experience hospitalizations. In addition, almost half of the Most SIP subgroup were not hospitalized at all, despite having an average hospitalization rate greater than one. Conclusion:Allocating resources (personnel and services) toward reducing hospitalizations when almost half of the targeted population never goes to the hospital could result in unnecessary expenditures and exclude patients that could potentially benefit. Engaging community-based services to detect changes in status could provide supplemental indications of when and for whom to target palliative care resources.

UNASSIGNED: Palliative care affords numerous benefits, including improvements in symptom management, mental health, and quality of life, financial savings, and decreased mortality. Yet palliative care is poorly understood and often erroneously viewed as end-of-life care and hospice. Barriers for better education of the public about palliative care and its benefits include shortage of healthcare providers specializing in palliative care and generalist clinicians\' lack of knowledge and confidence to discuss this topic and time constraints in busy clinical settings.
UNASSIGNED: Explore and compare the knowledge, values, and practices of community-dwelling adults 19 years and older from Nebraska about serious illness and end-of-life healthcare options.
UNASSIGNED: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected in 2022 of 635 adults. We examined the fifth wave (2022) of a multiyear survey focusing on exploring Nebraskans\' understanding of and preferences related to end-of-life care planning.
UNASSIGNED: Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to compare results between groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses examine associations of variables as to knowledge of hospice and palliative care.
UNASSIGNED: While 50% of respondents had heard a little or a lot about palliative care, 64% either did not know or were not sure of the difference between palliative care and hospice. Those who reported being in poor health were not more likely to know the difference between palliative care and hospice compared to those reporting being in fair, good, or excellent health.
UNASSIGNED: This study offers insight into the knowledge and attitudes about palliative care among community-dwelling adults, 19 years and older living in Nebraska. More effort is needed to communicate what palliative care is, who can receive help from it, and why it is not only for people at end of life. Advance care planning discussions can be useful in offering clarity.

UNASSIGNED: System level demands and interpersonal barriers can disrupt nurse delivery of high-quality information at discharge, which can contribute to a lack of caregiver preparedness to manage care of the patient and ultimately affect patient health.
UNASSIGNED: To synthesize evidence on effective nurse communication with informal caregivers during hospital discharge of adult patients with cognitive decline or Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementia.
UNASSIGNED: A scoping review of inpatient nurse communication with informal caregivers.
UNASSIGNED: Collected research (published between 2011 and 2023) from three databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL), along with a separate search for gray literature (N = 18), to extract and synthesize recommended communication practices evidenced to improve the nurse care experience and support caregiver activation and preparedness.
UNASSIGNED: Extraction synthesis of strategies resulted in two themes with corresponding sub-themes: Support (Information exchange, Space and time to determine preparedness, and Positive reinforcement of caregiver efforts) and Structure (Setting shared expectations, Informational resources, and Standardization).
UNASSIGNED: We offer practical recommendations for both interpersonal and policy level facilitation of nurse delivery of high-quality information at discharge to caregivers of patients with serious illness.

BACKGROUND: General practice is often recommended as an ideal setting to initiate advance care planning (ACP), but uptake of ACP in this setting is low. ACP-GP is a complex intervention to facilitate ACP for patients with chronic, life-limiting illness in Belgian general practice. It aims to increase patient ACP engagement and general practitioner (GP) ACP self-efficacy. In a cluster-randomized controlled trial, the intervention was not superior to control in increasing these outcomes. A parallel process evaluation aimed to enhance understanding of how the intervention was implemented, and which factors might have influenced trial results.
METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods process evaluation following the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Data sources include recruitment and implementation monitoring, questionnaires for patients and GPs, and semi-structured (focus group) interviews with patients and GPs. Questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative data were first analyzed inductively; themes were then assigned deductively to RE-AIM dimensions.
RESULTS: Thirty-five GPs and 95 patients were recruited to the trial; GP reach was low. Sixteen GPs and 46 patients provided questionnaire data at 3 months post-baseline; qualitative data were transcribed for 14 GPs and 11 patients. Adoption of intervention components was moderate to good, with the exception of the documentation template for GPs. Interviews revealed varying patient attitudes towards ACP, but patients nonetheless emphasized that conversations made them feel reassured. GPs especially valued a positive framing of ACP. When adopted, the intervention was well-implemented and participant satisfaction was high. However, intention for maintenance was moderate, with GPs raising questions of how to sustainably implement ACP conversations in the future.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing the complex ACP-GP intervention in general practice is feasible, and can be successful. However, the implementation process is challenging and the sustainability is suboptimal. Our findings will guide future research and recommendations for facilitating and implementing ACP in general practice.
BACKGROUND: ISRCTN12995230; prospectively registered on 19/06/2020.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the association between portal use and end-of-life (EOL) outcomes in the last year of life. Methods: A retrospective cohort (n = 6,517) study at Kaiser Permanente Colorado among adults with serious illness deceased between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019. Portal use was categorized into engagement types: no use, nonactive, active without a provider, and active with a provider. EOL outcomes were hospitalizations in the month before death, last-year advance directive completion, and hospice use. Association between EOL outcomes and levels of portal use was assessed using χ2 statistics and generalized linear models. Results: Higher portal engagement types were associated with higher rates of hospitalizations (p = 0.0492), advance directive completion (p = 0.0226), and hospice use (p = 0.0070). Conclusion: Portal use in the last year of life was associated with increases in a poor EOL outcome, hospitalizations, and beneficial EOL outcomes, advance directives, and hospice care.