Sensitivity and Specificity

灵敏度和特异性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在我们的设置中,颅内压(ICP)升高约占儿科重症监护病房(PICU)入院人数的20%。在这种情况下,及时识别和治疗升高的ICP对于预防脑疝和死亡很重要。这项研究的目的是检查视神经鞘直径(ONSD)在检测儿童临床相关的ICP升高中的作用。
    方法:在印度一家三级护理机构的PICU中,对2-14岁儿童进行了基于医院的观察性分析研究。在三个时间点测量所有儿童的ONSD,即,第1天,第2天以及入院第4天和第7天之间。比较有和没有ICP升高临床症状的儿童的ONSD值。
    结果:在招募的137名儿科患者中,34人有ICP升高的迹象。第1天的平均ONSD在ICP升高的儿童中更高(4.99±0.57vs4.06±0.40;p<0.01)。升高的ICP患者在第2天的平均ONSD也较高(4.94±0.55vs4.04±0.40;p<0.01)。入院第4天和第7天之间的第三次读数小于前2个值,但在升高的ICP患者中仍然更高(4.48±1.26vs3.99±0.57;p<0.001)。在ROC曲线上检测升高的ICP的截止ONSD值为4.46mm,曲线下面积为0.906(95%CI0.844至0.968),敏感性85.3%,特异性86.4%。无论ICP升高的迹象如何,在任何时间点,右眼和左眼之间的ONSD都没有差异。
    结论:我们发现经眶超声测量ONSD能够检测到临床相关的升高的ICP,在4.46mm的截止值处具有出色的辨别性能。
    BACKGROUND: Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) contributes to approximately 20% of the admissions in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in our setting. Timely identification and treatment of raised ICP is important to prevent brain herniation and death in such cases. The objective of this study was to examine the role of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in detecting clinically relevant raised ICP in children.
    METHODS: A hospital-based observational analytical study in a PICU of a tertiary care institute in India on children aged 2-14 years. ONSD was measured in all children on three time points that is, day 1, day 2 and between day 4 and 7 of admission. ONSD values were compared between children with and without clinical signs of raised ICP.
    RESULTS: Out of 137 paediatric patients recruited, 34 had signs of raised ICP. Mean ONSD on day 1 was higher in children with signs of raised ICP (4.99±0.57 vs 4.06±0.40; p<0.01). Mean ONSD on day 2 also was higher in raised ICP patients (4.94±0.55 vs 4.04±0.40; p<0.01). The third reading between days 4 and 7 of admission was less than the first 2 values but still higher in raised ICP patients (4.48±1.26 vs 3.99±0.57; p<0.001). The cut-off ONSD value for detecting raised ICP was 4.46 mm on the ROC curve with an area under curve 0.906 (95% CI 0.844 to 0.968), 85.3% sensitivity and 86.4% specificity. There was no difference in ONSD between the right and the left eyes at any time point irrespective of signs of raised ICP.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that measurement of ONSD by transorbital ultrasound was able to detect clinically relevant raised ICP with an excellent discriminatory performance at the cut-off value of 4.46 mm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估二进制诊断测试的性能,包括人工智能分类算法,涉及测量灵敏度,特异性,正预测值,和阴性预测值。特别是在比较应用于同一组患者的两种诊断测试的性能时,这些指标对于识别更准确的测试至关重要。然而,比较预测值提出了统计挑战,因为它们的分母取决于测试结果,不同于敏感性和特异性的比较。本文回顾了现有的比较预测值的方法,并提出了使用置换检验。置换测试是直观的,适用于小样本数据集的非参数方法。我们使用来自MRI的数据集以及乳房X线照相术和超声的组合模式来证明每种方法诊断乳腺癌。
    Evaluating the performance of a binary diagnostic test, including artificial intelligence classification algorithms, involves measuring sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Particularly when comparing the performance of two diagnostic tests applied on the same set of patients, these metrics are crucial for identifying the more accurate test. However, comparing predictive values presents statistical challenges because their denominators depend on the test outcomes, unlike the comparison of sensitivities and specificities. This paper reviews existing methods for comparing predictive values and proposes using the permutation test. The permutation test is an intuitive, non-parametric method suitable for datasets with small sample sizes. We demonstrate each method using a dataset from MRI and combined modality of mammography and ultrasound in diagnosing breast cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们假设甘油三酯-葡萄糖(TyG)-丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)指数,结合了TyG指数和ALT,可以提高检测非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)严重程度的敏感性和特异性。共纳入131例NAFLD患者,平均年龄11.5±2.29岁,通过超声脂肪肝指数(US-FLI)评分评估严重程度。TyG-ALT指数定义为ln(空腹甘油三酯[mg/dL]×空腹血糖[mg/dL]×ALT[IU/L]/2)。多元线性回归分析显示,在控制性别后,TyG-ALT指数与US-FLI之间存在显着关联(β=0.317,P<.001)。年龄,和体重指数。与ALT和TyG指数相比,TyG-ALT指数显示出更稳定和更好的检测NAFLD严重程度的能力。曲线下的面积值,按ALT的顺序列出,TyG指数,和TyG-ALT指数,结果如下:0.737(P<.001),0.599(P=.055),在US-FLI≥4分时为0.704(P<.001);0.717(P<.001),0.720(P<.001),在US-FLI≥5分时为0.775(P<.001);0.689(P<.05),0.748(P<0.01),US-FLI≥6分,0.775(P<.001)。TyG-ALT指数与US-FLI评分相关,在预测NAFLD严重程度方面优于ALT和TyG指数。这些发现表明TyG-ALT指数在儿科NAFLD进展管理中的潜力。
    We hypothesized that the triglyceride-glucose (TyG)-alanine aminotransferase (ALT) index, which combines the TyG index with ALT, may enhance sensitivity and specificity in detecting the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A total of 131 NAFLD patients with a mean age of 11.5 ± 2.29 years were enrolled, and severity was assessed by ultrasound fatty liver index (US-FLI) scoring. The TyG-ALT index was defined as ln(fasting triglyceride [mg/dL] × fasting glucose [mg/dL] × ALT [IU/L]/2). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between the TyG-ALT index and US-FLI (β = 0.317, P < .001) after controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. The TyG-ALT index showed a more stable and superior ability to detect the severity of NAFLD compared to both ALT and the TyG index. The area under the curve values, listed in the order of ALT, TyG index, and TyG-ALT index, were as follows: 0.737 (P < .001), 0.599 (P = .055), and 0.704 (P < .001) at US-FLI ≥ 4 points; 0.717 (P < .001), 0.720 (P < .001), and 0.775 (P < .001) at US-FLI ≥ 5 points; and 0.689 (P < .05), 0.748 (P < .01), and 0.775 (P < .001) at US-FLI ≥ 6 points. The TyG-ALT index is associated with US-FLI score and superior to both ALT and the TyG index in predicting NAFLD severity. These findings indicate the potential of the TyG-ALT index in the management of pediatric NAFLD progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    结核分枝杆菌(MTB)的快速检测对于控制结核病至关重要。方法我们设计了一种基于便携式热循环仪的实时荧光环介导等温扩增测定法(cyp141-RealAmp),使用来自cyp141的六个寡核苷酸引物检测MTB。对213个痰样本(169个来自临床诊断的肺结核病例和44个来自没有肺结核的对照组)进行了抗酸杆菌(AFB)涂片,文化,XpertMTB/RIF测定,和cyp141-RealAmp测定。
    通过靶向MTBcyp141,该技术可以在30分钟内检测低至10个拷贝/反应,它被其他分枝杆菌和其他测试的细菌物种成功拒绝。169名患者中,cyp141-RealAmp的检出率无统计学差异(92.90%,95%CI:89.03-96.07)和XpertMTB/RIF(94.67%,95%CI:91.28-98.06(P>0.05),但两者在统计学上都高于培养(65.68%,95%CI:58.52-72.84)(P<0.05)和AFB(57.40%,95%CI:49.94-64.86(P<0.05)。cyp141-RealAmp和XpertMTB/RIF均具有100%的特异性。此外,cyp141-RealAmp与XpertMTB/RIF高度一致(Kappa=0.89)。
    cyp141-RealAmp分析被证明是有效的,响应,在这项研究中准确。该方法为MTB的快速和精确检测提供了一种前瞻性策略。
    UNASSIGNED: The rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is essential for controlling tuberculosis. Methods We designed a portable thermocycler-based real-time fluorescence loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (cyp141-RealAmp) using six oligonucleotide primers derived from cyp141 to detect MTB. A combined number of 213 sputum samples (169 obtained from clinically diagnosed cases of pulmonary TB and 44 from a control group without tuberculosis) underwent Acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF assays, and cyp141-RealAmp assay.
    UNASSIGNED: By targeting MTB cyp141, this technique could detect as low as 10 copies/reaction within 30 min, and it was successfully rejected by other mycobacteria and other bacterial species tested. Of the 169 patients, there was no statistical difference between the detection rate of cyp141-RealAmp (92.90%, 95% CI: 89.03-96.07) and that of Xpert MTB/RIF (94.67%, 95% CI: 91.28-98.06) (P > 0.05), but both were statistically higher than that of culture (65.68%, 95% CI: 58.52-72.84) (P< 0.05) and AFB (57.40%, 95% CI: 49.94-64.86) (P< 0.05). Both cyp141-RealAmp and Xpert MTB/RIF had a specificity of 100%. Furthermore, a high concordance between cyp141-RealAmp and Xpert MTB/RIF was found (Kappa = 0.89).
    UNASSIGNED: The cyp141-RealAmp assay was shown to be effective, responsive, and accurate in this study. This method offers a prospective strategy for the speedy and precise detection of MTB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究人员深入研究了慢性肾脏疾病中肾脏纤维化(RF)的非侵入性诊断方法,包括超声(美国),磁共振成像(MRI),和放射组学。然而,这些诊断方法在射频无创诊断中的价值仍存在争议.因此,本研究旨在系统地描述射频无创诊断的准确性。
    涵盖PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience数据库为符合条件的研究进行了截至2023年7月28日的所有可用数据.
    我们纳入了21项研究,涵盖4885名参与者。其中,九项研究将US用作非侵入性诊断方法,八项研究使用核磁共振成像,和四篇文章采用了影像组学。US检测RF的敏感性和特异性分别为0.81(95%CI:0.76-0.86)和0.79(95%CI:0.72-0.84)。MRI的敏感性和特异性分别为0.77(95%CI:0.70-0.83)和0.92(95%CI:0.85-0.96)。影像组学的敏感性和特异性分别为0.69(95%CI:0.59-0.77)和0.78(95%CI:0.68-0.85)。
    当前射频的早期无创诊断方法包括US,MRI,和放射组学。然而,这项研究表明,与MRI相比,US对RF的检测具有更高的灵敏度。与美国相比,基于美国的影像组学研究并未显示出优越的优势.因此,目前诊断射频的影像组学方法仍然存在挑战,需要进一步探索优化的人工智能(AI)算法和技术。
    UNASSIGNED: Researchers have delved into noninvasive diagnostic methods of renal fibrosis (RF) in chronic kidney disease, including ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radiomics. However, the value of these diagnostic methods in the noninvasive diagnosis of RF remains contentious. Consequently, the present study aimed to systematically delineate the accuracy of the noninvasive diagnosis of RF.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search covering PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for all data available up to 28 July 2023 was conducted for eligible studies.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 21 studies covering 4885 participants. Among them, nine studies utilized US as a noninvasive diagnostic method, eight studies used MRI, and four articles employed radiomics. The sensitivity and specificity of US for detecting RF were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72-0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.96). The sensitivity and specificity of radiomics were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59-0.77) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85).
    UNASSIGNED: The current early noninvasive diagnostic methods for RF include US, MRI, and radiomics. However, this study demonstrates that US has a higher sensitivity for the detection of RF compared to MRI. Compared to US, radiomics studies based on US did not show superior advantages. Therefore, challenges still exist in the current radiomics approaches for diagnosing RF, and further exploration of optimized artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and technologies is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:物质使用和物质使用障碍(SUD)的急剧上升表明迫切需要使用有效的措施评估其患病率。本系统综述总结了在基于人口和亚人群的调查中估计的评估美国物质使用和SUD患病率的措施的有效性。
    方法:使用9个在线数据库进行文献检索。如果研究以英文发表,并在一般或亚人群水平上测试了美国成年人的物质使用和SUD措施的有效性,则将其纳入综述。作者进行了独立审查,以完成数据综合并评估偏倚风险。
    结果:总体而言,本综述包括46项验证物质使用/SUD(n=46)措施的研究,其中63%在临床环境中进行,89%评估SUD措施的有效性.在评估SUD筛查措施的研究中,78%的人检查了通用SUD措施,其余的筛查特定疾病。几乎所有研究都使用了不同的调查措施。总的来说,在超过三分之一的研究中进行了敏感性和特异性测试以进行验证,和10项研究使用接收器工作特性曲线。
    结论:研究结果表明,在测量和报告美国成年人中药物使用/SUD患病率的调查中缺乏标准化方法。它强调了迫切需要制定不需要冗长的短期评估SUD的短期措施,耗时的数据收集,难以纳入评估多种健康层面的基于人群的调查。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42022298280。
    BACKGROUND: The steep rise in substance use and substance use disorder (SUD) shows an urgency to assess its prevalence using valid measures. This systematic review summarizes the validity of measures to assess the prevalence of substance use and SUD in the US estimated in population and sub-population-based surveys.
    METHODS: A literature search was performed using nine online databases. Studies were included in the review if they were published in English and tested the validity of substance use and SUD measures among US adults at the general or sub-population level. Independent reviews were conducted by the authors to complete data synthesis and assess the risk of bias.
    RESULTS: Overall, 46 studies validating substance use/SUD (n = 46) measures were included in this review, in which 63% were conducted in clinical settings and 89% assessed the validity of SUD measures. Among the studies that assessed SUD screening measures, 78% examined a generic SUD measure, and the rest screened for specific disorders. Almost every study used a different survey measure. Overall, sensitivity and specificity tests were conducted in over a third of the studies for validation, and 10 studies used receiver operating characteristics curve.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a lack of standardized methods in surveys measuring and reporting prevalence of substance use/SUD among US adults. It highlights a critical need to develop short measures for assessing SUD that do not require lengthy, time-consuming data collection that would be difficult to incorporate into population-based surveys assessing a multitude of health dimensions.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022298280.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺癌(LC),其特点是发病率和死亡率高,在肿瘤学中提出了重大挑战。尽管在治疗方面取得了进展,早期检测对于改善患者预后仍然至关重要.通过检测呼出气中的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)来筛选LC的准确性尚待确定。
    方法:我们的系统评价,遵循PRISMA指南并分析截至2023年10月1日的25项研究的数据,评估不同技术检测VOCs的有效性。我们向PROSPERO注册了审查方案,并在PubMed中进行了系统搜索,EMBASE和WebofScience。审稿人筛选了研究的标题/摘要和全文,并使用QUADAS-2工具进行质量评估。然后通过采用敏感性和特异性的双变量模型进行荟萃分析。
    结果:本研究探讨了呼出气体中挥发性有机化合物作为LC筛查生物标志物的潜力,提供传统方法的非侵入性替代方案。在所有研究中,呼出的VOCs将LC与对照区分开。荟萃分析表明,综合敏感性和特异性分别为85%和86%,分别,VOC检测的AUC为0.93。我们还对测试化合物中出现频率最高的物质来源进行了系统分析。尽管结果很有希望,研究质量和方法学挑战的可变性凸显了进一步研究的必要性。
    结论:这篇综述强调了VOC分析的潜力,早期LC检测的非侵入性筛查工具,这可以显著提高患者管理和生存率。
    BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC), characterized by high incidence and mortality rates, presents a significant challenge in oncology. Despite advancements in treatments, early detection remains crucial for improving patient outcomes. The accuracy of screening for LC by detecting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath remains to be determined.
    METHODS: Our systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines and analyzing data from 25 studies up to October 1, 2023, evaluates the effectiveness of different techniques in detecting VOCs. We registered the review protocol with PROSPERO and performed a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Reviewers screened the studies\' titles/abstracts and full texts, and used QUADAS-2 tool for quality assessment. Then performed meta-analysis by adopting a bivariate model for sensitivity and specificity.
    RESULTS: This study explores the potential of VOCs in exhaled breath as biomarkers for LC screening, offering a non-invasive alternative to traditional methods. In all studies, exhaled VOCs discriminated LC from controls. The meta-analysis indicates an integrated sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 86%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.93 for VOC detection. We also conducted a systematic analysis of the source of the substance with the highest frequency of occurrence in the tested compounds. Despite the promising results, variability in study quality and methodological challenges highlight the need for further research.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review emphasizes the potential of VOC analysis as a cost-effective, non-invasive screening tool for early LC detection, which could significantly improve patient management and survival rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:原发性宫颈癌筛查和癌前病变治疗是预防宫颈癌的有效方法。然而,在大多数发展中国家,甚至一些发达国家,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗和常规筛查的覆盖率都很低。本研究旨在探索人工智能辅助细胞学(AI)系统在中国宫颈癌高危人群筛查计划中的益处。
    方法:收集2018年至2020年在解放军总医院接受阴道镜检查的女性液基细胞学(LBC)切片1231张。所有妇女都根据阴道镜检查和活检的结果接受了组织学诊断。灵敏度(Se),特异性(Sp),阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值(NPV),假阳性率(FPR),假阴性率(FNR),总体精度(OA),正似然比(PLR),人工智能的负似然比(NLR)和尤登指数(YI),LBC,HPV,LBC+HPV,AI+LBC,计算低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)和高度鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)阈值的AI+HPV和HPVSeqLBC筛查策略以评估其有效性。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以评估不同筛查策略的诊断价值。
    结果:在LSIL和HSIL阈值下,初级AI单独策略的Se和Sp优于LBC+HPV共检测策略。在筛查策略中,AI策略在LSIL+阈值和HSIL+阈值的YI值最高。在HSIL+阈值处,人工智能战略取得了最好的结果,AUC值为0.621(95%CI,0.587-0.654),而HPV检测结果最差,AUC值为0.521(95%CI,0.484-0.559)。同样,在LSIL+阈值,基于LBC的策略取得了最好的结果,AUC为0.637(95%CI,0.606-0.668),而HPV检测结果最差,AUC为0.524(95%CI,0.491-0.557)。此外,在该阈值下,AI和LBC策略的AUC相似(分别为0.631和0.637).
    结论:这些结果证实,仅AI筛查是诊断HSIL和LSIL的最权威方法,提高阴道镜诊断的准确性,并且比传统的LBC+HPV共检测对患者更有益。
    BACKGROUND: Primary cervical cancer screening and treating precancerous lesions are effective ways to prevent cervical cancer. However, the coverage rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and routine screening are low in most developing countries and even some developed countries. This study aimed to explore the benefit of an artificial intelligence-assisted cytology (AI) system in a screening program for a cervical cancer high-risk population in China.
    METHODS: A total of 1231 liquid-based cytology (LBC) slides from women who underwent colposcopy at the Chinese PLA General Hospital from 2018 to 2020 were collected. All women had received a histological diagnosis based on the results of colposcopy and biopsy. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), false-positive rate (FPR), false-negative rate (FNR), overall accuracy (OA), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and Youden index (YI) of the AI, LBC, HPV, LBC + HPV, AI + LBC, AI + HPV and HPV Seq LBC screening strategies at low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) thresholds were calculated to assess their effectiveness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the diagnostic values of the different screening strategies.
    RESULTS: The Se and Sp of the primary AI-alone strategy at the LSIL and HSIL thresholds were superior to those of the LBC + HPV cotesting strategy. Among the screening strategies, the YIs of the AI strategy at the LSIL + threshold and HSIL + threshold were the highest. At the HSIL + threshold, the AI strategy achieved the best result, with an AUC value of 0.621 (95% CI, 0.587-0.654), whereas HPV testing achieved the worst result, with an AUC value of 0.521 (95% CI, 0.484-0.559). Similarly, at the LSIL + threshold, the LBC-based strategy achieved the best result, with an AUC of 0.637 (95% CI, 0.606-0.668), whereas HPV testing achieved the worst result, with an AUC of 0.524 (95% CI, 0.491-0.557). Moreover, the AUCs of the AI and LBC strategies at this threshold were similar (0.631 and 0.637, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: These results confirmed that AI-only screening was the most authoritative method for diagnosing HSILs and LSILs, improving the accuracy of colposcopy diagnosis, and was more beneficial for patients than traditional LBC + HPV cotesting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    准确筛查有症状患者的COVID-19感染状况是一项关键的公共卫生任务。尽管目前存在针对COVID-19的分子和抗原测试,但在资源有限的环境中,筛查测试通常不可用。此外,在大流行的早期阶段,没有任何能力进行检测。我们利用自动机器学习(ML)方法在由常用临床和实验室数据组成的临床数据集上训练和评估数千个模型。以及患者的细胞因子谱(n=150)。然后在样本外二次数据集(n=120)上进一步测试这些模型的泛化性。我们能够使用三种方法开发一种ML模型,用于快速可靠地筛查COVID-19阳性或阴性的患者:常用的临床和实验室数据,细胞因子谱,以及共同数据和细胞因子谱的组合。在针对这三种方法自动测试的成千上万个模型中,所有三种方法均显示>92%的灵敏度和>88的特异性,而我们表现最高的模型获得了95.6%的灵敏度和98.1%的特异性.这些模型代表了在资源有限的环境中对有症状的患者进行COVID-19状态分类的潜在有效可部署解决方案,并为快速开发新型新兴传染病的筛查工具提供了概念证明。
    Accurate screening of COVID-19 infection status for symptomatic patients is a critical public health task. Although molecular and antigen tests now exist for COVID-19, in resource-limited settings, screening tests are often not available. Furthermore, during the early stages of the pandemic tests were not available in any capacity. We utilized an automated machine learning (ML) approach to train and evaluate thousands of models on a clinical dataset consisting of commonly available clinical and laboratory data, along with cytokine profiles for patients (n = 150). These models were then further tested for generalizability on an out-of-sample secondary dataset (n = 120). We were able to develop a ML model for rapid and reliable screening of patients as COVID-19 positive or negative using three approaches: commonly available clinical and laboratory data, a cytokine profile, and a combination of the common data and cytokine profile. Of the tens of thousands of models automatically tested for the three approaches, all three approaches demonstrated > 92% sensitivity and > 88 specificity while our highest performing model achieved 95.6% sensitivity and 98.1% specificity. These models represent a potential effective deployable solution for COVID-19 status classification for symptomatic patients in resource-limited settings and provide proof-of-concept for rapid development of screening tools for novel emerging infectious diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Introduction.尿路感染(UTI)微生物学诊断的金标准方法学缺失,导致结果解释和处理方法的标准不够标准化,特别是孵化时间和培养基。假说。48小时的孵育时间和使用血琼脂显着增强了分离的微生物的敏感性。瞄准.为了确定血液琼脂和华晨UTI显色琼脂的敏感性,孵育不同时期(24-48小时),用于检测尿液培养阳性。方法论。在培养基和孵育时间的所有可能组合之间进行比较。作为黄金标准参考,我们使用了实验室的常规方法,这包括事先用可用的临床数据进行筛查,流式细胞术,沉积物分析和/或革兰氏染色。然后将筛选的样品在血琼脂和显色琼脂上培养并孵育48小时。此外,根据革兰氏染色的结果,在选定的病例中加入了额外的培养基.结果。显色琼脂培养24小时和血琼脂培养48小时之间的差异最大,后一种方法允许回收10.14%以上的微生物(P<0.0001)。此外,证明了进行革兰氏染色指导加工的价值,因为它避免了至少5.14%的分离株的损失。Conclusions.至少在泌尿科和肾病患者中,由于尿液培养物的诊断敏感性的提高,必须包括富集的培养基(血琼脂)或延长孵育时间。革兰氏染色还可以帮助检测挑剔的微生物或混合感染的存在,表明是否应包括丰富和/或选择性培养基以增强培养物的诊断敏感性。如果不遵循这种方法,应该指出的是,除了挑剔的物种,挑剔的大肠杆菌菌株,变形杆菌,铜绿假单胞菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌也将被遗漏。
    Introduction. The absence of a gold-standard methodology for the microbiological diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTI) has led to insufficient standardization of criteria for the interpretation of results and processing methods, particularly incubation time and culture media.Hypothesis. 48-hour incubation time period and use of blood agar enhances the sensitivity of microorganisms isolated significantly.Aim. To determine the sensitivity of blood agar and Brilliance UTI chromogenic agar, incubating for different periods (24-48 hours), for the detection of positive urine cultures.Methodoloy. Comparisons were made between all possible combinations of media and incubation times. As the gold-standard reference, we used the routine methodology of our laboratory, which involves prior screening with available clinical data, flow cytometry, sediment analysis and/or Gram staining. Screened samples were then cultured on blood agar and chromogenic agar and incubated for 48 hours. Also, based on the results of Gram staining, additional media were added in selected cases.Results. The most significant difference was found between chromogenic agar incubated for 24 hours and blood agar incubated for 48 hours, with the latter method allowing the recovery of 10.14 % more microorganisms (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the value of performing Gram staining to guide processing was demonstrated, as it avoided the loss of at least 5.14 % of isolates.Conclusions. At least in urological and nephrological patients it is essential to include enriched culture media (blood agar) or to extend the incubation times due to the improvement of the diagnostic sensitivity of urine cultures. Gram staining also can help detect the presence of fastidious microorganisms or mixed infections, indicating whether rich and/or selective media should be included to enhance the diagnostic sensitivity of cultures. If this methodology is not followed, it should be noted that besides fastidious species, fastidious strains of Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aerugniosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia will also be missed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号