Selective neck dissection (SND) is the treatment of choice in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) and clinically node-negative necks (cN0). The treatment of patients with positive-staged necks (cN+) includes SND as well as comprehensive neck dissection (CND). The clear benefit of one or the other remains under debate. We aim to address this lack of clarity by analysing patients with OSCC staged with clinically node-positive necks, treated with either CND or SND using a level-by-level approach. This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OSCC with clinically (cN+) and pathologically (pN+) positive cervical lymph nodes (LNs) with clear neck level categorization during the years 2010-2019. In total, 74 patients were analysed. Cox regression analysis found no significance for the type of ND being an independent risk factor, neither for overall survival (OS) nor for disease-free survival (DFS). Regional recurrence of CND cases (5.77%) was comparable to SND cases (9.09%). For OS, extracapsular spread (ECS) and male sex were identified as independent risk factors with poorer outcome. pT-stage and ECS were found to be independent risk factors for DFS. The results of this study suggest that both CND and SND may be viable treatment options for certain patients with OSCC pN+.

UNASSIGNED: This population-based study aims to assess the survival benefits of selective neck dissection (SND) compared to neck observation in patients with T1/T2N0M0 major salivary gland malignancy (MSGC).
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective review of T1/T2N0M0 MSGC patients who underwent primary tumor surgical extirpation with or without elective neck dissection in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) from 2004-2015. The impact of SND and clinical variables on overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) was evaluated using Univariate and Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, and survival rates were assessed via the log-rank test.
UNASSIGNED: Of 3778 post-operative T1-T2N0M0 MSGC patients, 2305 underwent elective neck dissection, while 1473 did not. Median follow-up was 106 months. Univariate and Multivariate analysis identified SND as a prognostic factor for OS in all the study population. After stratified analysis, we found that in the poorly high-grade (differentiated and undifferentiated) patients, the survival showed a significant OS and DSS benefit after receiving SND compared with the neck observations [HR for OS (95%CI): 0.571(0.446-0.731), P<0.001] and [HR for DSS (95%CI): 0.564(0.385-0.826), P=0.003], other than in the well differentiated or moderately differentiated subgroup. Especially, when the pathological is squamous cell carcinoma, the results show that the people underwent SND had better prognosis, not only in OS [HR (95%CI): 0.532(0.322-0.876), P=0.013], but also in DSS [HR (95%CI): 0.330(0.136-0.797), P=0.014]. The multivariate analysis also yielded encouraging results, compared with neck observation, receiving SND bought about a significant independent OS (adjusted HR, 0.555; 95% CI, 0.328-0.941; P=0.029) and DSS (adjusted HR, 0.349; 95% CI, 0.142-0.858; P=0.022) advantage in high grade squamous cell carcinoma MSGC patients. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves also demonstrated that adjusted SND still had significantly better OS(P=0.029) and DSS(P=0.022) than the observation group in patients with high-grade squamous cell carcinoma of MSGC.
UNASSIGNED: Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated T1/T2N0M0 major salivary gland malignancy treated with selective neck dissection demonstrated superior survival compared to neck observation, especially in the pathological subtype of squamous cell carcinoma. These findings suggest the potential benefits of multimodal therapy for appropriately selected patients, emphasizing significant clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: Neck dissection forms an important component in the surgical management of head and neck cancers. By using the conventional techniques of neck dissection, a conspicuous scar is inevitable for the patients. The development of robotic assisted neck dissection provides for a scar-free neck along with good oncological and functional outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in our institute from 2020 March to 2022 March, where robotic-assisted neck dissections performed via the modified bilateral axillo-breast insufflation technique.
RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent robotic neck dissections in our institute. Notably, 79 patients were treatment-naïve. The average docking time was 12 min and console time was 160 ± 15 min. The mean lymph node yield was 28.2. The average post-operative stay was 5.6 days. The average follow-up was noted to be 6.4 months. The mean cosmetic satisfaction score in our patients was 4.45. Only one patient presented with nodal recurrence, who was identified as a defaulter for adjuvant treatment. Robotic neck dissection gives similar functional and oncological outcomes as compared with conventional neck dissection. Patients had excellent cosmetic satisfaction following the procedure. The limitations of these techniques include high cost of procedure and longer operating time. This is a level IV evidence study.
CONCLUSIONS: Although good oncological, functional, and cosmetic outcomes have been attained in robotic assisted neck dissection, further randomized controlled studies need to be conducted to justify the added costs, cosmetic advantage, and the time taken.
METHODS: IV Laryngoscope, 134:4045-4051, 2024.

BACKGROUND: Selective neck dissection (SND) has traditionally been applied to clinically negative (cN0) necks in mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We aimed to examine the oncological safety and patterns of regional recurrence (RR) of SND in clinically positive (cN+) necks.
METHODS: Retrospective review of prospective cohort of 206 patients with mucosal SCC undergoing neck dissection. RR was classified as occurring within previously dissected levels, within ipsilateral undissected levels, within unusual locations of ipsilateral neck, or contralateral neck.
RESULTS: Seven of seventy-seven (9.1%) cN+ patients undergoing SND developed isolated RR, versus 16.2% after MRND, and 8.7% after SND for cN0 disease. RR was rarely seen within undissected levels of the ipsilateral neck. RR and survival rates were not associated with ND extent (SND vs. MRND) among either cN+ or pN+ patients.
CONCLUSIONS: SND can be safely performed in most patients with cN+ SCC, who do not have gross sternocleidomastoid infiltration or level V metastases.

Among the thyroid cancers, papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is the most common with lymphatic metastasis. It has the propensity to spread to the level II-VI lymph nodes in a predictable manner. We evaluated the pattern of nodal distribution at different levels of neck in papillary thyroid cancer in this Observational Prospective study. Total 41 patients of PTC (Papillary thyroid cancer) were included in the study. 36 out of them were diagnosed as PTC by FNAC and underwent total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection, while 5 patients were histologically confirmed cases of PTC on previous hemithyroidectomy and underwent completion thyroidectomy and central neck dissection .Patients with T3/T4 stage or N1 underwent lateral neck dissection also. Clinicopathological factors such as age, sex, tumor stage, nodal metastasis and extracapsular invasion, were evaluated. Lymph node metastasis was noted in 21 patients (51.2%) and all these patients had central (level VI) lymph node involvement. Among 21 patients, pathological ipsilateral lateral neck metastasis was noted in 6 patients (28.57%) at level II, 10 patients (47.62%) at level III and 8 patients (38.10%) at level IV. Only 5 patients (23.81%) had metastasis at level V. Extracapsular invasion was observed in 10 (24.4%) patients. We concluded that patients with PTC show higher rates of metastasis at central neck (level VI) and are not easily detected on clinical examination or by USG due to low sensitivity but are sensitive and specific for lateral neck nodes in late stages . Thus, ipsilateral selective neck dissection should be considered with total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection in presence of clinically or radiologically evident lateral lymph nodes (preoperatively) and in T3, T4 stage (late stages) tumors.

With the rate of oropharyngeal cancer on the rise, appropriate surgical management is an increasingly important consideration. Much debate currently exists regarding the necessary extent of neck dissections when performing curative surgery for primary oropharyngeal malignancies. Here, we present the case of a 64-year-old patient with p16+ T1N1M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the right tonsil. Approximately four years following transoral robotic surgery oropharyngectomy and ipsilateral level II-IV right selective neck dissection, metastatic SCC was discovered on fine-needle aspiration biopsy of a right perifacial lymph node (level Ib). The patient then underwent a revision right neck dissection at levels Ia and Ib. Adjuvant immunotherapy was recommended following revision neck dissection. Postoperative imaging and flexible laryngoscopy three months after surgery were not concerning for cervical lymphadenopathy or oropharyngeal lesions. Although rare, physicians must maintain a healthy level of suspicion for recurrence to level Ib in oropharyngeal primary malignancies.

UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of transoral robotic selective neck dissection (SND) with or without a postauricular incision for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).
UNASSIGNED: We studied 14 patients with PTC who underwent robotic SND via the transoral or combined transoral and postauricular approaches.
UNASSIGNED: The transoral approach was performed on 10 patients for dissection of levels III and IV. An additional postauricular incision was made on 4 patients for dissection of level II in addition to levels III, IV, and V. The operation was completed successfully in 13 patients, except 1 patient with the procedure conversion due to uncontrolled bleeding from the internal jugular vein. The mean numbers of removed lymph nodes in the lateral compartment were 23.1 ± 9.4 and 38.3 ± 8.5 in the transoral and combined groups. Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 1 patient, transient hypoparathyroidism in 3 patients, and chyle leakage in 1 patient. There were no hematomas, mental nerve injuries, surgical space infections, or CO2 embolisms.
UNASSIGNED: Transoral robotic SND is feasible with or without a postauricular incision.

OBJECTIVE: Different parameters have been identified in patients with oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) that have a serious impact on survival, including residual tumour and extracapsular spread. Moreover, other factors, including the lymph node ratio (LNR) and lymph node yield (LNY), have been suggested as prognostic markers.
METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with OSCC and cervical lymph node metastases during the years 2010-2020. Patients\' records were evaluated regarding lymph node status, final therapy regime, tumour recurrence, time to death, tumour association with death, disease-free survival (DSF), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: In 242 patients with a mean age of 63.57 ± 11.24 years, treated either by selective neck dissection (SND; n = 70) or by modified radical neck dissection (MRND; n = 172), 5772 lymph nodes were detected. The LNR and LNY were identified as independent risk factors in OS and DFS. The optimal cut-off point for the LNY was ≥ 17 lymph nodes in the SND and ≥ 27 lymph nodes in the MRND group. The metastatic lymph node clearance (MLNC) was established as a score to relate the LNR and LNY to the extent of lymph node removal. Survival analysis showed statistically significant differences among score levels.
CONCLUSIONS: As information about the extent of nodal dissection is excluded from LNR and LNY, we propose the use of a new scoring system comprising individual cut-off values for LNY and LNR with regard to the extent of neck dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: MLNC might help to identify high-risk OSCC patients with metastatic lymph nodes.

Cervical lymph node metastasis is frequent in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. In addition to the extent of thyroidectomy, the need as well as the extent of concomitant lymphadenectomy has been a subject of controversy and debate. The central compartment is the most frequent site of metastasis followed by the lateral compartment although skip metastasis in the lateral compartment can occur. Papillary thyroid carcinoma can also present with cervical lymph node metastasis, while the primary tumor remains clinically undetectable. Surgical removal of clinically involved nodal metastasis should be mandatory to prevent recurrence and improve disease prognosis. However, despite a low accuracy of preoperative imaging for microscopic disease and the frequent microscopic metastasis to the central compartment, routine prophylactic neck dissection has not been shown to have any relevance to prevent recurrence or improve disease cure. Routine or prophylactic central compartment dissection is generally not recommended unless in the presence of high-risk tumors. The potential benefit of reducing central compartment recurrence or avoiding high-risk reoperation probably outweighs the risk of inducing surgical complication including hypoparathyroidism during routine central neck dissection. Therapeutic lateral neck dissection is performed for clinically involved nodes detected by preoperative imaging confirmed by needle biopsy, while prophylactic lateral neck dissection is contraindicated. The extent of neck dissection has been de-escalated, and compartmental nodal dissection aiming at preservation of function is performed to achieve a complete surgical resection. Postoperative adjuvant radioiodine is frequently administered for patients with positive nodal metastasis (intermediate-risk group) to avoid future recurrence. Routine central neck dissection may also upstage patients with microscopic nodal metastases and increase the use of postoperative adjuvant radioiodine.

BACKGROUND: Selective neck dissection (SND) is the surgical treatment of choice in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) with suspected or manifest metastases in the cervical lymph nodes. For SND to be successful, treated lymph node levels should be selected according to anatomic considerations and the extent of the disease. Aim of this study was to identify neck dissection levels that had an impact on individual prognosis.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of SND as part of primary treatment of HNSCC. Overall survival (OS) and regional control rates (RCR) were calculated for all patients treated at one academic tertiary referral center.
RESULTS: 661 patients with HNSCC were included, 644 underwent ipsilateral and 319 contralateral SND. Average follow-up was 78.9 ± 106.4 months. 67 (10.1%) patients eventually developed nodal recurrence. Tumor sites were oral cavity (135), oropharynx (179), hypopharynx (118) and larynx (229). Tumor categories pT1-pT4a, and all clinical and pathological nodal categories were included. Multivariate analysis indicated improved OS rates for patients undergoing SND in ipsilateral levels I and V as well as level III contralaterally. Analysis for tumor origin showed that SND in ipsilateral level I showed significantly improved OS in HNSCC of the oral cavity.
CONCLUSIONS: The dissection of ipsilateral level I in oral cavity cancer was of particular relevance in our exploratory, retrospective analysis. To clarify the relevance for the determination of the extent of SND, this should be investigated prospectively in a more homogenous patient cohort.