UNASSIGNED: Tamoxifen (TAM) is a widely used drug in patients with gynecomastia and breast cancer. TAM exerts its anticancer effects via its antiestrogenic activities. Unfortunately, TAM has been reported to exert gonadotoxic effects on male testes. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the possible associated mechanisms involved in TAM-induced testicular dysfunction and the possible ameliorative effects of omega-3 fatty acids (O3FA).
UNASSIGNED: Animals were randomly divided into control, O3FA, TAM, and TAM + O3FA. All treatment lasted for 28 days.
UNASSIGNED: TAM exposure impaired sperm qualities (count, motility, and normal morphology) and decreased testicular 3β-HSD and 17β-HSD. It was accompanied by a decline in serum testosterone and an increase in estradiol, luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormones. These observed alterations were associated with an increase in testicular injury markers, oxido-inflammatory response, and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. These observed alterations were ameliorated by O3FA treatments.
UNASSIGNED: O3FA ameliorated TAM-induced testicular dysfunction in male Wistar rats by modulating XO/UA and Nrf2/NF-kb signaling and cytochrome c-mediated apoptosis in TAM-treated rats.

UNASSIGNED: Raloxifene and bazedoxifene are selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) used to prevent and treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Raloxifene is also known for its preventive effect against invasive breast cancer; however, its effect on other cancer types is unclear. This study investigated the incidence of various cancers in osteoporosis patients receiving SERM therapy to determine its association with the risk of developing specific cancer types.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study examined the association between SERM use and the incidence of cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and colorectal cancers in postmenopausal women using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Propensity score matching ensured group comparability by analyzing 95,513 participants. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the cancer risk associated with SERM therapy, differentiating between the effects of raloxifene and bazedoxifene.
UNASSIGNED: SERM therapy was associated with a reduced risk of cervical (adjusted HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71), ovarian (adjusted HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.88), and colorectal cancer (adjusted HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.42-0.57). No significant risk reduction was observed for endometrial cancer (adjusted HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.70-1.59). A comparison between raloxifene and bazedoxifene revealed no significant differences in their cancer prevention effects.
UNASSIGNED: SERM therapy administration is associated with a decreased incidence of cervical, ovarian, and colorectal cancers. Notably, the effects of raloxifene and bazedoxifene were consistent. Further investigations are crucial to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these observations and their clinical implications.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide. With around 70% of breast cancers expressing the estrogen receptor (ER), molecules capable of antagonizing and degrading ER (SERDs) or covalently binding to and antagonizing ER (SERCAs) are at the forefront of efforts to bring better treatments to patients.
UNASSIGNED: This review summarizes patent applications that claim estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) and covalent antagonists (SERCAs) identified using SciFinder between the period July 2021 to December 2023. A total of 91 new patent applications from 32 different applicants are evaluated with stratification into acidic SERDs, basic SERDs, SERCAs and miscellaneous degraders.
UNASSIGNED: The widespread adoption of fulvestrant in the treatment of ER+ breast cancer continues to stimulate research into orally bioavailable SERDs and SERCAs. A number of molecules have entered clinical development and, although some have been discontinued, a cohort of potential new treatments have generated encouraging efficacy and safety data. Notably, the first example of an oral SERD, elacestrant, has now been approved by the FDA and EMA, providing further encouragement for this class of targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: Endoxifen, a protein kinase C inhibitor and selective estrogen receptor modulator, primarily used in breast cancer treatment, has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic option for managing manic episodes associated with bipolar disorder (BD). This review aims to assess the existing evidence base for endoxifen in BD treatment and evaluate the strengths and limitations of current research findings.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. We included studies published in English that used endoxifen in BD, alongside any relevant studies identified through manual searching and conference papers with full-text availability. Information pertaining to dose, duration, clinical effects, and safety profiles was extracted from the included studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias in clinical trials.
RESULTS: The final review included seven case reports (including two conference presentations), two clinical trials, and one prospective study. Most studies administered endoxifen 8 mg and reported an improvement in manic symptoms. Several case reports included patients with comorbid substance use, and most patients received mood stabilizers concurrently. Few reports lacked any structured outcome measures. The clinical trials used divalproex 1000 mg as an active comparator, which was deemed sub-therapeutic. Despite being multicentric, the first trial lacked data on center-wise recruitment, and certain methodological concerns were observed across the included trials. There were no serious adverse effects noted, except for a significant elevation in lipid profile within a 3-week period. Limited data were available regarding endoxifen efficacy and safety in mixed episodes, depressive episodes, and maintenance treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of research on the efficacy and safety of endoxifen in BD. While existing evidence suggests short-term efficacy in manic episodes, significant limitations were identified in most of the included studies. Further research is imperative to establish the efficacy and safety of endoxifen in BD before considering its recommendation as a viable treatment option.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate whether lasofoxifene improves vaginal signs/symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.
METHODS: Two identical, phase 3 trials randomized postmenopausal women with moderate to severe vaginal symptoms to oral lasofoxifene 0.25 or 0.5 mg/d, or placebo, for 12 week. Changes from baseline to week 12 in most bothersome symptom, vaginal pH, and percentages of vaginal parabasal and superficial cells were evaluated. These coprimary endpoints were analyzed using analysis of covariance, except superficial cells, which were analyzed by the nonparametric, rank-based Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: The two studies enrolled 444 and 445 women (mean age, ~60 y), respectively. Coprimary endpoints at week 12 improved with lasofoxifene 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d greater than with placebo ( P < 0.0125 for all). Study 1: most bothersome symptom (least square mean difference from placebo: -0.4 and -0.5 for 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d, respectively), vaginal pH (-0.65, -0.58), and vaginal superficial (5.2%, 5.4%), and parabasal (-39.9%, -34.9%) cells; study 2: most bothersome symptom (-0.4, -0.5), vaginal pH (-0.57, -0.67), and vaginal superficial (3.5%, 2.2%) and parabasal (-34.1%, -33.5%) cells. Some improvements occurred as early as week 2. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate and hot flushes were most frequently reported (lasofoxifene vs placebo: 13%-23% vs 9%-11%). Serious adverse events were infrequent and no deaths occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: In two phase 3 trials, oral lasofoxifene 0.25 and 0.5 mg/d provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in vaginal signs/symptoms with a favorable safety profile, suggesting beneficial effects of lasofoxifene on genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Maternal immune activation (MIA) during pregnancy is known to increase the risk of development of schizophrenia in the offspring. Sex steroid hormone analogues have been proposed as potential antipsychotic treatments but the mechanisms of action involved remain unclear. Estrogen has been shown to alter N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor binding in the brain. We therefore studied the effect of chronic treatment with 17β-estradiol, its isomer, 17α-estradiol, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator, raloxifene, on MIA-induced psychosis-like behaviour and the effect of the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801. Pregnant rats were treated with saline or the viral mimetic, poly(I:C), on gestational day 15. Adult female offspring were tested for changes in baseline prepulse inhibition (PPI) and the effects of acute treatment with MK-801 on PPI and locomotor activity. Poly(I:C) offspring had significantly lower baseline PPI compared to control offspring, and this effect was prevented by 17β-estradiol and raloxifene, but not 17α-estradiol. MK-801 reduced PPI in control offspring but had no effect in poly(I:C) offspring treated with vehicle. Chronic treatment with 17β-estradiol and raloxifene restored the effect of MK-801 on PPI. There were no effects of MIA or estrogenic treatment on MK-801 induced locomotor hyperactivity. These results show that MIA affects baseline PPI as well as NMDA receptor-mediated regulation of PPI in female rats, and strengthen the view that estrogenic treatment may have antipsychotic effects.

UNASSIGNED: Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype, and therapeutic management relies primarily on inhibiting ER signaling. In the metastatic setting, ER signaling is typically targeted by selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the latter of which prevent estrogen production. Activating ESR1 mutations are among the most common emergent breast cancer mutations and confer resistance to AIs.
UNASSIGNED: Until 2023, fulvestrant was the only approved SERD; fulvestrant is administered intramuscularly, and in some cases may also have limited efficacy in the setting of certain ESR1 mutations. In 2023, the first oral SERD, elacestrant, was approved for use in ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and represents a new class of therapeutic options. While the initial approval was as monotherapy, ongoing studies are evaluating elacestrant (as well as other oral SERDs) in combination with other therapies including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, which parallels the current combination uses of fulvestrant.
UNASSIGNED: Elacestrant\'s recent approval sheds light on the use of biomarkers such as ESR1 to gauge a tumor\'s endocrine sensitivity. Ongoing therapeutic and correlative biomarker studies will offer new insight and expanding treatment options for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Aim & objective: Levormeloxifene (L-ORM) and raloxifene (RAL) are selective estrogen receptor modulators used in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and breast cancer. Here, we developed and validated a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous estimation of both drugs. Materials & methods: A quality-by-design (QbD) approach was used for the optimization of the nanoemulsion, and US FDA guidelines were followed for method validation. Results: Multiple reaction monitoring transitions were used for L-ORM (459.05→98.50), RAL (475.00→112.02) and internal standard (180.10→110.2). Analytes were resolved in a C18 column with 80:20 v/v% acetonitrile (ACN), 0.1% formic acid in triple-distilled water as a mobile phase. The developed method was linear over a concentration range of 1-600 ng/ml. Pharmacokinetic results of free L-ORM-RAL and the L-ORM-RAL nanoemulsion showed Cmax of free L-ORM - 70.65 ± 16.64, free RAL 13.53 ± 2.72, L-ORM nanoemulsion 65.07 ± 14.0 and RAL-nanoemulsion 59.27 ± 17.44 ng/ml. Conclusion: Future findings will contribute to the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and breast cancer using L-ORM and RAL.
[Box: see text].

Over the past few decades, first-line therapy for treating advanced and metastatic HR+/HER2-breast cancer has transformed due to the introduction of adjuvant endocrine therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i). However, there is an unmet need for novel classes of endocrine therapy with superior efficacy to improve treatment outcomes and overcome CDK4/6i resistance. New generation selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), orally administered and with higher bioavailability, could potentially be the novel compounds to meet this emerging need. In this paper, we review accredited clinical studies on the combining effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors and oral SERDs, report efficacy of treatment data when available, and provide a framework for future research focusing on these promising agents.