Septal extension

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:控制鼻尖位置对于最终的鼻整复效果至关重要。施加尖端控制的两种常用方法是小柱撑杆和尾间隔延伸移植物(SEG)。过去的工作表明,SEG能够更好地保持尖端位置。然而,没有描述长期预测和轮换的定量数据。这项研究的目的是分析SEG后尖端突出和旋转的长期维持。
    方法:对接受开放性隆鼻手术的成年患者进行回顾性研究。进行了鼻尖位置的三维摄影测量评估。在术前和术后进行人体测量点分析。结果变量是尖端预测,尖端旋转,和鼻长。
    结果:纳入20例患者,平均随访时间为3.3年(2.0-6.6年)。从术后1到6周,旋转有统计学上的显着下降(-4.3%,p<0.01)。投影没有统计学上显著的下降,旋转,或鼻长从术后6周到术后2年,或从术后6周到最终随访(2.0-6.6年)。
    结论:鼻尖突起和旋转从术后即刻位置开始减少,可能是由于解决水肿。在这项研究中,接受SEG开放性鼻整理术的患者在术后6周之前出现了适度的投射和旋转损失,但从术后6周到2年及以上,投射和旋转均保持不变。这项研究提供了证据,证明SEG保持了尖端投影和旋转的长期变化。
    方法:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: Control of nasal tip position is critical to final rhinoplasty outcomes. Two frequent methods of exerting tip control are columellar strut and caudal septal extension graft (SEG). Past work has demonstrated that SEG are better able to preserve tip position. However, there is no quantitative data describing long-term projection and rotation. The purpose of this study was to analyze long-term maintenance of tip projection and rotation following SEG.
    METHODS: A retrospective study of adult patients undergoing open rhinoplasty was conducted. Three-dimensional photogrammetric evaluation of nasal tip position was performed. Anthropometric points were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively. Outcome variables were tip projection, tip rotation, and nasal length.
    RESULTS: Twenty patients were included with an average follow-up time of 3.3 years (2.0 - 6.6 years). From postoperative week 1 to 6, there was a statistically significant decrease in rotation (-4.3%, p<0.01). There were no statistically significant decreases in projection, rotation, or nasal length from 6 weeks postoperative to 2 years postoperative, or from 6 weeks postoperative to final follow-up (2.0 - 6.6 years).
    CONCLUSIONS: Nasal tip projection and rotation appear to decrease from the immediate postoperative position, likely due to resolving edema. In this study, patients that underwent open rhinoplasty with SEG experienced modest loss of projection and rotation until 6 weeks postoperative, but projection and rotation were maintained from 6 weeks postoperative to 2 years and beyond. This study provides evidence that SEG maintains long-term changes in tip projection and rotation.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    存在不同的技术来在隆鼻中提供尖端支撑。几乎没有证据可以就最有效的选择达成共识。
    评估小柱支撑移植物(CSG)和间隔延长移植物(SEG)对气道功能的影响,患者满意度和小费支持。
    对165例接受CSG或SEG开放性隆鼻手术的成年患者进行了回顾性队列研究,从2012年2月到2019年8月,在悉尼进行了一次三级面部整形练习,澳大利亚。手术是为了美容和功能适应症,并对主要病例和修订病例进行了评估.术前和手术后至少6个月进行气道测试和患者报告的结果(PROM)。从大约4个月和12个月的术后照片中获取摄影尖端分析。
    鼻峰值吸气流量(NPIF)和总气道阻力(NAR)是主要的气道功能结果。分析的主要PROM是鼻塞的视觉模拟量表(VAS)和全球宇宙的13点Likert量表,鼻预后症状评估(NOSE),和鼻塞评分。尖端支持由Apaydin等人开发的Rhinobase评估的鼻唇沟角度(NLA)和Simon's比率确定。在横向法兰克福飞机照片上。数据标准化为术前基线的改善,考虑个体差异。
    共评估了165例患者(35.2±12.9岁,72%女性),100人(61%)收到SEG。CSG和SEG组之间的鼻气道评估相似,ΔNPIF(20.0±42.1L/minv19.9±44.9L/min,p=0.983)和Δ“阻塞”NAR(-1.13±1.90v-1.02±4.33Pa/cm3/s,p=0.849)。在PROMs中,在SEG组中观察到更大的美容结果(7.20±2.97v5.69±3.45,p<0.01),CSG和SEG技术之间的所有其他评估相似.尖端投影的摄影分析显示SEG中NLA畸变减少。
    虽然在SEG患者中看到了更大的患者感知外观,两组间气流和患者报告的鼻功能相似.尖端投影的摄影分析显示,SEG患者还受益于更少的NLA变形和更多的尖端维护。
    Different techniques exist to provide tip support in rhinoplasty. There is little evidence to provide a consensus on the most effective choice.
    Evaluating columellar strut graft (CSG) and septal extension grafts (SEG) for their influence on airway function, patient satisfaction and tip support.
    A retrospective cohort study was undertaken on 165 adult patients who underwent open rhinoplasty with either a CSG or SEG, from February 2012 to August 2019 in a single tertiary facial-plastic practice in Sydney, Australia. Operations were for both cosmetic and functional indications, and both primary and revision cases were assessed. Airway testing and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were performed preoperatively and at least 6 months following the procedure. Photographic tip analysis was taken from approximately 4 and 12-month postoperative photographs.
    Nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) and total nasal airway resistance (NAR) were the primary airway functional outcomes. The primary PROMs analysed were a visual analogue scale (VAS) for nasal obstruction and 13-point Likert scale for global cosmesis, the Nose Outcome Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), and the nasal obstruction score. Tip support was determined by the nasolabial angle (NLA) and Simon\'s ratio as assessed by Rhinobase developed by Apaydin et al. on lateral Frankfort plane photographs. Data normalised as an improvement over preoperative baseline, accounting for individual variability.
    A total of 165 patients was assessed (35.2 ± 12.9 yrs, 72% female), 100 (61%) of which received SEG. There were similar nasal airway assessments between CSG and SEG groups, with ΔNPIF (20.0 ± 42.1 L/min v 19.9 ± 44.9 L/min, p = 0.983) and Δ \"obstructed\" NAR (-1.13 ± 1.90 v -1.02 ± 4.33 Pa/cm3/s, p = 0.849). Amongst PROMs, a greater cosmetic outcome was seen in the SEG group (7.20 ± 2.97 v 5.69 ± 3.45, p < 0.01) with all other assessments similar between CSG and SEG techniques. Photographic analysis of tip projection showed reduced NLA distortion in the SEG.
    While greater patient-perceived cosmesis was seen in patients with a SEG, there were similar airflow and patient-reported nasal function between groups. Photographic analysis of tip projection showed SEG patients additionally benefited from less NLA distortion and greater tip maintenance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号