Saccade

扫视
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:眼动追踪技术不仅揭示了注视时视觉信息的获取,而且有可能揭示学习使用多功能假手所涉及的潜在认知过程。它还揭示了在标准化任务和自我选择任务期间观察到的凝视行为。该研究的目的是探索在假肢康复中两个不同时间点使用眼动跟踪来跟踪多功能手的学习进度。
    方法:三名截肢者接受了具有新控制策略的多功能手的控制训练。首先收集控制训练的详细描述。他们戴着TobiiPro2眼动眼镜,在一天的训练和一年的随访中(由于插座问题,随访中缺少受试者3的数据)后,执行了一组标准化任务(要求每个任务切换到不同的手柄)。他们还执行了自己选择的任务(可以自由地对任何物体使用任何抓地力),并被指示以他们通常在家中的方式执行任务。使用TobiiProLab分析了凝视覆盖的视频,并提取了以下指标:固定持续时间,扫视幅度,眼手延迟,固定计数和第一次固定的时间。
    结果:在控制训练期间,受试者学会了3到4个握把。有些抓握更容易,而其他人则更加困难,因为他们忘记或混淆了转换策略。在为期一年的随访中,性能时间的减少,固定持续时间,眼手延迟,在受试者1和2中观察到固定计数,表明控制多功能手的能力得到改善,认知负荷减少。在两个受试者中都观察到扫视幅度增加,这表明控制假手的难度降低了。在标准化任务期间,所有三个受试者的第一次固定都在所有对象的多功能手上。在自己选择的任务中,最初的注视主要是首先在物体上。
    结论:来自对照训练的定性数据和来自临床标准化任务的定量眼动追踪数据为学习控制多功能手的认知加工提供了丰富的探索。许多假肢使用者更喜欢多功能手,通过这项研究,我们证明了具有可靠评估方法的有针对性的假肢训练方案将有助于为测量多功能手的功能益处奠定基础。
    BACKGROUND: Eye tracking technology not only reveals the acquisition of visual information at fixation but also has the potential to unveil underlying cognitive processes involved in learning to use a multifunction prosthetic hand. It also reveals gaze behaviours observed during standardized tasks and self-chosen tasks. The aim of the study was to explore the use of eye tracking to track learning progress of multifunction hands at two different time points in prosthetic rehabilitation.
    METHODS: Three amputees received control training of a multifunction hand with new control strategy. Detailed description of control training was collected first. They wore Tobii Pro2 eye-tracking glasses and performed a set of standardized tasks (required to switch to different grips for each task) after one day of training and at one-year-follow-up (missing data for Subject 3 at the follow up due to socket problem). They also performed a self-chosen task (free to use any grip for any object) and were instructed to perform the task in a way how they would normally do at home. The gaze-overlaid videos were analysed using the Tobii Pro Lab and the following metrics were extracted: fixation duration, saccade amplitude, eye-hand latency, fixation count and time to first fixation.
    RESULTS: During control training, the subjects learned 3 to 4 grips. Some grips were easier, and others were more difficult because they forgot or were confused with the switching strategies. At the one-year-follow-up, a decrease in performance time, fixation duration, eye-hand latency, and fixation count was observed in Subject 1 and 2, indicating an improvement in the ability to control the multifunction hand and a reduction of cognitive load. An increase in saccade amplitude was observed in both subjects, suggesting a decrease in difficulty to control the prosthetic hand. During the standardized tasks, the first fixation of all three subjects were on the multifunction hand in all objects. During the self-chosen tasks, the first fixations were mostly on the objects first.
    CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative data from control training and the quantitative eye tracking data from clinical standardized tasks provided a rich exploration of cognitive processing in learning to control a multifunction hand. Many prosthesis users prefer multifunction hands and with this study we have demonstrated that a targeted prosthetic training protocol with reliable assessment methods will help to lay the foundation for measuring functional benefits of multifunction hands.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:动眼回路跨越许多与精神疾病有关的皮质和皮质下区域。这个,结合以前的发现,提示眼动追踪可能是研究饮食失调的有用方法。因此,这项研究旨在评估有或没有进食障碍的青少年的动眼行为。
    方法:患有和不患有饮食失调的女性青年完成了一项结构化任务,其中包括使用基于视频的眼动追踪进行随机交错的前视(朝向刺激)和反扫视(远离刺激)试验。扫视的差异(两点之间的快速眼动),检查了眨眼和瞳孔。
    结果:将患有饮食失调的青年(n=65,Mage=17.16±3.5岁)与健康对照组(HC;n=65,Mage=17.88±4.3岁)进行比较。进食障碍组由神经性厌食症患者组成(n=49),神经性贪食症(n=7)和其他特定的进食或进食障碍(n=9)。进食障碍组进一步分为两个亚组:患有限制性谱系进食障碍(ED-R;n=43)或贪食谱系进食障碍(ED-BP;n=22)的个体。在支持扫视的试验中,进食障碍组的固定断裂明显多于HC(F(1,128)=5.33,p=0.023)。ED-BP小组进行了最预期的扫视,其次是ED-R,然后是HC(F(2,127)=3.38,p=0.037)。各组在正确的表达或常规的潜伏期前扫视的比率上没有差异。在反扫视试验中,各组仅在校正的方向误差百分比上存在显着差异(F(2,127)=4.554,p=0.012)。与HC相比,进食障碍组的基线瞳孔大小明显较小(F(2,127)=3.60,p=0.030),扫视前扩张速度较慢(F(2,127)=3.30,p=0.040)。ED-R组在试验间隔(ITI)期间眨眼概率最低,其次是ED-BP,其中HC具有最高的ITI闪烁概率(F(2,125)=3.63,p=0.029)。
    结论:这些结果表明,患有进食障碍的青少年在结构化眼动追踪任务中可能具有不同的动眼行为。在这项研究中观察到的动眼行为差异为确定进食障碍的神经生物学和认知贡献迈出了重要的一步。
    基于视频的眼动追踪是研究患有和不患有感兴趣的精神疾病的个体之间的差异的有前途的方法。虽然一些研究探索了进食障碍患者的动眼行为,还有很多未知。本研究调查了扫视(两点之间的快速眼动),在进行扫视(看一点)和反扫视(看一点)眼动跟踪任务期间,有和没有进食障碍的女性青年(10-25岁)之间的眨眼和瞳孔反应。患有饮食失调的人做出了更多的前视猜测,在试验开始之前,瞳孔大小较小,眨眼次数较少。在患有限制性进食障碍的个体中(例如,神经性厌食症限制性型),瞳孔反应可能与情绪失调(情绪调节不良)有关。总的来说,这项研究为确定进食障碍患者与对照组的动眼行为差异迈出了重要一步.
    BACKGROUND: The oculomotor circuit spans many cortical and subcortical areas that have been implicated in psychiatric disease. This, combined with previous findings, suggests that eye tracking may be a useful method to investigate eating disorders. Therefore, this study aimed to assess oculomotor behaviors in youth with and without an eating disorder.
    METHODS: Female youth with and without an eating disorder completed a structured task involving randomly interleaved pro-saccade (toward at a stimulus) and anti-saccade (away from stimulus) trials with video-based eye tracking. Differences in saccades (rapid eye movements between two points), eye blinks and pupil were examined.
    RESULTS: Youth with an eating disorder (n = 65, Mage = 17.16 ± 3.5 years) were compared to healthy controls (HC; n = 65, Mage = 17.88 ± 4.3 years). The eating disorder group was composed of individuals with anorexia nervosa (n = 49), bulimia nervosa (n = 7) and other specified feeding or eating disorder (n = 9). The eating disorder group was further divided into two subgroups: individuals with a restrictive spectrum eating disorder (ED-R; n = 43) or a bulimic spectrum eating disorder (ED-BP; n = 22). In pro-saccade trials, the eating disorder group made significantly more fixation breaks than HCs (F(1,128) = 5.33, p = 0.023). The ED-BP group made the most anticipatory pro-saccades, followed by ED-R, then HCs (F(2,127) = 3.38, p = 0.037). Groups did not differ on rate of correct express or regular latency pro-saccades. In anti-saccade trials, groups only significantly differed on percentage of direction errors corrected (F(2, 127) = 4.554, p = 0.012). The eating disorder group had a significantly smaller baseline pupil size (F(2,127) = 3.60, p = 0.030) and slower pro-saccade dilation velocity (F(2,127) = 3.30, p = 0.040) compared to HCs. The ED-R group had the lowest blink probability during the intertrial interval (ITI), followed by ED-BP, with HCs having the highest ITI blink probability (F(2,125) = 3.63, p = 0.029).
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that youth with an eating disorder may have different oculomotor behaviors during a structured eye tracking task. The oculomotor behavioral differences observed in this study presents an important step towards identifying neurobiological and cognitive contributions towards eating disorders.
    Video based eye tracking is a promising method for studying differences between individuals with and without a psychiatric disease of interest. While some studies have explored oculomotor behaviors in individuals with an eating disorder, much remains unknown. The present study investigated saccades (fast eye movements between two points), eye blinks and pupil responses between female youth (aged 10–25 years) with and without an eating disorder during a pro-saccade (looking at a point) and anti-saccade (looking away from a point) eye tracking task. Individuals with an eating disorder made more pro-saccade guesses, had a smaller pupil size and blinked less before a trial started. In individuals with a restrictive type eating disorder (e.g., anorexia nervosa restrictive type), pupil responses may have a relationship with emotional dysregulation (poorly regulated emotional responses). Overall, this study represents an important step towards identifying oculomotor behavior differences in individuals with an eating disorder compared to controls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    成人发育协调障碍(DCD),有时被称为运动障碍,在电机开发和协调方面遇到困难,影响他们日常生活的方方面面。令人惊讶的是,人们对他们在运动领域遇到的困难背后的机制知之甚少。在儿童DCD中,已显示眼球运动控制方面发生了变化。这项研究的目的是确定有和没有可能的DCD的成年人是否存在动眼差异。视觉固定稳定性,顺利的追求,我们在21名可能患有DCD/行为障碍(pDCD)的成人(平均年龄29岁)和21名典型发育(TD)成人(平均年龄21岁)中评估了前视和抗扫视表现.眼动追踪技术显示,前视和后视任务中的动眼反应准备在各组之间具有可比性,在两个平稳的追求任务中较慢的追求收益也是如此。然而,与没有DCD的成年人相比,患有pDCD的成年人从固定目标处进行的扫视明显更多,并且反扫视错误明显更多。Further,与TD成年人相比,患有pDCD的成年人在维持参与方面表现出困难,并且在较快的追求任务中追求增益较低。这表明患有pDCD的成年人具有扫视抑制和保持对视觉目标的注意力的问题。由于在患有DCD的儿童中也报道了这种结果模式,对于患有DCD的患者,眼球运动困难可能在整个生命周期中持续存在。意识到非典型动眼控制在整个生命周期的日常生活活动中的影响将有助于更清楚地了解DCD患者这些困难的原因和影响。
    Adults with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), sometimes referred to as dyspraxia, experience difficulties in motor development and coordination, which impacts on all aspects of their daily lives. Surprisingly little is known about the mechanisms underlying the difficulties they experience in the motor domain. In childhood DCD, aspects of oculomotor control have been shown to be altered. The purpose of this study was to determine whether oculomotor differences are present in adults with and without probable DCD. Visual fixation stability, smooth pursuit, and pro-and anti-saccade performance were assessed in 21 adults (mean age 29 years) with probable DCD/dyspraxia (pDCD) and 21 typically-developing (TD) adults (mean age 21 years). Eye tracking technology revealed that oculomotor response preparation in the pro- and anti-saccade tasks was comparable across groups, as was pursuit gain in the slower of the two smooth pursuit tasks. However, adults with pDCD made significantly more saccades away from the fixation target than those without DCD and significantly more anti-saccade errors. Further, compared to TD adults, adults with pDCD demonstrated difficulties in maintaining engagement and had lower pursuit gain in the faster pursuit task. This suggests that adults with pDCD have problems with saccadic inhibition and maintaining attention on a visual target. Since this pattern of results has also been reported in children with DCD, oculomotor difficulties may be persistent for those with DCD across the lifespan. An awareness of the impact of atypical oculomotor control in activities of daily living across the lifespan would support clearer understanding of the causes and impacts of these difficulties for those with DCD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨屈光参差性弱视患儿的眼球运动特点,并将这些特征与对照组的眼球运动进行比较。
    方法:屈光参差性弱视组31名儿童(A组31只弱视眼,B组31只眼)和对照组24例(C组48只眼)。A组被细分为Aa组(重度弱视)和Ab组(轻度-中度弱视)。总体年龄范围为6-12岁(平均值,7.83±1.79年)。所有儿童均接受眼科检查;使用Eyelink1000眼动仪评估眼球运动参数,包括扫视潜伏期和幅度。使用DataViewer和MATLAB软件进行数据分析。
    结果:平均和最大扫视延迟,以及平均和最大扫视幅度,A组治疗前后均显著大于B、C组(P<0.05)。Aa组之间的平均和最大扫视潜伏期显着不同,Ab,C(P<0.05)。两种检测模式下的瞳孔轨迹表明,双眼固定优于单眼固定。
    结论:对侧正常眼和对照眼的眼动参数显著不同。屈光参差性弱视患儿的临床评价不应仅仅关注静态视力,而且还要评估眼球运动。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of eye movement in children with anisometropic amblyopia, and to compare those characteristics with eye movement in a control group.
    METHODS: 31 children in the anisometropic amblyopia group (31 amblyopic eyes in group A, 31 contralateral eyes in group B) and 24 children in the control group (48 eyes in group C). Group A was subdivided into groups Aa (severe amblyopia) and Ab (mild-moderate amblyopia). The overall age range was 6-12 years (mean, 7.83 ± 1.79 years). All children underwent ophthalmic examinations; eye movement parameters including saccade latency and amplitude were evaluated using an Eyelink1000 eye tracker. Data Viewer and MATLAB software were used for data analysis.
    RESULTS: Mean and maximum saccade latencies, as well as mean and maximum saccade amplitudes, were significantly greater in group A than in groups B and C before and after treatment (P < 0.05). Mean and maximum saccade latencies were significantly different among groups Aa, Ab, and C (P < 0.05). Pupil trajectories in two detection modes suggested that binocular fixation was better than monocular fixation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Eye movement parameters significantly differed between contralateral normal eyes and control eyes. Clinical evaluation of children with anisometropic amblyopia should not focus only on static visual acuity, but also on the assessment of eye movement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经过30多年的广泛调查,在识别意识神经相关性(NCC)方面取得了令人印象深刻的进展。然而,时空独特的意识相关神经活动在意识感知中的功能作用存在争议。一个有影响力的框架提出,与意识相关的神经活动可以分为两个不同的过程:现象意识和访问意识。然而,尽管激烈辩论,其真实性尚未在单一范例中通过更多信息的颅内记录进行检查。在本研究中,我们进行了视觉感知任务,并记录了在皮质和皮质下区域植入电极的患者的局部场电位(LFP).总的来说,我们发现视觉意识相关活动的潜伏期表现出双峰分布,并且具有短延迟和长延迟的记录站点在位置上基本上是分开的,除了外侧前额叶皮层(lPFC)。lPFC中短延迟和长延迟的混合表明,它在连接现象和访问意识方面起着关键作用。然而,两者之间的划分并不像中央沟那么简单,正如之前提出的。此外,在4名患者中,电极植入双侧前额叶皮质,早期意识相关活动仅限于对侧,而双方都出现了与后期意识相关的活动。最后,Granger因果关系分析表明,与意识相关的信息从早期站点流向后期站点。这些结果提供了现象和访问意识的神经相关性的第一个LFP证据,这揭示了人脑中NCC的时空动力学。
    After more than 30 years of extensive investigation, impressive progress has been made in identifying the neural correlates of consciousness (NCC). However, the functional role of spatiotemporally distinct consciousness-related neural activity in conscious perception is debated. An influential framework proposed that consciousness-related neural activities could be dissociated into two distinct processes: phenomenal and access consciousness. However, though hotly debated, its authenticity has not been examined in a single paradigm with more informative intracranial recordings. In the present study, we employed a visual awareness task and recorded the local field potential (LFP) of patients with electrodes implanted in cortical and subcortical regions. Overall, we found that the latency of visual awareness-related activity exhibited a bimodal distribution, and the recording sites with short and long latencies were largely separated in location, except in the lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC). The mixture of short and long latencies in the lPFC indicates that it plays a critical role in linking phenomenal and access consciousness. However, the division between the two is not as simple as the central sulcus, as proposed previously. Moreover, in 4 patients with electrodes implanted in the bilateral prefrontal cortex, early awareness-related activity was confined to the contralateral side, while late awareness-related activity appeared on both sides. Finally, Granger causality analysis showed that awareness-related information flowed from the early sites to the late sites. These results provide the first LFP evidence of neural correlates of phenomenal and access consciousness, which sheds light on the spatiotemporal dynamics of NCC in the human brain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    扫视适应在保持扫视准确性中起着至关重要的作用。扫视适应外部提示运动的行为特征和神经机制,例如视觉引导扫视(VGS),在非人灵长类动物中得到了很好的研究。相比之下,对内部驱动运动的扫视适应知之甚少,例如记忆引导扫视(MGS),由视觉空间工作记忆指导。当动眼植物因生长而改变时,老化,或者骨骼问题,这两种类型的扫视都需要调整。Dobothsaccadetypesengageacommonadaptationmechanism?Inthisstudy,我们比较了MGS和非人灵长类动物VGS的振幅下降适应特征。我们发现MGS的适应速度比VGS快。MGS适应期间扫视持续时间改变,而扫视峰值速度在VGS适应过程中发生变化。我们还比较了适应领域,也就是说,除适应外,扫视幅度的增益变化。MGS的增益变化在自适应振幅的较小和较大侧都下降,对于更大的振幅比更小的振幅更快,而VGS的下降被逆转。因此,VGS和MGS适应特征之间的差异支持先前提出的假设,即VGS和MGS的适应机制是不同的。此外,结果表明,MGS适应位点是影响扫视持续时间的大脑结构,而VGS适应位点影响扫视峰值速度。这些结果对未来的神经生理学实验是有益的。
    Saccade adaptation plays a crucial role in maintaining saccade accuracy. The behavioral characteristics and neural mechanisms of saccade adaptation for an externally cued movement, such as visually guided saccades (VGS), are well studied in nonhuman primates. In contrast, little is known about the saccade adaptation of an internally driven movement, such as memory-guided saccades (MGS), which are guided by visuospatial working memory. As the oculomotor plant changes because of growth, aging, or skeletomuscular problems, both types of saccades need to be adapted. Do both saccade types engage a common adaptation mechanism? In this study, we compared the characteristics of amplitude decrease adaptation in MGS with VGS in nonhuman primates. We found that the adaptation speed was faster for MGS than for VGS. Saccade duration changed during MGS adaptation, whereas saccade peak velocity changed during VGS adaptation. We also compared the adaptation field, that is, the gain change for saccade amplitudes other than the adapted. The gain change for MGS declines on both smaller and larger sides of adapted amplitude, more rapidly for larger than smaller amplitudes, whereas the decline in VGS was reversed. Thus, the differences between VGS and MGS adaptation characteristics support the previously suggested hypothesis that the adaptation mechanisms of VGS and MGS are distinct. Furthermore, the result suggests that the MGS adaptation site is a brain structure that influences saccade duration, whereas the VGS adaptation site influences saccade peak velocity. These results should be beneficial for future neurophysiological experiments.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Plasticity helps to overcome persistent motor errors. Such motor plasticity or adaptation can be investigated with saccades. Thus far our knowledge is primarily about visually guided saccades, an externally cued movement, which we can make only when the object is visible at the time of saccade. However, as the world is complex, we can make saccades even when the object is not visible. Here, we investigate the adaptation of an internally driven movement: the memory-guided saccade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:当前测试方法的不同功效加剧了重症肌无力(MG)的诊断挑战,需要创新的方法来准确地识别病情。这项研究旨在使用视频眼图(VOG)评估MG患者的眼部肌肉疲劳,方法是检查重复的扫视眼球运动并将这些指标与健康对照参与者的指标进行比较。
    方法:这种前瞻性,横断面研究是在三级护理中心进行的,涉及62例诊断为MG的患者(48例眼部MG和14例全身MG)和31名健康个体的对照组。年龄和性别相匹配。评估包括记录±15°范围内的眼球扫视运动,水平和垂直,在5分钟内每分钟15次扫视,产生75个周期。参与者在每组之间提供3分钟的休息间隔,以减轻累积疲劳。主要结果是眼球运动疲劳的检测,通过扫视波形的变化来评估,范围,峰值速度,延迟,以及从发病到目标的持续时间,重点是将第二次扫视与最后五次扫视的平均值进行比较。
    结果:在重复性扫视运动的评估中,MG患者表现出减少的扫视范围和延长的持续时间,以达到目标,与健康的受试者相比。此外,在MG患者中观察到多步扫视频率显着升高,在连续的试验中观察到明显的上升。接收机工作特性(ROC)分析揭示了多步扫视频率的判别性能,结合第二次扫视和最后五次扫视的平均值之间的扫视范围和从开始到目标完成的持续时间的变化,有效区分MG患者和健康受试者。尽管峰值扫视速度和潜伏期的变化不太明显,尽管如此,它们还是可以检测到的。
    结论:将VOG用于诊断MG的重复性扫视测试已证明具有相当的诊断精度。该方法在评估MG患者的眼部肌肉疲劳方面具有显着的准确性,提供III类证据支持其临床应用。
    OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic challenge of myasthenia gravis (MG) is exacerbated by the variable efficacy of current testing methodologies, necessitating innovative approaches to accurately identify the condition. This study aimed to assess ocular muscle fatigue in patients with MG using video-oculography (VOG) by examining repetitive saccadic eye movements and comparing these metrics to those of healthy control participants.
    METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care center and involved 62 patients diagnosed with MG (48 with ocular MG and 14 with generalized MG) and a control group of 31 healthy individuals, matched for age and sex. The assessment involved recording saccadic eye movements within a ± 15° range, both horizontally and vertically, at a rate of 15 saccades per minute over a 5-min period, resulting in 75 cycles. Participants were afforded a 3-min rest interval between each set to mitigate cumulative fatigue. The primary outcome was the detection of oculomotor fatigue, assessed through changes in saccadic waveforms, range, peak velocity, latency, and the duration from onset to target, with a focus on comparing the second saccade against the average of the last five saccades.
    RESULTS: In the evaluation of repetitive saccadic movements, patients with MG exhibited a reduced saccadic range and a prolonged duration to reach the target, compared to healthy subjects. Furthermore, a significant elevation in the frequency of multistep saccades was observed among MG patients, with a marked rise observed over consecutive trials. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed the discriminative performance of multistep saccade frequency, in conjunction with variations in saccadic range and duration from onset to target achievement between the second saccade and the mean of the final five saccades, as effective in distinguishing MG patients from healthy subjects. Although alterations in peak saccadic velocity and latency were less pronounced, they were nevertheless detectable.
    CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of VOG for repetitive saccadic testing in the diagnosis of MG has demonstrated considerable diagnostic precision. This methodology affords significant accuracy in evaluating ocular muscle fatigue in MG patients, providing class III evidence supportive of its clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    视觉注意力通常向即将到来的扫视眼球运动的目标转移。这种观察通常被解释为注意选择和动眼编程之间的强制性耦合。这里,我们调查了视觉目标和运动目标之间的空间一致性的习惯性期望是否促进了这种耦合。为此,我们进行了双重任务(即,同时扫视任务和视觉辨别任务)的实验,在该实验中,对男性和女性参与者进行了训练,以预测扫视目标与注意力探针刺激之间的空间一致性或不一致性。为了评估期望对运动前注意力分配的训练诱导影响,参与者随后完成了一个测试阶段,其中注意力探针位置被随机化.结果表明,辨别表现系统地偏向于预期的注意力探针位置,不管这个位置是否匹配扫视目标。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,视觉注意力可以与正在进行的动眼编程实质上脱钩,并提示习惯性期望在注意力-动作耦合中起重要作用.
    Visual attention is typically shifted toward the targets of upcoming saccadic eye movements. This observation is commonly interpreted in terms of an obligatory coupling between attentional selection and oculomotor programming. Here, we investigated whether this coupling is facilitated by a habitual expectation of spatial congruence between visual and motor targets. To this end, we conducted a dual-task (i.e., concurrent saccade task and visual discrimination task) experiment in which male and female participants were trained to either anticipate spatial congruence or incongruence between a saccade target and an attention probe stimulus. To assess training-induced effects of expectation on premotor attention allocation, participants subsequently completed a test phase in which the attention probe position was randomized. Results revealed that discrimination performance was systematically biased toward the expected attention probe position, irrespective of whether this position matched the saccade target or not. Overall, our findings demonstrate that visual attention can be substantially decoupled from ongoing oculomotor programming and suggest an important role of habitual expectations in the attention-action coupling.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的眼睛快速执行,称为扫视的定向运动,每秒发生几次,专注于我们环境中感兴趣的物体。在这些运动中,视觉敏感度暂时降低。尽管对这个主题进行了大量研究,潜在的机制仍然难以捉摸,包括关于扫视抑制是否影响小细胞视觉通路的争论。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项研究,采用由色度和亮度刺激引起的稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP),而观察者进行扫视眼球运动。我们还采用了创新的分析管道来增强信噪比,与以前的方法相比,效果更好。我们的发现表明,与固定期相比,扫视期间对SSVEP信号有明显的抑制作用。值得注意的是,这种抑制作用对于色度和亮度刺激都是相当的。我们进一步测量了各种对比度水平的抑制作用,这使我们能够使用对比响应函数对SSVEP响应进行建模。结果表明,扫视主要减少响应增益,而不会显着影响对比度增益,并且这种降低均匀地适用于色度和亮度路径。总之,我们的研究提供了有力的证据,即扫视类似地抑制人类早期视觉皮层中的小细胞和大细胞通路的视觉处理,如SSVEP反应所示。眼跳运动影响响应增益而不是对比度增益的观察表明,它们通过乘法机制影响视觉处理。
    Our eyes execute rapid, directional movements known as saccades, occurring several times per second, to focus on objects of interest in our environment. During these movements, visual sensitivity is temporarily reduced. Despite numerous studies on this topic, the underlying mechanism remains elusive, including a lingering debate on whether saccadic suppression affects the parvocellular visual pathway. To address this issue, we conducted a study employing steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by chromatic and luminance stimuli while observers performed saccadic eye movements. We also employed an innovative analysis pipeline to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, yielding superior results compared to the previous method. Our findings revealed a clear suppression effect on SSVEP signals during saccades compared to fixation periods. Notably, this suppression effect was comparable for both chromatic and luminance stimuli. We went further to measure the suppression effect across various contrast levels, which enabled us to model SSVEP responses with contrast response functions. The results suggest that saccades primarily reduce response gain without significantly affecting contrast gain and that this reduction applies uniformly to both chromatic and luminance pathways. In summary, our study provides robust evidence that saccades similarly suppress visual processing in both the parvocellular and magnocellular pathways within the human early visual cortex, as indicated by SSVEP responses. The observation that saccadic eye movements impact response gain rather than contrast gain implies that they influence visual processing through a multiplicative mechanism.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present study demonstrates that saccadic eye movements reduce the processing of both luminance and chromatic stimuli in the early visual cortex of humans. By modeling the contrast response function, the study further shows that saccades affect visual processing by reducing the response gain rather than altering the contrast gain, suggesting that a multiplicative mechanism of visual attenuation affects both parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号