BACKGROUND: The use of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is controversial. The aim was to investigate the clinical outcomes and report the implant removal rate of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct for stage 1 PCFD.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 212 consecutive feet undergoing operative management of stage 1 PCFD with adjunctive subtalar arthroereisis between October 2010 and April 2018. The primary outcome was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Secondary outcomes included Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), Euroqol-5D-5L Index and implant removal rate.
RESULTS: Post-operative clinical FAOS outcomes were collected for 153 feet (72.2%). At mean 2.5-year follow-up, the mean ± standard deviation FAOS for each domain was as follows; Pain: 81.5 ± 18.5, Symptoms: 79.5 ± 12.9, Activities of Daily Living: 82.5 ± 15.4 and Quality of Life: 64.2 ± 23.7. EQ-5D-5L Index was 0.884 ± 0.152. Pre-operative scores were available for 20 of these feet demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in all FAOS, FADI and EQ-5D-5L domains (p < 0.05). The implant removal rate for persistent sinus tarsi pain was 48.1% (n = 102).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a subtalar arthroereisis implant as an adjunct to conventional procedures in stage 1 flexible PCFD can result in significant improvement in pain and function. Patients should be counselled as to the relatively frequent rate of subsequent implant removal.
METHODS: IV.

Dental implants can cause complications, including the loosening of the abutment screw or fracture. However, there is no standardized technique for removing broken abutment screws. This necessitates further research.
This study aimed to measure heat generation during screw removal to better understand its implications for dental implant procedures.
The experimental setup involved using synthetic bone blocks and titanium implants. An ultrasonically operated instrument tip was utilized for screw removal. Infrared thermometry was employed for accurate temperature measurement, considering factors such as emissivity and distance. Statistical analysis using linear regression and ANOVA was conducted.
The findings revealed an initial rapid temperature increase during the removal process, followed by a gradual decrease. The regression model demonstrated a strong correlation between time and temperature, indicating the heat generation pattern.
Heat generation during screw removal poses risks such as tissue damage and integration issues. Clinicians should minimize heat risks through an intermittent approach. The lack of a standardized technique requires further research and caution. Understanding the generated heat optimizes implant procedures.

Non-union of displaced pelvic ring injuries are challenging to treat. In cases where a previous osteosynthesis has failed it can be challenging to remove the previous implant. This technical note presents a technique for the removal of a broken SI screw in the sacrum. It is a navigation assisted technique that allows for minimal invasive screw remnant removal so that the sacral corridors remain available for later reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with ankle fractures complicated by syndesmotic injuries, no consensus has been reached on the best method of syndesmosis fixation using syndesmotic screws. One previous study revealed no difference in the tibiofibular overlap between two groups with or without syndesmotic screw removal. Other studies have indicated that distal tibiofibular diastasis exists after the removal of syndesmotic screws. In this study, we aimed to confirm the effect of syndesmotic screw removal on diastasis occurrence. We further analyzed the risk factors that may contribute to the widening of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.
METHODS: This retrospective study involved a review of the records of 63 patients with ankle fractures accompanied by syndesmosis injuries that required syndesmotic screw fixation. Anteroposterior radiographs were analyzed for each patient at various time points, from syndesmotic screw fixation to outpatient department follow-ups after screw removal. The changes in tibia-fibula overlap (OL), tibia-fibula clear space (CS), and medial clear space (MCS) were analyzed. Further analysis was performed to reveal potential factors that may have contributed to radiographic differences.
RESULTS: Compared with the postoperation radiographs following syndesmotic screw fixation, OL decreased (2.0 mm) and CS increased (0.8 mm) in the anteroposterior radiographs from outpatient department follow-ups. No significant changes were noted in OL or CS after syndesmotic screw removal. However, OL decreased (1.8 mm) and CS increased (0.5 mm) before syndesmotic screw removal. No significant change in MCS occurred during the whole observation period. Linear regression analysis did not reveal any significant correlations between potentially related factors and radiographic changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Marked diastasis had occurred at final follow-up. Notably, the diastasis occurred before rather than after screw removal. This implies that screw removal does not significantly influence the radiographic outcomes of rotational ankle fractures.

BACKGROUND: Removal of screws from a titanium locking plate is often difficult once the screw has seized and the head is damaged. Such stripped screws are removed with an extraction screw, which can be used manually or on power. We aim to compare the extraction rates using both these methods.
METHODS: We used 50, 3.5 mm diameter/20 mm long titanium locking screws. Fourth-generation saw bone models (radii) were used and 3.5 mm locking plates were fixed. The screws were deliberately over tightened and heads were damaged using a carbide drill to mimic stripped, seized screws. A left turn conical extraction screw coupled with a power tool was used for the first 25 screws and extraction screws coupled with a T handle for the remaining 25. A high-definition camera with a 60 fps frame rate was used to record the event. The time taken to remove screws from the plate was recorded.
RESULTS: When the extraction screw was used manually with T handle, we could remove 23 out of 25 screws (92%). When we used the extraction screw along with a power tool, 15 out of 25 (60%) locking screws were successfully removed.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend manual extraction with a T handle, rather than a power tool when removing the stripped locking screws (p-value <0.001). We feel that the haptic feedback provided when using manual extraction allows the surgeon to engage the extraction screws onto the damaged heads, thereby improving the extraction rates.

UNASSIGNED: Difficulties encountered during removal of implants present a common technical challenge in orthopedic surgery, for which a number of factors have been implicated. A variety of techniques and instruments have been used to overcome this. However, some of these may prove to be time consuming, expensive, and inaccessible to many surgical setups. We describe a technique used for the removal of a jammed interlocking screw from an intramedullary nail that allows for minimal damage to the hardware, bone, and surrounding soft tissue, with the added advantage of being relatively quick and technically uncomplicated with the use of simple instruments.
UNASSIGNED: We describe the case of an 81-year-old female with a history of surgical fixation for a left femur intertrochanteric fracture, who presented with groin pain 13 months post-fixation. Radiographs were suggestive of avascular necrosis of the femoral head with resultant cut-in of the blade, and the patient was eventually taken up for the removal of implants and total hip replacement. Intraoperatively, difficulties were encountered in the removal of the distal interlocking screw, with failure of conventional techniques initially. A high-speed burr was then employed to shape the screw head so as to achieve better grip with extraction devices, which facilitated smooth removal.
UNASSIGNED: We describe a simple method for difficult screw removal involving the use of a high-speed burr and vise grip pliers. This technique provides a quick and inexpensive option with commonly available surgical tools and may be considered when encountering difficulties with screw extraction.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous-short segment screw fixation (SSSF) without bone fusion has proven to be a safe and effective modality for thoracolumbar spine fractures (TLSFs). When fracture consolidation is confirmed, pedicle screws are no longer essential, but clear indications for screw removal following fracture consolidation have not been established.
METHODS: In total, we enrolled 31 patients with TLSFs who underwent screw removal following treatment using percutaneous-SSSF without fusion. Plain radiographs, taken at different intervals, measured local kyphosis using Cobb\' angle (CA), vertebra body height (VBH), and the segmental motion angle (SMA). A visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied pre-screw removal and at the last follow-up.
RESULTS: The overall mean CA deteriorated by 1.58° (p < 0.05) and the overall mean VBH decreased by 0.52 mm (p = 0.001). SMA preservation was achieved in 18 patients (58.1%) and kyphotic recurrence occurred in 4 patients (12.9%). SMA preservation was statistically significant in patients who underwent screw removal within 12 months following the primary operation (p = 0.002). Kyphotic recurrence occurred in patients with a CA ≥ 20° at injury (p < 0.001) with a median interval of 16.5 months after screw removal. No patients reported worsening pain or an increased ODI score after screw removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Screw removal within 12 months can be recommended for restoration of SMA with improvement in clinical outcomes. Although, TLSFs with CA ≥ 20° at the time of injury can help to predict kyphotic recurrence after screw removal, the clinical outcomes are less relevant.

BACKGROUND: Syndesmosis injuries are common with rotational ankle injuries, and placement of a positional syndesmotic screw to maintain its reduction is used as the ligaments heal. There is no clear consensus on routine removal or retention of syndesmotic screw. This study aimed to appraise the current evidence both on removal and retention of syndesmotic screw and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes and rate of complications of syndesmotic screw removal and retention.
METHODS: Following PROSPERO registration, a systematic search using was performed using keywords (\'Syndesmosis\' OR \'Syndesmotic\' OR \'Transsyndesmotic\' OR \'distal tibiofibular\') AND (\'Screw\') AND (\'Removal\' OR \'Retention\') AND \'Outcome\' in various databases. No language restrictions were applied and the meta-analysis incorporated the PRISMA statement. VAS (Visual analogue scale for pain), AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot And Ankle Society) scores expressed as mean ± SD, and both groups\' complication rates were compared. Comparisons with a random-effects model were performed, and heterogeneity between the studies was calculated using the I2 statistic. T-test for two independent sample means was used to compare pooled mean and Z-test for two proportions to assess the difference in the proportion of complications.
RESULTS: A total of 7 studies with 522 patients were included in this review for analysis. Pooled analysis showed non-significant difference in AOFAS score (MD = -1.84; 95% CI: -4.33 to 0.66; p = 0.150) as well as for VAS score (MD = -0.48; 95% CI: -1.56 to 0.60; p = 0.390) between the two groups. The value of z and p-value for complication rates was 0.6021 and 0.5485, respectively, which was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: There doesn\'t appear to be a difference in functional outcome, pain scores, and complication rates between patients who had their syndesmotic screws removed and those where screw was retained. The fear of inferior outcomes with retained screws is thus unfounded, and routine removal adds to morbidity and financial burden. In conclusion, present data does not support the routine removal of the intact syndesmosis screw, and a change in practice is needed to abandon routine syndesmotic screw removal.

OBJECTIVE: Orthognathic surgery (OGS) is a surgical intervention that corrects dentofacial deformities through the movement of maxillary and mandibular segments to achieve adequate masticatory function, joint health, and facial harmony. However, some patients present with occlusal discrepancies, condylar sag, and/or temporomandibular disorders after OGS. Various methods have been employed to solve these problems after surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early screw removal in patients with occlusal discrepancies after OGS using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
METHODS: In 44 patients with dentofacial deformities, patient-customized OGSs with customized plates were performed to correct facial deformities using customized guides with computer-aided surgical simulation. Of the 44 patients, eight patients complained of occlusal discrepancies and temporomandibular disorders after OGS. These eight patients underwent screw removal under local anesthesia around four weeks. The temporomandibular joint spaces at three time points (pre-surgical, post-surgical, and after screw removal) in the sagittal and coronal planes were compared using CBCT.
RESULTS: Eight patients showed an increase in joint space on CBCT images immediately after surgery (T1), but after early screw removal (T2), these spaces almost returned to their pre-surgical state, and the temporomandibular joint problem disappeared.
CONCLUSIONS: The removal of screws located in the distal segment under local anesthesia between three and four weeks post-surgically may be a treatment option for patients with post-OGS occlusal discrepancies, condylar sag, and/or temporomandibular disorder.

Anterior shoulder instability can be successfully treated using Latarjet procedures, although a small proportion of patients report unexplained pain.
The purpose was to report the prevalence and characteristics of patients with unexplained pain without recurrent instability after open Latarjet procedures and to determine whether screw removal can alleviate pain. The hypothesis was that unexplained pain without recurrent instability might be due to soft tissue impingements against the screw heads and that the removal of screws would alleviate or reduce pain.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic records of 461 consecutive shoulders treated by open Latarjet procedures for anterior instability between 2002 and 2014. Unexplained anterior pain was present in 21 shoulders (4.6%) and treated by screw removal at 29 ± 37 months (mean ± SD). Postoperative assessment at >12 months after screw removal included complications, visual analog scale for pain (pVAS), subjective shoulder value, Rowe score, Walch-Duplay score, and ranges of motion. The study cohort comprised the shoulders of 20 patients (9 women, 11 men) aged 25 ± 6 years (median, 25 years; range, 16-34 years) at screw removal and involved the dominant arm in 13 (62%) shoulders.
Screw removal alleviated pain completely in 14 shoulders (67%; pVAS improvement, 6.4 ± 1.8; median, 6; range, 3-8) and reduced pain in the remaining 7 (33%; pVAS improvement, 2.4 ± 1.4; median, 2; range, 1-5). At 38 ± 23 months after screw removal, 2 recurrences of instability unrelated to screw removal occurred. The subjective shoulder value was 79% ± 22% (median, 90%; range, 0%-95%); Rowe score, 85 ± 20 (median, 95; range, 30-100); and Walch-Duplay score, 82 ± 19 (median, 85; range, 25-100). Mobility improved in active forward elevation (171°± 14°), external rotation with the elbow at the side (61°± 12°), and external rotation with the arm at 90° of abduction (67°± 13°) and especially in internal rotation, with only 2 shoulders (10%) limited to T12 spine segment.
The present findings confirm that unexplained anterior pain after Latarjet procedures can be related to the screws used to fix bone blocks, which can safely be alleviated or reduced by screw removal.